Healthcare Provider Update: Healthcare Provider for Conagra Brands: For Conagra Brands, the healthcare provider information is typically linked to their employment benefits and can vary based on the location and specific plans offered to employees. Generally, large companies like Conagra may partner with major insurers such as UnitedHealthcare, Anthem (Elevance Health), or Aetna to provide health insurance benefits to their employees. It is advisable for Enrolled members to refer to their HR department or employee benefit documentation for specific provider details. Potential Healthcare Cost Increases in 2026: As we look ahead to 2026, significant increases in healthcare costs are anticipated, largely influenced by the expiration of enhanced federal subsidies under the Affordable Care Act (ACA). Reports indicate that premium rates for ACA marketplace plans could rise by over 60% in certain states due to higher medical expenses and market adjustments. Notably, a staggering 92% of policyholders may face a potential increase in their out-of-pocket premiums by more than 75%, reflecting the compounded effect of expiring subsidies and aggressive rate hikes from leading insurers. This perfect storm may lead to many consumers being priced out of essential healthcare coverage, forcing a reevaluation of their insurance options as financial pressures mount. Click here to learn more
What Is It?
A tenancy by the entirety is a way spouses can own property together. As a Conagra Brands employee, if you are the co-owner of property owned as a tenancy by the entirety (you are a tenant by the entirety), that property passes automatically at your death to your surviving spouse without the expense and delay of probate.
Example(s): Jack and Sylvia own a cabin on a hill as tenants by the entirety. When Jack dies, Sylvia automatically owns the cabin.
You can own most types of property with your spouse as tenants by the entirety. Real estate is the most common type of property to own as tenants by the entirety, but you can own other property (such as bank accounts, securities, and vehicles) in this way. A tenancy by the entirety is almost identical to a joint tenancy, but is available only to married couples.
When Can It Be Used?
You Are Married and Want to Make Your Spouse Co-Owner
Only a married couple can own property as tenants by the entirety.
Your State Permits Tenancy by the Entirety
Not all states permit a tenancy by the entirety.
The Property You Want to Transfer Can Be Owned As Tenants by the Entirety
Some states restrict the types of property that can be held as a tenancy by the entirety. Other types of property, such as an IRA, can't be owned as a tenancy by the entirety.
Strengths
Avoids the Expense and Delay of Probate
Probate can be expensive, and generally the largest expense is the attorney's fees, especially if they are calculated as a percentage of the gross probate estate. For employees in Conagra Brands companies who are strongly invested in real estate, owning your property as a tenancy by the entirety could be beneficial as it enables the possibility of avoiding probate and payment of costly attorney's fees.
Caution: In reality, it is practically impossible to avoid probate. Generally, some level of probate proceeding will be necessary to settle your estate.
Tip: Negotiating an hourly rate or flat fee may result in more reasonable attorney's fees.
The person responsible for managing your estate during the probate process (your personal representative) is entitled to a fee for these services, although a friend or relative serving as a personal representative may agree to serve without a fee.
Prevents Additional Probate Proceedings for Property Owned In Other States
Property that you own in another state must go through a separate ancillary probate in that state unless it can be excluded from probate, for example, by owning it as a tenancy by the entirety.
Example(s): If you own a home in Massachusetts, a cabin in New Hampshire, and a time-share condominium in Colorado, your estate will be probated in all three states. Although each state will probate only the property located in that state, each probate proceeding significantly increases the expense and delay of the entire process.
Minimizes Delays in the Transfer of Property
Probate takes an average of 12 months and may last for several years. All of the probate property generally won't be distributed until the process is completed. However, owning property as a tenancy by the entirety allows for an automatic transfer of that property at your death.
Probate can also interfere with the management of property such as a closely held business or stock portfolio. Although your personal representative is responsible for managing the property until probate is complete, he or she may not have the expertise or authority to make significant management and/or financial decisions. Owning the property as a tenancy by the entirety will result in an automatic transfer of the property and possibly a smoother management transition.
Discourages Interference with Your Plans to Distribute Your Property
Although it seems that anybody can bring a lawsuit, a will is generally much easier to challenge than a transfer of property by tenancy by the entirety.
Is Relatively Simple and Inexpensive to Create
In most instances, taking title to property as tenants by the entirety is not complicated. Many couples purchasing a home will take title as tenants by the entirety without any planning. Generally, you will not need to involve an attorney in creating a tenancy by the entirety. When purchasing a home, however, there are often other good reasons for involving an attorney.
Caution: Since your state may require you to use specific, unambiguous language when creating a tenancy by the entirety, it might be wise to consult an attorney to confirm that you have actually created a tenancy by the entirety.
Has Intangible and Emotional Benefits
Couples will often decide to own property as tenants by the entirety because it conforms to their feelings of partnership, faith, and unity. Planning to transfer the family home automatically to the surviving spouse may create a sense of well-being.
Caution: Your family may not actually be able to keep the home if you have not provided for future payments on it.
May Shield Property from the Creditors of the Tenants by the Entirety
In some states, one spouse's creditors cannot attach property held as a tenancy by the entirety. However, assets held as a tenancy by the entirety are protected only as long as both spouses are living and the marriage is not dissolved. This could have drastic consequences if, say, one spouse is sued and the other spouse dies shortly thereafter.
All property owned as tenants by the entirety is immediately exposed to the surviving spouse's current and potential creditors. Further, assets held as a tenancy by the entirety are not protected against joint debts. While titling property as a tenancy by the entirety may be an inexpensive and easy way to protect marital assets, it may not provide secure asset protection over the long term.
May Result In Lower Capital Gains Tax
Your surviving spouse may be subject to less capital gains tax when he or she sells the property than if you had given him or her the property during your life. In general, you are subject to capital gains taxes on the difference between what you 'paid' for property and what you receive when you sell it. For Conagra Brands employees who have high exposure in the real estate market, this benefit is of particular interest as it diminishes taxes paid in transfer or sale of property. Furthermore, after your death, your surviving spouse will be treated as having 'paid' whatever your interest in the property was worth at your death.
Example(s): Years ago, Dylan and Barbara (husband and wife) bought rental property for $10,000, and owned it as tenants by the entirety. Dylan died when it was worth $100,000. Fifty percent of the property's value was included in Dylan's gross taxable estate. Barbara's tax basis in the property after Dylan's death is $55,000 — one-half of the original purchase price ($5,000) and the amount Dylan's one-half interest was worth at his death ($50,000). If Barbara sells the property for $100,000, she will have a capital gain of $45,000. If Barbara had owned the property outright, her capital gain would be $90,000. However, if Dylan had owned the property outright and left it to Barbara at his death, her basis would be $100,000 and she would have no capital gain. Note that the first $250,000 of capital gain on the sale of a principal residence is generally excluded from capital gains tax. (The excludable amount for a married couple is $500,000.)
Featured Video
Articles you may find interesting:
- Corporate Employees: 8 Factors When Choosing a Mutual Fund
- Use of Escrow Accounts: Divorce
- Medicare Open Enrollment for Corporate Employees: Cost Changes in 2024!
- Stages of Retirement for Corporate Employees
- 7 Things to Consider Before Leaving Your Company
- How Are Workers Impacted by Inflation & Rising Interest Rates?
- Lump-Sum vs Annuity and Rising Interest Rates
- Internal Revenue Code Section 409A (Governing Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans)
- Corporate Employees: Do NOT Believe These 6 Retirement Myths!
- 401K, Social Security, Pension – How to Maximize Your Options
- Have You Looked at Your 401(k) Plan Recently?
- 11 Questions You Should Ask Yourself When Planning for Retirement
- Worst Month of Layoffs In Over a Year!
- Corporate Employees: 8 Factors When Choosing a Mutual Fund
- Use of Escrow Accounts: Divorce
- Medicare Open Enrollment for Corporate Employees: Cost Changes in 2024!
- Stages of Retirement for Corporate Employees
- 7 Things to Consider Before Leaving Your Company
- How Are Workers Impacted by Inflation & Rising Interest Rates?
- Lump-Sum vs Annuity and Rising Interest Rates
- Internal Revenue Code Section 409A (Governing Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans)
- Corporate Employees: Do NOT Believe These 6 Retirement Myths!
- 401K, Social Security, Pension – How to Maximize Your Options
- Have You Looked at Your 401(k) Plan Recently?
- 11 Questions You Should Ask Yourself When Planning for Retirement
- Worst Month of Layoffs In Over a Year!
|
Dylan and Barbara Own as Tenants by the Entirety |
Dylan Owns Outright |
||
|
Dylan dies first |
Barbara dies first |
Dylan dies first |
Barbara dies first |
Sale Price |
$100,000 |
$100,000 |
$100,000 |
$100,000 |
Tax Basis |
-$55,000 |
-$55,000 |
-$100,000 |
-$10,000 |
Capital Gain |
$45,000 |
$45,000 |
$0 |
$90,000 |
Technical Note: This increase in what your co-tenant by the entirety is considered to have 'paid' for the property is called a step-up in basis.
Tradeoffs
It Is an Irrevocable Gift of Interest in the Property
Once you make your spouse a tenant by the entirety, he or she is a co-owner of that property for the rest of his or her life unless there is a divorce, an annulment, or an agreement to partition. If you die owning property in a tenancy by the entirety, your spouse will own the property outright and can do what he or she wants with it.
It May Not Be Appropriate If You Have a Large Estate
If you are married and own more than the federal estate tax applicable exclusion amount ($11,580,000 in 2020, $23,160,000 per married couple) in property as a couple, there may be a significant tax advantage in leaving some property to someone other than your spouse. If you make your spouse your joint tenant, you may be unable to take advantage of this strategy for that property. The availability of portability (the estate of a deceased spouse can transfer any unused exclusion to the surviving spouse) in 2011 and later years may make planning easier.
Caution: If your estate is this large and you are considering owning property in joint tenancy, you should meet with an attorney or tax professional regarding options to minimize potential federal and/or state estate taxes.
It May Not Protect Your Spouse from Your Creditors
The probate process requires that all claims against the estate be presented within months of your death, preventing delayed claims against your estate and beneficiaries.
Technical Note: The statute of limitations is a rule that prevents lawsuits that haven't been brought quickly enough. Someone can sue you (or your estate) until the statute of limitations for that claim has expired.
Example(s): If the statute of limitations for a breach of contract lawsuit is seven years, the Record Club has seven years to sue you for failing to buy that seventh cassette. However, if your property passes through probate, that property is immune from claims by your creditors, regardless of whether the claim is barred by the statute of limitations.
Your Interest In Property Held As a Tenancy By the Entirety Is Guaranteed to Go to Your Spouse If You Die First
You cannot leave your interest in property held as a tenancy by the entirety to anyone in your will. Your interest passes automatically to your surviving spouse.
You Cannot Control How the Property Will Be Used After Your Death
The surviving spouse has complete control over the property, which could result in an accidental disinheritance.
Example(s): Louis and Sally own a house as tenants by the entirety. Louis dies and Sally, as the surviving spouse, owns the house outright. Sally marries Sylvester and they own the house as tenants by the entirety. Sally dies, and Sylvester becomes the sole owner. Louis and Sally's daughter, Patty, receives nothing, which Louis never intended.
It Does Not Give Your Spouse the Legal Right to Manage or Dispose of the Property If You Become Incompetent
If you become incompetent, the fact that you own property in a tenancy by the entirety doesn't automatically allow your spouse to exercise control over the property, even on your behalf.
Example(s): If a couple owns a house as tenants by the entirety and the husband becomes incompetent, his wife does not have the right to sell or mortgage the property to pay for his care. She will need to have a guardian appointed, unless she has his durable power of attorney, a document giving her the legal right to act on his behalf.
It May Create Problems for Business Owners Seeking To Take Advantage of Certain Estate Planning Strategies
A business owner can take advantage of certain estate planning strategies (such as Section 303 death tax redemptions, Section 2032A special use valuations, and Section 6166 deferral of estate taxes) if his or her interest in the business represents a large enough percentage of his or her total estate. However, if the business interest is owned as a tenancy by the entirety, only half of the business will be included in the estate for estate tax purposes and he or she may not pass the ownership test. Therefore, if you anticipate using one of these techniques, tenancy by the entirety might be disadvantageous.
How to Do It
Evaluate the Desirability of the Strategy
Because taking title to property as tenants by the entirety is simple and inexpensive, it is a very common way for Conagra Brands employees to own property. You may be unduly biased in favor of forming a tenancy by the entirety. However, you might be better served by another planning strategy. You should compare the strengths and tradeoffs of a tenancy by the entirety with those of alternative strategies.
Confirm That Tenancy by the Entirety Doesn't Interfere With Other Estate Planning Strategies
Property held as a tenancy by the entirety may interfere with other strategies you may have implemented, such as a credit shelter trust or living trust. You should determine how your property will be distributed at your death under your present estate plan to ensure that unintended consequences do not arise.
Tax Considerations
Income Tax
Your Surviving Spouse May Receive a Stepped-Up Basis in Your Interest in the Property
Half of the property's fair market value may be includable in your estate for estate tax purposes, but your surviving spouse may receive a stepped-up basis in that interest.
Example(s): Years ago, Dick and Judith (husband and wife) bought their house for $10,000, and held it as tenants by the entirety. Dick died when the property was worth $100,000. Because they owned the house as tenants by the entirety, 50 percent of the value of the property was subject to Dick's estate taxes. Judith's basis in the property is now $55,000 — Dick's 50 percent interest that has been stepped-up and her $5,000 basis (one-half of the purchase price). If Judith sells the house for $100,000, she will have a capital gain of $45,000 ($100,000 minus the $55,000 basis). If Judith had owned the house outright, her capital gain would be $90,000. However, if Dick had owned the house outright and left it to Judith at his death, her basis would be $100,000 and she would have had no capital gain ($100,000 sale price minus $100,000 basis). (Note that for an individual the first $250,000 of capital gain from the sale of a principal residence is generally excluded from capital gains taxes. The exclusion currently is $500,000 for a married couple's gain from such a sale.)
Tip: If you were sure which spouse would die first, you could transfer the property to that spouse. If the deceased spouse then left the property to the surviving spouse, the surviving spouse may receive a 100 percent step-up in basis. This would not apply, though, if the spouse receiving the gift died within one year of the gift. The problem is that you can't be absolutely sure and, if you are wrong, the surviving spouse receives no step-up in basis.
Questions & Answers
Why Isn't Property Held As a Tenancy By the Entirety Subject to Probate?
If you own property as a tenancy by the entirety and you die, your interest in the property is automatically transferred to your surviving spouse. The probate court doesn't become involved with property that passes to others at your death because of the form of ownership ('title').
How does Conagra Brands, Inc. ensure that employees understand their retirement benefits, particularly the nuances of the Conagra Foods Inc. Pension Plan and the historical obligations from the Beatrice Retirement Income Plan (BRIP)? Are there specific communication strategies or resources provided to employees to navigate their eligibility and benefits?
Conagra Brands has not provided consistent documentation of the Beatrice Retirement Income Plan (BRIP), as evidenced by a lost BRIP Plan document, which has created confusion among former Beatrice employees. Conagra relies on internal committees like the Conagra Brands Employee Benefits Administrative Committee to oversee the administration of the Conagra Foods Inc. Pension Plan and the historical obligations from BRIP. However, there are allegations in the class action that Conagra has failed to communicate certain benefit entitlements, particularly the age at which unreduced benefits should commence(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).
In light of regulatory compliance, what measures does Conagra Brands, Inc. take to maintain the integrity and security of pension plan documents, especially considering the historical loss of the BRIP Plan document? How do the missing documents impact employee knowledge of their benefits?
The loss of the BRIP Plan document represents a significant failure in document retention and regulatory compliance. Under ERISA, Conagra is required to maintain and distribute these documents upon request. The missing BRIP documents have caused discrepancies in the administration of retirement benefits, particularly regarding the age of eligibility for unreduced benefits. Conagra has been criticized for not informing employees that these documents were lost, leading to confusion and underpayment of benefits(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).
What resources does Conagra Brands, Inc. offer to its employees who have questions about their pension benefits or discrepancies that may arise from the transition from the Beatrice Retirement Income Plan to the Conagra Foods Inc. Pension Plan? How can employees best utilize these resources?
Conagra directs employees to contact the Plan service center for inquiries related to their pension benefits. However, based on the complaints filed in court, there have been issues with transparency and the accessibility of important plan documents, including the BRIP. Employees have had to appeal their benefit decisions and deal with insufficient guidance on navigating the discrepancies between the old BRIP and the Conagra Plan. Resources like benefit calculators and service centers have sometimes provided inaccurate or incomplete information(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).
How does Conagra Brands, Inc. handle the potential discrepancies regarding the pension benefits related to the age eligibility for receiving unreduced benefits in the context of both the Conagra Plan and the Beatrice plan? What steps have been taken to prevent similar issues in the future?
Conagra has been handling discrepancies poorly, particularly around the age at which participants in the BRIP are entitled to receive unreduced benefits. The company's adjustment of the eligibility age from 60 to 65 without properly consulting or notifying employees has led to underpayment of benefits. The ongoing class action lawsuit seeks to address these discrepancies and prevent future issues by clarifying benefit entitlements under the terms of both plans(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).
Can you elaborate on the process that Conagra Brands, Inc. utilizes to communicate with employees about plan amendments and to clarify their rights under the Conagra Foods Inc. Pension Plan? What specific improvements have been made to this communication strategy in recent years?
The communication process regarding plan amendments at Conagra has been criticized as insufficient, particularly concerning the transition from the BRIP to the Conagra Plan. Employees have filed complaints about not receiving adequate notice of important changes, such as the shift in eligibility age for unreduced benefits. Conagra has failed to provide clear documentation, leading to confusion among employees. There is no evidence of significant improvements in recent years(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).
How does Conagra Brands, Inc. ensure compliance with the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), especially regarding the fiduciary duties of the Conagra Brands Employee Benefits Administrative Committee? What protocols are in place to guarantee that employees’ rights are consistently protected?
Conagra's compliance with ERISA has been challenged in court, with allegations of fiduciary breaches related to the loss of critical plan documents like the BRIP. The Conagra Brands Employee Benefits Administrative Committee is responsible for maintaining the integrity of the pension plan, but the loss of documents and failure to notify employees of their rights raise questions about the adequacy of these protocols. The lawsuit highlights a need for improved oversight and adherence to ERISA's fiduciary requirements(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).
What options are currently available for former Beatrice employees and other participants in the Conagra Foods Inc. Pension Plan to claim benefits they believe they are entitled to? How does Conagra Brands, Inc. facilitate this process?
Former Beatrice employees can contact the Pension Service Center to inquire about their benefits and initiate claims. However, the process has been complicated by missing documentation and conflicting information about eligibility. Some employees have been forced to file legal claims to recover benefits owed to them, as in the case of the ongoing class action lawsuit. The lack of clear and accessible resources has made it difficult for employees to navigate the process effectively(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).
In what ways does Conagra Brands, Inc. provide support or guidance for employees approaching retirement, particularly in understanding the timelines and responsibilities associated with electing benefits from the Conagra Foods Inc. Pension Plan?
Conagra provides online calculators and service center assistance for employees approaching retirement, but these tools have proven unreliable for some participants. Employees have reported being unable to calculate their benefits accurately or being told they were ineligible for benefits before age 65, despite the terms of the BRIP allowing benefits to begin at age 60. The class action complaint highlights deficiencies in the guidance provided to employees regarding their benefits(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).
How can employees at Conagra Brands, Inc. contact the Employee Benefits Administrative Committee for inquiries related to their benefits? What are the most efficient avenues for addressing concerns about the Conagra Foods Inc. Pension Plan or the transitions from the Beatrice plan?
Employees can contact the Plan service center for inquiries related to their benefits, but accessing the Employee Benefits Administrative Committee directly appears to be more challenging. The lawsuit indicates that employees seeking to address discrepancies with their benefits have not received timely or effective communication from the committee, often requiring legal action to resolve their concerns(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).
How does Conagra Brands, Inc. evaluate its pension plan's performance and benefits offerings in relation to industry standards? What methods are used to ensure the company remains competitive while protecting employee benefits under the Conagra Foods Inc. Pension Plan?
There is little publicly available information regarding how Conagra evaluates its pension plan's performance against industry standards. The company's handling of historical pension obligations, particularly from the Beatrice acquisition, suggests that its methods for protecting employee benefits have been insufficient. Ongoing litigation regarding underpayment of benefits and loss of critical documents indicates that the company may need to improve its evaluation methods and compliance efforts to remain competitive(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).