Navigating Retirement: Annuities vs. IRA Withdrawals for Procter & Gamble Employees

Healthcare Provider Update: Healthcare Provider for Procter & Gamble Procter & Gamble typically collaborates with a range of health insurance providers to offer coverage to its employees. Although specific details regarding their primary healthcare provider may vary, they often include major insurers like Aetna, UnitedHealthcare, and Blue Cross Blue Shield, which provide comprehensive benefits tailored to their workforce. Potential Healthcare Cost Increases for Procter & Gamble in 2026 As health insurance rates soar, Procter & Gamble employees may face significant increases in their healthcare costs in 2026. With projections indicating that ACA marketplace premiums may rise by more than 60% in some areas, employees relying on these plans could see their out-of-pocket expenses balloon by over 75% if enhanced federal subsidies expire. Contributing factors include heightened medical costs, aggressive rate hikes from major insurers, and the potential loss of financial assistance that currently mitigates premium expenses. This confluence of challenges could substantially strain budgets for many P&G employees seeking health coverage next year. Click here to learn more

There are just a couple of things almost all Procter & Gamble retirees need when they hit retirement: predictable income and protection against a cluster of risks, which include longevity risk, performance risk and sequence-of-returns risk.

In the past we have seen retiring Procter & Gamble employees utilize the “4% rule,” where retirees take annual withdrawals start at 4% of the entire portfolio and increase with inflation. They then keep the remainder of the portfolio with at least 50% invested in equities. Based on historical data, this would give a Procter & Gamble retiree about 30 years of retirement income.

As the economy constantly changes, a number of factors may force prospective Procter & Gamble retirees to revisit the 4% rule. It may be worth considering annuities as an alternative.

As life expectancies increase, Procter & Gamble retirees need to prepare for expenses over a longer time frame. In the past we would plan for a 15 to 20 year retirement, but now we need to prepare for a 30 to 35 year retirement. What is available to assist meeting the 35-year time frame?  

The annuity strategy can assist with a few of the pitfalls we see in the 4% rule. For example:

If you need $50,000 per year in retirement and need that for 30 years, you may need $1.2 million in fixed income at a 3% interest rate. BUT if you look to fund $50,000 for 30 years, you can cover that expense with $800,000 by choosing the annuity option.

The other pitfall with the 4% rule is that it may not reflect a client’s risk tolerance. When you are accumulating assets, you can afford more volatility and can take on more risk than when in the retirement and withdrawal phase after leaving Procter & Gamble. 

Also, should we see a drop in the market, you would be able to reduce your income using the 4% rule, which you cannot do if you choose an annuity option.

 

Articles you may find interesting: