New Update: Healthcare Costs Increasing by Over 60% in Some States. Will you be impacted?

6 Retirement Myths Every Conagra Brands Employee Should Rethink

Healthcare Provider Update: Healthcare Provider for Conagra Brands: For Conagra Brands, the healthcare provider information is typically linked to their employment benefits and can vary based on the location and specific plans offered to employees. Generally, large companies like Conagra may partner with major insurers such as UnitedHealthcare, Anthem (Elevance Health), or Aetna to provide health insurance benefits to their employees. It is advisable for Enrolled members to refer to their HR department or employee benefit documentation for specific provider details. Potential Healthcare Cost Increases in 2026: As we look ahead to 2026, significant increases in healthcare costs are anticipated, largely influenced by the expiration of enhanced federal subsidies under the Affordable Care Act (ACA). Reports indicate that premium rates for ACA marketplace plans could rise by over 60% in certain states due to higher medical expenses and market adjustments. Notably, a staggering 92% of policyholders may face a potential increase in their out-of-pocket premiums by more than 75%, reflecting the compounded effect of expiring subsidies and aggressive rate hikes from leading insurers. This perfect storm may lead to many consumers being priced out of essential healthcare coverage, forcing a reevaluation of their insurance options as financial pressures mount. Click here to learn more

'Conagra Brands employees should view retirement planning as an opportunity to enhance long-term clarity and resilience by challenging outdated myths and aligning financial decisions with their personal goals.' – Wesley Boudreaux, a representative of The Retirement Group, a division of Wealth Enhancement.

'For Conagra Brands employees aiming to build financial confidence, it can help to realize that retirement success often comes from balancing disciplined financial management with meaningful life choices.' – Patrick Ray, a representative of The Retirement Group, a division of Wealth Enhancement.

In this article we will discuss:

Common retirement myths that may affect financial decisions.
How charitable giving, spending, and debt management can shape retirement strategies.
Overlooked risks, such as fraud, that may be more damaging than market downturns.

There are several myths related to retirement finance that have the potential to jeopardize even the most meticulously crafted financial strategies. Last quarter, for instance, we debunked the idea that bond allocations should match your age and that retirees should never touch principal. Misconceptions about retirement planning, however, go far beyond outdated guidelines.

Here, we look at six common myths that can influence retirement decision-making and aim to dispel them before they affect the financial well-being of Conagra Brands employees.

Myth 1: Making a Large Splurge Is Not Acceptable

It's commonly believed that spending large amounts of money too soon in retirement is irresponsible and should be strongly discouraged. This isn't always the case, though.

'Enjoying the results of your hard work is what retirement is all about,' says Wealth Enhancement advisor Wesley Boudreaux. 'One well-considered investment won't ruin your future if you've laid a solid foundation.'

Take the case of a person who has saved $3 million and plans to withdraw roughly 4% annually, which comes to about $120,000 a year. The total balance falls to $2.95 million if the person decides to buy a $50,000 recreational vehicle to realize a lifelong goal. The reward of reaching a significant life goal likely outweighs the $2,000 reduction in the sustainable yearly withdrawal that results from this modification. Intentionality is the fundamental difference: a planned, one-time expense is not the same as ongoing discretionary spending that undermines long-term consistency—a lesson relevant for Conagra Brands retirees envisioning lifestyle goals.

Myth 2: You Should Only Give Money to Charities After You Die

Many people believe that bequests are the most effective way to give to charities. However, waiting until death is not always the best course of action, even though donating assets to charity through estate planning is a noble goal.

Carlos Hernandez, a Wealth Enhancement financial advisor, observes, 'The estate tax exemption is almost $14 million per individual today.' ¹ This generally exempts many estates from federal estate tax. The upshot? By waiting until death to donate, you might miss advantages you could have right now.

Giving during one’s lifetime has many benefits. It can reduce an estate's size, lower current taxable income, and provide the personal satisfaction of witnessing charitable contributions in action. Donors can feel the direct effects of their gift while they are still alive by establishing a scholarship, setting up a community shelter, or funding a local program. This can create both tax efficiency and emotional gratification for Conagra Brands employees interesting in pursuing long-term philanthropic strategies.

Myth 3: You Should Save Everything for Your Heirs and Spend Less

Although modest spending practices are generally recommended, being overly frugal in retirement might result in regrets and lost opportunities.

According to Boudreaux, 'Far too many people undervalue themselves by treating retirement as just another stage of accumulation. A life well-lived is what your savings are supposed to support.'

Decades of financial resources are meant to be used meaningfully in addition to being preserved. Beyond inheritance, thoughtful financial support can offer advantages such as financing family vacations, helping adult children with a down payment on a house, or contributing to grandchildren's education funds. For Conagra Brands workers approaching retirement, these investments in opportunities and experiences may yield greater satisfaction than leaving behind a larger inheritance.

Myth 4: Before You Can Retire, You Must Pay Off Your Mortgage

Although it is a compelling goal, it's not always financially advantageous to enter retirement debt-free.

Hernandez says, 'When properly managed, mortgage debt can be a strategic tool.' Low interest rates may compare favorably to investment returns, and interest is frequently tax deductible. Furthermore, paying off a mortgage with tax-advantaged retirement assets may result in needless taxes and possibly place retirees in a higher tax bracket.

The choice should be based on weighing the prospective growth of unaltered investments against the after-tax cost of holding mortgage debt. While putting money into investment accounts may improve long-term financial results, for certain households, ongoing mortgage payments maintain liquidity and flexibility. For Conagra Brands families, the right decision depends on evaluating your broader financial picture rather than making a blanket assumption about debt.

Myth 5: You Should Never Take Out a Reverse Mortgage

Despite their reputation for predatory behavior, ² reverse mortgages are now strictly regulated financial instruments. They can give homeowners 62 years of age or older access to their home equity without necessitating a sale or producing taxable income.

'A reverse mortgage can be helpful for the right retiree—supplementing income, helping cover health care costs, or reducing the need to draw from investments during market downturns,' Boudreaux explains, adding that they are not for everyone.

The proceeds are usually not regarded as taxable income because they are structured as a loan. In some cases, this can result in meaningful tax savings. But careful consideration is essential. Long-term objectives, estate planning factors, and household financial dynamics must all be taken into account when implementing a reverse mortgage. Conagra Brands employees should consult trusted advisors before deciding if this tool fits their retirement plan.

Myth 6: Your Greatest Financial Risk Is a Stock Market Crash

Featured Video

Articles you may find interesting:

Market downturns frequently make the news, escalating retirement worries. Yet, even though it can be unnerving, volatility isn't always the biggest risk to long-term financial health.

Hernandez says, 'Diversification and careful planning help cushion market downturns. But fraud and scams are among the most underrated threats.'

Con artists commonly use text messages, emails, and phone calls to target older individuals. Scammers take advantage of weaknesses, such as cognitive deterioration, to obtain personal information or money. ³ Financial losses resulting from fraud can quickly damage a retirement fund, frequently more severely than a brief drop in the stock market. Conagra Brands retirees should remain cautious by safeguarding personal information, rejecting unverified payment requests, and confirming suspicious communications with trusted advisors.

Retirement Is Individual

Dispelling these six fallacies reveals an important reality: retirement preparation is very personal. Decisions that depend on particular conditions can be oversimplified by general guidelines and recommendations.

Boudreaux highlights that each retiree has distinct objectives, family dynamics, and risk tolerances. 'For this reason, a customized strategy is more important than merely adhering to general myths.'

The objective is to use your savings wisely—to support your lifestyle, your loved ones, and the causes that are most important to you—rather than merely preserving them, Hernandez adds.

Retirement ought to be viewed as a living strategy that is adaptable, flexible, and representative of individual priorities. By moving past outdated beliefs, Conagra Brands retirees can approach their financial prospects with clarity, resilience, and the freedom that retirement was intended to offer.

According to recent behavioral finance research, retirees who are financially literate, optimistic, future-oriented, and reward-focused are more proactive in their retirement planning—qualities that can be developed over time. People who possessed these traits were less stressed about money and had a tendency to save more regularly. Even though just about 10% of respondents had all four qualities, the study shows that cultivating them may help enhance retirement results. ⁴

Closing Analogy

Retirement planning is similar to driving across the country. Myths like 'every detour is dangerous,' 'fuel should never be used for a scenic stop,' and 'the journey must end with a perfectly full tank' are examples of out-of-date maps that can lead people astray. Knowing when to share resources along the journey, when to save for unforeseen circumstances, and when to savor a meaningful pause are all essential components of true success. For Conagra Brands employees, the path ahead becomes smoother and more rewarding when outdated misconceptions are replaced with well-informed tactics.

Sources:

1. IRS, ' Estate tax ,' October 29, 2024.

2. Bankrate, ' Reverse mortgage scams: What they are and how to avoid them ,' by Kacie Goff, June 9, 2025.

3. FBI, ' Elder Fraud ,' 2025.

4. Goldman Sachs Asset Management, ' Retirement Mindset Matters ,' October 2023.

How does Conagra Brands, Inc. ensure that employees understand their retirement benefits, particularly the nuances of the Conagra Foods Inc. Pension Plan and the historical obligations from the Beatrice Retirement Income Plan (BRIP)? Are there specific communication strategies or resources provided to employees to navigate their eligibility and benefits?

Conagra Brands has not provided consistent documentation of the Beatrice Retirement Income Plan (BRIP), as evidenced by a lost BRIP Plan document, which has created confusion among former Beatrice employees. Conagra relies on internal committees like the Conagra Brands Employee Benefits Administrative Committee to oversee the administration of the Conagra Foods Inc. Pension Plan and the historical obligations from BRIP. However, there are allegations in the class action that Conagra has failed to communicate certain benefit entitlements, particularly the age at which unreduced benefits should commence(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).

In light of regulatory compliance, what measures does Conagra Brands, Inc. take to maintain the integrity and security of pension plan documents, especially considering the historical loss of the BRIP Plan document? How do the missing documents impact employee knowledge of their benefits?

The loss of the BRIP Plan document represents a significant failure in document retention and regulatory compliance. Under ERISA, Conagra is required to maintain and distribute these documents upon request. The missing BRIP documents have caused discrepancies in the administration of retirement benefits, particularly regarding the age of eligibility for unreduced benefits. Conagra has been criticized for not informing employees that these documents were lost, leading to confusion and underpayment of benefits(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).

What resources does Conagra Brands, Inc. offer to its employees who have questions about their pension benefits or discrepancies that may arise from the transition from the Beatrice Retirement Income Plan to the Conagra Foods Inc. Pension Plan? How can employees best utilize these resources?

Conagra directs employees to contact the Plan service center for inquiries related to their pension benefits. However, based on the complaints filed in court, there have been issues with transparency and the accessibility of important plan documents, including the BRIP. Employees have had to appeal their benefit decisions and deal with insufficient guidance on navigating the discrepancies between the old BRIP and the Conagra Plan. Resources like benefit calculators and service centers have sometimes provided inaccurate or incomplete information(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).

How does Conagra Brands, Inc. handle the potential discrepancies regarding the pension benefits related to the age eligibility for receiving unreduced benefits in the context of both the Conagra Plan and the Beatrice plan? What steps have been taken to prevent similar issues in the future?

Conagra has been handling discrepancies poorly, particularly around the age at which participants in the BRIP are entitled to receive unreduced benefits. The company's adjustment of the eligibility age from 60 to 65 without properly consulting or notifying employees has led to underpayment of benefits. The ongoing class action lawsuit seeks to address these discrepancies and prevent future issues by clarifying benefit entitlements under the terms of both plans(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).

Can you elaborate on the process that Conagra Brands, Inc. utilizes to communicate with employees about plan amendments and to clarify their rights under the Conagra Foods Inc. Pension Plan? What specific improvements have been made to this communication strategy in recent years?

The communication process regarding plan amendments at Conagra has been criticized as insufficient, particularly concerning the transition from the BRIP to the Conagra Plan. Employees have filed complaints about not receiving adequate notice of important changes, such as the shift in eligibility age for unreduced benefits. Conagra has failed to provide clear documentation, leading to confusion among employees. There is no evidence of significant improvements in recent years(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).

How does Conagra Brands, Inc. ensure compliance with the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), especially regarding the fiduciary duties of the Conagra Brands Employee Benefits Administrative Committee? What protocols are in place to guarantee that employeesâ€™ rights are consistently protected?

Conagra's compliance with ERISA has been challenged in court, with allegations of fiduciary breaches related to the loss of critical plan documents like the BRIP. The Conagra Brands Employee Benefits Administrative Committee is responsible for maintaining the integrity of the pension plan, but the loss of documents and failure to notify employees of their rights raise questions about the adequacy of these protocols. The lawsuit highlights a need for improved oversight and adherence to ERISA's fiduciary requirements(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).

What options are currently available for former Beatrice employees and other participants in the Conagra Foods Inc. Pension Plan to claim benefits they believe they are entitled to? How does Conagra Brands, Inc. facilitate this process?

Former Beatrice employees can contact the Pension Service Center to inquire about their benefits and initiate claims. However, the process has been complicated by missing documentation and conflicting information about eligibility. Some employees have been forced to file legal claims to recover benefits owed to them, as in the case of the ongoing class action lawsuit. The lack of clear and accessible resources has made it difficult for employees to navigate the process effectively(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).

In what ways does Conagra Brands, Inc. provide support or guidance for employees approaching retirement, particularly in understanding the timelines and responsibilities associated with electing benefits from the Conagra Foods Inc. Pension Plan?

Conagra provides online calculators and service center assistance for employees approaching retirement, but these tools have proven unreliable for some participants. Employees have reported being unable to calculate their benefits accurately or being told they were ineligible for benefits before age 65, despite the terms of the BRIP allowing benefits to begin at age 60. The class action complaint highlights deficiencies in the guidance provided to employees regarding their benefits(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).

How can employees at Conagra Brands, Inc. contact the Employee Benefits Administrative Committee for inquiries related to their benefits? What are the most efficient avenues for addressing concerns about the Conagra Foods Inc. Pension Plan or the transitions from the Beatrice plan?

Employees can contact the Plan service center for inquiries related to their benefits, but accessing the Employee Benefits Administrative Committee directly appears to be more challenging. The lawsuit indicates that employees seeking to address discrepancies with their benefits have not received timely or effective communication from the committee, often requiring legal action to resolve their concerns(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).

How does Conagra Brands, Inc. evaluate its pension plan's performance and benefits offerings in relation to industry standards? What methods are used to ensure the company remains competitive while protecting employee benefits under the Conagra Foods Inc. Pension Plan?

There is little publicly available information regarding how Conagra evaluates its pension plan's performance against industry standards. The company's handling of historical pension obligations, particularly from the Beatrice acquisition, suggests that its methods for protecting employee benefits have been insufficient. Ongoing litigation regarding underpayment of benefits and loss of critical documents indicates that the company may need to improve its evaluation methods and compliance efforts to remain competitive(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).

With the current political climate we are in it is important to keep up with current news and remain knowledgeable about your benefits.

Conagra Brands announced a restructuring plan aiming to streamline operations and reduce costs. This includes layoffs impacting various departments and potential changes to employee benefits.

Additional Articles

Check Out Articles for Conagra Brands employees

For more information you can reach the plan administrator for Conagra Brands at 222 W. Merchandise Mart Plaza Chicago, IL 60654; or by calling them at (312) 549-5000.