<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=314834185700910&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">

Understanding QDROs: What Baker Hughes Employees Need to Know About Dividing Retirement Assets

image-table

If you are a resident in a US state, you should know how your Baker Hughes retirement assets may be affected by the Qualified Domestic Relations Order . 

What is a Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO)?

A qualified domestic relations order (QDRO) is a court judgment, decree, or order establishing the marital property rights of a spouse, former spouse, child, or dependent of a Baker Hughes pension plan participant with respect to certain qualified retirement plans. Several requirements and restrictions apply.

To What Extent Are Retirement Assets Subject to Divorce Court Jurisdiction?

A Baker Hughes retirement plan is a form of property. Like houses, cars, and bank accounts, a retirement plan can be divided between spouses at the time of a divorce. For example, if one spouse participates in a Baker Hughes pension plan at work while the other spouse remains at home to care for the children, a judge has numerous options with respect to the retirement plan. Among other choices, he or she can award all of the pension to the working spouse, award all of it to the nonworking spouse, or split it equally (50/50). Judges often use QDROs to effect these pension assignments. In a marriage of long duration, a pension plan may be one of the most valuable marital assets.

How Are Retirement Plans Classified?

Many different kinds of retirement plans exist, with individual retirement accounts ( IRAs ) being one of the more common forms. In terms of employer-sponsored retirement plans, plans are classified as either qualified or nonqualified. Basically, qualified plans are those that satisfy federal requirements and are afforded special tax treatment. Most qualified plans can be further categorized as either defined contribution plans or defined benefit plans.

  • Defined contribution plans--Each participant in a Baker Hughes defined contribution plan has an individual account. When you retire, you're entitled to receive your entire account balance. Funding depends on the type of plan. With some plans, the employees are the only ones who contribute, and with others, the employers do all the contributing or may match employee contributions dollar for dollar (or according to a certain percentage). Typical examples of defined contribution plans include 401(k) plans and profit-sharing plans.
  • Defined benefit plans--A Baker Hughes defined benefit plan does not use individual accounts. Instead, benefits for the participants in the plan are fixed under a particular formula. Specified benefits are paid to participants based on such factors as age, length of service, and amount of compensation. Generally, the plan promises to pay the employee a certain amount per month at retirement time based on enumerated factors.

Before you think about dividing pension plans, it's important to understand the difference between defined contribution plans and defined benefit plans.

What Requirements and Restrictions Apply to QDROs?

A QDRO provides for child support, alimony payments, or marital property rights for a spouse, former spouse, child, or other dependent of a qualified plan participant and is made pursuant to a state domestic relations law. It creates or recognizes the existence of the right of the individual other than the plan participant (i.e., the alternate payee) to receive all or a portion of a participant's benefits under a qualified retirement plan.

Featured Video

Articles you may find interesting:

Loading...

A QDRO must satisfy certain requirements. It must clearly specify:

  • The name and last known mailing address of the participant and each alternate payee covered by the order
  • The amount or percentage of the participant's benefits the plan must pay to each alternative payee (or the manner in which such amount or percentage is to be determined)
  • The number of payments or periods to which the order relates, and
  • Each qualified retirement plan to which the order applies

However, a QDRO may not require the plan to do any of the following: 

  • Mandate increased benefits
  • Pay benefits to an alternate payee that must already be paid to a different alternate payee under another QDRO, or
  • Provide a type or form of benefit (or any option) not otherwise provided under the plan

For instance, the QDRO can't require the plan to provide cost-of-living increases if the plan doesn't already have cost-of-living provisions. Furthermore, a spouse's plan can't allocate 60 percent of the benefits to his or her former spouse if 50 percent of the benefits had previously been allocated to another prior spouse.

In What Ways May Baker Hughes Retirement Plans Be Divided Pursuant to a  QDRO?

The QDRO specifies what the plan administrator is to do with the spouse's share of the plan. If under the plan a participant has no right to an immediate cash payment, a QDRO can't require the plan administrator to make an immediate cash payment to a spouse. Instead, a QDRO will probably be used to segregate plan assets into a subtrust for the benefit of the alternate payee-spouse, with cash distributions made at the earliest time they would be permitted under plan provisions.

Defined contribution plans are easy to value because the money is in an individual account and the plan administrator usually provides a quarterly report of the value. Defined benefit plans can pose a problem, however, and often require the services of an actuary to ascertain the present value of the fund. An actuary may be necessary, for example, if your eventual pension payout is tied to your compensation during your three highest paid years.

Example(s):  John is 50 years old and has a defined benefit plan that has no cash value right now. When John retires, he  currently expects to receive $1,200 per month. His ex-wife, Mary, will get a portion of the payout. If there is a 50 percent split of  the present value according to a QDRO, John and Mary will each get $600 per month at retirement time. However, if John actually  receives $1,800 per month when he retires, Mary will still only get $600 per month.

Segregation of Plan Assets

One option is to segregate the alternate payee's portion of the plan until the employee reaches retirement age. At that time, the alternate payee can access the funds. With this approach, the alternate payee is treated as a participant in the plan. The employee's defined contribution plan balance (or defined benefit plan accrued benefit) is valued as of a certain date, and that benefit is divided between the participant and the alternate payee in accordance with the QDRO. Once divided, the alternate payee is treated similarly to a terminated participant with a vested deferred benefit.

There are certain advantages to this approach. For example, if you're the alternate payee, you're probably assured of receiving some retirement income in the future. Also, you won't have to deal with the problems of how to invest your money right now and how to value the plan today.

However, staying in the plan maintains your economic ties with your ex-spouse, so you might lose some money if your ex-spouse takes early retirement. Also, you will not be able to control the investment decisions for your share of the retirement assets. And finally, your share of the plan will generally not be accessible to you until your ex-spouse reaches retirement age.

Current Distribution of Plan Assets

the plan allows, the plan administrator can distribute (to the alternate payee) the full amount of money due. The alternate payee can then either keep the money and pay tax on it now, or roll it into an IRA within 60 days, delaying taxation until later. There are also certain advantages to this approach. For example, if you need cash now for living expenses, you can keep all of the distribution. Also, you're able to control the investment decisions.

There are some drawbacks. For example, you may be subject to income tax (and perhaps the 10 percent penalty tax) if you don't roll the money into an IRA account within 60 days. Also, requesting a current distribution requires you to make your own investment decisions. And finally, you'll lose the long-term tax-sheltering advantage as well as the retirement savings if you spend the money now.

Tip:  The IRS has authority to waive the 60-day rule for rollovers under certain circumstances, such as proven hardship.

Aside From QDROs, What Options May Spouses Consider With Respect to Retirement Plan Assets?

One option is to trade retirement assets for something else. For example, a divorcing couple can simply decide that one spouse gets the entire retirement plan and the other gets the house plus alimony. Or perhaps the other spouse gets a big cash buyout right now instead of a claim on the pension assets.

There are advantages to avoiding QDROs. You will save time and money by not having to draft a QDRO. QDROs can be very expensive, especially when actuaries must be hired. Trading assets can simplify the property settlement considerably, which saves attorney's fees. Also, you may be able to trade for an asset you really want, like the house.

However, you may jeopardize your future financial security if you relinquish pension rights today. Also, you and your spouse may not have enough other assets to make a fair division if one of you keeps the entire retirement plan. And if the retirement plan is a defined benefit plan, it will have to be valued in order to determine what amount of other assets would make an equitable offset.

Tip:  Remember that QDROs don't apply to most nonqualified retirement plans, such as certain annuity plans and certain deferred  compensation plans. So, if your spouse's plan is a nonqualified one, the specific QDRO rules may not have to be followed.

Tip:  Also, the QDRO rules don't apply to IRAs. Nevertheless, it is possible for a QDRO to require a distribution of pension benefits  to an employee and then a transfer of the distribution to an IRA for the benefit of the former spouse.

When Retirement Plans Are Divided Pursuant to a Court Order, What Are the Income-tax Ramifications?

  • Tax impact of QDRO on plan participant--If a QDRO orders a distribution of funds from a participant's plan to a spouse or former spouse, those funds will not represent taxable income to the plan participant. The 10 percent early withdrawal penalty will not apply. If the alternate payee is a child or dependent (rather than a spouse), then the distribution will be taxed to the plan participant. In such a case, the 10 percent early withdrawal penalty will still not apply.
  • Tax impact on plan participant if there is no QDRO--If there is no QDRO and retirement plan assets are distributed to a spouse (or anyone else), then the distribution will be taxed to the plan participant. Furthermore, the 10 percent early withdrawal penalty may apply. Beware, also, of withholding requirements.
  • Tax impact of QDRO on former spouse (or alternate payee)--A spouse or former spouse who receives a distribution under a QDRO steps into the shoes of the plan participant. As a result, such distributions become taxable to the spouse rather than to the plan participant. The money will be included in the alternate payee's gross income for the year of distribution. However, any cost basis that the participant had in the plan must be apportioned. It will be allocated on a pro rata basis between the present value of the alternate payee's interest and the total present value of all the benefits payable with respect to the plan participant.

Example(s):  Assume John was married to Mary and had a vested balance in his 401(k) plan of $300,000. John had made  after-tax contributions to the plan in the amount of $30,000. When John and Mary negotiated a divorce, it was decided that Mary  would get 50 percent of the plan assets immediately ($150,000). John's $30,000 after-tax basis in the plan will be allocated to him  and Mary based on the ratio of their respective interests in the plan. Thus, $15,000 of the $150,000 distribution to Mary will be  nontaxable. The remaining $135,000 will be taxable to Mary unless she rolls this money over into an IRA within 60 days of receipt.  Since the distribution was made pursuant to a QDRO, there will not be a 10 percent early withdrawal penalty.

Tip:  Distributions to children and other dependents will be taxable to the plan participant.

  • If the alternate payee is the spouse or former spouse, the taxable part of any distribution received by such person will qualify as an eligible rollover distribution. Thus, it can be rolled over into an IRA within 60 days of receipt. If the alternate payee is a child or other dependent, the money may not be rolled over into an IRA.
  • Tax impact on former spouse if there is no QDRO--If there is no QDRO, the former spouse doesn't include the distribution in gross income; the distribution is taxable to the plan participant. Also, the plan participant may be subject to the 10 percent early withdrawal penalty. Such a distribution doesn't qualify to be rolled over into an IRA.

Tip:  Distributions from a Section 457 plan made pursuant to a QDRO are taxed under the same rules that apply to qualified plans.

What strategies can Baker McKenzie implement to enhance the understanding of how Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) factors can impact pension scheme investments among its employees, and what resources are available for them to access this knowledge within the company?

Enhancing ESG Understanding among Employees: Baker McKenzie can enhance understanding of ESG factors impacting pension investments by implementing comprehensive training programs and workshops dedicated to ESG topics. They can develop internal resources such as newsletters, dedicated intranet sections, and regular updates about ESG impacts and opportunities. Additionally, engaging employees through interactive seminars with ESG experts and providing access to online courses or subscriptions to ESG-focused publications can foster a deeper understanding and commitment.

How is Baker McKenzie addressing the evolving legal landscape regarding pension schemes in the UK and other jurisdictions, particularly concerning the integration of ESG considerations into their investment policies, and what implications does this have for employees contributing to these pension plans?

Addressing the Evolving Legal Landscape: Baker McKenzie addresses the evolving legal landscape regarding ESG integration into pension schemes by staying abreast of legislative changes across different jurisdictions, particularly in the UK. The firm can ensure compliance and adapt strategies by integrating ESG considerations into investment policies, which is increasingly codified in laws such as the UK's amendments to pension investment regulations. This approach helps protect employee contributions by aligning pension investments with broader, sustainable financial interests that consider long-term environmental and social impacts.

In what ways can Baker McKenzie support employees in understanding their retirement options, especially regarding the impact of ESG policies on their pension benefits and investment choices, and what role do these policies play in enhancing the sustainability of retirement plans?

Supporting Employee Understanding of Retirement Options: Baker McKenzie can support employees by providing clear, accessible information on how ESG policies influence pension benefits and investment choices. Hosting regular financial planning sessions, creating detailed FAQs on pension management websites, and offering one-on-one consultations with ESG-knowledgeable pension plan advisors can help employees make informed decisions. Additionally, explaining the sustainability of retirement plans through these policies can reassure employees about the long-term viability and ethical grounding of their investments.

How does Baker McKenzie monitor and assess the climate-related risks associated with its pension schemes, and what measures are being taken to ensure that employees' retirement savings are effectively protected against these potential threats?

Monitoring and Assessing Climate-Related Risks: To monitor and assess climate-related risks, Baker McKenzie can implement robust risk assessment frameworks that integrate climate risk into the overall risk management strategy for pension schemes. This includes regular reviews of investment portfolios for exposure to climate risks, adopting climate risk assessment tools, and engaging with investment managers to prioritize ESG-compliant investments. Periodic reporting on these activities helps maintain transparency and reassures employees about the safeguarding of their retirement savings.

What are the key differences between the fiduciary responsibilities of trustees in Baker McKenzie’s pension schemes in the UK compared to those in the US, and how do these differences reflect on the investment choices made on behalf of employees?

Differences in Fiduciary Responsibilities: The fiduciary responsibilities of trustees in Baker McKenzie’s pension schemes vary significantly between the UK and the US. In the UK, trustees are encouraged to consider ESG factors as financially material considerations, whereas in the US, recent regulatory changes have made it challenging to integrate ESG factors unless they directly relate to financial returns. These differences influence investment choices by aligning them more closely with regional legal frameworks and societal expectations.

How can Baker McKenzie’s employees actively participate in discussions regarding investment strategies that incorporate ESG factors, and what processes are in place to collect employee feedback on how these strategies align with their values and preferences?

Employee Participation in Investment Strategies: Baker McKenzie can facilitate employee participation in discussing investment strategies by setting up regular pension committee meetings that include employee representatives, conducting surveys to gather employee opinions on ESG matters, and establishing feedback mechanisms through internal communication platforms. This inclusive approach ensures that investment strategies align with employee values and preferences, fostering a sense of ownership and engagement with the firm’s pension strategy.

What information can Baker McKenzie provide regarding the performance of its pension schemes with respect to integrating ESG factors into investment decisions, and how can employees stay informed about the outcomes of these strategies?

Performance of ESG-integrated Investment Strategies: Baker McKenzie can keep employees informed about the performance of pension schemes with integrated ESG factors by publishing annual sustainability reports, including ESG performance in regular pension statements, and holding informational webinars. Transparently sharing successes and areas for improvement in ESG integration helps build trust and encourages continued employee investment in ESG-focused pension options.

Given the importance of transparency in pension management, how does Baker McKenzie plan to communicate with its employees about the governance and performance of its pension schemes, particularly in light of the growing emphasis on ESG accountability?

Communicating Governance and Performance: Transparency in pension management is crucial, and Baker McKenzie can enhance this by regularly updating employees through digital newsletters, detailed annual reports, and interactive Q&A sessions with pension managers. Focusing communications on the governance structures in place and the performance outcomes of pension schemes, especially concerning ESG accountability, ensures that employees are well-informed and confident in the management of their pensions.

How can employees at Baker McKenzie leverage the company's resources to better prepare for their retirement, especially in understanding the long-term impacts of the company’s current pension strategies on their future benefits?

Leveraging Company Resources for Retirement Preparation: Employees at Baker McKenzie can leverage company resources for retirement preparation by utilizing detailed planning tools offered by the firm, attending retirement planning workshops, and accessing personalized advice from financial advisors specializing in pension management. The company can also provide case studies illustrating the long-term benefits of various pension strategies, including those incorporating ESG considerations.

For employees who wish to learn more about Baker McKenzie’s pension plans and ESG initiatives, what is the best way to reach out to the company for more information, and what specific contact points are available to facilitate these inquiries?

Learning More about Pension Plans and ESG Initiatives: For employees interested in learning more about Baker McKenzie’s pension plans and ESG initiatives, the company should establish clear contact points such as dedicated email addresses, hotline numbers for pension plan inquiries, and scheduled office hours with HR representatives specializing in pension management. Providing easy access to this information through the company’s intranet and organizing regular informational sessions can facilitate effective communication and employee engagement.

With the current political climate we are in it is important to keep up with current news and remain knowledgeable about your benefits.
Baker Hughes has announced a restructuring plan aiming to streamline operations and improve efficiency. This includes potential layoffs in certain divisions and changes to employee benefits.
New call-to-action

Additional Articles

Check Out Articles for Baker Hughes employees

Loading...

For more information you can reach the plan administrator for Baker Hughes at 17021 Aldine Westfield Rd Houston, TX 77073; or by calling them at +1 713-439-8600.

*Please see disclaimer for more information

Relevant Articles

Check Out Articles for Baker Hughes employees