For Baker Hughes employees who have experienced significant market appreciation, the thought of rebalancing their portfolio can be daunting. The large embedded capital gains in their holdings often create a powerful disincentive to sell, leading to a 'tax-locked' portfolio. While an investor may have a well-diversified portfolio on the whole, a single, highly appreciated stock can still represent an uncomfortable level of risk. In these situations, the conventional wisdom of simply selling the position is often prohibitively expensive from a tax perspective. However, a little-known but powerful tool—the Section 351 exchange—may offer a strategic and tax-efficient solution.
Consider Michael, a successful professional with a total investment portfolio of $5 million. The majority of his assets are in a broadly diversified mix of mutual funds and exchange traded funds (ETFs). However, his portfolio also includes a single stock position valued at $500,000, which he acquired years ago for $100,000. While this single stock represents only 10% of his total portfolio, its low cost basis and unrealized gain of $400,000 make him hesitant to sell. A sale would trigger a tax bill of roughly $95,200, reducing the capital available for reinvestment and diversification. Michael's situation is common; he understands the importance of diversification, but the tax cost of achieving it feels punitive.
This is precisely the kind of scenario where a Section 351 exchange can provide a strategic advantage. This tax provision, as outlined in the Internal Revenue Code, allows for a tax-deferred transfer of property to a corporation in exchange for its stock, provided certain conditions are met. As Kevin Landis, a finanial advisor with Wealth Enhancement notes, 'A Section 351 exchange could help investors with appreciated assets achieve tax-efficient diversification.'
The core of the strategy is rooted in the tax code itself. IRC Section 351(a) states: “No gain or loss shall be recognized if property is transferred to a corporation by one or more persons solely in exchange for stock in such corporation and immediately after the exchange such person or persons are in control (as defined in section 368(c)) of the corporation.” The gain is not eliminated, but deferred, as the investor's original cost basis carries over to the new corporate shares. This is a critical distinction from a traditional sale.
For the exchange to be valid, two main requirements must be satisfied:
Diversification: The portfolio being transferred must be diversified according to the IRS's 25/50 test. This means no single holding can represent more than 25% of the total value, and the top five holdings cannot exceed 50%. Since Michael's $500,000 single stock position is only 10% of his total $5 million portfolio, his entire portfolio passes this test.
Control: The investor must have at least 80% control of the newly formed corporation immediately following the exchange. In practice, this is often achieved by multiple 'seeding' investors transferring assets at the same time to establish an ETF, or by an investor with a significant enough portfolio acting as the primary seeder of a new fund.
By working with an ETF sponsor that facilitates these exchanges, Michael can transfer his entire $5 million portfolio into a newly formed ETF. He would receive ETF shares in return, and his $400,000 unrealized gain would not be taxed. Within the ETF wrapper, the fund manager could then sell Michael's single stock and reinvest the proceeds into other securities to align with the fund's mandate. Due to the in-kind creation and redemption process of ETFs, this internal rebalancing does not trigger a taxable event for Michael. He has successfully diversified away from his single-stock risk and preserved the full $500,000 of market value.
Tyson Mavar, a Senior Vice President and Financial Advisor with Wealth Enhancement, emphasizes the importance of a holistic approach to these complex strategies. 'For clients with significant embedded gains, the goal is always to optimize after-tax returns,' Mavar says. 'A Section 351 exchange is a prime example of a strategy that, when executed correctly, can help preserve capital that may otherwise be lost to taxes, allowing it to continue working for the client over the long term.'
While the benefits are clear, it's important to acknowledge the limitations. The number of ETFs currently accepting such exchanges is limited, and these funds may have higher expense ratios than their more established counterparts. There's also the risk of an inadvertent tax treatment failure if the rules are not strictly followed. However, for an investor like Michael, the ability to defer a substantial tax bill and gain immediate diversification makes the strategy compelling. It is a powerful tool for advisors to help their clients escape the 'tax-locked' state and realign their portfolios with their long-term financial goals.
Key Resources:
IRC Section 351(a): https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/351
IRS Treasury Regulation 1.351-1(c)(5): This regulation details the diversification test, often referred to as the 25/50 test, which is crucial for the strategy to be valid.
Kitces.com: 'Using Section 351 Exchanges To Tax-Efficiently Reallocate Portfolios' by Ben Henry-Moreland (March 12, 2025). This article provides a comprehensive overview of the strategy's mechanics and use cases.
Cambria Tax Aware ETF (Ticker: TAX): As one of the first ETFs to publicly announce the use of Section 351 exchanges, its prospectus and fund information offer a real-world example of the strategy in practice.
Longview
Advantage ETF (Ticker: EBI): Another example of a new fund launched via Section 351, demonstrating the increasing adoption of this strategy by ETF sponsors.
Other ideas if you own a highly appreciated stock
Featured Video
Articles you may find interesting:
- Corporate Employees: 8 Factors When Choosing a Mutual Fund
- Use of Escrow Accounts: Divorce
- Medicare Open Enrollment for Corporate Employees: Cost Changes in 2024!
- Stages of Retirement for Corporate Employees
- 7 Things to Consider Before Leaving Your Company
- How Are Workers Impacted by Inflation & Rising Interest Rates?
- Lump-Sum vs Annuity and Rising Interest Rates
- Internal Revenue Code Section 409A (Governing Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans)
- Corporate Employees: Do NOT Believe These 6 Retirement Myths!
- 401K, Social Security, Pension – How to Maximize Your Options
- Have You Looked at Your 401(k) Plan Recently?
- 11 Questions You Should Ask Yourself When Planning for Retirement
- Worst Month of Layoffs In Over a Year!
- Corporate Employees: 8 Factors When Choosing a Mutual Fund
- Use of Escrow Accounts: Divorce
- Medicare Open Enrollment for Corporate Employees: Cost Changes in 2024!
- Stages of Retirement for Corporate Employees
- 7 Things to Consider Before Leaving Your Company
- How Are Workers Impacted by Inflation & Rising Interest Rates?
- Lump-Sum vs Annuity and Rising Interest Rates
- Internal Revenue Code Section 409A (Governing Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans)
- Corporate Employees: Do NOT Believe These 6 Retirement Myths!
- 401K, Social Security, Pension – How to Maximize Your Options
- Have You Looked at Your 401(k) Plan Recently?
- 11 Questions You Should Ask Yourself When Planning for Retirement
- Worst Month of Layoffs In Over a Year!
- Donating highly appreciated stock to a public charity.
- Contributing appreciated stock to a Donor-Advised Fund (DAF).
- Gifting highly appreciated stock to a family member in a lower tax bracket.
- Upstream gifting of appreciated stock to an older family member for a step-up in basis.
- Using tax-loss harvesting to offset capital gains.
- Entering into a variable prepaid forward contract.
- Reinvesting capital gains into a Qualified Opportunity Fund (QOF).
- Holding the stock until death to receive a step-up in basis for heirs.
What strategies can Baker McKenzie implement to enhance the understanding of how Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) factors can impact pension scheme investments among its employees, and what resources are available for them to access this knowledge within the company?
Enhancing ESG Understanding among Employees: Baker McKenzie can enhance understanding of ESG factors impacting pension investments by implementing comprehensive training programs and workshops dedicated to ESG topics. They can develop internal resources such as newsletters, dedicated intranet sections, and regular updates about ESG impacts and opportunities. Additionally, engaging employees through interactive seminars with ESG experts and providing access to online courses or subscriptions to ESG-focused publications can foster a deeper understanding and commitment.
How is Baker McKenzie addressing the evolving legal landscape regarding pension schemes in the UK and other jurisdictions, particularly concerning the integration of ESG considerations into their investment policies, and what implications does this have for employees contributing to these pension plans?
Addressing the Evolving Legal Landscape: Baker McKenzie addresses the evolving legal landscape regarding ESG integration into pension schemes by staying abreast of legislative changes across different jurisdictions, particularly in the UK. The firm can ensure compliance and adapt strategies by integrating ESG considerations into investment policies, which is increasingly codified in laws such as the UK's amendments to pension investment regulations. This approach helps protect employee contributions by aligning pension investments with broader, sustainable financial interests that consider long-term environmental and social impacts.
In what ways can Baker McKenzie support employees in understanding their retirement options, especially regarding the impact of ESG policies on their pension benefits and investment choices, and what role do these policies play in enhancing the sustainability of retirement plans?
Supporting Employee Understanding of Retirement Options: Baker McKenzie can support employees by providing clear, accessible information on how ESG policies influence pension benefits and investment choices. Hosting regular financial planning sessions, creating detailed FAQs on pension management websites, and offering one-on-one consultations with ESG-knowledgeable pension plan advisors can help employees make informed decisions. Additionally, explaining the sustainability of retirement plans through these policies can reassure employees about the long-term viability and ethical grounding of their investments.
How does Baker McKenzie monitor and assess the climate-related risks associated with its pension schemes, and what measures are being taken to ensure that employees' retirement savings are effectively protected against these potential threats?
Monitoring and Assessing Climate-Related Risks: To monitor and assess climate-related risks, Baker McKenzie can implement robust risk assessment frameworks that integrate climate risk into the overall risk management strategy for pension schemes. This includes regular reviews of investment portfolios for exposure to climate risks, adopting climate risk assessment tools, and engaging with investment managers to prioritize ESG-compliant investments. Periodic reporting on these activities helps maintain transparency and reassures employees about the safeguarding of their retirement savings.
What are the key differences between the fiduciary responsibilities of trustees in Baker McKenzie’s pension schemes in the UK compared to those in the US, and how do these differences reflect on the investment choices made on behalf of employees?
Differences in Fiduciary Responsibilities: The fiduciary responsibilities of trustees in Baker McKenzie’s pension schemes vary significantly between the UK and the US. In the UK, trustees are encouraged to consider ESG factors as financially material considerations, whereas in the US, recent regulatory changes have made it challenging to integrate ESG factors unless they directly relate to financial returns. These differences influence investment choices by aligning them more closely with regional legal frameworks and societal expectations.
How can Baker McKenzie’s employees actively participate in discussions regarding investment strategies that incorporate ESG factors, and what processes are in place to collect employee feedback on how these strategies align with their values and preferences?
Employee Participation in Investment Strategies: Baker McKenzie can facilitate employee participation in discussing investment strategies by setting up regular pension committee meetings that include employee representatives, conducting surveys to gather employee opinions on ESG matters, and establishing feedback mechanisms through internal communication platforms. This inclusive approach ensures that investment strategies align with employee values and preferences, fostering a sense of ownership and engagement with the firm’s pension strategy.
What information can Baker McKenzie provide regarding the performance of its pension schemes with respect to integrating ESG factors into investment decisions, and how can employees stay informed about the outcomes of these strategies?
Performance of ESG-integrated Investment Strategies: Baker McKenzie can keep employees informed about the performance of pension schemes with integrated ESG factors by publishing annual sustainability reports, including ESG performance in regular pension statements, and holding informational webinars. Transparently sharing successes and areas for improvement in ESG integration helps build trust and encourages continued employee investment in ESG-focused pension options.
Given the importance of transparency in pension management, how does Baker McKenzie plan to communicate with its employees about the governance and performance of its pension schemes, particularly in light of the growing emphasis on ESG accountability?
Communicating Governance and Performance: Transparency in pension management is crucial, and Baker McKenzie can enhance this by regularly updating employees through digital newsletters, detailed annual reports, and interactive Q&A sessions with pension managers. Focusing communications on the governance structures in place and the performance outcomes of pension schemes, especially concerning ESG accountability, ensures that employees are well-informed and confident in the management of their pensions.
How can employees at Baker McKenzie leverage the company's resources to better prepare for their retirement, especially in understanding the long-term impacts of the company’s current pension strategies on their future benefits?
Leveraging Company Resources for Retirement Preparation: Employees at Baker McKenzie can leverage company resources for retirement preparation by utilizing detailed planning tools offered by the firm, attending retirement planning workshops, and accessing personalized advice from financial advisors specializing in pension management. The company can also provide case studies illustrating the long-term benefits of various pension strategies, including those incorporating ESG considerations.
For employees who wish to learn more about Baker McKenzie’s pension plans and ESG initiatives, what is the best way to reach out to the company for more information, and what specific contact points are available to facilitate these inquiries?
Learning More about Pension Plans and ESG Initiatives: For employees interested in learning more about Baker McKenzie’s pension plans and ESG initiatives, the company should establish clear contact points such as dedicated email addresses, hotline numbers for pension plan inquiries, and scheduled office hours with HR representatives specializing in pension management. Providing easy access to this information through the company’s intranet and organizing regular informational sessions can facilitate effective communication and employee engagement.