Annuities Vs. IRA Withdrawals at 4% Rule for Monsanto Employees

Healthcare Provider Update: Monsanto, a major player in agricultural biotechnology, is covered by various health insurance providers, with many employees accessing coverage through employer-sponsored plans. However, healthcare costs for employers, including those at Monsanto, are projected to rise significantly in 2026. This surge is attributed to a combination of factors such as escalating medical expenses, an expected 8.5% increase in employer-sponsored insurance costs, and possible reductions in federal subsidies for ACA plans. Moreover, with insurers foreseeing double-digit premium increases, many employees could face a substantial financial burden if these trends continue, as both employers and employees adjust to these rapidly increasing costs. Click here to learn more

There are just a couple of things almost all Monsanto retirees need when they hit retirement: predictable income and protection against a cluster of risks, which include longevity risk, performance risk and sequence-of-returns risk.

In the past we have seen retiring Monsanto employees utilize the “4% rule,” where retirees take annual withdrawals start at 4% of the entire portfolio and increase with inflation. They then keep the remainder of the portfolio with at least 50% invested in equities. Based on historical data, this would give a Monsanto retiree about 30 years of retirement income.

As the economy constantly changes, a number of factors may force prospective Monsanto retirees to revisit the 4% rule. It may be worth considering annuities as an alternative.

As life expectancies increase, Monsanto retirees need to prepare for expenses over a longer time frame. In the past we would plan for a 15 to 20 year retirement, but now we need to prepare for a 30 to 35 year retirement. What is available to assist meeting the 35-year time frame?  

The annuity strategy can assist with a few of the pitfalls we see in the 4% rule. For example:

If you need $50,000 per year in retirement and need that for 30 years, you may need $1.2 million in fixed income at a 3% interest rate. BUT if you look to fund $50,000 for 30 years, you can cover that expense with $800,000 by choosing the annuity option.

The other pitfall with the 4% rule is that it may not reflect a client’s risk tolerance. When you are accumulating assets, you can afford more volatility and can take on more risk than when in the retirement and withdrawal phase after leaving Monsanto. 

Also, should we see a drop in the market, you would be able to reduce your income using the 4% rule, which you cannot do if you choose an annuity option.

 

Featured Video

Articles you may find interesting: