New Update: Healthcare Costs Increasing by Over 60% in Some States. Will you be impacted?

University of Chicago Employees and the New California SALT Deduction Boost

'University of Chicago employees navigating California’s high property taxes should view the new SALT deduction cap as an opportunity to revisit whether itemizing or taking the standard deduction provides the most benefit, and making that comparison now can help them plan ahead with greater clarity.' – Wesley Boudreaux, a representative of The Retirement Group, a division of Wealth Enhancement.

'University of Chicago employees and retirees should recognize that the higher SALT deduction cap creates a chance to reevaluate household tax strategies, but the true value will depend on income thresholds, property taxes, and whether itemized deductions outweigh the standard deduction.' – Patrick Ray, a representative of The Retirement Group, a division of Wealth Enhancement.

In this article, we will discuss:

How the 2025 spending bill changes the SALT deduction cap for California homeowners.
The impact of Proposition 13, income thresholds, and itemized deductions on potential savings.
What University of Chicago employees and retirees should consider when comparing itemized deductions versus the standard deduction.

With the passage of the 2025 One Big Beautiful Bill Act, the cap on state and local tax (SALT) deductions increased, positioning millions of taxpayers nationwide to see relief on their federal tax returns. With some of the largest state and local tax burdens in the nation, California homeowners—including many University of Chicago employees—will be especially affected by the shift. Still, it's unclear how much Californians could save.

Before 2017, the entire amount of state and local taxes paid could be subtracted from a taxpayer's federal taxable income. With the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which set a $10,000 deduction cap, this was altered. ¹ Residents in high-tax areas like California, where taxes and property values often exceed national norms, were disproportionately impacted by the cap, creating challenges for University of Chicago families with significant home values.

Potential Savings

Although the ceiling is not completely removed by the new 2025 legislation, it is replaced with an income-based cap that permits deductions of up to $40,000, contingent on a taxpayer's earnings. ² The change may give many homeowners a meaningful advantage, but the benefits may differ depending on income, house value, and mortgage balance, according to Kevin Won of Wealth Enhancement's California office, which frequently works with University of Chicago employees.

The deduction power that Californians in high-tax districts lost in 2017 could now be partially restored, according to Won. 'But under the new income thresholds, people with higher incomes might still see their SALT benefit phased out.' This is particularly relevant for University of Chicago retirees and mid-career employees navigating compensation and property costs in high-value regions.

Redfin data shows the possible savings. Instead of the $10,000 cap, the average California homeowner can now deduct about $26,000 in SALT payments. ³ This could result in a $4,000 decrease in federal taxes at a marginal tax rate of 24%. ³ However, not every taxpayer—including those in the University of Chicago workforce—will qualify for the entire benefit.

Unequal Application

A significant factor in the outcome is California's distinct property tax structure, which was influenced by Proposition 13. Long-term homeowners frequently pay lower property taxes than new buyers because Proposition 13 restricts annual increases in property tax assessments. According to Won, 'many Californians will not see the same percentage savings as newer buyers or residents of other states because Proposition 13 keeps long-term homeowners’ property taxes artificially low,' an important distinction for University of Chicago employees with decades of homeownership.

The extended deduction may help around three-quarters of California homeowners, according to research. ³ But the only people who are likely to see major tax reductions are those who have large itemized deductions that surpass the standard deduction threshold. For many University of Chicago professionals, the standard deduction might still be the better choice depending on their household situation.

Won suggested, 'It's still wise to run the numbers. To find out which approach works best, compare your new itemized deductions to the standard deduction.' University of Chicago families approaching retirement may want to evaluate both options carefully.

Understanding the Nuances

In the end, the increased SALT cap gives Californians more flexibility, but the effects will differ greatly. 'It's a positive change, especially for upper-middle-income homeowners,' Won summed up. However, the impact may be minimal for long-term property owners or retirees with lower property taxes and smaller mortgages, a scenario that may apply to University of Chicago retirees who have owned property for decades.

There is one important change: taxpayers 65 and older may claim an extra $6,000 tax deduction for tax years 2025–2028, regardless of whether they itemize. ⁴ Phase-outs begin at $75,000 of income for single filers and $150,000 for joint filers. ⁴ Together with the increased SALT cap modification, this senior deduction may expand older homeowners' tax relief—something University of Chicago retirees should pay particular attention to.

Find out how California homeowners will be affected by the 2025 increase in the state and local tax (SALT) deduction cap. Typical property owners might save almost $4,000 in federal taxes under the new law, which increases the threshold from $10,000 to an income-based ceiling of up to $40,000. Discover why newer owners in high-tax districts may benefit the most, as well as how eligibility is influenced by Proposition 13, mortgage amounts, and itemized versus standard deductions, which are key considerations for many University of Chicago employees.

Featured Video

Articles you may find interesting:

California's recent SALT deduction extension is comparable to reopening a long-blocked road lane. The 2017 limits forced traffic into fewer lanes for years, which reduced mobility and caused congestion. A portion of that lost lane has been reopened by the 2025 amendments, which permit deductions of up to $40,000, potentially reducing thousands of dollars in federal taxes. Similar to the freeway's continued speed limitations and restrictions, Proposition 13, income requirements, and itemized deduction laws limit the amount of benefit that homeowners may actually receive, making it easier for some but not for others—including many in the University of Chicago workforce.

Sources:

1. Congress.gov. ' The SALT Cap: Overview and Analysis .' 3 Apr. 2025.

2. Bipartisan Policy Center. “ SALT Deduction Changes in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act ,” by Fredrick Hernandez, 30 July 2025.

3. Redfin News. “ Homeowners in New York, California and Other Coastal States Could Shave Thousands Off Their Annual Tax Bill with SALT Cap Increase ,' by Mark Worley, Asad Khan. 18 Sept. 2025.

4. IRS. ' One, Big, Beautiful Bill provisions: Deduction for Seniors (Sec. 70103) '. 2025.

What are the eligibility criteria for participation in the SEPP plan for employees of The University of Chicago, and how can factors like years of service and age impact an employee's benefits under this plan? Discuss how these criteria might have changed for new employees post-2016 and what implications this has for retirement planning.

Eligibility Criteria for SEPP: Employees at The University of Chicago become eligible to participate in the SEPP upon meeting age and service requirements: being at least 21 years old and completing one year of service. For employees hired after the plan freeze on October 31, 2016, these criteria have been crucial in determining eligibility for newer employees, impacting their retirement planning as they do not accrue benefits under SEPP beyond this freeze date.

In what ways does the SEPP (Staff Employees Pension Plan) benefit calculation at The University of Chicago reflect an employee's years of service and final average pay? Examine the formulas involved in the benefits determination process, including how outside factors such as Social Security compensation can affect the total pension benefits an employee receives at retirement.

Benefit Calculation Reflecting Service and Pay: The SEPP benefits are calculated based on the final average pay and years of participation, factoring in Social Security covered compensation. Changes post-2016 have frozen benefits accrual, meaning that current employees’ benefits are calculated only up to this freeze date, affecting long-term benefits despite continued employment.

How can employees at The University of Chicago expect their SEPP benefits to be paid out upon their retirement, especially in terms of the options between lump sum distributions and annuities? Analyze the advantages and disadvantages of each payment option, and how these choices can impact an employee's financial situation in retirement.

Payout Options (Lump Sum vs. Annuities): Upon retirement, employees can opt for a lump sum payment or annuities. Each option presents financial implications; lump sums provide immediate access to funds but annuities offer sustained income. This choice is significant for financial stability in retirement, particularly under the constraints post the 2016 plan changes.

Can you elaborate on the spousal rights associated with the pension benefits under the SEPP plan at The University of Chicago? Discuss how marital status influences annuity payments and the required spousal consent when considering changes to beneficiary designations.

Spousal Rights in SEPP Benefits: Spouses have rights to pension benefits, requiring spousal consent for altering beneficiary arrangements under the SEPP. Changes post-2016 do not impact these rights, but understanding these is vital for making informed decisions about pension benefits and beneficiary designations.

As an employee nearing retirement at The University of Chicago, what considerations should one keep in mind regarding taxes on pension benefits received from the SEPP? Explore the tax implications of different types of distributions and how they align with current IRS regulations for the 2024 tax year.

Tax Considerations for SEPP Benefits: SEPP distributions are taxable income. Employees must consider the tax implications of their chosen payout method—lump sum or annuities—and plan for potential tax liabilities. This understanding is crucial, especially with the plan’s benefit accrual freeze affecting the retirement timeline.

What resources are available for employees of The University of Chicago wishing to understand more about their retirement benefits under SEPP? Discuss the types of information that can be requested from the Benefits Office and highlight the contact methods for obtaining more detailed assistance.

Resources for Understanding SEPP Benefits: The University provides resources for employees to understand their SEPP benefits, including access to the Benefits Office for personalized queries. Utilizing these resources is essential for employees, especially newer ones post-2016, to fully understand their retirement benefits under the current plan structure.

How does The University of Chicago address benefits for employees upon their death, and what provisions exist for both spouses and non-spouse beneficiaries under the SEPP plan? Analyze the specific benefits and payment structures available to beneficiaries and the conditions under which these benefits are distributed.

Posthumous Benefits: The SEPP includes provisions for spouses and non-spouse beneficiaries, detailing the continuation or lump sum payments upon the death of the employee. Understanding these provisions is crucial for estate planning and ensuring financial security for beneficiaries.

What factors ensure an employee remains fully vested in their pension benefits with The University of Chicago, and how does the vesting schedule affect retirement planning strategies? Consider the implications of not fulfilling the vesting criteria and how this might influence decisions around employment tenure and retirement timing.

Vesting and Retirement Planning: Vesting in SEPP requires three years of service, with full benefits contingent on meeting this criterion. For employees navigating post-2016 changes, understanding vesting is crucial for retirement planning, particularly as no additional benefits accrue beyond the freeze date.

Discuss the impact of a Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO) on the SEPP benefits for employees at The University of Chicago. How do divorce or separation proceedings influence pension benefits, and what steps should employees take to ensure compliance with a QDRO?

Impact of QDROs on SEPP Benefits: SEPP complies with Qualified Domestic Relations Orders, which can allocate pension benefits to alternate payees. Understanding how QDROs affect one’s benefits is crucial for financial planning, especially in the context of marital dissolution.

How can employees at The University of Chicago, who have questions about their benefits under the SEPP plan, effectively communicate with the Benefits Office for clarity and assistance? Specify the various communication methods available for employees and what kind of information or support they can expect to receive.

Communicating with the Benefits Office: Employees can reach out to the Benefits Office via email or phone for detailed assistance on their SEPP benefits. Effective communication with this office is vital for employees to clarify their benefits status, particularly in light of the post-2016 changes to the plan.