New Update: Healthcare Costs Increasing by Over 60% in Some States. Will you be impacted?

Private Equity in Stryker 401(k) Plans: What Employees Should Know

Healthcare Provider Update: Stryker Healthcare Provider Stryker Corporation, a leading medical technology firm, typically provides its employees with a robust array of healthcare options through its own internal benefit programs as well as partnerships with major national insurers. These include employer-sponsored health insurance plans that often customize options tailored to the needs of their workforce, including coverage for medical, dental, and vision care. Potential Healthcare Cost Increases in 2026 In 2026, Stryker employees may face significant increases in healthcare costs as the trend of premium hikes in the Affordable Care Act (ACA) marketplace is projected to intensify. With major insurers reporting planned increases exceeding 60% in states like New York, employees can expect to see out-of-pocket expenses rise substantially. The combination of expiring enhanced federal subsidies and soaring medical costs, driven largely by rising expenses for hospital services and prescription drugs, could lead to a sharp increase in overall healthcare affordability, impacting the financial planning of many families. As businesses further adjust their benefit structures in response to these challenges, understanding and proactive management of healthcare options will be essential for maintaining comprehensive coverage without bearing unmanageable costs. Click here to learn more

'Stryker employees should carefully weigh transparency, costs, and flexibility when evaluating new 401(k) options, as thoughtful planning today can make a meaningful difference in retirement outcomes.' — Michael Corgiat, a representative of The Retirement Group, a division of Wealth Enhancement.

'Stryker employees navigating evolving 401(k) choices should focus on understanding fees, liquidity, and long-term impact to help align their retirement strategies with their personal goals.' — Brent Wolf, a representative of The Retirement Group, a division of Wealth Enhancement.

In this article, we will discuss:

The opportunities and risks of private equity’s entry into 401(k) retirement plans.
The impact of fees, transparency, and liquidity on long-term retirement outcomes.
Key considerations Stryker employees should weigh before adding private equity to their portfolios.

For several years, private equity firms have been seeking access to corporate retirement plans, which could affect the investment choices available in 401(k) accounts. Traditionally, these alternative investments have been limited to wealthy and institutional investors, who provide private equity firms with funds they can use to buy equity stakes in unlisted private companies. Under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), however, private equity funds have been excluded from most workplace retirement plans due to their high fees, limited liquidity, and opaque reporting requirements. ¹

New federal guidelines may be shifting this landscape. In an Executive Order issued in August 2025, the Trump administration supported access to alternative assets for 401(k) investors. ² While these changes may broaden diversification opportunities, they also raise questions about appropriateness, costs, and transparency for Stryker employees planning their retirement. 'It's a historic change in access, but it's also a time that calls for caution,' said Neva Bradley of Wealth Enhancement. Although private equity may offer diversification benefits, a higher risk profile and less transparent pricing require careful consideration.

Juggling Promise and Risk

Private equity funds have historically delivered strong long-term returns, ³ but more recent conditions have narrowed the edge over traditional stock indexes. ⁴ Rising interest rates and volatile markets have made performance less consistent, which is an important factor for Stryker workers evaluating retirement strategies. While opportunities for gains remain, the trade-off in volatility cannot be ignored.

Fee structures complicate matters further. Compared to low-cost index funds, private equity investments involve multiple layers of expenses. According to Bradley, 'the fee structures and volatility can significantly reduce those gains over time.' Stryker employees should note that these fees can be ten times higher than standard 401(k) options, ⁵ which can diminish long-term compounding.

Challenges of Transparency

One of the largest differences between mutual funds and private equity is reporting. Mutual funds tend to publish daily prices and transparent performance updates, while private equity reports are typically quarterly and valuations are often based on estimates. ¹ This lack of standard benchmarks can make it difficult for even seasoned investors to evaluate performance consistently. For Stryker participants, this means private equity may feel less straightforward than traditional investment choices.

The Cost Aspect

Private equity is also known for its high fees. Typical structures include a 1% to 2% annual management charge plus performance-based incentives, compared to about 0.25% for many mutual funds. ¹ Over decades, these higher costs compound, especially for retirement accounts where long-term growth is important. As Bradley points out, 'those costs compound over decades,' underscoring the need to weigh fees against potential returns.

Important Things to Consider for Retirement Planning

For Stryker employees who may encounter private equity options in their 401(k), here are some key considerations:

Liquidity: Investments are often locked in for years with limited access.
Costs: Carefully review and compare fee structures.
Timeline: Private equity may lack the flexibility needed closer to retirement.
Diversification: If included, it should represent only a small portion of the portfolio.

Bradley summarized, 'Private equity is not a panacea, but it can contribute to complex portfolios.' Stryker participants should evaluate transparency, fees, and personal risk tolerance before making decisions.

One notable development is that target-date funds that include private equity and private credit holdings have been shown to potentially boost retirement income by 5% to 15% over 40 years, ⁶ provided top-tier managers are selected. For Stryker employees, this underscores both the opportunity and the complexity of integrating private equity into a long-term plan.