'Understanding the 'income valley' offers Bank of America employees a critical opportunity to strategically manage their tax burdens during retirement, and with the recent SECURE 2.0 Act changes, it's more important than ever to implement tax-efficient strategies well in advance of required minimum distributions.' – Paul Bergeron, a representative of The Retirement Group, a division of Wealth Enhancement Group.
'Bank of America employees approaching retirement can significantly benefit from planning during the 'income valley,' utilizing tax-saving strategies and Roth conversions to lower their overall tax burden, especially with the SECURE 2.0 Act providing more flexibility before RMDs begin.' – Tyson Mavar, a representative of The Retirement Group, a division of Wealth Enhancement Group.
In this article, we will discuss:
-
The concept of the 'income valley' and its significance for retirement planning.
-
Tax-efficient strategies such as tax-saving withdrawals, Roth conversions, and charitable giving during the income valley.
-
The impact of the SECURE 2.0 Act on retirement planning and RMDs.
When it comes to retirement planning, time is one of our most precious resources. Building a nest egg that can support a comfortable retirement requires effective use of time, particularly in the form of compound profits. Traditional and Roth retirement savings, taxable accounts, and Social Security income are frequently used to finance retirement. But for many people, retirement doesn't always begin at a specific age, and when to make key retirement-related decisions can significantly affect increasing retirement income and reducing taxes.
For Bank of America employees born in 1960 or later, the full retirement age for Social Security benefits is 67. However, recent legislative amendments have added additional factors to retirement planning. The required minimum distribution (RMD) age was raised from 72 to 73 by the SECURE 2.0 Act, which went into effect in 2023. This presents new opportunities for tax planning by allowing those who retire at age 67 to delay RMDs for an additional year.
Starting in 2033, the RMD age for individuals born in 1960 or later will rise to 75, providing more time to manage taxes before required withdrawals from tax-deferred retirement plans like 401(k)s and IRAs. Though this change is still years away, it will significantly affect how retirees manage their taxes and income in the years before RMDs.
For tax planning, understanding this time frame—known as the 'income valley'—can be quite beneficial. The period between retirement and the start of mandatory minimum distributions is called the 'income valley.' During this time, a retiree may find themselves in a lower tax bracket due to reduced taxable income. Depending on the retirement income sources and withdrawal strategy, this period can vary significantly.
Consider the situation of Sally and Carl, a Bank of America couple in their early 60s preparing for retirement. With a total pre-retirement income of $150,000, Sally and Carl plan to retire at age 67. They have $55,000 in available income, drawn from a mix of Social Security, their 401(k), and taxable assets, to cover their estimated $95,000 in yearly retirement needs. However, their taxable income may be much lower in the early years of retirement than later on, as they begin their retirement before the mandatory minimum distributions start.
The Income Valley's Mechanisms
In this example, Sally and Carl plan to use their $250,000 bank account and $1,000,000 401(k) to pay for their living expenses in the first few years of retirement. They can tap into their taxable accounts and take withdrawals from their checking accounts during this income valley period without incurring significant tax liabilities. Sally and Carl would be able to live on relatively low taxable income during this time since withdrawals from non-tax-deferred accounts, such as their bank or brokerage account, would not be counted as taxable income.
Since their Social Security payouts are taxed up to 85%, using non-taxable funds first can provide substantial tax relief before RMDs begin. This period also offers them a chance to figure out the most tax-efficient way to manage their 401(k) withdrawals. The scenario changes when they start taking withdrawals from their 401(k) at age 72, as they will be taxed as ordinary income, which may push them into a higher tax bracket.
Handling the Income Valley
For retirees, the income valley presents a unique opportunity to implement strategies that can lower overall tax burdens. Retirees like Sally and Carl might want to consider three tax solutions during the income valley years:
Tax-Saving Withdrawals
Making tax-efficient withdrawals is one of the best ways to manage taxes in retirement. This involves carefully selecting the source of the money used to cover living expenses based on tax treatment. For example, a retiree might withdraw from taxable assets first, followed by tax-deferred accounts like a 401(k), and finally, tax-free Roth accounts. This strategy organizes withdrawals in the most tax-efficient order.
Another tactic is proportional withdrawals, where money is withdrawn from each account based on their total amounts. This strategy helps reduce the chances of being pushed into a higher tax bracket later in retirement and maintains a more stable income stream. By carefully managing withdrawals from tax-deferred accounts, retirees can reduce lifetime taxes and future RMDs while in lower tax brackets.
However, this strategy's impact on Social Security taxes must be carefully considered. Withdrawals from tax-deferred accounts raise taxable income, which could result in higher taxes on Social Security benefits. Additionally, the retiree might be placed in a higher Medicare premium bracket due to increasing income. It is essential to consult with a tax professional before making any retirement planning decisions.
Roth Conversions
Converting tax-deferred retirement funds (like an IRA or 401(k)) into a Roth IRA is known as a Roth conversion. While Roth accounts grow tax-free and allow for tax-free withdrawals in retirement, retirees must pay taxes on the converted amount today. Conducting a Roth conversion during a period of low taxable income, such as the income valley, is especially advantageous.
Retirees can reduce the size of their tax-deferred accounts and, consequently, their RMDs (and related taxes) after they start by transferring a portion of their 401(k) funds into a Roth IRA during the income valley. Roth IRAs provide more control over retirement income in later years since they are not subject to RMDs.
However, like tax-efficient withdrawals, Roth conversions may temporarily increase taxable income, which could lead to higher Social Security taxes and higher Medicare premiums. Future tax implications should be carefully considered before deciding to convert funds into a Roth IRA, as the timing of the conversion can significantly impact its outcome.
Charitable Giving
Charitable donations can substantially lower taxable income during the income valley for retirees who are philanthropically inclined. By contributing to charities, retirees can support causes they care about while lowering their taxable income. Donations can dramatically reduce tax liabilities if the retiree itemizes deductions.
The Qualified Charitable Distribution (QCD) is particularly beneficial for retirees. A QCD allows individuals to donate up to $100,000 per year to a qualified charity directly from their IRA. The QCD is not included in taxable income but counts as a distribution for RMD purposes. This strategy allows retirees to meet their RMD requirement without increasing their taxable income. As of 2025, retirees may be able to lower their RMD levels and further reduce their tax burden by using QCDs.
QCDs are a simple method to give back while lowering taxable income because they don't need to be itemized, unlike traditional charity donations.
Considerations & Restrictions
While these strategies can be effective in reducing taxes during retirement, not all retirees will have the same flexibility in managing their retirement income. Some retirees may have limited options for withdrawing funds, particularly if they mostly rely on tax-deferred accounts like 401(k)s or IRAs. In such cases, the ability to strategically withdraw from taxable or tax-free funds may be limited, reducing their ability to lower taxable income.
Featured Video
Articles you may find interesting:
- Corporate Employees: 8 Factors When Choosing a Mutual Fund
- Use of Escrow Accounts: Divorce
- Medicare Open Enrollment for Corporate Employees: Cost Changes in 2024!
- Stages of Retirement for Corporate Employees
- 7 Things to Consider Before Leaving Your Company
- How Are Workers Impacted by Inflation & Rising Interest Rates?
- Lump-Sum vs Annuity and Rising Interest Rates
- Internal Revenue Code Section 409A (Governing Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans)
- Corporate Employees: Do NOT Believe These 6 Retirement Myths!
- 401K, Social Security, Pension – How to Maximize Your Options
- Have You Looked at Your 401(k) Plan Recently?
- 11 Questions You Should Ask Yourself When Planning for Retirement
- Worst Month of Layoffs In Over a Year!
- Corporate Employees: 8 Factors When Choosing a Mutual Fund
- Use of Escrow Accounts: Divorce
- Medicare Open Enrollment for Corporate Employees: Cost Changes in 2024!
- Stages of Retirement for Corporate Employees
- 7 Things to Consider Before Leaving Your Company
- How Are Workers Impacted by Inflation & Rising Interest Rates?
- Lump-Sum vs Annuity and Rising Interest Rates
- Internal Revenue Code Section 409A (Governing Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans)
- Corporate Employees: Do NOT Believe These 6 Retirement Myths!
- 401K, Social Security, Pension – How to Maximize Your Options
- Have You Looked at Your 401(k) Plan Recently?
- 11 Questions You Should Ask Yourself When Planning for Retirement
- Worst Month of Layoffs In Over a Year!
Moreover, retirees with additional income sources—such as pensions, annuities, or rental income—may find their taxable income increases, making it more difficult to implement these tax-efficient strategies. While they may still be able to manage their withdrawals, they have little control over the taxation of their other income sources.
The SECURE 2.0 Act's delay of RMDs provides retirees more time to strategize their tax planning. It is crucial to consult with financial professionals to understand how these changes might impact individual situations.
In summary, the income valley offers retirees a valuable window to manage taxes before RMDs begin. By implementing strategies like tax-efficient withdrawals, Roth conversions, and charitable giving, retirees can reduce their tax burden, spread out tax payments, and preserve more of their hard-earned savings.
Bank of America employees should also consider healthcare expenses as they approach the income valley. According to a Fidelity Investments study, excluding long-term care, the average couple retiring at age 65 in 2023 will need approximately $315,000 for healthcare expenses during retirement. By planning for these needs during the income valley, when taxable income is lower, retirees can better manage their resources and avoid financial strain. Planning for healthcare is essential to long-term financial well-being.
Learn how to navigate the retirement income valley with smart withdrawal strategies and tax-saving solutions. Discover how you can lower your tax burden, enhance your retirement savings, and take advantage of the SECURE 2.0 Act's provisions to safeguard your financial future. By making informed choices today, you can plan for a more comfortable retirement.
Consider the retirement income valley as a calm stretch of a long journey. Just as a driver might ease off the pedal to conserve fuel on a flat, easy stretch of road, retirees can reduce taxes and preserve wealth during this period before RMDs begin.
Source:
1. 'What the Wealthy Get Right About Retirement Withdrawals.' Investopedia , 2 May 2025, www.investopedia.com/articles/retirement/101/wealthy-get-right-about-retirement-withdrawals . Accessed 4 May 2025.
2. 'Charitable Trusts vs. Private Foundations: What Is Right for You?' Investopedia , 2 May 2025, www.investopedia.com/articles/retirement/101/charitable-trusts-vs-private-foundations . Accessed 4 May 2025.
3. Foster, Lauren. 'The Market Is Swinging Wildly. Should Retirees Wait to Take RMDs?' Barron's , 1 May 2025, www.barrons.com/articles/market-swinging-wildly-rmds-should-retirees-wait . Accessed 4 May 2025.
4. 'Understanding the Retirement Income Valley.' Fidelity Investments , 30 Apr. 2025, www.fidelity.com/retirement-planning/retirement-income-valley . Accessed 4 May 2025.
5. 'SECURE 2.0 Act Changes RMD Rules.' Ascensus , 25 Oct. 2023, www.ascensus.com/news/secure-2-0-act-rmd-changes . Accessed 4 May 2025.
What are the key differences between the single-life annuity option and the joint-life annuity option offered by Bank of America Corporation, and how can employees determine which option is more beneficial for their personal circumstances? To make this decision, employees should consider their marital status, life expectancy, and other retirement income sources they might have while assessing their overall financial picture.
Single-life vs. Joint-life Annuity Options: The single-life annuity option provides monthly payments only for the retiree's life, making it potentially higher as it is based solely on one life expectancy. Conversely, the joint-life annuity option extends payments to cover the life of a spouse or another beneficiary after the retiree's death, typically resulting in lower monthly payments due to the extended payout period. Employees should consider their marital status, life expectancy, and whether they need to provide for a spouse or other dependents in deciding which option suits their personal circumstances best.
How does the vesting schedule in the pension plan of Bank of America Corporation affect employees' entitlement to their benefits, and what factors should employees consider when planning for their retirement? Understanding whether your plan follows a cliff or graded vesting approach is crucial to knowing how long employees must work before they fully own their benefits.
Vesting Schedule Impact: Bank of America's pension plan offers two types of vesting schedules: cliff and graded. Cliff vesting allows employees to be fully vested after a set number of years, while graded vesting gradually increases the vested percentage over time. Employees should factor in their career plans, like how long they intend to stay with the company, as reaching full vesting can significantly affect their pension entitlement.
Given that pension plans are increasingly uncommon, as noted for Bank of America Corporation, how can employees best utilize their pension benefits to ensure financial stability in retirement? Employees should explore the historical context of pension availability in the company and industry while considering the impact of other retirement accounts, such as 401(k) plans and IRAs.
Utilizing Pension Benefits: With pension plans becoming less common, employees of Bank of America should maximize this benefit by understanding how it complements other retirement resources such as 401(k)s or IRAs. Employees can benefit from the security a pension provides by integrating it into a broader retirement strategy, considering factors like inflation and other income sources.
In what ways can Bank of America Corporation employees access information about the specifics of their pension plans, including eligibility criteria and benefit calculations? Employees should familiarize themselves with their Summary Plan Description (SPD) and the Annual Funding Notice they receive to stay informed about their benefits.
Accessing Pension Plan Information: Bank of America employees can access details of their pension plans through the Summary Plan Description (SPD) and Annual Funding Notices. These documents provide essential information about eligibility, benefit calculations, and rights under the plan, helping employees make informed decisions about their retirement.
What considerations should Bank of America Corporation employees take into account when opting for a lump-sum distribution versus an annuity payment, and how might these choices impact their long-term financial security? Employees need to evaluate their comfort with investment risks and their plans for retirement fund distribution, keeping in mind the potential for inflation.
Choosing Between Lump-Sum and Annuity Payments: The choice between receiving a lump-sum or annuity payments impacts long-term financial security. A lump-sum offers flexibility and control over investments, suitable for those comfortable with managing large sums. An annuity provides a steady income stream, preferable for those seeking stability and less investment risk. Factors like health, life expectancy, and other income sources should influence this decision.
How can employees at Bank of America Corporation estimate their monthly retirement income from the pension plan, and what resources are available to help them with this calculation? Utilizing employer-provided tools, financial calculators, or consulting with a financial planner could significantly aid employees in understanding their expected retirement income.
Estimating Monthly Retirement Income: Bank of America employees can estimate their pension income using tools provided by the employer, such as financial calculators, or by consulting with a financial planner. These resources help employees project their income based on their salary and years of service.
Considering the potential tax implications associated with pension plans, how should employees of Bank of America Corporation prepare to manage these taxes upon retiring? Understanding when taxes will be incurred and what strategies can minimize tax liabilities will be key as they transition into retirement.
Managing Tax Implications of Pensions: Understanding the tax implications of pension benefits is crucial. Bank of America employees should plan for the taxation of pension payments upon receipt and consider strategies to minimize tax liabilities, possibly consulting with tax professionals.
How does the funding structure of Bank of America Corporation’s pension plan, including employer contributions, influence the sustainability and reliability of benefits for employees? Employees should be aware of the responsibilities their employer has in managing the pension plan and ensuring sufficient funding across economic fluctuations.
Funding Structure and Benefit Reliability: The sustainability of pension benefits at Bank of America depends on the company's commitment to adequately fund the plan and pay required insurance premiums to the PBGC. Employees should be aware of the funding status through the Annual Funding Notice to assess the plan's health.
What role does the Pension Benefits Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) play in protecting the pension benefits of Bank of America Corporation employees, and how should employees understand this protection when planning for their future? Familiarizing themselves with the limits of the PBGC can help employees gauge the security of their pension benefits.
Role of the PBGC: The Pension Benefits Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) protects the pension benefits of Bank of America employees, providing a safety net in cases where plans cannot meet their obligations. Employees should understand the extent of PBGC coverage and limits to evaluate the security of their benefits.
How can Bank of America Corporation employees reach out to learn more about their pension plan and any specific benefits applicable to them? Employees should seek guidance from the plan administrator or utilize the communication channels provided within the company to obtain personalized assistance regarding their retirement planning needs.
Learning More About Pension Benefits: Bank of America employees looking for more detailed information about their specific pension benefits should consult their plan administrator or utilize company-provided communication channels. This direct engagement helps ensure employees receive personalized and up-to-date information regarding their retirement planning.