New Update: Healthcare Costs Increasing by Over 60% in Some States. Will you be impacted?

Learn More

Investing Insights for CUNA Mutual Group Employees: The Pros and Cons of Dollar-Cost Averaging vs. Lump-Sum Contributions

The Value Series

What is Book Value?

Testing

Weighting

The Brandes Research Institute

About The Retirement Group

Sources

The Value Series

Given the current elevated market volatility, we think now is a good time to revisit important value metrics in our four-part series. As an employee or retiree of CUNA Mutual Group, who likely has little market analysis experience, we understand that the valuation process can seem confusing. However, we are here to tell you that the valuation process does not have to be complex to be successful. Simple valuation techniques such as the price-to-book ratio are generally easy to use and have been proven to be effective if utilized correctly. Investors are often looking for ways for their clients to beat the market. If you're one of those investors, you may want to consider the following strategy that has been implemented by the investment greats. Some value investors have historically beat the average annualized returns of the S&P 500, and many have successful track records spanning several decades to prove it. CUNA Mutual Group employees, it is important to be knowledgeable regarding tactics used by famous investors such as Warren Buffett, Benjamin Graham, David Dodd, Charlie Munger, Christopher Browne and Seth Klarman. The investment style implemented by these professionals focus on four metrics that characterize a value investment. These four metrics include the Price to Earnings Ratio, the Price to Cash Flow Ratio, High Dividend Yield and the Price to Book Ratio. These metrics, as you will see, are strong indicators of undervalued security. If undervalued security is brought back to fair value then we would see positive returns on that security. For CUNA Mutual Group employees, it is possible to utilize these metrics to better position yourself in the market for heightened returns. We will examine the effect of investing based off of certain characteristics and how their investment returns are correlated. Today, I want to end the four-part TRG Value Series with the granddaddy of metrics, the Price-to-Book value ratio (P/B).

What is Book Value?

Book value is preferred by many value investors to cash flow and earnings metrics because it is more stable year-to-year whereas cash flow and earnings can vary greatly. This is an important property for those at CUNA Mutual Group to look out for due to the following reason: When a business at a cyclical trough with diminished cash flow and earnings might look expensive on the basis of price-to-cash flow or price-to-earnings, that same business may appear cheap on the basis of price-to-book value. This is because book value won’t fall much or at all in a downturn, and vice versa. Thus, the argument goes, the price-to-book value gives a more reliable picture of a company’s usual business performance, which CUNA Mutual Group employees can use to elevate their investment decisions and investment performance. Benjamin Graham popularized the indicator in his books “Security Analysis” and “The Intelligent Investor”. Nobel Prize winner Eugene Fama and his research partner Kenneth French used the ratio in their three- and five-factor models to describe stock returns. Professor Joseph Piotroski uses the ratio as the only valuation measure in his F-Score methodology.

Testing

We understand the importance of data driven research for CUNA Mutual Group employees and retirees. Set out below are the results of two Fama and French backtests of the book value-to-market equity (the inverse of the PB ratio) data from 1926 to 2013. As of December 2013, there were 3,175 firms in the sample (Carlisle-PB, P2). The value decile contained the 459 stocks with the highest earnings yield, and the glamour decile contained the 404 stocks with the lowest earnings yield.

The average size of the glamour stocks is $7.48 billion and the value stocks are $2.54 billion. (Note that the average is heavily skewed by the biggest companies. For context, the 3,175th company has a market capitalization today of $404 million, which is smaller than the average, but still investable for most investors). Portfolios are formed on June 30 and rebalanced annually. When accounting for this backtest, CUNA Mutual Group employees may recognize how two portfolios are weighted by market capitalization, which means that bigger firms contribute more to the performance of the portfolio, and smaller firms contribute less. Here, we can see that the value decile has comprehensively outperformed the glamour decile, returning 12.6 percent compounded (17.7 percent in the average year) over the full period versus 8.6 percent for the glamour decile (10.9 percent in the average year) (Carlisle-PB, P3).

These returns are considerably lower than the returns found for the price-to-earnings and cash-flow ratios discussed earlier. Despite the irregularity, CUNA Mutual Group employees must be aware that the earnings and cash flow back tests ran back to only 1951, and the book value return data begins in 1926. The difference is due to the 1929 crash, which had an oversized impact on returns. The impact of the crash is visible on the chart; it took twenty years for the value decile to fully recover. CUNA Mutual Group employees must also note how something similar has happened to the glamour decile since 2000; it hasn’t grown in 13 years. To make a comparison possible of the book value’s performance to the performance of earnings and cash flow over the same period, I also measured the returns beginning in 1951. Since 1951, the low P/B value decile has generated a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 15.0 percent and an average annual return (AAR) of 17.9 percent. Over the same period, the glamour decile returned a CAGR of 9.6 percent and an AAR of 12.6 percent (Carlisle-PB, P5). These returns are approximately the same as the returns generated by the low P/CF and P/E studies over the same period.

In their study, they found that the quintile of the lowest P/E stocks significantly outperformed the high P/E quintile. The portfolio containing the lowest P/E stock returned 11.61% annualized compared to 4.83% for the highest P/E portfolio and 7.55% for the used universe of stocks. The graph below shows how the cumulative returns compare (it’s not even close). CUNA Mutual Group employees can utilize this information to avoid investing in underperforming assets and better predict economic trends that translate into higher ROI.

Articles you may find interesting:

Weighting

It is important for employees and retirees of CUNA Mutual Group to understand how market capitalization-weighted returns are useful for demonstrating that the outperformance of value over glamour is not due to the value portfolios containing smaller stocks. Unless you’re running an index (or hugging an index), they’re not really meaningful. The easiest portfolio weighting scheme is to simply equally weight each position. (If we’re prepared to put up with a little extra volatility for a little extra return, we can also Kelly weight our best ideas). Kelly Weighting is determined by the Kelly Criterion which is a formula used to determine what percentage of their capital should be used in each trade to maximize long-term growth. There are two key components to the formula (Kelly % = W- [(1 - W) / R]): the winning probability factor (W) and the win/loss ratio (R). The winning probability is the probability a trade will have a positive return. The win/loss ratio is equal to the total positive trade amounts divided by the total negative trading amounts. The result of the formula will tell investors what percentage of their total capital they should apply to each investment. By utilizing the Kelly Weighting, investors employed or retiring from CUNA Mutual Group can have a better grasp of their exposure to each individual asset in their portfolio and make informed decisions regarding their asset allocation.

CUNA Mutual Group employees should also account for the equal weight return statistics for book value. In the equal weight backtest, the value generated a 20.2 percent compounded return (27.3 percent on average), beating out glamour’s 6.3 percent compounded return (10.4 percent on average) (Carlisle-PB, P10). Since 1951 the equally weighted P/B value decile has generated a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 20.0 percent and an average annual return (AAR) of 25.4 percent (Carlisle-PB, P11).

Over the same period, the glamour decile returned a CAGR of 6.4 percent and an AAR of 10.8 percent. These returns are close to the same as the returns generated by the low P/CF and P/E studies over the same period. When accounting for this information, CUNA Mutual Group employees must recognize that the value portfolios outperformed because they bought more book value per dollar invested than the glamour portfolios: 4.57x on average versus 0.25x in the glamour portfolios (Carlisle-PB, P12). In the equal-weight portfolios, value has significantly outperformed glamour since 1999, beating it by an extraordinary 15.9 percent compounded, and 16.1 percent in the average year (Carlisle-PB, P13).

The Brandes Research Institute

Because we understand just how important data-driven solutions are for our CUNA Mutual Group employees and retirees, we have provided another study, which discusses the P/CF ratio. In a Brandes Research Institute study, Exhibit 6 below illustrates the global all-cap findings across three price metrics.

The results confirmed a consistent value premium across all metrics. We will focus on the P/CF ratio and the outperformance in the decile 10 value stocks. The smallest outperformance between decile 1 glamour stocks and decile 10 value stocks can be observed with the P/B measurement, where the average outperformance was 7.1% (Brandes, p. 8).

About The Retirement Group

The Retirement Group is a nation-wide group of financial advisors who work together as a team.

We focus entirely on retirement planning and the design of retirement portfolios for transitioning corporate employees. Each representative of the group has been hand selected by The Retirement Group in select cities of the United States. Each advisor was selected based on their pension expertise, experience in financial planning, and portfolio construction knowledge.

TRG takes a teamwork approach in providing the best possible solutions for our clients’ concerns. The Team has a conservative investment philosophy and diversifies client portfolios with laddered bonds, CDs, mutual funds, ETFs, Annuities, Stocks and other investments to help achieve their goals. The team addresses Retirement, Pension, Tax, Asset Allocation, Estate, and Elder Care issues. This document utilizes various research tools and techniques. A variety of assumptions and judgmental elements are inevitably inherent in any attempt to estimate future results and, consequently, such results should be viewed as tentative estimations. Changes in the law, investment climate, interest rates, and personal circumstances will have profound effects on both the accuracy of our estimations and the suitability of our recommendations. The need for ongoing sensitivity to change and for constant re-examination and alteration of the plan is thus apparent.

Therefore, we encourage you to have your plan updated a few months before your potential retirement date as well as an annual review. It should be emphasized that neither The Retirement Group, LLC nor any of its employees can engage in the practice of law or accounting and that nothing in this document should be taken as an effort to do so. We look forward to working with tax and/or legal professionals you may select to discuss the relevant ramifications of our recommendations.

Throughout your retirement years we will continue to update you on issues affecting your retirement through our complimentary and proprietary newsletters, workshops and regular updates. You may always reach us at (800) 900-5867.

Sources

What to do with an Early Retirement Ebook
Social Security Ebook
Lump Sum vs. Annuity Ebook
401(k) Rollover Strategies Ebook
Closing the Retirement Gap Ebook
Brandes Institute, The. “Value vs. Glamour: A Long-Term Worldwide Perspective”. 2014. < https://www.brandes.com/docs/default-source/brandes-institute/value-vs-glamour-worldwide-perspective>.
Carlisle, Tobias. “Investing Using the Price-to-Earnings Ratio and Earnings Yield (Backtests 1951 to 2013)”. May 26, 2014. <http://greenbackd.com/2014/05/26/price-to-earnings-ratio-backtest-1951-to-2013/>.
Causeway Capital. “The Compelling Case for Value Stocks”. 2018 https://www.causewaycap.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/201802-TheCompellingCaseforValue-1.pdf
Research Affiliates. “To Win with ‘Smart Beta’, Ask if the Price is Right” September 7, 2016 < https://seekingalpha.com/article/4004564-win-smart-beta-ask-price-right>
Tweedy Browne Company LLC. “What Has Worked in Investing: Studies of Investment Approaches and Characteristics Associated with Exceptional Returns.” 1992. <http://www.tweedy.com/resources/library_docs/papers/WhatHasWorkedFundVersionWeb.pdf>.
Yuan, Vera. Guru Focus. “Earnings, Free Cash Flow, Book Value? Which Parameters Are Stock Prices Most Correlated To?”. August 2, 2013. < http://www.gurufocus.com/news/225255/earnings-free-cash-flow-book-value-which-parameters-are-stock-prices-most-correlated-to->.
Fama and French Backtesting http://mba.tuck.dartmouth.edu/pages/faculty/ken.french/data_library.html

What are the key differences between defined benefit plans and defined contribution plans offered by CUNA Mutual Group, and how might these differences affect my retirement benefits? As an employee of CUNA Mutual Group, understanding the nuances of defined benefit plans versus defined contribution plans is critical for effective retirement planning. Defined benefit plans typically promise a specific payout at retirement based on factors such as salary history and duration of employment. In contrast, defined contribution plans, like 401(k) plans, depend more on employee contributions and investment performance. Given the volatility in investment returns and changing employment patterns, employees might find themselves at a crossroad between predictable retirement income versus self-directed savings and investment risks. It's vital to explore how these plans could impact long-term financial security at retirement.

A defined benefit plan at CUNA Mutual Group offers predictable retirement payouts, typically based on salary history and years of service, ensuring employees a guaranteed income in retirement. In contrast, defined contribution plans, such as a 401(k), rely heavily on individual contributions and investment performance. Employees may face risks with defined contribution plans due to market volatility but benefit from greater control over their retirement savings. Depending on your financial situation and retirement goals, these differences can impact how secure your future income will be, either through guaranteed payouts or potential growth in investments.

How are pension costs determined in a defined benefit plan at CUNA Mutual Group, and what factors can influence these costs over time? The cost structure of a defined benefit plan at CUNA Mutual Group is predicated on various components, including service costs, interest costs, expected returns on assets, and amortization of gains and losses. Understanding these factors helps in managing potential burden changes on the organization's budget and employees' retirement expectations. For instance, factors such as fluctuating interest rates can significantly alter the present value of future liabilities, affecting the costs that CUNA Mutual Group bears. Employees should be versed in these aspects to contextualize their retirement benefits.

Pension costs at CUNA Mutual Group are influenced by factors such as service cost (new benefit accruals), interest cost (growth on past benefits), expected return on plan assets, and the amortization of gains or losses. Changes in these factors, like fluctuations in interest rates or salary adjustments, can affect the overall cost of the plan. Employees should be aware of how these variables impact their future pension benefits and how changes to the company's funding strategy could alter expectations.

What strategies can CUNA Mutual Group adopt to manage the costs and benefits of its defined benefit plan without drastically impacting employees' retirement security? CUNA Mutual Group faces the challenge of balancing cost management for its defined benefit plan while also ensuring that employees have adequate retirement benefits. Options like freezing benefit accruals, amending contribution formulas, or shifting to defined contribution plans can be explored. However, such strategies must be handled delicately to avoid significant disruptions to employees' retirement planning. Understanding employee concerns and the potential ramifications of these strategies is crucial to formulating a balanced approach.

CUNA Mutual Group can adopt strategies such as freezing benefit accruals, transitioning to cash balance designs, or reducing benefit formulas to manage costs. These strategies may lower expenses but must be carefully balanced to avoid significantly affecting employees' long-term retirement benefits. Clear communication about potential changes and their impact on retirement income is crucial for employees to adjust their retirement planning.

In what ways could regulatory changes influence the CUNA Mutual Group's pension plan design and its offerings to employees after retirement? Regulatory bodies frequently revise guidelines that govern employee benefit plans, potentially impacting how CUNA Mutual Group structures its pension offerings. For instance, changes to tax policies or pension funding requirements could affect administrative decisions regarding contribution levels or payout structures for defined benefit plans. It is imperative for employees to stay apprised of these regulations so they can understand any changes that might occur in their future benefits and what steps CUNA Mutual Group might take to adapt to new compliance needs.

Regulatory changes, such as adjustments in pension funding requirements or tax policies, can have a substantial impact on CUNA Mutual Group’s pension plan design. Changes in laws may require adjustments to benefit levels, contribution structures, or funding strategies. Employees should monitor such regulatory shifts to understand how they could influence future pension payouts and retirement strategies.

Could you explain the process employees at CUNA Mutual Group would need to undertake to access their retirement benefits upon leaving the company? For employees transitioning from CUNA Mutual Group to other ventures, itâ€™s essential to understand the process involved in accessing retirement benefits. This process may involve determining eligibility for pension payouts, selecting between lump-sum distributions or annuitized payments, and understanding how past contribution levels affect final benefits. Employees are encouraged to seek guidance from the HR department or pension plan administrators to navigate this process thoroughly.

When leaving CUNA Mutual Group, employees need to assess their eligibility for pension benefits, choose between lump-sum payouts or annuities, and understand how their years of service and contributions affect the final payout. It's advisable to consult with HR or a plan administrator to navigate the options and ensure that the benefits are accessed appropriately.

What tools and resources does CUNA Mutual Group provide to assist employees in planning for retirement effectively? CUNA Mutual Group offers various resources designed to support employees in their retirement planning journey. These might include access to financial planning tools, informational webinars about defined benefit and contribution options, or one-on-one consultations with benefits specialists. Employees should actively participate in these offerings as a means of optimizing their retirement readiness and ensuring they are leveraging all available benefits to the fullest extent.

CUNA Mutual Group offers several resources for retirement planning, such as access to financial planning tools, retirement webinars, and consultations with benefits specialists. These resources are designed to help employees make informed decisions about their defined benefit and defined contribution options, ensuring they optimize their retirement strategies.

How does the CUNA Mutual Group approach the issue of pension funding, and what implications does this have for current and future employees? The funding strategy for the pension plan at CUNA Mutual Group has significant implications for the benefits that employees can expect. A well-funded pension plan can provide assurance for employees about the stability and security of their retirement income. Conversely, fluctuations in the funding status could lead the organization to consider changes in benefit formulas or contribution strategies. Employees should be aware of how funding levels could affect their future benefits and the overall health of the pension plan.

CUNA Mutual Group’s pension funding strategy is critical to maintaining the stability of retirement benefits. A well-funded plan assures employees of predictable payouts, while underfunded plans may lead to changes in benefit formulas or contributions. Employees should stay informed about the funding status, as it could affect the future security of their pension income.

What should employees at CUNA Mutual Group know about the potential risks and benefits associated with their defined benefit plan? Employees should have a clear understanding of the inherent risks and benefits linked to CUNA Mutual Group's defined benefit plan. While these plans offer predictable retirement income, they are subject to various risks such as underfunding issues, market volatility, and regulatory changes. This understanding equips employees with knowledge about their eventual retirement income and helps them plan strategically alongside their professional developments or transitions within their careers.

Employees need to understand that defined benefit plans at CUNA Mutual Group provide predictable retirement income but come with risks such as underfunding, economic fluctuations, and regulatory changes. By staying informed about these risks, employees can better plan for their financial security in retirement, potentially supplementing their pension with other savings strategies.

What happens to my retirement benefits if CUNA Mutual Group decides to freeze its defined benefit plan? The implications of freezing a defined benefit plan at CUNA Mutual Group would be substantial for employees. Understanding the details surrounding such a freeze, including whether it would impact future accruals or merely limit new benefits for incoming participants, is crucial. Employees should consider consulting HR for comprehensive information regarding their specific situations and how a freeze could influence their expected retirement payouts.

If CUNA Mutual Group freezes its defined benefit plan, employees may no longer accrue new benefits, though they retain previously earned benefits. A freeze could impact future retirement income, particularly for employees nearing retirement, as they could miss out on years of service accruals or salary increases factored into their final benefit calculation.

How can employees contact CUNA Mutual Group to inquire further about their retirement benefits and related services? To learn more about retirement benefits, employees should reach out directly to CUNA Mutual Groupâ€™s HR department or designated pension plan administrators. The organization provides channels such as in-person meetings, phone consultations, and online resources which are specifically structured to assist employees with inquiries related to their retirement benefits and participant obligations. Employees can also explore dedicated web portals for additional information and updates on their pension plans.

Employees can contact CUNA Mutual Group directly through their retirement solutions division at 1-800-356-2644 or visit the website at CUNA Mutual Retirement Solutions for more information about retirement planning services and personalized assistance with their retirement benefits.

Additional Articles

Check Out Articles for CUNA Mutual Group employees

For more information you can reach the plan administrator for CUNA Mutual Group at 5910 Mineral Point Rd Madison, WI 53705; or by calling them at (608) 238-5851.