New Update: Healthcare Costs Increasing by Over 60% in Some States. Will you be impacted?

Conagra Brands Employees Weighing Oklahoma: Lower Costs, Lower Taxes, and a Different Kind of Retirement

Healthcare Provider Update: Healthcare Provider for Conagra Brands: For Conagra Brands, the healthcare provider information is typically linked to their employment benefits and can vary based on the location and specific plans offered to employees. Generally, large companies like Conagra may partner with major insurers such as UnitedHealthcare, Anthem (Elevance Health), or Aetna to provide health insurance benefits to their employees. It is advisable for Enrolled members to refer to their HR department or employee benefit documentation for specific provider details. Potential Healthcare Cost Increases in 2026: As we look ahead to 2026, significant increases in healthcare costs are anticipated, largely influenced by the expiration of enhanced federal subsidies under the Affordable Care Act (ACA). Reports indicate that premium rates for ACA marketplace plans could rise by over 60% in certain states due to higher medical expenses and market adjustments. Notably, a staggering 92% of policyholders may face a potential increase in their out-of-pocket premiums by more than 75%, reflecting the compounded effect of expiring subsidies and aggressive rate hikes from leading insurers. This perfect storm may lead to many consumers being priced out of essential healthcare coverage, forcing a reevaluation of their insurance options as financial pressures mount. Click here to learn more

'Conagra Brands employees weighing a move from California to Oklahoma should recognize that differences in state taxes, property values, and cost of living can influence how long their retirement savings last.' — Wesley Boudreaux, a representative of The Retirement Group, a division of Wealth Enhancement.

'Conagra Brands employees evaluating retirement options can benefit from comparing states like California and Oklahoma, where differences in taxation and living expenses may directly impact long-term financial stability.' — Patrick Ray, a representative of The Retirement Group, a division of Wealth Enhancement.

In this article we will discuss:

How taxes in California and Oklahoma impact retirees and their income.
The differences in cost of living, property values, and daily expenses between the two states.
Programs and lifestyle considerations, such as Tulsa Remote and health care access, that may influence relocation decisions.

The thought of leaving behind California's vibrant cities, golden beaches, and Mediterranean-like climate may seem unthinkable to many residents. The state continues to draw attention from around the world because of its world-class amenities, varied cultural life, and natural beauty. However, California's growing cost of living, high state taxes, and skyrocketing housing costs have put a heavy financial burden on those on fixed incomes like Social Security and pensions. Some employees at Conagra Brands are therefore looking at alternatives that offer a more sustainable retirement way of life. Oklahoma is one place that is becoming more popular.

Due to advantageous tax laws, reduced housing prices, and even incentive programs like Tulsa Remote, hundreds of Californians have moved to Oklahoma in recent years. ¹ While Oklahoma may not be the best option for every retiree, there are sufficient financial differences between the two states that they should be carefully considered.

California versus Oklahoma Tax Comparisons

Retirement planning heavily relies on taxes, and there are significant disparities between California and Oklahoma. The tax code in California is particularly difficult for retirees who have several sources of income, according to Carlos Hernandez of Wealth Enhancement. Although Social Security benefits are not taxed in California, the state's progressive tax system applies to pensions, 401k contributions, and other retirement income. Rates can reach 12.3% for many taxpayers, while the highest incomes can pay up to 13.3%, ² which is the highest state income tax rate in the country.

In contrast, Oklahoma offers retirees 65 and older a $10,000 deduction on other types of retirement income in addition to exempting Social Security income from taxes. ³ Oklahoma's highest marginal income tax rate is 4.75%, ³ which is far lower than California's even without taking this deduction into account.

These differences can result in annual tax savings of thousands of dollars for seniors who receive both Social Security and pensions. Take, for instance, a person who receives $30,000 in Social Security benefits in addition to a $40,000 pension. The pension income would be subject to full state taxation in California. In Oklahoma, Social Security would be completely untaxed, $10,000 of the pension income would be exempt, and the remaining taxable pension amount would be subject to significantly lower rates. As a result, the tax burden is considerably lighter, giving the household budget more flexibility.

Cost of Living and Property Values

The financial equation consists of more than just taxes. The housing market in California puts additional financial strain on seniors, claims Kevin Won of Wealth Enhancement. California routinely has some of the highest property values in the country. The base property tax payment is still correlated with high market values, despite the fact that established safeguards like Proposition 13 restrict yearly increases in property tax assessments. The absolute cost is nevertheless high in comparison to national norms, even if householders 55 and older may relocate their tax base under specific circumstances. ⁴

The problem is made worse by insurance premiums. In California, plans that cover the danger of earthquakes or wildfires are not only costly, but they are also getting harder to obtain in high-risk locations.

The real estate market in Oklahoma paints a completely different picture. Compared to many California regions, the median home value is less than half. ⁵ Reduced property taxes are a direct result of lower property prices. Although Oklahoma does not provide tax-base transfers or unique senior exemptions like California does, retirees frequently still benefit from lower total valuations.

Additionally, Oklahoma benefits from a lower overall cost of living. Daily costs, such as groceries, utilities, and medical care, are often less than in California. Retirement savings can extend further thanks to the combined impact of lower housing, insurance, and daily expenses, which gives people greater flexibility in choosing their spending and lifestyle preferences.

Rewards Initiatives: Tulsa Remote

Tulsa Remote is one distinctive program contributing to Oklahoma's rising popularity. This program was started in 2018 with the goal of luring remote workers to Tulsa by providing cash incentives and opportunities for community integration. The program offers $10,000 to participants who agree to stay in Tulsa for a minimum of one year.

Over 60,000 applications have been submitted to Tulsa Remote since its launch, with almost 8,000 of those applications coming from California. ⁶ As a result, nearly 3,600 participants have relocated to Tulsa. ⁶ Despite focusing on working professionals rather than retirees, this program has helped spread awareness about Oklahoma's affordability and livability.

The Practical Financial Impact

The practical impact is better demonstrated by going over the previous financial case again. In California, a retiree with $40,000 in pension income and $30,000 in Social Security would pay high taxes; nevertheless, in Oklahoma, they would receive large benefits. Once the $10,000 exemption and reduced marginal rates are applied, the difference could result in yearly savings of thousands of dollars.

Beyond taxes, long-term financial consistency is strengthened by being able to buy a home for half as much, or less, than in many California markets. Over time, lower utility costs, lower insurance premiums, and overall cost-of-living reductions can add up to provide more discretionary income for leisure, travel, or building retirement stability.

In Conclusion

Although California is still a popular place to live, seniors are finding it increasingly difficult to keep up with the state's high taxes, high property values, and overall cost of living. Oklahoma is a strong alternative because of its low tax rates, $10,000 retirement income exemption, reasonably priced housing market, and lower cost of living.

According to a recent analysis, retirees in Oklahoma could maintain their financial resources for roughly 51 years with $1.5 million in savings and Social Security benefits, far exceeding the 24 years estimated in California. ⁷ This difference is primarily due to Oklahoma's significantly lower annual cost of living (about $29,666) ⁷ than to California's high expenses.

Featured Video

Articles you may find interesting:

Sources:

1. MSN. ' Hundreds of Californians have been paid $10,000 to relocate to Oklahoma ,' by Hannah Fry. August 15, 2025.

2. Nerdwallet. ' California State Income Tax Rates and Brackets for 2024-2025 ,' by Sabrina Parys. June 5, 2025.

3. SmartAsset. ' Oklahoma Retirement Tax Friendliness .' 2025.

4. California State Board of Equalization. ' Transfer of Base Year Value for Persons Age 55 and Over - Propositions 60/90 .' 2025.

5. Forbes. ' Median Home Price by State ,' by Kiah Treece. July 29, 2025.

6. SF Gate. ' The surprising destination luring California transplants with $10,000 ,' by Tessa McLean. August 4, 2025.

7. CNBC. ' $1.5 million is the 'magic number' for retirement savings--here's how long it lasts in every U.S. state ,' by Mike Winters. Mar. 15, 2025.

How does Conagra Brands, Inc. ensure that employees understand their retirement benefits, particularly the nuances of the Conagra Foods Inc. Pension Plan and the historical obligations from the Beatrice Retirement Income Plan (BRIP)? Are there specific communication strategies or resources provided to employees to navigate their eligibility and benefits?

Conagra Brands has not provided consistent documentation of the Beatrice Retirement Income Plan (BRIP), as evidenced by a lost BRIP Plan document, which has created confusion among former Beatrice employees. Conagra relies on internal committees like the Conagra Brands Employee Benefits Administrative Committee to oversee the administration of the Conagra Foods Inc. Pension Plan and the historical obligations from BRIP. However, there are allegations in the class action that Conagra has failed to communicate certain benefit entitlements, particularly the age at which unreduced benefits should commence(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).

In light of regulatory compliance, what measures does Conagra Brands, Inc. take to maintain the integrity and security of pension plan documents, especially considering the historical loss of the BRIP Plan document? How do the missing documents impact employee knowledge of their benefits?

The loss of the BRIP Plan document represents a significant failure in document retention and regulatory compliance. Under ERISA, Conagra is required to maintain and distribute these documents upon request. The missing BRIP documents have caused discrepancies in the administration of retirement benefits, particularly regarding the age of eligibility for unreduced benefits. Conagra has been criticized for not informing employees that these documents were lost, leading to confusion and underpayment of benefits(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).

What resources does Conagra Brands, Inc. offer to its employees who have questions about their pension benefits or discrepancies that may arise from the transition from the Beatrice Retirement Income Plan to the Conagra Foods Inc. Pension Plan? How can employees best utilize these resources?

Conagra directs employees to contact the Plan service center for inquiries related to their pension benefits. However, based on the complaints filed in court, there have been issues with transparency and the accessibility of important plan documents, including the BRIP. Employees have had to appeal their benefit decisions and deal with insufficient guidance on navigating the discrepancies between the old BRIP and the Conagra Plan. Resources like benefit calculators and service centers have sometimes provided inaccurate or incomplete information(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).

How does Conagra Brands, Inc. handle the potential discrepancies regarding the pension benefits related to the age eligibility for receiving unreduced benefits in the context of both the Conagra Plan and the Beatrice plan? What steps have been taken to prevent similar issues in the future?

Conagra has been handling discrepancies poorly, particularly around the age at which participants in the BRIP are entitled to receive unreduced benefits. The company's adjustment of the eligibility age from 60 to 65 without properly consulting or notifying employees has led to underpayment of benefits. The ongoing class action lawsuit seeks to address these discrepancies and prevent future issues by clarifying benefit entitlements under the terms of both plans(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).

Can you elaborate on the process that Conagra Brands, Inc. utilizes to communicate with employees about plan amendments and to clarify their rights under the Conagra Foods Inc. Pension Plan? What specific improvements have been made to this communication strategy in recent years?

The communication process regarding plan amendments at Conagra has been criticized as insufficient, particularly concerning the transition from the BRIP to the Conagra Plan. Employees have filed complaints about not receiving adequate notice of important changes, such as the shift in eligibility age for unreduced benefits. Conagra has failed to provide clear documentation, leading to confusion among employees. There is no evidence of significant improvements in recent years(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).

How does Conagra Brands, Inc. ensure compliance with the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), especially regarding the fiduciary duties of the Conagra Brands Employee Benefits Administrative Committee? What protocols are in place to guarantee that employeesâ€™ rights are consistently protected?

Conagra's compliance with ERISA has been challenged in court, with allegations of fiduciary breaches related to the loss of critical plan documents like the BRIP. The Conagra Brands Employee Benefits Administrative Committee is responsible for maintaining the integrity of the pension plan, but the loss of documents and failure to notify employees of their rights raise questions about the adequacy of these protocols. The lawsuit highlights a need for improved oversight and adherence to ERISA's fiduciary requirements(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).

What options are currently available for former Beatrice employees and other participants in the Conagra Foods Inc. Pension Plan to claim benefits they believe they are entitled to? How does Conagra Brands, Inc. facilitate this process?

Former Beatrice employees can contact the Pension Service Center to inquire about their benefits and initiate claims. However, the process has been complicated by missing documentation and conflicting information about eligibility. Some employees have been forced to file legal claims to recover benefits owed to them, as in the case of the ongoing class action lawsuit. The lack of clear and accessible resources has made it difficult for employees to navigate the process effectively(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).

In what ways does Conagra Brands, Inc. provide support or guidance for employees approaching retirement, particularly in understanding the timelines and responsibilities associated with electing benefits from the Conagra Foods Inc. Pension Plan?

Conagra provides online calculators and service center assistance for employees approaching retirement, but these tools have proven unreliable for some participants. Employees have reported being unable to calculate their benefits accurately or being told they were ineligible for benefits before age 65, despite the terms of the BRIP allowing benefits to begin at age 60. The class action complaint highlights deficiencies in the guidance provided to employees regarding their benefits(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).

How can employees at Conagra Brands, Inc. contact the Employee Benefits Administrative Committee for inquiries related to their benefits? What are the most efficient avenues for addressing concerns about the Conagra Foods Inc. Pension Plan or the transitions from the Beatrice plan?

Employees can contact the Plan service center for inquiries related to their benefits, but accessing the Employee Benefits Administrative Committee directly appears to be more challenging. The lawsuit indicates that employees seeking to address discrepancies with their benefits have not received timely or effective communication from the committee, often requiring legal action to resolve their concerns(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).

How does Conagra Brands, Inc. evaluate its pension plan's performance and benefits offerings in relation to industry standards? What methods are used to ensure the company remains competitive while protecting employee benefits under the Conagra Foods Inc. Pension Plan?

There is little publicly available information regarding how Conagra evaluates its pension plan's performance against industry standards. The company's handling of historical pension obligations, particularly from the Beatrice acquisition, suggests that its methods for protecting employee benefits have been insufficient. Ongoing litigation regarding underpayment of benefits and loss of critical documents indicates that the company may need to improve its evaluation methods and compliance efforts to remain competitive(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).

With the current political climate we are in it is important to keep up with current news and remain knowledgeable about your benefits.

Conagra Brands announced a restructuring plan aiming to streamline operations and reduce costs. This includes layoffs impacting various departments and potential changes to employee benefits.

Additional Articles

Check Out Articles for Conagra Brands employees

For more information you can reach the plan administrator for Conagra Brands at 222 W. Merchandise Mart Plaza Chicago, IL 60654; or by calling them at (312) 549-5000.