Healthcare Provider Update: Healthcare Provider for Baker Hughes Baker Hughes partners with Cigna Healthcare to provide health insurance and related benefits to its employees. Healthcare Cost Increases in 2026 As we approach 2026, health insurance premiums for Affordable Care Act (ACA) marketplace plans are anticipated to rise sharply due to a combination of factors. Many states are projected to experience increases of over 60%, largely driven by the expiration of enhanced federal premium subsidies and escalating medical costs. Estimates suggest that over 22 million marketplace enrollees could face an average out-of-pocket premium increase exceeding 75%, significantly impacting their healthcare affordability. The combination of these elements creates a challenging landscape for consumers, as they will need to navigate higher expenses while seeking adequate coverage. Click here to learn more
'Baker Hughes employees should carefully weigh transparency, costs, and flexibility when evaluating new 401(k) options, as thoughtful planning today can make a meaningful difference in retirement outcomes.' — Michael Corgiat, a representative of The Retirement Group, a division of Wealth Enhancement.
'Baker Hughes employees navigating evolving 401(k) choices should focus on understanding fees, liquidity, and long-term impact to help align their retirement strategies with their personal goals.' — Brent Wolf, a representative of The Retirement Group, a division of Wealth Enhancement.
In this article, we will discuss:
-
The opportunities and risks of private equity’s entry into 401(k) retirement plans.
-
The impact of fees, transparency, and liquidity on long-term retirement outcomes.
-
Key considerations Baker Hughes employees should weigh before adding private equity to their portfolios.
For several years, private equity firms have been seeking access to corporate retirement plans, which could affect the investment choices available in 401(k) accounts. Traditionally, these alternative investments have been limited to wealthy and institutional investors, who provide private equity firms with funds they can use to buy equity stakes in unlisted private companies. Under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), however, private equity funds have been excluded from most workplace retirement plans due to their high fees, limited liquidity, and opaque reporting requirements. 1
New federal guidelines may be shifting this landscape. In an Executive Order issued in August 2025, the Trump administration supported access to alternative assets for 401(k) investors. 2 While these changes may broaden diversification opportunities, they also raise questions about appropriateness, costs, and transparency for Baker Hughes employees planning their retirement. 'It's a historic change in access, but it's also a time that calls for caution,' said Neva Bradley of Wealth Enhancement. Although private equity may offer diversification benefits, a higher risk profile and less transparent pricing require careful consideration.
Juggling Promise and Risk
Private equity funds have historically delivered strong long-term returns, 3 but more recent conditions have narrowed the edge over traditional stock indexes. 4 Rising interest rates and volatile markets have made performance less consistent, which is an important factor for Baker Hughes workers evaluating retirement strategies. While opportunities for gains remain, the trade-off in volatility cannot be ignored.
Fee structures complicate matters further. Compared to low-cost index funds, private equity investments involve multiple layers of expenses. According to Bradley, 'the fee structures and volatility can significantly reduce those gains over time.' Baker Hughes employees should note that these fees can be ten times higher than standard 401(k) options, 5 which can diminish long-term compounding.
Challenges of Transparency
One of the largest differences between mutual funds and private equity is reporting. Mutual funds tend to publish daily prices and transparent performance updates, while private equity reports are typically quarterly and valuations are often based on estimates. 1 This lack of standard benchmarks can make it difficult for even seasoned investors to evaluate performance consistently. For Baker Hughes participants, this means private equity may feel less straightforward than traditional investment choices.
The Cost Aspect
Private equity is also known for its high fees. Typical structures include a 1% to 2% annual management charge plus performance-based incentives, compared to about 0.25% for many mutual funds. 1 Over decades, these higher costs compound, especially for retirement accounts where long-term growth is important. As Bradley points out, 'those costs compound over decades,' underscoring the need to weigh fees against potential returns.
Important Things to Consider for Retirement Planning
For Baker Hughes employees who may encounter private equity options in their 401(k), here are some key considerations:
-
Liquidity: Investments are often locked in for years with limited access.
-
Costs: Carefully review and compare fee structures.
-
Timeline: Private equity may lack the flexibility needed closer to retirement.
-
Diversification: If included, it should represent only a small portion of the portfolio.
Bradley summarized, 'Private equity is not a panacea, but it can contribute to complex portfolios.' Baker Hughes participants should evaluate transparency, fees, and personal risk tolerance before making decisions.
One notable development is that target-date funds that include private equity and private credit holdings have been shown to potentially boost retirement income by 5% to 15% over 40 years, 6 provided top-tier managers are selected. For Baker Hughes employees, this underscores both the opportunity and the complexity of integrating private equity into a long-term plan.
Featured Video
Articles you may find interesting:
- Corporate Employees: 8 Factors When Choosing a Mutual Fund
- Use of Escrow Accounts: Divorce
- Medicare Open Enrollment for Corporate Employees: Cost Changes in 2024!
- Stages of Retirement for Corporate Employees
- 7 Things to Consider Before Leaving Your Company
- How Are Workers Impacted by Inflation & Rising Interest Rates?
- Lump-Sum vs Annuity and Rising Interest Rates
- Internal Revenue Code Section 409A (Governing Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans)
- Corporate Employees: Do NOT Believe These 6 Retirement Myths!
- 401K, Social Security, Pension – How to Maximize Your Options
- Have You Looked at Your 401(k) Plan Recently?
- 11 Questions You Should Ask Yourself When Planning for Retirement
- Worst Month of Layoffs In Over a Year!
- Corporate Employees: 8 Factors When Choosing a Mutual Fund
- Use of Escrow Accounts: Divorce
- Medicare Open Enrollment for Corporate Employees: Cost Changes in 2024!
- Stages of Retirement for Corporate Employees
- 7 Things to Consider Before Leaving Your Company
- How Are Workers Impacted by Inflation & Rising Interest Rates?
- Lump-Sum vs Annuity and Rising Interest Rates
- Internal Revenue Code Section 409A (Governing Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans)
- Corporate Employees: Do NOT Believe These 6 Retirement Myths!
- 401K, Social Security, Pension – How to Maximize Your Options
- Have You Looked at Your 401(k) Plan Recently?
- 11 Questions You Should Ask Yourself When Planning for Retirement
- Worst Month of Layoffs In Over a Year!
Sources:
1. Investopedia. ' Private Equity is Coming for Your 401(k): How to Protect Yourself ,' by Daniel Liberto. 17 Jan. 2025.
2. The White House, Presidential Actions. ' Democratizing Access to Alternative Assets for 401(k) Investors ,' Executive Orders. 7 Aug. 2025.
3. Institutional Investor. ' Why Private Equity Wins ,' by Dawson Partners. 24 Mar. 2025.
4. Morningstar. ' How Attractive Is Private Equity? ' by Jack Shannon. 11 June 2025.
5. Investopedia. ' Private Equity Explained With Examples and Ways To Invest ,' by James Chen. 2 Sep. 2025.
6. BlackRock Advisor Center. ' How private markets could improve retirement outcomes ,' by BlackRock Retirement Perspectives. 26 Jun. 2025.
What strategies can Baker McKenzie implement to enhance the understanding of how Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) factors can impact pension scheme investments among its employees, and what resources are available for them to access this knowledge within the company?
Enhancing ESG Understanding among Employees: Baker McKenzie can enhance understanding of ESG factors impacting pension investments by implementing comprehensive training programs and workshops dedicated to ESG topics. They can develop internal resources such as newsletters, dedicated intranet sections, and regular updates about ESG impacts and opportunities. Additionally, engaging employees through interactive seminars with ESG experts and providing access to online courses or subscriptions to ESG-focused publications can foster a deeper understanding and commitment.
How is Baker McKenzie addressing the evolving legal landscape regarding pension schemes in the UK and other jurisdictions, particularly concerning the integration of ESG considerations into their investment policies, and what implications does this have for employees contributing to these pension plans?
Addressing the Evolving Legal Landscape: Baker McKenzie addresses the evolving legal landscape regarding ESG integration into pension schemes by staying abreast of legislative changes across different jurisdictions, particularly in the UK. The firm can ensure compliance and adapt strategies by integrating ESG considerations into investment policies, which is increasingly codified in laws such as the UK's amendments to pension investment regulations. This approach helps protect employee contributions by aligning pension investments with broader, sustainable financial interests that consider long-term environmental and social impacts.
In what ways can Baker McKenzie support employees in understanding their retirement options, especially regarding the impact of ESG policies on their pension benefits and investment choices, and what role do these policies play in enhancing the sustainability of retirement plans?
Supporting Employee Understanding of Retirement Options: Baker McKenzie can support employees by providing clear, accessible information on how ESG policies influence pension benefits and investment choices. Hosting regular financial planning sessions, creating detailed FAQs on pension management websites, and offering one-on-one consultations with ESG-knowledgeable pension plan advisors can help employees make informed decisions. Additionally, explaining the sustainability of retirement plans through these policies can reassure employees about the long-term viability and ethical grounding of their investments.
How does Baker McKenzie monitor and assess the climate-related risks associated with its pension schemes, and what measures are being taken to ensure that employees' retirement savings are effectively protected against these potential threats?
Monitoring and Assessing Climate-Related Risks: To monitor and assess climate-related risks, Baker McKenzie can implement robust risk assessment frameworks that integrate climate risk into the overall risk management strategy for pension schemes. This includes regular reviews of investment portfolios for exposure to climate risks, adopting climate risk assessment tools, and engaging with investment managers to prioritize ESG-compliant investments. Periodic reporting on these activities helps maintain transparency and reassures employees about the safeguarding of their retirement savings.
What are the key differences between the fiduciary responsibilities of trustees in Baker McKenzie’s pension schemes in the UK compared to those in the US, and how do these differences reflect on the investment choices made on behalf of employees?
Differences in Fiduciary Responsibilities: The fiduciary responsibilities of trustees in Baker McKenzie’s pension schemes vary significantly between the UK and the US. In the UK, trustees are encouraged to consider ESG factors as financially material considerations, whereas in the US, recent regulatory changes have made it challenging to integrate ESG factors unless they directly relate to financial returns. These differences influence investment choices by aligning them more closely with regional legal frameworks and societal expectations.
How can Baker McKenzie’s employees actively participate in discussions regarding investment strategies that incorporate ESG factors, and what processes are in place to collect employee feedback on how these strategies align with their values and preferences?
Employee Participation in Investment Strategies: Baker McKenzie can facilitate employee participation in discussing investment strategies by setting up regular pension committee meetings that include employee representatives, conducting surveys to gather employee opinions on ESG matters, and establishing feedback mechanisms through internal communication platforms. This inclusive approach ensures that investment strategies align with employee values and preferences, fostering a sense of ownership and engagement with the firm’s pension strategy.
What information can Baker McKenzie provide regarding the performance of its pension schemes with respect to integrating ESG factors into investment decisions, and how can employees stay informed about the outcomes of these strategies?
Performance of ESG-integrated Investment Strategies: Baker McKenzie can keep employees informed about the performance of pension schemes with integrated ESG factors by publishing annual sustainability reports, including ESG performance in regular pension statements, and holding informational webinars. Transparently sharing successes and areas for improvement in ESG integration helps build trust and encourages continued employee investment in ESG-focused pension options.
Given the importance of transparency in pension management, how does Baker McKenzie plan to communicate with its employees about the governance and performance of its pension schemes, particularly in light of the growing emphasis on ESG accountability?
Communicating Governance and Performance: Transparency in pension management is crucial, and Baker McKenzie can enhance this by regularly updating employees through digital newsletters, detailed annual reports, and interactive Q&A sessions with pension managers. Focusing communications on the governance structures in place and the performance outcomes of pension schemes, especially concerning ESG accountability, ensures that employees are well-informed and confident in the management of their pensions.
How can employees at Baker McKenzie leverage the company's resources to better prepare for their retirement, especially in understanding the long-term impacts of the company’s current pension strategies on their future benefits?
Leveraging Company Resources for Retirement Preparation: Employees at Baker McKenzie can leverage company resources for retirement preparation by utilizing detailed planning tools offered by the firm, attending retirement planning workshops, and accessing personalized advice from financial advisors specializing in pension management. The company can also provide case studies illustrating the long-term benefits of various pension strategies, including those incorporating ESG considerations.
For employees who wish to learn more about Baker McKenzie’s pension plans and ESG initiatives, what is the best way to reach out to the company for more information, and what specific contact points are available to facilitate these inquiries?
Learning More about Pension Plans and ESG Initiatives: For employees interested in learning more about Baker McKenzie’s pension plans and ESG initiatives, the company should establish clear contact points such as dedicated email addresses, hotline numbers for pension plan inquiries, and scheduled office hours with HR representatives specializing in pension management. Providing easy access to this information through the company’s intranet and organizing regular informational sessions can facilitate effective communication and employee engagement.



-2.png?width=300&height=200&name=office-builing-main-lobby%20(52)-2.png)









.webp?width=300&height=200&name=office-builing-main-lobby%20(27).webp)