Healthcare Provider Update: Healthcare Provider for Conagra Brands: For Conagra Brands, the healthcare provider information is typically linked to their employment benefits and can vary based on the location and specific plans offered to employees. Generally, large companies like Conagra may partner with major insurers such as UnitedHealthcare, Anthem (Elevance Health), or Aetna to provide health insurance benefits to their employees. It is advisable for Enrolled members to refer to their HR department or employee benefit documentation for specific provider details. Potential Healthcare Cost Increases in 2026: As we look ahead to 2026, significant increases in healthcare costs are anticipated, largely influenced by the expiration of enhanced federal subsidies under the Affordable Care Act (ACA). Reports indicate that premium rates for ACA marketplace plans could rise by over 60% in certain states due to higher medical expenses and market adjustments. Notably, a staggering 92% of policyholders may face a potential increase in their out-of-pocket premiums by more than 75%, reflecting the compounded effect of expiring subsidies and aggressive rate hikes from leading insurers. This perfect storm may lead to many consumers being priced out of essential healthcare coverage, forcing a reevaluation of their insurance options as financial pressures mount. Click here to learn more
What Is It?
There are numerous issues associated with IRS audits. As a Conagra Brands employee, you should know your chances of being audited, the different types of audits, strategies for handling audits, your rights with respect to an audit, and how to appeal audit decisions.
Your Chances of an IRS Audit
Typically, only a small percentage of individual income tax returns are audited. Audit rates can vary from year to year, however, owing to several factors, including staffing levels at the IRS. How is a return selected for exam? Often, it's a case of simple computer scoring. When your Conagra Brands federal income tax return is processed, a computer program called the Discriminant Inventory Function (DIF) system assigns a 'DIF' score.
The higher the 'DIF' score, the greater the potential--in the computer program's estimation--that an audit will result in the collection of additional taxes. Your return as a Conagra Brands employee may also be selected. The reasoning behind this is there appears to be a discrepancy with information reported from third parties (e.g., Forms 1099 and W-2), because of one or more specific items reported on your return, or because of any information available that may indicate your return is not completely accurate (e.g., public records, newspaper articles).
As a Conagra Brands employee, it is worthy to note that while there's no way to know exactly what will trigger an audit in a given year, past years have seen an apparent focus on self-employed individuals (especially those running cash-centric businesses), those claiming home office deductions, and those with itemized deductions exceeding the average for individuals with similar income levels. In addition, high-income taxpayers have historically seen a higher degree of examined returns. As a Conagra Brands employee, it may be important to note that you are least likely to have your return audited if you don't itemize deductions, and all or most of your income is subject to withholding.
Types of Audits
There are three basic types of audits that you should recognize as a Conagra Brands employee: correspondence audits, office audits, and field audits. In a correspondence audit, you mail your records to the IRS. In an office audit, you bring in your records to the IRS for examination. In a field audit, the examination takes place at your office or your representative's office. The IRS decides the time and type of audit, with the requirement that the arrangement be reasonable under the circumstances.
What Tips Should You Bear In Mind When Dealing With The IRS?
There are a number of tips you should keep in mind when dealing with the IRS. In particular, you should know your rights as a Conagra Brands employee regarding IRS audits.
Know Your Rights
With the exception of criminal investigations, as a Conagra Brands employee you have the right to an explanation of the audit process and your basic rights at or before the time of your initial in-person meeting with the agent. Your other rights during the audit process include the following:
- The right to representation by an attorney, a CPA, or an enrolled agent
- The right, with advance notice, to tape-record meetings with the IRS agent
- The right to claim additional deductions you didn't originally claim on your return
According to IRS Publication 556, Examination of Returns, Appeal Rights, and Claims for Refunds, the IRS attempts to avoid repeat examinations of the same items, but sometimes this happens. For Conagra Brands employees, if your return was examined for the same items in either of the two previous years and no change was proposed to your tax liability, you should contact the IRS to request that the examination be discontinued.
Keep Good Records
As a Conagra Brands employee, you should keep records of all income (including nontaxable income, gifts, and savings). Likewise, you should keep detailed records regarding expenses and deductions.
Limit Direct Contact with IRS Personnel
Keep direct contact with IRS personnel to a minimum. As a Conagra Brands employee, the less contact you have, the less opportunity an IRS examiner will have to raise unexpected questions. Also, limited direct contact may help to keep the audit focused on the specified issues.
Tip: If you have specific questions or are having difficulty understanding the audit process, consider consulting a tax professional before contacting the IRS examiner. This way, you may be able to avoid the possibility of opening up new issues for audit.
Avoid Particular Mistakes in Your Dealings with the IRS
The following are mistakes you should avoid as a Conagra Brands employee dealing with the IRS:
- Ignoring correspondence from the IRS, or not adhering to instructions and deadlines
- Proceeding before understanding your rights or obtaining representation
- Coming to an audit appointment without records or requested documentation
- Projecting a negative attitude toward the IRS
- Neglecting current tax obligations (e.g., not filing a current year tax return while dealing with an audit of a prior year tax return)
- Signing any documentation without fully understanding it, or having it reviewed by a professional
- Omitting your Social Security number on documents and correspondence
What Are Some Practical Strategies for Handling IRS Audits?
Consider doing the following in connection with an audit of your return:
- Before your initial interview with the IRS agent, retain and meet with a tax professional to discuss strategies and expected audit results.
- Volunteer little or no information to the IRS agent. Simply have your representative respond to the agent's questions.
- Keep detailed records of the materials you submit to the agent, the questions asked by the agent, and the times of these activities.
- Know when it is time to conclude the audit and move the case to the next level. Avoid wasting time by submitting additional information after the agent has made a decision.
- Avoid agreeing to extend the statute of limitations unless you expect a favorable audit report. Extending the statute of limitations gives the IRS agent more time to examine your return and possibly discover more potential problems.
- Settle the audit at the lowest level possible. This way, you save expense and avoid the likelihood of other issues being raised.
- Be thoroughly prepared. Agents generally don't waste time conducting an in-depth audit if they see early on that a taxpayer's records clearly substantiate the items claimed on the return.
Featured Video
Articles you may find interesting:
- Corporate Employees: 8 Factors When Choosing a Mutual Fund
- Use of Escrow Accounts: Divorce
- Medicare Open Enrollment for Corporate Employees: Cost Changes in 2024!
- Stages of Retirement for Corporate Employees
- 7 Things to Consider Before Leaving Your Company
- How Are Workers Impacted by Inflation & Rising Interest Rates?
- Lump-Sum vs Annuity and Rising Interest Rates
- Internal Revenue Code Section 409A (Governing Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans)
- Corporate Employees: Do NOT Believe These 6 Retirement Myths!
- 401K, Social Security, Pension – How to Maximize Your Options
- Have You Looked at Your 401(k) Plan Recently?
- 11 Questions You Should Ask Yourself When Planning for Retirement
- Worst Month of Layoffs In Over a Year!
- Corporate Employees: 8 Factors When Choosing a Mutual Fund
- Use of Escrow Accounts: Divorce
- Medicare Open Enrollment for Corporate Employees: Cost Changes in 2024!
- Stages of Retirement for Corporate Employees
- 7 Things to Consider Before Leaving Your Company
- How Are Workers Impacted by Inflation & Rising Interest Rates?
- Lump-Sum vs Annuity and Rising Interest Rates
- Internal Revenue Code Section 409A (Governing Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans)
- Corporate Employees: Do NOT Believe These 6 Retirement Myths!
- 401K, Social Security, Pension – How to Maximize Your Options
- Have You Looked at Your 401(k) Plan Recently?
- 11 Questions You Should Ask Yourself When Planning for Retirement
- Worst Month of Layoffs In Over a Year!
Be Clear on Proposed Changes
As a Conagra Brands employee you should also understand why an IRS agent proposes to disallow an item on a return, to increase an income item, or to make other adjustments. It is imperative to never accept an agent's word on what constitutes the law. Agents aren't experts on all aspects of the tax law. If you are a Conagra Brands employee, you may want to consider seeking another opinion on the law from an attorney or other tax professional.
Negotiations
For Conagra Brands employees, although you can't officially 'bargain' with an IRS agent, unofficial negotiation happens all the time. For example, if there are several items involved in your discussion with an IRS agent, and you are more confident in your position on some items than others, there's room for discussion.
Be Careful About Signing the Examiner's Report
When you sign the examiner's report, you are agreeing that you owe the specified tax. You can't appeal the report within the IRS and can't file a petition in the Tax Court. If the audit is completed and the agent proposes to disallow items to which you feel entitled, don't sign the report.
Tip: If you are uncertain about whether to sign, consider consulting a tax professional before deciding.
Waiving the Statute of Limitations
An IRS auditor may ask you to waive the statute of limitations to allow more time to examine the case. If you refuse to sign the waiver, the examiner will generally disallow all the items he or she wanted to audit and issue a Notice of Deficiency. This Notice of Deficiency requires you to file a petition with the Tax Court within 90 days to avoid having to pay the tax until the Court considers the merits of the case.
Tip: It may be to your advantage not to sign the waiver if there are items on the return that you would rather the agent not probe into during an audit. In the Tax Court, you will still have to substantiate your treatment of the items in question, but you generally won't face the kind of probing that can open up examination on other items.
Tip: You also have the option of asking for a restricted waiver, which extends the limitations period for only a particular item on the return.
Unagreed Issues
Conagra Brands employees must also account for how unagreed issues have long processing times because they go through an internal IRS review process. There is often considerable delay before an agent's report, including unagreed items, is issued. If the IRS appeals officer feels that an issue may not have been treated properly, the case may be returned to the agent, causing further delays. If you need an immediate audit report before completion of the review process, you can request it from the agent or the group manager at the completion of the audit.
How Do You Appeal an Audit's Findings Within the IRS or In Court?
As a Conagra Brands employee, you can appeal the findings of an audit through the IRS appeals office. If you can't resolve the matter there, you can take it to court.
IRS Appeals Office Level
Assuming that you don't agree with an examiner's proposed changes, and don't sign an agreement form, you'll receive a package from the IRS that includes a copy of the examination report, an agreement or waiver form, a copy of IRS Publication 5, and a letter ('30-day letter') notifying you of your right to appeal the proposed changed within 30 days. You have 30 days from the date of this letter to appeal the proposed changes. To file an appeal, you have to follow the instructions in the letter (be sure to follow the instructions carefully, and act within the 30-day period).
The IRS Appeals Office that will hear your appeal is separate from the Examination Division that proposed the changes on your return. Appeals conferences can be done in person, over the phone, or through correspondence. You and your representative should be prepared to discuss all issues in dispute at the appeals conference.
Appealing In Court
If you don't respond to the 30-day letter sent to you after an audit, or if you do not agree with the findings of the Appeals Officer, you'll receive a notice of deficiency from the IRS (referred to as a '90-day letter'). As a Conagra Brands employee you have 90 days from the date of this letter to file a petition with the U.S. Tax court.
Caution: If the 90-day letter is addressed to you outside of the United states, you generally have 150 days to file a petition with the U.S. Tax court.
Caution: You cannot petition the U.S. Tax court before receiving a notice of deficiency from the IRS.
The advantage of appealing through the U.S. Tax Court is that, provided you file your petition on a timely basis, you don't have to pay the proposed tax first.
Tip: If you have a net worth of $2 million or less, meet certain other conditions, and prevail in Tax Court against the United States, you may be awarded litigation costs.
To file suit in U.S. District court or the Court of Federal claims, you must first pay the tax that results from the audit, and then file a claim for a credit or refund with the IRS. When your claim is totally or partially disallowed by the IRS, you'll receive a notice of claim disallowance. At this point, you can file suit. Additional information can be found in IRS Publication 556, Examination of Returns, Appeal Rights, and Claims for Refund.
How does Conagra Brands, Inc. ensure that employees understand their retirement benefits, particularly the nuances of the Conagra Foods Inc. Pension Plan and the historical obligations from the Beatrice Retirement Income Plan (BRIP)? Are there specific communication strategies or resources provided to employees to navigate their eligibility and benefits?
Conagra Brands has not provided consistent documentation of the Beatrice Retirement Income Plan (BRIP), as evidenced by a lost BRIP Plan document, which has created confusion among former Beatrice employees. Conagra relies on internal committees like the Conagra Brands Employee Benefits Administrative Committee to oversee the administration of the Conagra Foods Inc. Pension Plan and the historical obligations from BRIP. However, there are allegations in the class action that Conagra has failed to communicate certain benefit entitlements, particularly the age at which unreduced benefits should commence(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).
In light of regulatory compliance, what measures does Conagra Brands, Inc. take to maintain the integrity and security of pension plan documents, especially considering the historical loss of the BRIP Plan document? How do the missing documents impact employee knowledge of their benefits?
The loss of the BRIP Plan document represents a significant failure in document retention and regulatory compliance. Under ERISA, Conagra is required to maintain and distribute these documents upon request. The missing BRIP documents have caused discrepancies in the administration of retirement benefits, particularly regarding the age of eligibility for unreduced benefits. Conagra has been criticized for not informing employees that these documents were lost, leading to confusion and underpayment of benefits(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).
What resources does Conagra Brands, Inc. offer to its employees who have questions about their pension benefits or discrepancies that may arise from the transition from the Beatrice Retirement Income Plan to the Conagra Foods Inc. Pension Plan? How can employees best utilize these resources?
Conagra directs employees to contact the Plan service center for inquiries related to their pension benefits. However, based on the complaints filed in court, there have been issues with transparency and the accessibility of important plan documents, including the BRIP. Employees have had to appeal their benefit decisions and deal with insufficient guidance on navigating the discrepancies between the old BRIP and the Conagra Plan. Resources like benefit calculators and service centers have sometimes provided inaccurate or incomplete information(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).
How does Conagra Brands, Inc. handle the potential discrepancies regarding the pension benefits related to the age eligibility for receiving unreduced benefits in the context of both the Conagra Plan and the Beatrice plan? What steps have been taken to prevent similar issues in the future?
Conagra has been handling discrepancies poorly, particularly around the age at which participants in the BRIP are entitled to receive unreduced benefits. The company's adjustment of the eligibility age from 60 to 65 without properly consulting or notifying employees has led to underpayment of benefits. The ongoing class action lawsuit seeks to address these discrepancies and prevent future issues by clarifying benefit entitlements under the terms of both plans(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).
Can you elaborate on the process that Conagra Brands, Inc. utilizes to communicate with employees about plan amendments and to clarify their rights under the Conagra Foods Inc. Pension Plan? What specific improvements have been made to this communication strategy in recent years?
The communication process regarding plan amendments at Conagra has been criticized as insufficient, particularly concerning the transition from the BRIP to the Conagra Plan. Employees have filed complaints about not receiving adequate notice of important changes, such as the shift in eligibility age for unreduced benefits. Conagra has failed to provide clear documentation, leading to confusion among employees. There is no evidence of significant improvements in recent years(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).
How does Conagra Brands, Inc. ensure compliance with the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), especially regarding the fiduciary duties of the Conagra Brands Employee Benefits Administrative Committee? What protocols are in place to guarantee that employees’ rights are consistently protected?
Conagra's compliance with ERISA has been challenged in court, with allegations of fiduciary breaches related to the loss of critical plan documents like the BRIP. The Conagra Brands Employee Benefits Administrative Committee is responsible for maintaining the integrity of the pension plan, but the loss of documents and failure to notify employees of their rights raise questions about the adequacy of these protocols. The lawsuit highlights a need for improved oversight and adherence to ERISA's fiduciary requirements(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).
What options are currently available for former Beatrice employees and other participants in the Conagra Foods Inc. Pension Plan to claim benefits they believe they are entitled to? How does Conagra Brands, Inc. facilitate this process?
Former Beatrice employees can contact the Pension Service Center to inquire about their benefits and initiate claims. However, the process has been complicated by missing documentation and conflicting information about eligibility. Some employees have been forced to file legal claims to recover benefits owed to them, as in the case of the ongoing class action lawsuit. The lack of clear and accessible resources has made it difficult for employees to navigate the process effectively(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).
In what ways does Conagra Brands, Inc. provide support or guidance for employees approaching retirement, particularly in understanding the timelines and responsibilities associated with electing benefits from the Conagra Foods Inc. Pension Plan?
Conagra provides online calculators and service center assistance for employees approaching retirement, but these tools have proven unreliable for some participants. Employees have reported being unable to calculate their benefits accurately or being told they were ineligible for benefits before age 65, despite the terms of the BRIP allowing benefits to begin at age 60. The class action complaint highlights deficiencies in the guidance provided to employees regarding their benefits(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).
How can employees at Conagra Brands, Inc. contact the Employee Benefits Administrative Committee for inquiries related to their benefits? What are the most efficient avenues for addressing concerns about the Conagra Foods Inc. Pension Plan or the transitions from the Beatrice plan?
Employees can contact the Plan service center for inquiries related to their benefits, but accessing the Employee Benefits Administrative Committee directly appears to be more challenging. The lawsuit indicates that employees seeking to address discrepancies with their benefits have not received timely or effective communication from the committee, often requiring legal action to resolve their concerns(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).
How does Conagra Brands, Inc. evaluate its pension plan's performance and benefits offerings in relation to industry standards? What methods are used to ensure the company remains competitive while protecting employee benefits under the Conagra Foods Inc. Pension Plan?
There is little publicly available information regarding how Conagra evaluates its pension plan's performance against industry standards. The company's handling of historical pension obligations, particularly from the Beatrice acquisition, suggests that its methods for protecting employee benefits have been insufficient. Ongoing litigation regarding underpayment of benefits and loss of critical documents indicates that the company may need to improve its evaluation methods and compliance efforts to remain competitive(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).