<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=314834185700910&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">

New Update: Healthcare Costs Increasing by Over 60% in Some States. Will you be impacted?

Learn More

Understanding Constructive Ownership: What University of Chicago Employees Need to Know About Tax Implications

image-table

What Is Constructive Ownership?

We receive this question all the time from University of Chicago Employees and Retirees. The tax system recognizes different types of ownership of business interests for taxation purposes: actual ownership and constructive ownership. You (or your estate) are treated for certain tax purposes as owning not only assets that you actually own, but also assets that you are deemed to own because such assets are owned by related or controlled individuals or entities.

For instance, the constructive ownership rules may cause you to be treated as owning shares in a family corporation that are actually owned by other family members. The application of the constructive ownership rules may adversely affect the tax treatment of a redemption of shares of a corporation.

Featured Video

Articles you may find interesting:

Loading...

Why Does This Matter? (Because It Affects Your Tax Treatment)

We view constructive ownership as very important to all University of Chicago employees and retirees because it can drastically change your tax status. If you (or your estate) sell your entire actual interest in a corporation back to the corporation, the sale may not be considered a complete redemption of your interest in the corporation for taxation purposes if a family member or a beneficiary of your estate continues to own an interest in the business. A complete redemption may be subject to beneficial tax treatment. In the context of a family business organized as a corporation, the constructive ownership rules assume that for purposes of redemption, each family member constructively owns the stock owned directly or indirectly by other family members. The attribution rules make it difficult to arrange a transaction that will be treated for tax purposes as a complete redemption of your interest in a family-owned corporation.

Redemption of all of the shares you actually own might be considered only a partial redemption, and you might not receive tax treatment as favorable as a complete redemption.

What Do You Mean, Affect My Tax Treatment?

Depending upon the specific circumstances of a company stock redemption, the proceeds (payment) a shareholder receives from the redemption of his or her business interest may be classified as a sale or exchange of the seller's interest (subject to capital gains tax) or as a dividend distribution. Generally, the complete redemption of company stock (in cases other than a family business) is considered a sale or exchange, with any gain being taxed as a capital gain. A partial redemption, by comparison, may be considered a dividend distribution. This is a distinction that all University of Chicago employees and retirees should understand fully.

Tip:  In general, the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 permanently extended the preferential income tax treatment of qualified dividends and capital gains. Capital gains and qualified dividends are generally taxed at 0% for taxpayers in the 10% and 15% tax brackets, and at 15% for taxpayers in the 25% to 35% tax brackets. However, capital gains are generally taxed at 20% for taxpayers in the 39.6% tax bracket. Also, as a result of the Affordable Care Act of 2010, an additional 3.8% Medicare tax applies to some or all of the net investment income for married filers whose modified adjusted gross income exceeds $250,000 and single filers whose modified adjusted gross income is above $200,000.

However, there remains an advantage in classifying a transaction as a sale or exchange rather than as a dividend distribution despite the fact that both types of transactions are subject to tax at long-term capital gains tax rates. That is, in the case of dividend treatment, part or all of the distribution is first treated as a dividend, any remaining distribution is then received tax-free to the extent of basis, and any distribution still remaining is taxed as capital gains. In the case of sale or exchange treatment, however, the shareholder pays tax only to the extent that the amount paid by the company exceeds his or her basis in the stock. Thus, more may be subject to tax with dividend treatment than with sale or exchange treatment.

Tip:  If the sale or exchange of your shares occurs after your death, your shares will generally have a basis equal to the fair market value of the shares at the time of your death, and little or no tax may result.

How Do Constructive Ownership Rules Operate?

We feel that it's also important to remind all University of Chicago employees and retirees exactly which constructive ownership rules will be applied and how they will be applied. There are several constructive ownership rules included in the Internal Revenue Code, but the rules that are relevant in the context of a redemption of shares are included in Section 318. These rules state that you are treated as owning not only your own direct holdings but also the stock holdings of certain related taxpayers. The constructive ownership rules apply to stock held by family members, entities such as corporations, trusts, estates and partnerships, and beneficiaries.

Let's assume that you own stock in a closely held family corporation. The following table shows the constructive ownership relationships that would apply to you and your estate through the attribution rules:

Rule

You (and your estate) are deemed to own stock owned directly or indirectly by:

Family attribution rule

  • Yourself
  • Your spouse (unless divorced or legally separated)
  • Your children (including adopted children)
  • Your grandchildren
  • Your parents

Entity attribution FROM an estate

  • Stock owned by your estate is attributed to the beneficiaries in proportion to their interest in the estate

Entity attribution TO an estate

  • Stock actually or constructively owned by a beneficiary of your estate is attributed in full to your estate

A stockholder is not deemed to own stock of brothers, sisters, or grandparents for purposes of the Section 318 constructive ownership rules.

The Family Attribution Rule In Action

The following tables illustrate how family attribution works, using a sample family corporation owned by the parents, Harry and Wilma, and their two sons. In the beginning, each family member owns an equal percentage of the business:

Family Corporation

Actual Ownership

Harry

Wilma

Sam

Steve

25%

25%

25%

25%

Total Ownership

100%

In addition to the actual ownership percentages, there is constructive ownership, based on the family attribution rule. Harry's actual and constructive ownership is shown below:

Family Corporation

Attributed Ownership

Harry--actual ownership

Attribution from Wilma

Attribution from sons

25%

25%

50%

Harry's total constructive ownership

100%

Harry sells his 25 percent interest back to Family Corporation. The actual ownership percentages look like this after the sale:

Family Corporation

Attributed Ownership

Harry

Wilma

Sam

Steve

0%

33 1/3%

33 1/3%

33 1/3%

Total Ownership

100%

Harry expected the gain from the sale of his interest to be treated as a complete redemption, subject to tax at capital gains rates. Unfortunately, the tax system has a different view of the transaction. Under the family attribution rule, the transaction is viewed to have the following result:

Family Corporation

Attributed Ownership

Harry--actual ownership

Attribution from Wilma

Attribution from sons

0%

33 1/3%

66 2/3%

Harry's deemed ownership

100%

Under the family attribution rule, Harry's redemption of his interest in the Family Corporation does not change his percentage of ownership. Harry is deemed to own all of the stock in the business due to attribution from his spouse and sons. Under the family attribution rule, the transaction is treated as a dividend rather than a capital gain. These rules are essential for all University of Chicago employees and retirees that have family businesses.

Tip:  In general, the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 permanently extended the preferential income tax treatment of qualified dividends and capital gains. Capital gains and qualified dividends are generally taxed at 0% for taxpayers in the 10% and 15% tax brackets, and at 15% for taxpayers in the 25% to 35% tax brackets. However, capital gains are generally taxed at 20% for taxpayers in the 39.6% tax bracket. Also, as a result of the Affordable Care Act of 2010, an additional 3.8% Medicare tax applies to some or all of the net investment income for married filers whose modified adjusted gross income exceeds $250,000 and single filers whose modified adjusted gross income is above $200,000.

However, there remains an advantage in classifying a transaction as a sale or exchange rather than as a dividend distribution despite the fact that both types of transactions are subject to tax at long-term capital gains tax rates. That is, in the case of dividend treatment, part or all of the distribution is first treated as a dividend, any remaining distribution is then received tax-free to the extent of basis, and any distribution still remaining is taxed as capital gains. In the case of sale or exchange treatment, however, the shareholder pays tax only to the extent that the amount paid by the company exceeds his or her basis in the stock. Thus, more may be subject to tax with dividend treatment than with sale or exchange treatment.

Your Estate Must Play By The Rules, Too

When you die, your business interest passes to your estate. Your business interest is considered to be constructively owned by your estate. For tax purposes, the business interest is treated as if it is actually owned by the estate. Constructive ownership does not stop with your business interest, though. For taxation purposes, if a beneficiary of your estate also owns a portion of the business, the beneficiary's interest is considered constructively (indirectly) owned by your estate.

Example(s):  Let's say that you own 100 shares of the family business. Lou owns 50 shares of the business and is a beneficiary under your will. You die. The corporation redeems (buys back) your 100 shares in the business from your estate.

Example(s):  Even though your estate sold all of your actual ownership interest back to the business, it doesn't necessarily mean that your estate no longer owns an interest in the business. Because Lou is a beneficiary under your will, your estate is deemed to own his 50 shares of the business under the constructive ownership rules. After the redemption of your 100 shares, your estate is deemed to own Lou's interest because he is a beneficiary of your estate. Your estate's sale of your actual interest in the business would not be considered a complete redemption, because your estate is deemed to still own the 50 shares actually owned by Lou under estate/beneficiary attribution.

Avoiding Attribution of Stock Ownership Among Family Members

The family attribution rules can be waived if the redeeming shareholder meets the following conditions:

  1. The shareholder holds no interest in the business other than that of a creditor immediately after the redemption. The shareholder cannot act as an officer, director, or employee.
  2. The redeeming shareholder does not acquire any interest in the business (except by bequest or inheritance) for 10 years after the date of redemption.
  3. The redeemed shareholder agrees to notify the IRS of any acquisition of a prohibited interest within the 10-year period.
  4. None of the stock of the redeemed shareholder was acquired from any related person with the purpose of avoiding federal income tax in the 10 years before the redemption.
  5. In the past 10 years, the redeemed shareholder has not disposed of stock for the purpose of income tax avoidance to a related person who still owns stock at the time of the redemption.

The application of the constructive ownership rules can be complex, and the results of poor tax planning can be expensive. It's in your best interest to consult a competent tax advisor when considering a redemption of stock from your family or closely held business.

What are the eligibility criteria for participation in the SEPP plan for employees of The University of Chicago, and how can factors like years of service and age impact an employee's benefits under this plan? Discuss how these criteria might have changed for new employees post-2016 and what implications this has for retirement planning.

Eligibility Criteria for SEPP: Employees at The University of Chicago become eligible to participate in the SEPP upon meeting age and service requirements: being at least 21 years old and completing one year of service. For employees hired after the plan freeze on October 31, 2016, these criteria have been crucial in determining eligibility for newer employees, impacting their retirement planning as they do not accrue benefits under SEPP beyond this freeze date.

In what ways does the SEPP (Staff Employees Pension Plan) benefit calculation at The University of Chicago reflect an employee's years of service and final average pay? Examine the formulas involved in the benefits determination process, including how outside factors such as Social Security compensation can affect the total pension benefits an employee receives at retirement.

Benefit Calculation Reflecting Service and Pay: The SEPP benefits are calculated based on the final average pay and years of participation, factoring in Social Security covered compensation. Changes post-2016 have frozen benefits accrual, meaning that current employees’ benefits are calculated only up to this freeze date, affecting long-term benefits despite continued employment.

How can employees at The University of Chicago expect their SEPP benefits to be paid out upon their retirement, especially in terms of the options between lump sum distributions and annuities? Analyze the advantages and disadvantages of each payment option, and how these choices can impact an employee's financial situation in retirement.

Payout Options (Lump Sum vs. Annuities): Upon retirement, employees can opt for a lump sum payment or annuities. Each option presents financial implications; lump sums provide immediate access to funds but annuities offer sustained income. This choice is significant for financial stability in retirement, particularly under the constraints post the 2016 plan changes.

Can you elaborate on the spousal rights associated with the pension benefits under the SEPP plan at The University of Chicago? Discuss how marital status influences annuity payments and the required spousal consent when considering changes to beneficiary designations.

Spousal Rights in SEPP Benefits: Spouses have rights to pension benefits, requiring spousal consent for altering beneficiary arrangements under the SEPP. Changes post-2016 do not impact these rights, but understanding these is vital for making informed decisions about pension benefits and beneficiary designations.

As an employee nearing retirement at The University of Chicago, what considerations should one keep in mind regarding taxes on pension benefits received from the SEPP? Explore the tax implications of different types of distributions and how they align with current IRS regulations for the 2024 tax year.

Tax Considerations for SEPP Benefits: SEPP distributions are taxable income. Employees must consider the tax implications of their chosen payout method—lump sum or annuities—and plan for potential tax liabilities. This understanding is crucial, especially with the plan’s benefit accrual freeze affecting the retirement timeline.

What resources are available for employees of The University of Chicago wishing to understand more about their retirement benefits under SEPP? Discuss the types of information that can be requested from the Benefits Office and highlight the contact methods for obtaining more detailed assistance.

Resources for Understanding SEPP Benefits: The University provides resources for employees to understand their SEPP benefits, including access to the Benefits Office for personalized queries. Utilizing these resources is essential for employees, especially newer ones post-2016, to fully understand their retirement benefits under the current plan structure.

How does The University of Chicago address benefits for employees upon their death, and what provisions exist for both spouses and non-spouse beneficiaries under the SEPP plan? Analyze the specific benefits and payment structures available to beneficiaries and the conditions under which these benefits are distributed.

Posthumous Benefits: The SEPP includes provisions for spouses and non-spouse beneficiaries, detailing the continuation or lump sum payments upon the death of the employee. Understanding these provisions is crucial for estate planning and ensuring financial security for beneficiaries.

What factors ensure an employee remains fully vested in their pension benefits with The University of Chicago, and how does the vesting schedule affect retirement planning strategies? Consider the implications of not fulfilling the vesting criteria and how this might influence decisions around employment tenure and retirement timing.

Vesting and Retirement Planning: Vesting in SEPP requires three years of service, with full benefits contingent on meeting this criterion. For employees navigating post-2016 changes, understanding vesting is crucial for retirement planning, particularly as no additional benefits accrue beyond the freeze date.

Discuss the impact of a Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO) on the SEPP benefits for employees at The University of Chicago. How do divorce or separation proceedings influence pension benefits, and what steps should employees take to ensure compliance with a QDRO?

Impact of QDROs on SEPP Benefits: SEPP complies with Qualified Domestic Relations Orders, which can allocate pension benefits to alternate payees. Understanding how QDROs affect one’s benefits is crucial for financial planning, especially in the context of marital dissolution.

How can employees at The University of Chicago, who have questions about their benefits under the SEPP plan, effectively communicate with the Benefits Office for clarity and assistance? Specify the various communication methods available for employees and what kind of information or support they can expect to receive.

Communicating with the Benefits Office: Employees can reach out to the Benefits Office via email or phone for detailed assistance on their SEPP benefits. Effective communication with this office is vital for employees to clarify their benefits status, particularly in light of the post-2016 changes to the plan.

New call-to-action

Additional Articles

Check Out Articles for University of Chicago employees

Loading...

For more information you can reach the plan administrator for University of Chicago at , ; or by calling them at .

*Please see disclaimer for more information

Relevant Articles

Check Out Articles for University of Chicago employees