New Update: Healthcare Costs Increasing by Over 60% in Some States. Will you be impacted?

University of Chicago Employees Weighing Oklahoma: Lower Costs, Lower Taxes, and a Different Kind of Retirement

'University of Chicago employees weighing a move from California to Oklahoma should recognize that differences in state taxes, property values, and cost of living can influence how long their retirement savings last.' — Wesley Boudreaux, a representative of The Retirement Group, a division of Wealth Enhancement.

'University of Chicago employees evaluating retirement options can benefit from comparing states like California and Oklahoma, where differences in taxation and living expenses may directly impact long-term financial stability.' — Patrick Ray, a representative of The Retirement Group, a division of Wealth Enhancement.

In this article we will discuss:

How taxes in California and Oklahoma impact retirees and their income.
The differences in cost of living, property values, and daily expenses between the two states.
Programs and lifestyle considerations, such as Tulsa Remote and health care access, that may influence relocation decisions.

The thought of leaving behind California's vibrant cities, golden beaches, and Mediterranean-like climate may seem unthinkable to many residents. The state continues to draw attention from around the world because of its world-class amenities, varied cultural life, and natural beauty. However, California's growing cost of living, high state taxes, and skyrocketing housing costs have put a heavy financial burden on those on fixed incomes like Social Security and pensions. Some employees at University of Chicago are therefore looking at alternatives that offer a more sustainable retirement way of life. Oklahoma is one place that is becoming more popular.

Due to advantageous tax laws, reduced housing prices, and even incentive programs like Tulsa Remote, hundreds of Californians have moved to Oklahoma in recent years. ¹ While Oklahoma may not be the best option for every retiree, there are sufficient financial differences between the two states that they should be carefully considered.

California versus Oklahoma Tax Comparisons

Retirement planning heavily relies on taxes, and there are significant disparities between California and Oklahoma. The tax code in California is particularly difficult for retirees who have several sources of income, according to Carlos Hernandez of Wealth Enhancement. Although Social Security benefits are not taxed in California, the state's progressive tax system applies to pensions, 401k contributions, and other retirement income. Rates can reach 12.3% for many taxpayers, while the highest incomes can pay up to 13.3%, ² which is the highest state income tax rate in the country.

In contrast, Oklahoma offers retirees 65 and older a $10,000 deduction on other types of retirement income in addition to exempting Social Security income from taxes. ³ Oklahoma's highest marginal income tax rate is 4.75%, ³ which is far lower than California's even without taking this deduction into account.

These differences can result in annual tax savings of thousands of dollars for seniors who receive both Social Security and pensions. Take, for instance, a person who receives $30,000 in Social Security benefits in addition to a $40,000 pension. The pension income would be subject to full state taxation in California. In Oklahoma, Social Security would be completely untaxed, $10,000 of the pension income would be exempt, and the remaining taxable pension amount would be subject to significantly lower rates. As a result, the tax burden is considerably lighter, giving the household budget more flexibility.

Cost of Living and Property Values

The financial equation consists of more than just taxes. The housing market in California puts additional financial strain on seniors, claims Kevin Won of Wealth Enhancement. California routinely has some of the highest property values in the country. The base property tax payment is still correlated with high market values, despite the fact that established safeguards like Proposition 13 restrict yearly increases in property tax assessments. The absolute cost is nevertheless high in comparison to national norms, even if householders 55 and older may relocate their tax base under specific circumstances. ⁴

The problem is made worse by insurance premiums. In California, plans that cover the danger of earthquakes or wildfires are not only costly, but they are also getting harder to obtain in high-risk locations.

The real estate market in Oklahoma paints a completely different picture. Compared to many California regions, the median home value is less than half. ⁵ Reduced property taxes are a direct result of lower property prices. Although Oklahoma does not provide tax-base transfers or unique senior exemptions like California does, retirees frequently still benefit from lower total valuations.

Additionally, Oklahoma benefits from a lower overall cost of living. Daily costs, such as groceries, utilities, and medical care, are often less than in California. Retirement savings can extend further thanks to the combined impact of lower housing, insurance, and daily expenses, which gives people greater flexibility in choosing their spending and lifestyle preferences.

Rewards Initiatives: Tulsa Remote

Tulsa Remote is one distinctive program contributing to Oklahoma's rising popularity. This program was started in 2018 with the goal of luring remote workers to Tulsa by providing cash incentives and opportunities for community integration. The program offers $10,000 to participants who agree to stay in Tulsa for a minimum of one year.

Over 60,000 applications have been submitted to Tulsa Remote since its launch, with almost 8,000 of those applications coming from California. ⁶ As a result, nearly 3,600 participants have relocated to Tulsa. ⁶ Despite focusing on working professionals rather than retirees, this program has helped spread awareness about Oklahoma's affordability and livability.

The Practical Financial Impact

The practical impact is better demonstrated by going over the previous financial case again. In California, a retiree with $40,000 in pension income and $30,000 in Social Security would pay high taxes; nevertheless, in Oklahoma, they would receive large benefits. Once the $10,000 exemption and reduced marginal rates are applied, the difference could result in yearly savings of thousands of dollars.

Beyond taxes, long-term financial consistency is strengthened by being able to buy a home for half as much, or less, than in many California markets. Over time, lower utility costs, lower insurance premiums, and overall cost-of-living reductions can add up to provide more discretionary income for leisure, travel, or building retirement stability.

In Conclusion

Although California is still a popular place to live, seniors are finding it increasingly difficult to keep up with the state's high taxes, high property values, and overall cost of living. Oklahoma is a strong alternative because of its low tax rates, $10,000 retirement income exemption, reasonably priced housing market, and lower cost of living.

According to a recent analysis, retirees in Oklahoma could maintain their financial resources for roughly 51 years with $1.5 million in savings and Social Security benefits, far exceeding the 24 years estimated in California. ⁷ This difference is primarily due to Oklahoma's significantly lower annual cost of living (about $29,666) ⁷ than to California's high expenses.

Featured Video

Articles you may find interesting:

Sources:

1. MSN. ' Hundreds of Californians have been paid $10,000 to relocate to Oklahoma ,' by Hannah Fry. August 15, 2025.

2. Nerdwallet. ' California State Income Tax Rates and Brackets for 2024-2025 ,' by Sabrina Parys. June 5, 2025.

3. SmartAsset. ' Oklahoma Retirement Tax Friendliness .' 2025.

4. California State Board of Equalization. ' Transfer of Base Year Value for Persons Age 55 and Over - Propositions 60/90 .' 2025.

5. Forbes. ' Median Home Price by State ,' by Kiah Treece. July 29, 2025.

6. SF Gate. ' The surprising destination luring California transplants with $10,000 ,' by Tessa McLean. August 4, 2025.

7. CNBC. ' $1.5 million is the 'magic number' for retirement savings--here's how long it lasts in every U.S. state ,' by Mike Winters. Mar. 15, 2025.

What are the eligibility criteria for participation in the SEPP plan for employees of The University of Chicago, and how can factors like years of service and age impact an employee's benefits under this plan? Discuss how these criteria might have changed for new employees post-2016 and what implications this has for retirement planning.

Eligibility Criteria for SEPP: Employees at The University of Chicago become eligible to participate in the SEPP upon meeting age and service requirements: being at least 21 years old and completing one year of service. For employees hired after the plan freeze on October 31, 2016, these criteria have been crucial in determining eligibility for newer employees, impacting their retirement planning as they do not accrue benefits under SEPP beyond this freeze date.

In what ways does the SEPP (Staff Employees Pension Plan) benefit calculation at The University of Chicago reflect an employee's years of service and final average pay? Examine the formulas involved in the benefits determination process, including how outside factors such as Social Security compensation can affect the total pension benefits an employee receives at retirement.

Benefit Calculation Reflecting Service and Pay: The SEPP benefits are calculated based on the final average pay and years of participation, factoring in Social Security covered compensation. Changes post-2016 have frozen benefits accrual, meaning that current employees’ benefits are calculated only up to this freeze date, affecting long-term benefits despite continued employment.

How can employees at The University of Chicago expect their SEPP benefits to be paid out upon their retirement, especially in terms of the options between lump sum distributions and annuities? Analyze the advantages and disadvantages of each payment option, and how these choices can impact an employee's financial situation in retirement.

Payout Options (Lump Sum vs. Annuities): Upon retirement, employees can opt for a lump sum payment or annuities. Each option presents financial implications; lump sums provide immediate access to funds but annuities offer sustained income. This choice is significant for financial stability in retirement, particularly under the constraints post the 2016 plan changes.

Can you elaborate on the spousal rights associated with the pension benefits under the SEPP plan at The University of Chicago? Discuss how marital status influences annuity payments and the required spousal consent when considering changes to beneficiary designations.

Spousal Rights in SEPP Benefits: Spouses have rights to pension benefits, requiring spousal consent for altering beneficiary arrangements under the SEPP. Changes post-2016 do not impact these rights, but understanding these is vital for making informed decisions about pension benefits and beneficiary designations.

As an employee nearing retirement at The University of Chicago, what considerations should one keep in mind regarding taxes on pension benefits received from the SEPP? Explore the tax implications of different types of distributions and how they align with current IRS regulations for the 2024 tax year.

Tax Considerations for SEPP Benefits: SEPP distributions are taxable income. Employees must consider the tax implications of their chosen payout method—lump sum or annuities—and plan for potential tax liabilities. This understanding is crucial, especially with the plan’s benefit accrual freeze affecting the retirement timeline.

What resources are available for employees of The University of Chicago wishing to understand more about their retirement benefits under SEPP? Discuss the types of information that can be requested from the Benefits Office and highlight the contact methods for obtaining more detailed assistance.

Resources for Understanding SEPP Benefits: The University provides resources for employees to understand their SEPP benefits, including access to the Benefits Office for personalized queries. Utilizing these resources is essential for employees, especially newer ones post-2016, to fully understand their retirement benefits under the current plan structure.

How does The University of Chicago address benefits for employees upon their death, and what provisions exist for both spouses and non-spouse beneficiaries under the SEPP plan? Analyze the specific benefits and payment structures available to beneficiaries and the conditions under which these benefits are distributed.

Posthumous Benefits: The SEPP includes provisions for spouses and non-spouse beneficiaries, detailing the continuation or lump sum payments upon the death of the employee. Understanding these provisions is crucial for estate planning and ensuring financial security for beneficiaries.

What factors ensure an employee remains fully vested in their pension benefits with The University of Chicago, and how does the vesting schedule affect retirement planning strategies? Consider the implications of not fulfilling the vesting criteria and how this might influence decisions around employment tenure and retirement timing.

Vesting and Retirement Planning: Vesting in SEPP requires three years of service, with full benefits contingent on meeting this criterion. For employees navigating post-2016 changes, understanding vesting is crucial for retirement planning, particularly as no additional benefits accrue beyond the freeze date.

Discuss the impact of a Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO) on the SEPP benefits for employees at The University of Chicago. How do divorce or separation proceedings influence pension benefits, and what steps should employees take to ensure compliance with a QDRO?

Impact of QDROs on SEPP Benefits: SEPP complies with Qualified Domestic Relations Orders, which can allocate pension benefits to alternate payees. Understanding how QDROs affect one’s benefits is crucial for financial planning, especially in the context of marital dissolution.

How can employees at The University of Chicago, who have questions about their benefits under the SEPP plan, effectively communicate with the Benefits Office for clarity and assistance? Specify the various communication methods available for employees and what kind of information or support they can expect to receive.

Communicating with the Benefits Office: Employees can reach out to the Benefits Office via email or phone for detailed assistance on their SEPP benefits. Effective communication with this office is vital for employees to clarify their benefits status, particularly in light of the post-2016 changes to the plan.