<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=314834185700910&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">

New Update: Healthcare Costs Increasing by Over 60% in Some States. Will you be impacted?

Learn More

Averaging Your Dollar Vs. One-time Investment for Allstate Employees

image-table

Healthcare Provider Update: Allstate utilizes Cigna as its primary healthcare provider for its health insurance offerings. As we look ahead to 2026, healthcare costs are projected to spike significantly, driven by a combination of factors that include rising medical expenses and the impending expiration of enhanced federal premium subsidies. Many states are facing average premium hikes that could reach as high as 60%, with reports suggesting that over 22 million enrollees in the ACA marketplace may see their out-of-pocket costs soar by more than 75%. This alarming trend, fueled by rising healthcare supply costs and continued inflationary pressures, underscores the need for consumers to strategize and act decisively in managing their healthcare expenses during this pivotal year. Click here to learn more

Table of Contents

 

 

The Properties of Stock Market Returns

 

 

Lsi Tail Findings

 

Utilizing Dca in Bear Markets

When Stock Prices Are High What You Can Do With Dca

 

Cognitive Threats

 

In Conclusion

 

About The Retirement Group

 

Sources

 Prologue

8-Aug-12-2022-05-33-46-09-AM

The majority of Allstate employees we talk to bring up the difficulties of investing. Uncertainty is a constant in investing. Recent bias makes the current time, whenever that may be, feel more uncertain than ever. The COVID-19 pandemic and modern conflicts presented us with truly unprecedented economic and health-related uncertainty, but stepping back to any point in history there is always a reason that this time is different; this is true in both bull and bear markets. Uncertainty is not necessarily a bad thing - if investing felt certain we would not expect to collect a meaningfully positive risk premium from owning risky assets. For long-term investors, stocks should deliver on their positive expected returns. The concept of hanging on through tough markets to benefit from long-term expected returns is relatively easy for most investors to understand. The tricky part is doing it, and it doesn’t get any trickier than making the decision to invest a lump sum of cash.

 

The nagging uncertainty that comes with investing in the stock market seems to be particularly pronounced when it comes to investing “new money.” New money could be a windfall from selling a home or business, receiving an inheritance, or winning the lottery. Whatever its source, shifting from cash into stocks can be a nerve-racking experience. In the case of new money, it doesn’t help to know that long-term expected returns are positive when you are deciding to invest a large sum at a single point in time. Instead of investing a lump sum all at once, you might choose to enter the market gradually over some pre-determined period. This is commonly referred to as dollar-cost averaging. It seems intuitive that dollar cost averaging would lead to a better average outcome. You are buying more stocks when stocks are down and less when they are up, and you are avoiding the potential timing error of investing right before a crash. As usual, intuition and investment decisions don’t mix.

 

This paper aims to compare dollar-cost averaging (DCA) to lump sum investing (LSI) through time for Allstate employees and retirees. We will examine average historical outcomes, the worst LSI outcomes, historical bear markets, and historically expensive markets. Neither this analysis nor its broad findings are new. A 1979 paper in the Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis by George Constantinides, A Note on the Suboptimality of Dollar-Cost Averaging as an Investment Policy, regards DCA as suboptimal through two propositions. A 2012 paper from Vanguard, Dollar-cost averaging just means taking risk later, found that LSI beats DCA about two-thirds of the time in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia.

 

This paper extends the analysis to include a closer look at the distribution of outcomes on average and under special circumstances commonly believed to be suboptimal for LSI.

 Overview

6-Aug-12-2022-05-33-45-59-AM

Many Allstate employees and retirees have told us how difficult it feels to evaluate certain investment strategies. To evaluate DCA as an investment strategy we will compare it to lump sum investing for rolling 10-year investment periods with monthly steps. This means that starting with the first available month we will examine DCA and lump sum investing through the following decade of returns, and then move the start point one month ahead. For most data series in our sample, this results in 485 10-year periods. For Canada, we have 652 periods, and 1013 for the US. We will evaluate a 12-month DCA implementation, which means splitting up a lump sum into 12 equal monthly investments, against a single lump sum investment. The following chart shows an approximate allocation between cash and stocks over the course of a 12-month DCA period for $1,000,000 of starting cash.

 

Figure 1 – Dollar-Cost Averaging Illustration

 

 

Source: Benjamin Felix, Portfolio Manager, PWL Capital Inc.

 

In our model, the cash will earn interest at the rate of One-Month US Treasury Bills while it is waiting to be invested. The portfolios are 100% invested in stocks when fully implemented. All analysis has been conducted in US dollars using monthly returns for One-Month US Treasury Bills and the six global stock markets listed in Table 1.

 

Table 1 – Stock Market Indexes

 

 

Source: Benjamin Felix, Portfolio Manager, PWL Capital Inc.

 

In order to evaluate LSI relative to DCA, we have chosen to look at the ending performance of an investment after 10 years. First, we evaluated the full data series for each market to understand the average outcomes. We isolated the most extreme bad outcomes for LSI to examine how DCA performed in those periods. Knowing that we cannot predict when LSI will have its worst outcomes, we then compared LSI to DCA during bear markets and when stock prices are high.

 The Properties of Stock Market Returns

7-Aug-12-2022-05-33-44-64-AM

The equity risk premium – the premium that stocks are expected to deliver over a risk-free asset – tends to be consistent over long periods of time. Using US stock data going back to 1926 we can observe the nature of the premium.

 

Featured Video

Articles you may find interesting:

Loading...

Figure 2 – Historical Monthly US Equity Risk Premium

 

 

Data source: Dimensional Returns Web, CRSP, PWL Capital Inc.

 

The monthly US equity premium has been remarkably consistent, within a range, throughout history. It has an arithmetic average of 0.65%, and it has been positive 60% of the time. There tend to be periods, visible in Figure 2, where the monthly premium becomes more volatile; volatility clustering is a well-known phenomenon. Over periods longer than one month we also observe characteristic negative skewness - frequent small gains and a few extreme losses.

 

Given the nature of stock returns, we would expect a stock investor to achieve positive returns with roughly the same frequency as the equity risk premium being positive. For the remainder of this paper, we will be comparing lump sum investing to dollar-cost averaging in terms of absolute returns, as opposed to observing their risk premiums. US stock returns have been positive in absolute terms 63% of the time in the historical data.

Average Lsi Vs. Data Results

2-Aug-12-2022-05-33-44-38-AM

For most markets, and on average across markets, we find that roughly two-thirds of the time LSI beats DCA over 10-year periods in terms of ending assets. The exception is Japan which is unsurprising given its unique long-term stock market outcome; Japan’s equity market has trailed One-Month US Treasury Bills since 1990.

 

Table 2 – LSI vs. DCA for 10-Year Historical Periods

 

 

Data source: Dimensional Returns Web, CRSP, MSCI, S&P Dow Jones Indices, PWL Capital Inc.

 

The basic insight that we draw from this result is that, on average, LSI leads to greater ending wealth than DCA. To quantify the extent to which LSI tends to beat DCA we examined the 10-year annualized performance difference for the full sample. An annualized figure stated as a percentage makes for an easy comparison to familiar items like fees and withholding taxes. On average, DCA is leaving a meaningful amount of expected returns on the table at 0.38% annualized over ten years in the historical data; this should not be a surprise considering that DCA delays exposure to higher expected returning stocks.

 

Table 3 – LSI vs. DCA Annualized 10-Year Performance Difference

 

 

Data source: Dimensional Returns Web, CRSP, MSCI, S&P Dow Jones Indices, PWL Capital Inc.

 

Comparing average outcomes is interesting but it does not speak to the dispersion of outcomes. Even if DCA is worse on average in terms of expected average outcomes, maybe it offers some protection on the downside. To assess this, we calculate the difference in annualized returns for LSI and DCA over 10-year periods and sort the data into percentiles. The 10th percentile is the bottom 10% of outcomes, the 50th percentile is the median, and the 90th percentile is the top 10%.

 

Table 4 – Difference in Annualized Returns (LSI – DCA)

 

 

Data source: Dimensional Returns Web, CRSP, MSCI, S&P Dow Jones Indices, PWL Capital Inc.

 

It should be clear from Table 4 that LSI is beating DCA by a healthy margin on average. In the best 10% of outcomes (90th percentile), more has been gained by LSI over DCA than what has been lost in the worst 10% of outcomes. The median outcome is positive, and the distribution is negatively skewed. None of this should be a surprise considering the positive expected risk premium of stocks over treasury bills, and the left-skewed distribution of stock returns. Figure 3 shows the shape of the distribution of the differences in outcomes for LSI less DCA in terms of 10-year annualized returns.

 

Figure 3 – Distribution of Differences in 10-Year Annualized Outcomes (LSI - DCA)

 

 

Data source: Dimensional Returns Web, CRSP, MSCI, S&P Dow Jones Indices, PWL Capital Inc.

 

At the most extreme, the far left and right tails of the distribution, LSI does look worse than DCA. This observation is consistent with a negatively skewed distribution; we see that most of the outcomes are good, but the worst outcomes are more extreme than the best outcomes. This validates the idea that DCA might be able to offer protection from the worst outcomes, but it comes at a significant cost in terms of expected returns.

Lsi Tail Findings

4-Aug-12-2022-05-33-45-38-AM

Average historical outcomes may be of limited psychological value when making investment decisions under conditions of uncertainty. An investor doesn’t necessarily care to know about average outcomes – any point in time will never feel average to those living in it. Investors want to minimize their perception of the downside risk associated with investing a large sum of cash in an uncertain market. It is important for Allstate employees to note that this exercise is distinct from examining the percentiles in Table 4. Table 4 demonstrates the distribution of differences in outcomes. That is the magnitude of the average performance difference between LSI and DCA across the full data set.

 

Sorting by the difference between LSI and DCA lets us think about the total distribution of outcomes for DCA relative to LSI, but we are now interested in how DCA does when LSI does poorly relative to the full set of LSI outcomes. To examine this, we sort historical outcomes by LSI ending assets and observe how DCA performs when LSI has its worst 10% of historical outcomes. Framed differently, if we knew that the next 10 years would be among the worst in history for a lump sum investment, could we count on DCA to improve the outcome?

 

Table 5 – LSI vs. DCA in the 10th Percentile LSI Historical Periods

 

 

Data source: Dimensional Returns Web, CRSP, MSCI, S&P Dow Jones Indices, PWL Capital Inc.

 

In half of our markets, LSI still beats DCA most of the time even when LSI has delivered its worst historical outcomes; this is also true with an equal-weighted average of all markets in the sample. The results are not as strongly in favor of LSI as the full data series but remember that we have intentionally selected the worst LSI outcomes for this sample. While the number of outcomes is evenly matched, the bad outcomes in this case are worse in magnitude than the good ones. The result is a negative difference in annualized 10-year performance. This should not be surprising considering our intentional selection of the worst LSI outcomes in the sample.

 

Table 6 – Difference in Annualized Returns for 10th Percentile LSI Outcomes (LSI – DCA)

 

 

Data source: Dimensional Returns Web, CRSP, MSCI, S&P Dow Jones Indices, PWL Capital Inc.

 

Even under artificial conditions of a known bad future outcome for LSI, DCA offers less than a 50% shot at an improvement. DCA does however offer an edge when the magnitude of positive and negative outcomes is considered – despite the roughly even split between good and bad outcomes, the bad outcomes are worse than the good outcomes are good. This seems to give credence to the mythical ability of DCA to improve an extremely bad LSI outcome. An important nuance in the data is that the worst LSI outcomes relative to other LSI outcomes do not correspond with the worst LSI outcomes relative to DCA outcomes. The most extreme instances of underperformance for LSI relative to DCA have less to do with the LSI outcome being extremely bad and more to do with the DCA outcome being extremely good. In other words, lucky timing for DCA, as opposed to avoiding unlucky timing for LSI, drives the difference in the most extreme cases.

 

Given that it is impossible to predict which time periods will result in the worst outcomes for a lump sum investment, we next turn to two signals commonly believed to offer forward-looking insight into future investment returns.

Utilizing Dca in Bear Markets

1-Aug-12-2022-05-33-45-02-AM

One seemingly obvious case where DCA feels like it should shine is during bear markets - market drops of 20% or more. Stock market volatility tends to cluster; when markets are turbulent, they tend to remain so for some time. Spreading an investment out over 12 months in the face of a bear market seems like a reasonable approach to improving the expected outcome. To be clear, we are assuming that the 20% drop has already happened when we are making the LSI or DCA decision.

 

For this sample, we have defined a bear market as a monthly drop of 20% or more from the previous peak. We will begin the LSI and DCA samples in the month following the drop, with the idea being that an investor with new cash has just observed a 20% or greater drop in the market and is now deciding between LSI and DCA.

 

Table 7 – LSI vs. DCA in Historical Bear Markets

 

 

Data source: Dimensional Returns Web, CRSP, MSCI, S&P Dow Jones Indices, PWL Capital Inc.

 

We again find that LSI produces a better outcome than DCA most of the time in most countries in the sample. Allstate employees and retirees should note that the US experience is significantly impacted by the enormous volatility and seemingly perpetual market drops in the 1930s. We find that, on average, LSI beats DCA by a 10-year annualized 0.25% when the investment period begins with the month after a drop of 20% or more has occurred. Echoing the experience of the full data series we also see that there has historically been more to gain from LSI in the 90th percentile of outcomes than there has been to lose in the 10th percentile. DCA is not offering protection from bad outcomes without also exposing us to a greater risk of missing good outcomes.

 

Table 8 – Difference in Annualized Returns Starting at Bear Markets (LSI – DCA)

 

 

Data source: Dimensional Returns Web, CRSP, MSCI, S&P Dow Jones Indices, PWL Capital Inc.

 

It's important for Allstate employees to keep in mind that our trigger to begin the investment period is a 20% drop. In some cases, a 20% drop is followed by more drops, while in other cases it is followed by a rebound. Based on the data in Tables 7 and 8 we can see that rebounds are more impactful, on average than further drops. This results in LSI delivering a better result than DCA most of the time, even during periods of market volatility.

When Stock Prices Are High What You Can Do With Dca

5-Aug-12-2022-05-33-45-31-AM

In bear markets prices falls due to increased uncertainty, causing concern for investors deploying new cash. High prices can similarly make investors uneasy for fear of investing at a peak. To observe the relationship between market valuations and the relative performance of LSI and DCA we use the monthly Shiller CAPE ratio. Based on data availability we only observe US stock data. We will define expensive as the Shiller CAPE being in the 95th percentile of all historical monthly observations (February 1872 – May 2020). Comparing LSI to DCA when the market is in its 95th percentile of expensiveness, LSI beats DCA 54.24% of the time. 

 

Table 9 – LSI vs. DCA when Stock Prices are High Relative to all History

 

 

Data source: Dimensional Returns Web, CRSP, Barclays Research, PWL Capital Inc.

 

While it may seem concerning, this observation suffers from a massive bias: at any point in time we do not have the full set of past and future Shiller CAPE data to base a decision - we only have past data in our possession. We adjust for this by measuring the market’s expensiveness only relative to historical data for each data point. For example, for January 1926 we are comparing the Shiller CAPE to the set of data from February 1872 to January 1926, not from February 1872 to May 2020 to test for expansiveness. In this case, LSI beats DCA 63.70% of the time.

 

Table 10 – LSI vs. DCA when Stock Prices are High Relative to Backward-looking History

 

This exercise is to remind Allstate employees and retirees that while valuations may look high at a point in time, they can always get higher. Japan might be a particularly interesting case study on the usefulness of market valuations in making the LSI vs. DCA decision. We have less data for Japan, so instead of comparing historical Japanese data, we will compare Japanese valuations to US data to determine expensiveness. The highest level of the monthly Shiller CAPE for the full US historical data series is 44.19 which occurred in December 1999. Japan exceeded this level in May 1986 with a Shiller CAPE of 44.31. While the Japanese market did eventually crash in 1990, there are 29 monthly observations following May 1986 where LSI beats DCA by a wide margin. Even starting in November 1988, with a Shiller CAPE of 72.07, LSI beats DCA in Japan in terms of 10-year annualized returns.

 

It is well-known that future returns tend to be relatively low when valuations are relatively high. Despite this, using valuation as a signal to time the LSI vs. DCA decision has historically resulted in unfavorable outcomes most of the time.

Cognitive Threats

12-Oct-06-2022-05-47-07-68-AM

Despite the statistical evidence in favor of LSI, there is a meaningful psychological risk to investing in a lump sum. For many Allstate investors, losing money in the stock market is psychologically, and in some cases physiologically painful. There is evidence from behavioral finance suggesting that acts of commission are more painful than acts of omission. Making the decision to buy stocks today is an act of commission while deciding not to buy stocks is an act of omission. Buying stocks on a given day and then watching them fall is more psychologically painful than not buying stocks and watching them rise, even if the economic impact is identical. DCA could be viewed as diversifying acts of commission over time to reduce the potential for a psychologically painful outcome.

 

If DCA seems like a solution to avoiding pain when investing new money, we think that it is a reasonable strategy. However, we also think that if the fear of loss is so great that DCA needs to be employed to make an asset allocation decision palatable, that asset allocation may be too aggressive. It should feel comfortable to invest a lump sum in a risk-appropriate portfolio. We do not want to imply that DCA should never be employed, but we do believe that if it feels necessary to use DCA in order to implement an asset allocation decision, it may be wise to revisit the portfolio altogether.

In Conclusion

11-Oct-06-2022-06-36-26-14-AM

Dollar-cost averaging is the decision to gradually deploy a lump sum of cash into the stock market in order to avoid ex-post regretful timing. We have shown that, on average, dollar-cost averaging consistently trails lump sum investing about two-thirds of the time. This is true across stock markets and throughout history, and it is consistent with the historical nature of the equity risk premium. The implicit historical cost of dollar-cost averaging has been an annualized 0.38% over 10 years when compared to investing a lump sum.

 

When lump sum investing has historically delivered its worst outcomes dollar-cost averaging has looked better than average, but it has not been a consistent remedy. It is not possible to know when lump sum investing will deliver its worst outcomes ahead of time, so we test two forward-looking measures.

 

We find poor results for dollar-cost averaging during bear markets and when stock prices are high. Dollar-cost averaging tends to underperform lump sum investing during bear markets (53.66% of the time) and when stocks are trading in the 95th percentile of historical valuations (63.70% of the time).

 

It's important for Allstate employees to note that given the data that supports lump sum investing, we believe that there is a strong statistical argument to avoid dollar cost averaging unless it is absolutely necessary from a psychological perspective, and if that is the case, we believe that the long-term asset allocation may need to be revised toward a more conservative portfolio.

About The Retirement Group    

9-Aug-12-2022-05-33-45-60-AM

The Retirement Group is a nation-wide group of financial advisors who work together as a team.

 

We focus entirely on retirement planning and the design of retirement portfolios for transitioning corporate employees. Each representative of the group has been hand selected by The Retirement Group in select cities of the United States. Each advisor was selected based on their pension expertise, experience in financial planning, and portfolio construction knowledge.

TRG takes a teamwork approach in providing the best possible solutions for our clients’ concerns. The Team has a conservative investment philosophy and diversifies client portfolios with laddered bonds, CDs, mutual funds, ETFs, Annuities, Stocks and other investments to help achieve their goals. The team addresses Retirement, Pension, Tax, Asset Allocation, Estate, and Elder Care issues. This document utilizes various research tools and techniques. A variety of assumptions and judgmental elements are inevitably inherent in any attempt to estimate future results and, consequently, such results should be viewed as tentative estimations. Changes in the law, investment climate, interest rates, and personal circumstances will have profound effects on both the accuracy of our estimations and the suitability of our recommendations. The need for ongoing sensitivity to change and for constant re-examination and alteration of the plan is thus apparent.

Therefore, we encourage you to have your plan updated a few months before your potential retirement date as well as an annual review. It should be emphasized that neither The Retirement Group, LLC nor any of its employees can engage in the practice of law or accounting and that nothing in this document should be taken as an effort to do so. We look forward to working with tax and/or legal professionals you may select to discuss the relevant ramifications of our recommendations.

Throughout your retirement years we will continue to update you on issues affecting your retirement through our complimentary and proprietary newsletters, workshops and regular updates. You may always reach us at (800) 900-5867.

Sources

3-Aug-12-2022-05-33-45-40-AM

  1. What to do with an Early Retirement Ebook

  2. Social Security Ebook

  3. Lump Sum vs. Annuity Ebook

  4. 401(k) Rollover Strategies Ebook

  5. Closing the Retirement Gap Ebook

  6. Constantin ides, George, (1979), A Note on the Suboptimality of Dollar-Cost Averaging as an Investment Policy, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 14, issue 2, p. 443-450.
  7. Shtekhman, Anatoly, Tasopoulos, Christos, and Wimmer, Brian, (2012), Dollar-cost averaging just means taking risk later, Vanguard Research

How does the Allstate Retirement Plan ensure that employees are adequately informed of their retirement benefits and options? Specifically, what resources does Allstate offer to help participants understand the complexities of their benefits, and how can employees stay updated on changes to the Allstate Retirement Plan?

Allstate Retirement Plan resources: Allstate provides resources through its website AllstateGoodLife.com, where employees can model different pension scenarios, compare benefit estimates, and request pension statements. Employees are also encouraged to contact the Allstate Benefits Center for personalized support. Regular updates about the plan, including changes in compensation and interest credits, ensure participants stay informed​(Allstate_Retirement_Pla…).

In what ways does the Allstate Retirement Plan accommodate employees who might need to take a leave of absence due to military duty? Discuss how the plan's provisions align with federal regulations and the protections offered to ensure that employees do not lose accrued benefits during such leaves.

Military leave accommodations: The Allstate Retirement Plan adheres to the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA), ensuring that employees on military leave continue to accrue benefits and vesting service under the plan. Interest credits will continue to be added to their accounts during the leave​(Allstate_Retirement_Pla…).

What factors determine the calculation of the Cash Balance Benefit under the Allstate Retirement Plan? Detail how annual compensation is integrated into benefit calculations, and what limitations exist concerning eligible compensation for retirement benefits.

Cash Balance Benefit calculation: The Cash Balance Benefit is based on pay credits and interest credits. Pay credits depend on the employee’s years of vesting service, and are calculated as a percentage of their annual compensation. Annual compensation includes salary, bonuses, and certain paid leave, but excludes severance payments and certain awards. The benefit is subject to IRS limits​(Allstate_Retirement_Pla…).

Can you explain the differences between the Final Average Pay Benefit and the Cash Balance Benefit as part of the Allstate Retirement Plan? Discuss how benefits are accrued under each formula and the implications for employees transitioning between plans.

Final Average Pay vs. Cash Balance Benefit: The Final Average Pay Benefit was frozen as of December 31, 2013, for participants, while the Cash Balance Benefit is an ongoing accrual based on eligible annual compensation and interest credits. Employees with preserved Final Average Pay Benefits can receive both this benefit and a Cash Balance Benefit, creating a dual structure for those transitioning between plans​(Allstate_Retirement_Pla…).

What options do Allstate employees have for designating beneficiaries under the Retirement Plan, and how do these choices impact the benefits received by the designated individuals? Discuss the procedures for updating beneficiary designations and the importance of keeping this information current.

Beneficiary designations: Employees can designate beneficiaries for their Cash Balance and Final Average Pay Benefits through AllstateGoodLife.com. It is crucial to update beneficiary designations after significant life events such as marriage, as spousal consent is required for naming someone other than the spouse. Keeping this information current ensures smooth benefit distribution​(Allstate_Retirement_Pla…).

How does the Allstate Retirement Plan define and measure Vesting Service, and why is it critical for employees to understand this definition? Explain the implications of Vesting Service on eligibility for benefits and the calculations involved in determining retirement pay.

Vesting Service definition: Vesting Service is used to determine eligibility for benefits and is based on the total years of service with Allstate, including military leave and breaks in service under certain conditions. Employees must understand this concept, as vesting impacts their eligibility to receive retirement benefits, generally after three years of service​(Allstate_Retirement_Pla…).

What steps must Allstate employees follow to commence payment of their retirement benefits when they reach eligibility? Outline the necessary paperwork and timelines involved, as well as how timely submissions can affect payout dates.

Commencing retirement benefits: To commence payment of retirement benefits, employees must notify the Allstate Benefits Center 30 to 60 days prior to their selected Payment Start Date. This process involves submitting paperwork via the website or phone, with the payment date starting on the first day of the month​(Allstate_Retirement_Pla…)​(Allstate_Retirement_Pla…).

How do the provisions of the Allstate Retirement Plan address scenarios where an employee transitions to independent contractor status? Discuss the impact of this transition on their previously accrued benefits and any applicable rules that pertain to their retirement planning.

Transition to independent contractor status: Independent contractors are generally not eligible for the Allstate Retirement Plan. However, employees who previously accrued benefits under the plan before transitioning to contractor status will retain those benefits, but no further credits will accrue during their time as a contractor​(Allstate_Retirement_Pla…).

How are employees of Allstate notified of their rights under ERISA, and what resources are available for participants who believe their rights have been violated? Discuss the role of the Administrative Committee in safeguarding participant rights and ensuring compliance with federal regulations.

ERISA rights and resources: Employees are informed of their rights under ERISA through plan documents and can contact the Allstate Benefits Center for assistance. The Administrative Committee ensures compliance with ERISA and oversees participant rights, including providing resources for claims and disputes​(Allstate_Retirement_Pla…).

How can employees contact Allstate to learn more about their retirement benefits detailed in the Allstate Retirement Plan? Include specifics on the best methods for reaching out, including contact numbers and online resources available to employees for additional assistance.

Contacting Allstate for retirement plan information: Employees can contact Allstate through the Allstate Benefits Center at (888) 255-7772 or online at AllstateGoodLife.com. The website provides access to pension estimates, beneficiary management, and retirement planning tools​(Allstate_Retirement_Pla…).

With the current political climate we are in it is important to keep up with current news and remain knowledgeable about your benefits.
Allstate offers a cash balance pension plan known as the Allstate Retirement Plan. Employees are eligible after one year of service and fully vested after three years. The plan credits the employee’s account annually with pay and interest credits. Allstate also provides the Allstate 401(k) Savings Plan, which matches 4% of contributions when employees contribute at least 6%. Employees are vested after two years, and the plan supports traditional and Roth contributions. [Source: Allstate Benefits Guide, 2022, p. 22]
Restructuring and Layoffs: Allstate has undergone significant layoffs as part of its "Transformative Growth Plan." In Q1 2024, Allstate completed a final round of layoffs, affecting approximately 8% of its workforce. This was part of a strategic move to streamline operations, cut costs, and invest in digital protection and identity protection​ (Allguard Advice)​​ (Agency Height)​. Benefit Changes: Allstate offers a 4% 401(k) match when employees contribute at least 6% of their paycheck. Additionally, the company provides a cash balance pension plan with vesting occurring after three years​ (Allstate Corporation)​.Allstate is making significant changes to its benefits packages, including potential reductions in pension benefits and alterations to the 401(k) plans. The company is also implementing a new sales and compensation program for agents in 2024, which is considered by many as unachievable and part of a broader strategy to shift from agent-based sales to direct corporate sales​ (TheLayoff.com)​​ (TheLayoff.com)​.
Importance: These changes are vital for employees and retirees who rely on these benefits for their financial security. The modifications to pension and 401(k) plans may affect retirement planning and long-term financial stability, necessitating careful tax and investment planning. Investors should be aware of these changes as they reflect the company’s efforts to manage its liabilities and improve financial performance. Politically, changes to employee benefits can influence labor relations and may be a point of contention in discussions about corporate responsibility and worker rights. | | Allstate | News: The ongoing restructuring has led to a cultural shift within Allstate, emphasizing a "command and control" management style and moving away from a participative, employee-centric approach. This shift has resulted in low employee morale and significant resistance from the workforce, many of whom are waiting for severance packages and planning their exits​ (TheLayoff.com)​​ (TheLayoff.com)​.
Importance: Understanding the cultural dynamics within Allstate is important for predicting future organizational performance and employee turnover rates. For investors, this cultural shift may impact productivity and innovation within the company, influencing its competitive position in the market. From an economic perspective, the shift in corporate culture and subsequent layoffs contribute to the broader trend of workforce displacement and the need for policies supporting retraining and workforce development. Politically, the treatment of employees during this restructuring may attract attention from labor unions and policymakers focused on workers' rights. |
Allstate provides stock options and RSUs as part of its equity compensation. Stock options are granted with a predetermined price and vesting period, while RSUs vest over a few years based on performance or tenure. In 2022, Allstate enhanced its equity programs, emphasizing performance-based RSUs. This continued in 2023 and 2024, with broader RSU programs and performance metrics for stock options. Executives and middle management are the main recipients, fostering long-term alignment with company performance. [Source: Allstate Financial Reports 2022-2024, p. 62]
In 2022, Allstate introduced improvements to its healthcare benefits, including enhanced mental health support and expanded telemedicine services. By 2023, the company continued to enhance its offerings with additional wellness programs and preventive care options. For 2024, Allstate’s healthcare strategy emphasized maintaining robust benefits and integrating new health technologies. The company aimed to address evolving employee needs with comprehensive support and innovative solutions. Allstate focused on providing effective healthcare coverage while managing costs. Their updates reflected a commitment to improving overall employee well-being.
New call-to-action

Additional Articles

Check Out Articles for Allstate employees

Loading...

For more information you can reach the plan administrator for Allstate at 2775 sanders rd Northbrook, IL 60062; or by calling them at 847-402-5000.

https://www.allstate.com/docs/benefits/pension_plan2023.pdf - Page 14 https://www.allstate.com/docs/benefits/401k_plan2024.pdf - Page 21 https://www.allstate.com/docs/benefits/rsu_plan2022.pdf - Page 13 https://www.allstate.com/docs/benefits/stock_options2023.pdf - Page 18 https://www.allstate.com/docs/benefits/healthcare2024.pdf - Page 27 https://www.allstate.com/docs/benefits/annual_report2023.pdf - Page 9 https://www.allstate.com/docs/benefits/employee_handbook2022.pdf - Page 10 https://www.allstate.com/docs/benefits/retirement_guide2023.pdf - Page 23 https://www.allstate.com/docs/benefits/benefit_highlights2024.pdf - Page 16 https://www.allstate.com/docs/benefits/benefit_summary2023.pdf - Page 28

Further Information for Allstate* Employees

*Please see disclaimer for more information

Relevant Articles

Check Out Articles for Allstate employees

Loading...
Allstate Business Information
  • Revenue: 53228
  • Profit: 1599
  • Number of Employees: 54500
  • Sector: Financials
  • CEO: Thomas J. Wilson
  • Stock Ticker: ALL
  • Market Cap: 33721
Allstate Contact Information
  • PO BOX 661003, DALLAS, TX, 752661003
  • (847) 402-5000
  • www.allstate.com

Advisory services offered through Wealth Enhancement Advisory Services, LLC, a registered investment advisor and affiliate of Wealth Enhancement Group®. Trust services offered through Wealth Enhancement Trust Services, LLC, a trust company chartered under South Dakota law.

Check the background of investment professionals associated with this site on the Investment Advisor Public Disclosure website.

WEAS ADV Part 2A with Form CRS       Form CRS       WEAS ADV PART 2A Appendix 1

This site is published for residents of the United States only. Investment Advisor Representatives of Wealth Enhancement Advisory Services may only conduct business with residents of the states and jurisdictions in which they are properly registered. All information herein has been prepared solely for information purposes, and it is not an offer to buy or sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any security.
 
Check the background of this investment professional on FINRA's BrokerCheck »

The Retirement Group/Wealth Enhancement Group are not affiliated with your company.

Quick Links

© 2025 The Retirement Group, LLC