Healthcare Provider Update: Healthcare Provider for Duke Energy Duke Energy utilizes a range of health benefits and insurance plans provided through major healthcare organizations, with Aetna being one of the primary providers offering their employee health insurance coverage. Potential Healthcare Cost Increases for Duke Energy in 2026 As 2026 approaches, Duke Energy employees may face significant healthcare cost increases due to a combination of factors impacting the broader health insurance market. Record premium hikes for Affordable Care Act (ACA) marketplace plans, with some states eyeing increases exceeding 60%, could manifest in employer-sponsored plans as well. The potential expiration of enhanced federal premium subsidies, alongside rising medical costs and aggressive rate hikes from insurers, may significantly elevate out-of-pocket expenses for beneficiaries. This perfect storm of factors indicates that employees might need to prepare for substantial healthcare financial burdens in the upcoming year, as many individuals could see their premiums rise by more than 75%. Click here to learn more
For Duke Energy employees who have experienced significant market appreciation, the thought of rebalancing their portfolio can be daunting. The large embedded capital gains in their holdings often create a powerful disincentive to sell, leading to a 'tax-locked' portfolio. While an investor may have a well-diversified portfolio on the whole, a single, highly appreciated stock can still represent an uncomfortable level of risk. In these situations, the conventional wisdom of simply selling the position is often prohibitively expensive from a tax perspective. However, a little-known but powerful tool—the Section 351 exchange—may offer a strategic and tax-efficient solution.
Consider Michael, a successful professional with a total investment portfolio of $5 million. The majority of his assets are in a broadly diversified mix of mutual funds and exchange traded funds (ETFs). However, his portfolio also includes a single stock position valued at $500,000, which he acquired years ago for $100,000. While this single stock represents only 10% of his total portfolio, its low cost basis and unrealized gain of $400,000 make him hesitant to sell. A sale would trigger a tax bill of roughly $95,200, reducing the capital available for reinvestment and diversification. Michael's situation is common; he understands the importance of diversification, but the tax cost of achieving it feels punitive.
This is precisely the kind of scenario where a Section 351 exchange can provide a strategic advantage. This tax provision, as outlined in the Internal Revenue Code, allows for a tax-deferred transfer of property to a corporation in exchange for its stock, provided certain conditions are met. As Kevin Landis, a finanial advisor with Wealth Enhancement notes, 'A Section 351 exchange could help investors with appreciated assets achieve tax-efficient diversification.'
The core of the strategy is rooted in the tax code itself. IRC Section 351(a) states: “No gain or loss shall be recognized if property is transferred to a corporation by one or more persons solely in exchange for stock in such corporation and immediately after the exchange such person or persons are in control (as defined in section 368(c)) of the corporation.” The gain is not eliminated, but deferred, as the investor's original cost basis carries over to the new corporate shares. This is a critical distinction from a traditional sale.
For the exchange to be valid, two main requirements must be satisfied:
Diversification: The portfolio being transferred must be diversified according to the IRS's 25/50 test. This means no single holding can represent more than 25% of the total value, and the top five holdings cannot exceed 50%. Since Michael's $500,000 single stock position is only 10% of his total $5 million portfolio, his entire portfolio passes this test.
Control: The investor must have at least 80% control of the newly formed corporation immediately following the exchange. In practice, this is often achieved by multiple 'seeding' investors transferring assets at the same time to establish an ETF, or by an investor with a significant enough portfolio acting as the primary seeder of a new fund.
By working with an ETF sponsor that facilitates these exchanges, Michael can transfer his entire $5 million portfolio into a newly formed ETF. He would receive ETF shares in return, and his $400,000 unrealized gain would not be taxed. Within the ETF wrapper, the fund manager could then sell Michael's single stock and reinvest the proceeds into other securities to align with the fund's mandate. Due to the in-kind creation and redemption process of ETFs, this internal rebalancing does not trigger a taxable event for Michael. He has successfully diversified away from his single-stock risk and preserved the full $500,000 of market value.
Tyson Mavar, a Senior Vice President and Financial Advisor with Wealth Enhancement, emphasizes the importance of a holistic approach to these complex strategies. 'For clients with significant embedded gains, the goal is always to optimize after-tax returns,' Mavar says. 'A Section 351 exchange is a prime example of a strategy that, when executed correctly, can help preserve capital that may otherwise be lost to taxes, allowing it to continue working for the client over the long term.'
While the benefits are clear, it's important to acknowledge the limitations. The number of ETFs currently accepting such exchanges is limited, and these funds may have higher expense ratios than their more established counterparts. There's also the risk of an inadvertent tax treatment failure if the rules are not strictly followed. However, for an investor like Michael, the ability to defer a substantial tax bill and gain immediate diversification makes the strategy compelling. It is a powerful tool for advisors to help their clients escape the 'tax-locked' state and realign their portfolios with their long-term financial goals.
Key Resources:
IRC Section 351(a): https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/351
IRS Treasury Regulation 1.351-1(c)(5): This regulation details the diversification test, often referred to as the 25/50 test, which is crucial for the strategy to be valid.
Kitces.com: 'Using Section 351 Exchanges To Tax-Efficiently Reallocate Portfolios' by Ben Henry-Moreland (March 12, 2025). This article provides a comprehensive overview of the strategy's mechanics and use cases.
Cambria Tax Aware ETF (Ticker: TAX): As one of the first ETFs to publicly announce the use of Section 351 exchanges, its prospectus and fund information offer a real-world example of the strategy in practice.
Longview
Advantage ETF (Ticker: EBI): Another example of a new fund launched via Section 351, demonstrating the increasing adoption of this strategy by ETF sponsors.
Other ideas if you own a highly appreciated stock
Featured Video
Articles you may find interesting:
- Corporate Employees: 8 Factors When Choosing a Mutual Fund
- Use of Escrow Accounts: Divorce
- Medicare Open Enrollment for Corporate Employees: Cost Changes in 2024!
- Stages of Retirement for Corporate Employees
- 7 Things to Consider Before Leaving Your Company
- How Are Workers Impacted by Inflation & Rising Interest Rates?
- Lump-Sum vs Annuity and Rising Interest Rates
- Internal Revenue Code Section 409A (Governing Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans)
- Corporate Employees: Do NOT Believe These 6 Retirement Myths!
- 401K, Social Security, Pension – How to Maximize Your Options
- Have You Looked at Your 401(k) Plan Recently?
- 11 Questions You Should Ask Yourself When Planning for Retirement
- Worst Month of Layoffs In Over a Year!
- Corporate Employees: 8 Factors When Choosing a Mutual Fund
- Use of Escrow Accounts: Divorce
- Medicare Open Enrollment for Corporate Employees: Cost Changes in 2024!
- Stages of Retirement for Corporate Employees
- 7 Things to Consider Before Leaving Your Company
- How Are Workers Impacted by Inflation & Rising Interest Rates?
- Lump-Sum vs Annuity and Rising Interest Rates
- Internal Revenue Code Section 409A (Governing Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans)
- Corporate Employees: Do NOT Believe These 6 Retirement Myths!
- 401K, Social Security, Pension – How to Maximize Your Options
- Have You Looked at Your 401(k) Plan Recently?
- 11 Questions You Should Ask Yourself When Planning for Retirement
- Worst Month of Layoffs In Over a Year!
- Donating highly appreciated stock to a public charity.
- Contributing appreciated stock to a Donor-Advised Fund (DAF).
- Gifting highly appreciated stock to a family member in a lower tax bracket.
- Upstream gifting of appreciated stock to an older family member for a step-up in basis.
- Using tax-loss harvesting to offset capital gains.
- Entering into a variable prepaid forward contract.
- Reinvesting capital gains into a Qualified Opportunity Fund (QOF).
- Holding the stock until death to receive a step-up in basis for heirs.
How does the Duke Employees' Retirement Plan calculate benefits at normal retirement age, specifically for employees who reach the age of 65? In what circumstances might an employee consider retiring before reaching this age, and how would the benefits differ if they choose this option?
Benefit Calculation at Normal Retirement Age: Duke Employees' Retirement Plan calculates benefits for employees who retire at age 65 by applying a formula that includes 1.25% of their average final compensation for the first 20 years of credited service and 1.66% for any additional years. If an employee retires before 65, they can do so after age 45 with 15 years of service, but their benefits will be reduced based on how early they retire, resulting in lower payments due to a longer payout period.
What considerations should an employee keep in mind regarding their unused sick leave or carry-over bank hours when calculating benefits under the Duke Employees’ Retirement Plan? How does Duke utilize these factors to enhance an employee's credited service for the purpose of benefit calculation?
Impact of Unused Sick Leave and Carry-Over Bank Hours: Unused sick leave and carry-over bank hours are converted into additional credited service, which can enhance the calculation of retirement benefits. Employees who have accumulated these hours can see their credited service extended, leading to higher pension benefits at retirement.
In what situations would an employee's benefits under the Duke Employees' Retirement Plan be automatically paid in a lump sum? How does the Plan determine the value of benefits that fall below the threshold for monthly payouts, and what implications does this have for retirement planning?
Lump-Sum Payments for Small Benefits: If the value of an employee's benefit is $5,000 or less, Duke Employees' Retirement Plan automatically pays it as a lump sum. For benefits between $5,000 and $10,000, employees can choose between a lump-sum payment or a monthly pension. This can significantly impact retirement planning, especially for employees weighing whether to take a smaller upfront amount or spread it over time.
How does the Duke Employees' Retirement Plan handle benefit adjustments for employees who continue to work beyond their normal retirement age? What factors influence how these adjustments are calculated, and what implications might this have for future financial planning for employees nearing retirement?
Benefit Adjustments for Postponed Retirement: Employees who continue working beyond their normal retirement date will see their benefits increased annually (by no less than 10%) to account for the shorter period during which they will receive payments. The plan recalculates benefits based on the employee’s continued service and compensation after age 65.
What options are available to employees of Duke University regarding payment forms when they retire, and what are the long-term implications of choosing each option? How do these choices affect both the retiree's monthly income and survivor benefits for a spouse or other beneficiary?
Payment Form Options and Implications: At retirement, employees can choose various payment options such as a single life annuity, joint and survivor annuities, or a lump-sum payment. These choices affect the amount received monthly and any survivor benefits for a spouse or beneficiary. Employees should carefully consider their long-term financial needs and the needs of their beneficiaries when selecting a payment option.
What specific protections does the Duke Employees' Retirement Plan provide for spouses in the event of an employee's death, and how does this influence the choice of payment options? What steps must an employee take to ensure that their spouse's rights are upheld under the Plan?
Spousal Protections: The Plan provides protections for spouses in the event of an employee's death. A surviving spouse can receive 50% of the employee's reduced monthly benefit through a joint and survivor annuity. Employees must take steps to ensure spousal rights are protected by selecting the appropriate payment option and ensuring the necessary documentation is completed.
How can employees of Duke University ensure that they are informed about their rights under ERISA while participating in the Employees' Retirement Plan? What resources and tools does Duke provide to help employees understand and assert these rights?
Employee Rights Under ERISA: Duke provides resources for employees to understand their rights under ERISA, including access to plan documents and assistance in filing claims. Employees are encouraged to use Duke's available tools to assert their rights and ensure they are fully informed about the benefits available to them under the Plan.
In what ways can employees at Duke University navigate the complexities of reemployment after retirement, and how does their choice of retiree status affect their benefits? What regulations govern how benefits are recalculated if they choose to return to work at Duke?
Reemployment After Retirement: Employees who return to work at Duke after retiring can continue to receive their pension if they work fewer than 1,000 hours per year. However, if they exceed 1,000 hours, their payments will be paused and recalculated based on additional service and earnings when they retire again. This provides flexibility for employees considering reemployment after retirement.
What impact do legislative changes, such as those introduced by the IRS, have on the Duke Employees' Retirement Plan’s structure and benefits? How should employees approach understanding these changes in the context of their personal retirement strategies?
Impact of Legislative Changes: Changes introduced by the IRS or other regulatory bodies can impact the structure of the Duke Employees' Retirement Plan and its benefits. Employees should stay informed about these changes and how they affect personal retirement strategies, particularly regarding tax laws and pension calculations.
How can employees at Duke University contact the Retirement Board for questions or clarifications regarding their retirement benefits? What is the best approach for reaching out to ensure that they receive timely and accurate information?
Contacting the Retirement Board: Employees can contact Duke's Retirement Board for any questions or clarifications regarding their retirement benefits. The Retirement Board is responsible for managing the Plan, and employees are encouraged to reach out directly for timely and accurate information to address any concerns about their retirement.