Healthcare Provider Update: Healthcare Provider for Conagra Brands: For Conagra Brands, the healthcare provider information is typically linked to their employment benefits and can vary based on the location and specific plans offered to employees. Generally, large companies like Conagra may partner with major insurers such as UnitedHealthcare, Anthem (Elevance Health), or Aetna to provide health insurance benefits to their employees. It is advisable for Enrolled members to refer to their HR department or employee benefit documentation for specific provider details. Potential Healthcare Cost Increases in 2026: As we look ahead to 2026, significant increases in healthcare costs are anticipated, largely influenced by the expiration of enhanced federal subsidies under the Affordable Care Act (ACA). Reports indicate that premium rates for ACA marketplace plans could rise by over 60% in certain states due to higher medical expenses and market adjustments. Notably, a staggering 92% of policyholders may face a potential increase in their out-of-pocket premiums by more than 75%, reflecting the compounded effect of expiring subsidies and aggressive rate hikes from leading insurers. This perfect storm may lead to many consumers being priced out of essential healthcare coverage, forcing a reevaluation of their insurance options as financial pressures mount. Click here to learn more
What Is Constructive Ownership?
We receive this question all the time from Conagra Brands Employees and Retirees. The tax system recognizes different types of ownership of business interests for taxation purposes: actual ownership and constructive ownership. You (or your estate) are treated for certain tax purposes as owning not only assets that you actually own, but also assets that you are deemed to own because such assets are owned by related or controlled individuals or entities.
For instance, the constructive ownership rules may cause you to be treated as owning shares in a family corporation that are actually owned by other family members. The application of the constructive ownership rules may adversely affect the tax treatment of a redemption of shares of a corporation.
Featured Video
Articles you may find interesting:
- Corporate Employees: 8 Factors When Choosing a Mutual Fund
- Use of Escrow Accounts: Divorce
- Medicare Open Enrollment for Corporate Employees: Cost Changes in 2024!
- Stages of Retirement for Corporate Employees
- 7 Things to Consider Before Leaving Your Company
- How Are Workers Impacted by Inflation & Rising Interest Rates?
- Lump-Sum vs Annuity and Rising Interest Rates
- Internal Revenue Code Section 409A (Governing Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans)
- Corporate Employees: Do NOT Believe These 6 Retirement Myths!
- 401K, Social Security, Pension – How to Maximize Your Options
- Have You Looked at Your 401(k) Plan Recently?
- 11 Questions You Should Ask Yourself When Planning for Retirement
- Worst Month of Layoffs In Over a Year!
- Corporate Employees: 8 Factors When Choosing a Mutual Fund
- Use of Escrow Accounts: Divorce
- Medicare Open Enrollment for Corporate Employees: Cost Changes in 2024!
- Stages of Retirement for Corporate Employees
- 7 Things to Consider Before Leaving Your Company
- How Are Workers Impacted by Inflation & Rising Interest Rates?
- Lump-Sum vs Annuity and Rising Interest Rates
- Internal Revenue Code Section 409A (Governing Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans)
- Corporate Employees: Do NOT Believe These 6 Retirement Myths!
- 401K, Social Security, Pension – How to Maximize Your Options
- Have You Looked at Your 401(k) Plan Recently?
- 11 Questions You Should Ask Yourself When Planning for Retirement
- Worst Month of Layoffs In Over a Year!
Why Does This Matter? (Because It Affects Your Tax Treatment)
We view constructive ownership as very important to all Conagra Brands employees and retirees because it can drastically change your tax status. If you (or your estate) sell your entire actual interest in a corporation back to the corporation, the sale may not be considered a complete redemption of your interest in the corporation for taxation purposes if a family member or a beneficiary of your estate continues to own an interest in the business. A complete redemption may be subject to beneficial tax treatment. In the context of a family business organized as a corporation, the constructive ownership rules assume that for purposes of redemption, each family member constructively owns the stock owned directly or indirectly by other family members. The attribution rules make it difficult to arrange a transaction that will be treated for tax purposes as a complete redemption of your interest in a family-owned corporation.
Redemption of all of the shares you actually own might be considered only a partial redemption, and you might not receive tax treatment as favorable as a complete redemption.
What Do You Mean, Affect My Tax Treatment?
Depending upon the specific circumstances of a company stock redemption, the proceeds (payment) a shareholder receives from the redemption of his or her business interest may be classified as a sale or exchange of the seller's interest (subject to capital gains tax) or as a dividend distribution. Generally, the complete redemption of company stock (in cases other than a family business) is considered a sale or exchange, with any gain being taxed as a capital gain. A partial redemption, by comparison, may be considered a dividend distribution. This is a distinction that all Conagra Brands employees and retirees should understand fully.
Tip: In general, the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 permanently extended the preferential income tax treatment of qualified dividends and capital gains. Capital gains and qualified dividends are generally taxed at 0% for taxpayers in the 10% and 15% tax brackets, and at 15% for taxpayers in the 25% to 35% tax brackets. However, capital gains are generally taxed at 20% for taxpayers in the 39.6% tax bracket. Also, as a result of the Affordable Care Act of 2010, an additional 3.8% Medicare tax applies to some or all of the net investment income for married filers whose modified adjusted gross income exceeds $250,000 and single filers whose modified adjusted gross income is above $200,000.
However, there remains an advantage in classifying a transaction as a sale or exchange rather than as a dividend distribution despite the fact that both types of transactions are subject to tax at long-term capital gains tax rates. That is, in the case of dividend treatment, part or all of the distribution is first treated as a dividend, any remaining distribution is then received tax-free to the extent of basis, and any distribution still remaining is taxed as capital gains. In the case of sale or exchange treatment, however, the shareholder pays tax only to the extent that the amount paid by the company exceeds his or her basis in the stock. Thus, more may be subject to tax with dividend treatment than with sale or exchange treatment.
Tip: If the sale or exchange of your shares occurs after your death, your shares will generally have a basis equal to the fair market value of the shares at the time of your death, and little or no tax may result.
How Do Constructive Ownership Rules Operate?
We feel that it's also important to remind all Conagra Brands employees and retirees exactly which constructive ownership rules will be applied and how they will be applied. There are several constructive ownership rules included in the Internal Revenue Code, but the rules that are relevant in the context of a redemption of shares are included in Section 318. These rules state that you are treated as owning not only your own direct holdings but also the stock holdings of certain related taxpayers. The constructive ownership rules apply to stock held by family members, entities such as corporations, trusts, estates and partnerships, and beneficiaries.
Let's assume that you own stock in a closely held family corporation. The following table shows the constructive ownership relationships that would apply to you and your estate through the attribution rules:
Rule
You (and your estate) are deemed to own stock owned directly or indirectly by:
Family attribution rule
- Yourself
- Your spouse (unless divorced or legally separated)
- Your children (including adopted children)
- Your grandchildren
- Your parents
Entity attribution FROM an estate
- Stock owned by your estate is attributed to the beneficiaries in proportion to their interest in the estate
Entity attribution TO an estate
- Stock actually or constructively owned by a beneficiary of your estate is attributed in full to your estate
A stockholder is not deemed to own stock of brothers, sisters, or grandparents for purposes of the Section 318 constructive ownership rules.
The Family Attribution Rule In Action
The following tables illustrate how family attribution works, using a sample family corporation owned by the parents, Harry and Wilma, and their two sons. In the beginning, each family member owns an equal percentage of the business:
Family Corporation
Actual Ownership
Harry
Wilma
Sam
Steve
25%
25%
25%
25%
Total Ownership
100%
In addition to the actual ownership percentages, there is constructive ownership, based on the family attribution rule. Harry's actual and constructive ownership is shown below:
Family Corporation
Attributed Ownership
Harry--actual ownership
Attribution from Wilma
Attribution from sons
25%
25%
50%
Harry's total constructive ownership
100%
Harry sells his 25 percent interest back to Family Corporation. The actual ownership percentages look like this after the sale:
Family Corporation
Attributed Ownership
Harry
Wilma
Sam
Steve
0%
33 1/3%
33 1/3%
33 1/3%
Total Ownership
100%
Harry expected the gain from the sale of his interest to be treated as a complete redemption, subject to tax at capital gains rates. Unfortunately, the tax system has a different view of the transaction. Under the family attribution rule, the transaction is viewed to have the following result:
Family Corporation
Attributed Ownership
Harry--actual ownership
Attribution from Wilma
Attribution from sons
0%
33 1/3%
66 2/3%
Harry's deemed ownership
100%
Under the family attribution rule, Harry's redemption of his interest in the Family Corporation does not change his percentage of ownership. Harry is deemed to own all of the stock in the business due to attribution from his spouse and sons. Under the family attribution rule, the transaction is treated as a dividend rather than a capital gain. These rules are essential for all Conagra Brands employees and retirees that have family businesses.
Tip: In general, the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 permanently extended the preferential income tax treatment of qualified dividends and capital gains. Capital gains and qualified dividends are generally taxed at 0% for taxpayers in the 10% and 15% tax brackets, and at 15% for taxpayers in the 25% to 35% tax brackets. However, capital gains are generally taxed at 20% for taxpayers in the 39.6% tax bracket. Also, as a result of the Affordable Care Act of 2010, an additional 3.8% Medicare tax applies to some or all of the net investment income for married filers whose modified adjusted gross income exceeds $250,000 and single filers whose modified adjusted gross income is above $200,000.
However, there remains an advantage in classifying a transaction as a sale or exchange rather than as a dividend distribution despite the fact that both types of transactions are subject to tax at long-term capital gains tax rates. That is, in the case of dividend treatment, part or all of the distribution is first treated as a dividend, any remaining distribution is then received tax-free to the extent of basis, and any distribution still remaining is taxed as capital gains. In the case of sale or exchange treatment, however, the shareholder pays tax only to the extent that the amount paid by the company exceeds his or her basis in the stock. Thus, more may be subject to tax with dividend treatment than with sale or exchange treatment.
Your Estate Must Play By The Rules, Too
When you die, your business interest passes to your estate. Your business interest is considered to be constructively owned by your estate. For tax purposes, the business interest is treated as if it is actually owned by the estate. Constructive ownership does not stop with your business interest, though. For taxation purposes, if a beneficiary of your estate also owns a portion of the business, the beneficiary's interest is considered constructively (indirectly) owned by your estate.
Example(s): Let's say that you own 100 shares of the family business. Lou owns 50 shares of the business and is a beneficiary under your will. You die. The corporation redeems (buys back) your 100 shares in the business from your estate.
Example(s): Even though your estate sold all of your actual ownership interest back to the business, it doesn't necessarily mean that your estate no longer owns an interest in the business. Because Lou is a beneficiary under your will, your estate is deemed to own his 50 shares of the business under the constructive ownership rules. After the redemption of your 100 shares, your estate is deemed to own Lou's interest because he is a beneficiary of your estate. Your estate's sale of your actual interest in the business would not be considered a complete redemption, because your estate is deemed to still own the 50 shares actually owned by Lou under estate/beneficiary attribution.
Avoiding Attribution of Stock Ownership Among Family Members
The family attribution rules can be waived if the redeeming shareholder meets the following conditions:
- The shareholder holds no interest in the business other than that of a creditor immediately after the redemption. The shareholder cannot act as an officer, director, or employee.
- The redeeming shareholder does not acquire any interest in the business (except by bequest or inheritance) for 10 years after the date of redemption.
- The redeemed shareholder agrees to notify the IRS of any acquisition of a prohibited interest within the 10-year period.
- None of the stock of the redeemed shareholder was acquired from any related person with the purpose of avoiding federal income tax in the 10 years before the redemption.
- In the past 10 years, the redeemed shareholder has not disposed of stock for the purpose of income tax avoidance to a related person who still owns stock at the time of the redemption.
The application of the constructive ownership rules can be complex, and the results of poor tax planning can be expensive. It's in your best interest to consult a competent tax advisor when considering a redemption of stock from your family or closely held business.
How does Conagra Brands, Inc. ensure that employees understand their retirement benefits, particularly the nuances of the Conagra Foods Inc. Pension Plan and the historical obligations from the Beatrice Retirement Income Plan (BRIP)? Are there specific communication strategies or resources provided to employees to navigate their eligibility and benefits?
Conagra Brands has not provided consistent documentation of the Beatrice Retirement Income Plan (BRIP), as evidenced by a lost BRIP Plan document, which has created confusion among former Beatrice employees. Conagra relies on internal committees like the Conagra Brands Employee Benefits Administrative Committee to oversee the administration of the Conagra Foods Inc. Pension Plan and the historical obligations from BRIP. However, there are allegations in the class action that Conagra has failed to communicate certain benefit entitlements, particularly the age at which unreduced benefits should commence(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).
In light of regulatory compliance, what measures does Conagra Brands, Inc. take to maintain the integrity and security of pension plan documents, especially considering the historical loss of the BRIP Plan document? How do the missing documents impact employee knowledge of their benefits?
The loss of the BRIP Plan document represents a significant failure in document retention and regulatory compliance. Under ERISA, Conagra is required to maintain and distribute these documents upon request. The missing BRIP documents have caused discrepancies in the administration of retirement benefits, particularly regarding the age of eligibility for unreduced benefits. Conagra has been criticized for not informing employees that these documents were lost, leading to confusion and underpayment of benefits(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).
What resources does Conagra Brands, Inc. offer to its employees who have questions about their pension benefits or discrepancies that may arise from the transition from the Beatrice Retirement Income Plan to the Conagra Foods Inc. Pension Plan? How can employees best utilize these resources?
Conagra directs employees to contact the Plan service center for inquiries related to their pension benefits. However, based on the complaints filed in court, there have been issues with transparency and the accessibility of important plan documents, including the BRIP. Employees have had to appeal their benefit decisions and deal with insufficient guidance on navigating the discrepancies between the old BRIP and the Conagra Plan. Resources like benefit calculators and service centers have sometimes provided inaccurate or incomplete information(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).
How does Conagra Brands, Inc. handle the potential discrepancies regarding the pension benefits related to the age eligibility for receiving unreduced benefits in the context of both the Conagra Plan and the Beatrice plan? What steps have been taken to prevent similar issues in the future?
Conagra has been handling discrepancies poorly, particularly around the age at which participants in the BRIP are entitled to receive unreduced benefits. The company's adjustment of the eligibility age from 60 to 65 without properly consulting or notifying employees has led to underpayment of benefits. The ongoing class action lawsuit seeks to address these discrepancies and prevent future issues by clarifying benefit entitlements under the terms of both plans(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).
Can you elaborate on the process that Conagra Brands, Inc. utilizes to communicate with employees about plan amendments and to clarify their rights under the Conagra Foods Inc. Pension Plan? What specific improvements have been made to this communication strategy in recent years?
The communication process regarding plan amendments at Conagra has been criticized as insufficient, particularly concerning the transition from the BRIP to the Conagra Plan. Employees have filed complaints about not receiving adequate notice of important changes, such as the shift in eligibility age for unreduced benefits. Conagra has failed to provide clear documentation, leading to confusion among employees. There is no evidence of significant improvements in recent years(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).
How does Conagra Brands, Inc. ensure compliance with the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), especially regarding the fiduciary duties of the Conagra Brands Employee Benefits Administrative Committee? What protocols are in place to guarantee that employees’ rights are consistently protected?
Conagra's compliance with ERISA has been challenged in court, with allegations of fiduciary breaches related to the loss of critical plan documents like the BRIP. The Conagra Brands Employee Benefits Administrative Committee is responsible for maintaining the integrity of the pension plan, but the loss of documents and failure to notify employees of their rights raise questions about the adequacy of these protocols. The lawsuit highlights a need for improved oversight and adherence to ERISA's fiduciary requirements(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).
What options are currently available for former Beatrice employees and other participants in the Conagra Foods Inc. Pension Plan to claim benefits they believe they are entitled to? How does Conagra Brands, Inc. facilitate this process?
Former Beatrice employees can contact the Pension Service Center to inquire about their benefits and initiate claims. However, the process has been complicated by missing documentation and conflicting information about eligibility. Some employees have been forced to file legal claims to recover benefits owed to them, as in the case of the ongoing class action lawsuit. The lack of clear and accessible resources has made it difficult for employees to navigate the process effectively(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).
In what ways does Conagra Brands, Inc. provide support or guidance for employees approaching retirement, particularly in understanding the timelines and responsibilities associated with electing benefits from the Conagra Foods Inc. Pension Plan?
Conagra provides online calculators and service center assistance for employees approaching retirement, but these tools have proven unreliable for some participants. Employees have reported being unable to calculate their benefits accurately or being told they were ineligible for benefits before age 65, despite the terms of the BRIP allowing benefits to begin at age 60. The class action complaint highlights deficiencies in the guidance provided to employees regarding their benefits(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).
How can employees at Conagra Brands, Inc. contact the Employee Benefits Administrative Committee for inquiries related to their benefits? What are the most efficient avenues for addressing concerns about the Conagra Foods Inc. Pension Plan or the transitions from the Beatrice plan?
Employees can contact the Plan service center for inquiries related to their benefits, but accessing the Employee Benefits Administrative Committee directly appears to be more challenging. The lawsuit indicates that employees seeking to address discrepancies with their benefits have not received timely or effective communication from the committee, often requiring legal action to resolve their concerns(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).
How does Conagra Brands, Inc. evaluate its pension plan's performance and benefits offerings in relation to industry standards? What methods are used to ensure the company remains competitive while protecting employee benefits under the Conagra Foods Inc. Pension Plan?
There is little publicly available information regarding how Conagra evaluates its pension plan's performance against industry standards. The company's handling of historical pension obligations, particularly from the Beatrice acquisition, suggests that its methods for protecting employee benefits have been insufficient. Ongoing litigation regarding underpayment of benefits and loss of critical documents indicates that the company may need to improve its evaluation methods and compliance efforts to remain competitive(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).