New Update: Healthcare Costs Increasing by Over 60% in Some States. Will you be impacted?

Conagra Brands Employees and the New California SALT Deduction Boost

Healthcare Provider Update: Healthcare Provider for Conagra Brands: For Conagra Brands, the healthcare provider information is typically linked to their employment benefits and can vary based on the location and specific plans offered to employees. Generally, large companies like Conagra may partner with major insurers such as UnitedHealthcare, Anthem (Elevance Health), or Aetna to provide health insurance benefits to their employees. It is advisable for Enrolled members to refer to their HR department or employee benefit documentation for specific provider details. Potential Healthcare Cost Increases in 2026: As we look ahead to 2026, significant increases in healthcare costs are anticipated, largely influenced by the expiration of enhanced federal subsidies under the Affordable Care Act (ACA). Reports indicate that premium rates for ACA marketplace plans could rise by over 60% in certain states due to higher medical expenses and market adjustments. Notably, a staggering 92% of policyholders may face a potential increase in their out-of-pocket premiums by more than 75%, reflecting the compounded effect of expiring subsidies and aggressive rate hikes from leading insurers. This perfect storm may lead to many consumers being priced out of essential healthcare coverage, forcing a reevaluation of their insurance options as financial pressures mount. Click here to learn more

'Conagra Brands employees navigating California’s high property taxes should view the new SALT deduction cap as an opportunity to revisit whether itemizing or taking the standard deduction provides the most benefit, and making that comparison now can help them plan ahead with greater clarity.' – Wesley Boudreaux, a representative of The Retirement Group, a division of Wealth Enhancement.

'Conagra Brands employees and retirees should recognize that the higher SALT deduction cap creates a chance to reevaluate household tax strategies, but the true value will depend on income thresholds, property taxes, and whether itemized deductions outweigh the standard deduction.' – Patrick Ray, a representative of The Retirement Group, a division of Wealth Enhancement.

In this article, we will discuss:

How the 2025 spending bill changes the SALT deduction cap for California homeowners.
The impact of Proposition 13, income thresholds, and itemized deductions on potential savings.
What Conagra Brands employees and retirees should consider when comparing itemized deductions versus the standard deduction.

With the passage of the 2025 One Big Beautiful Bill Act, the cap on state and local tax (SALT) deductions increased, positioning millions of taxpayers nationwide to see relief on their federal tax returns. With some of the largest state and local tax burdens in the nation, California homeowners—including many Conagra Brands employees—will be especially affected by the shift. Still, it's unclear how much Californians could save.

Before 2017, the entire amount of state and local taxes paid could be subtracted from a taxpayer's federal taxable income. With the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which set a $10,000 deduction cap, this was altered. ¹ Residents in high-tax areas like California, where taxes and property values often exceed national norms, were disproportionately impacted by the cap, creating challenges for Conagra Brands families with significant home values.

Potential Savings

Although the ceiling is not completely removed by the new 2025 legislation, it is replaced with an income-based cap that permits deductions of up to $40,000, contingent on a taxpayer's earnings. ² The change may give many homeowners a meaningful advantage, but the benefits may differ depending on income, house value, and mortgage balance, according to Kevin Won of Wealth Enhancement's California office, which frequently works with Conagra Brands employees.

The deduction power that Californians in high-tax districts lost in 2017 could now be partially restored, according to Won. 'But under the new income thresholds, people with higher incomes might still see their SALT benefit phased out.' This is particularly relevant for Conagra Brands retirees and mid-career employees navigating compensation and property costs in high-value regions.

Redfin data shows the possible savings. Instead of the $10,000 cap, the average California homeowner can now deduct about $26,000 in SALT payments. ³ This could result in a $4,000 decrease in federal taxes at a marginal tax rate of 24%. ³ However, not every taxpayer—including those in the Conagra Brands workforce—will qualify for the entire benefit.

Unequal Application

A significant factor in the outcome is California's distinct property tax structure, which was influenced by Proposition 13. Long-term homeowners frequently pay lower property taxes than new buyers because Proposition 13 restricts annual increases in property tax assessments. According to Won, 'many Californians will not see the same percentage savings as newer buyers or residents of other states because Proposition 13 keeps long-term homeowners’ property taxes artificially low,' an important distinction for Conagra Brands employees with decades of homeownership.

The extended deduction may help around three-quarters of California homeowners, according to research. ³ But the only people who are likely to see major tax reductions are those who have large itemized deductions that surpass the standard deduction threshold. For many Conagra Brands professionals, the standard deduction might still be the better choice depending on their household situation.

Won suggested, 'It's still wise to run the numbers. To find out which approach works best, compare your new itemized deductions to the standard deduction.' Conagra Brands families approaching retirement may want to evaluate both options carefully.

Understanding the Nuances

In the end, the increased SALT cap gives Californians more flexibility, but the effects will differ greatly. 'It's a positive change, especially for upper-middle-income homeowners,' Won summed up. However, the impact may be minimal for long-term property owners or retirees with lower property taxes and smaller mortgages, a scenario that may apply to Conagra Brands retirees who have owned property for decades.

There is one important change: taxpayers 65 and older may claim an extra $6,000 tax deduction for tax years 2025–2028, regardless of whether they itemize. ⁴ Phase-outs begin at $75,000 of income for single filers and $150,000 for joint filers. ⁴ Together with the increased SALT cap modification, this senior deduction may expand older homeowners' tax relief—something Conagra Brands retirees should pay particular attention to.

Find out how California homeowners will be affected by the 2025 increase in the state and local tax (SALT) deduction cap. Typical property owners might save almost $4,000 in federal taxes under the new law, which increases the threshold from $10,000 to an income-based ceiling of up to $40,000. Discover why newer owners in high-tax districts may benefit the most, as well as how eligibility is influenced by Proposition 13, mortgage amounts, and itemized versus standard deductions, which are key considerations for many Conagra Brands employees.

Featured Video

Articles you may find interesting:

California's recent SALT deduction extension is comparable to reopening a long-blocked road lane. The 2017 limits forced traffic into fewer lanes for years, which reduced mobility and caused congestion. A portion of that lost lane has been reopened by the 2025 amendments, which permit deductions of up to $40,000, potentially reducing thousands of dollars in federal taxes. Similar to the freeway's continued speed limitations and restrictions, Proposition 13, income requirements, and itemized deduction laws limit the amount of benefit that homeowners may actually receive, making it easier for some but not for others—including many in the Conagra Brands workforce.

Sources:

1. Congress.gov. ' The SALT Cap: Overview and Analysis .' 3 Apr. 2025.

2. Bipartisan Policy Center. “ SALT Deduction Changes in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act ,” by Fredrick Hernandez, 30 July 2025.

3. Redfin News. “ Homeowners in New York, California and Other Coastal States Could Shave Thousands Off Their Annual Tax Bill with SALT Cap Increase ,' by Mark Worley, Asad Khan. 18 Sept. 2025.

4. IRS. ' One, Big, Beautiful Bill provisions: Deduction for Seniors (Sec. 70103) '. 2025.

How does Conagra Brands, Inc. ensure that employees understand their retirement benefits, particularly the nuances of the Conagra Foods Inc. Pension Plan and the historical obligations from the Beatrice Retirement Income Plan (BRIP)? Are there specific communication strategies or resources provided to employees to navigate their eligibility and benefits?

Conagra Brands has not provided consistent documentation of the Beatrice Retirement Income Plan (BRIP), as evidenced by a lost BRIP Plan document, which has created confusion among former Beatrice employees. Conagra relies on internal committees like the Conagra Brands Employee Benefits Administrative Committee to oversee the administration of the Conagra Foods Inc. Pension Plan and the historical obligations from BRIP. However, there are allegations in the class action that Conagra has failed to communicate certain benefit entitlements, particularly the age at which unreduced benefits should commence(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).

In light of regulatory compliance, what measures does Conagra Brands, Inc. take to maintain the integrity and security of pension plan documents, especially considering the historical loss of the BRIP Plan document? How do the missing documents impact employee knowledge of their benefits?

The loss of the BRIP Plan document represents a significant failure in document retention and regulatory compliance. Under ERISA, Conagra is required to maintain and distribute these documents upon request. The missing BRIP documents have caused discrepancies in the administration of retirement benefits, particularly regarding the age of eligibility for unreduced benefits. Conagra has been criticized for not informing employees that these documents were lost, leading to confusion and underpayment of benefits(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).

What resources does Conagra Brands, Inc. offer to its employees who have questions about their pension benefits or discrepancies that may arise from the transition from the Beatrice Retirement Income Plan to the Conagra Foods Inc. Pension Plan? How can employees best utilize these resources?

Conagra directs employees to contact the Plan service center for inquiries related to their pension benefits. However, based on the complaints filed in court, there have been issues with transparency and the accessibility of important plan documents, including the BRIP. Employees have had to appeal their benefit decisions and deal with insufficient guidance on navigating the discrepancies between the old BRIP and the Conagra Plan. Resources like benefit calculators and service centers have sometimes provided inaccurate or incomplete information(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).

How does Conagra Brands, Inc. handle the potential discrepancies regarding the pension benefits related to the age eligibility for receiving unreduced benefits in the context of both the Conagra Plan and the Beatrice plan? What steps have been taken to prevent similar issues in the future?

Conagra has been handling discrepancies poorly, particularly around the age at which participants in the BRIP are entitled to receive unreduced benefits. The company's adjustment of the eligibility age from 60 to 65 without properly consulting or notifying employees has led to underpayment of benefits. The ongoing class action lawsuit seeks to address these discrepancies and prevent future issues by clarifying benefit entitlements under the terms of both plans(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).

Can you elaborate on the process that Conagra Brands, Inc. utilizes to communicate with employees about plan amendments and to clarify their rights under the Conagra Foods Inc. Pension Plan? What specific improvements have been made to this communication strategy in recent years?

The communication process regarding plan amendments at Conagra has been criticized as insufficient, particularly concerning the transition from the BRIP to the Conagra Plan. Employees have filed complaints about not receiving adequate notice of important changes, such as the shift in eligibility age for unreduced benefits. Conagra has failed to provide clear documentation, leading to confusion among employees. There is no evidence of significant improvements in recent years(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).

How does Conagra Brands, Inc. ensure compliance with the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), especially regarding the fiduciary duties of the Conagra Brands Employee Benefits Administrative Committee? What protocols are in place to guarantee that employeesâ€™ rights are consistently protected?

Conagra's compliance with ERISA has been challenged in court, with allegations of fiduciary breaches related to the loss of critical plan documents like the BRIP. The Conagra Brands Employee Benefits Administrative Committee is responsible for maintaining the integrity of the pension plan, but the loss of documents and failure to notify employees of their rights raise questions about the adequacy of these protocols. The lawsuit highlights a need for improved oversight and adherence to ERISA's fiduciary requirements(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).

What options are currently available for former Beatrice employees and other participants in the Conagra Foods Inc. Pension Plan to claim benefits they believe they are entitled to? How does Conagra Brands, Inc. facilitate this process?

Former Beatrice employees can contact the Pension Service Center to inquire about their benefits and initiate claims. However, the process has been complicated by missing documentation and conflicting information about eligibility. Some employees have been forced to file legal claims to recover benefits owed to them, as in the case of the ongoing class action lawsuit. The lack of clear and accessible resources has made it difficult for employees to navigate the process effectively(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).

In what ways does Conagra Brands, Inc. provide support or guidance for employees approaching retirement, particularly in understanding the timelines and responsibilities associated with electing benefits from the Conagra Foods Inc. Pension Plan?

Conagra provides online calculators and service center assistance for employees approaching retirement, but these tools have proven unreliable for some participants. Employees have reported being unable to calculate their benefits accurately or being told they were ineligible for benefits before age 65, despite the terms of the BRIP allowing benefits to begin at age 60. The class action complaint highlights deficiencies in the guidance provided to employees regarding their benefits(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).

How can employees at Conagra Brands, Inc. contact the Employee Benefits Administrative Committee for inquiries related to their benefits? What are the most efficient avenues for addressing concerns about the Conagra Foods Inc. Pension Plan or the transitions from the Beatrice plan?

Employees can contact the Plan service center for inquiries related to their benefits, but accessing the Employee Benefits Administrative Committee directly appears to be more challenging. The lawsuit indicates that employees seeking to address discrepancies with their benefits have not received timely or effective communication from the committee, often requiring legal action to resolve their concerns(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).

How does Conagra Brands, Inc. evaluate its pension plan's performance and benefits offerings in relation to industry standards? What methods are used to ensure the company remains competitive while protecting employee benefits under the Conagra Foods Inc. Pension Plan?

There is little publicly available information regarding how Conagra evaluates its pension plan's performance against industry standards. The company's handling of historical pension obligations, particularly from the Beatrice acquisition, suggests that its methods for protecting employee benefits have been insufficient. Ongoing litigation regarding underpayment of benefits and loss of critical documents indicates that the company may need to improve its evaluation methods and compliance efforts to remain competitive(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).

With the current political climate we are in it is important to keep up with current news and remain knowledgeable about your benefits.

Conagra Brands announced a restructuring plan aiming to streamline operations and reduce costs. This includes layoffs impacting various departments and potential changes to employee benefits.

Additional Articles

Check Out Articles for Conagra Brands employees

For more information you can reach the plan administrator for Conagra Brands at 222 W. Merchandise Mart Plaza Chicago, IL 60654; or by calling them at (312) 549-5000.