New Update: Healthcare Costs Increasing by Over 60% in Some States. Will you be impacted?

Estate Planning in Los Angeles: What Every University of Chicago Employee Should Know About Real Estate and Legacy

'Rising costs, evolving property tax rules, and liquidity pressures mean that investors should consider Los Angeles real estate as part of their larger retirement and estate strategy, rather than as a standalone asset. I encourage University of Chicago employees to regularly reassess how home ownership aligns with long-term cash flow, legacy goals, and overall financial flexibility.' – Michael Corgiat, a representative of The Retirement Group, a division of Wealth Enhancement.

'In today’s Los Angeles housing environment, University of Chicago employees should evaluate real estate through the lens of liquidity, long-term risk, and generational planning rather than relying solely on past appreciation. Thoughtful coordination between housing decisions and retirement objectives can create greater clarity and flexibility.' – Brent Wolf, a representative of The Retirement Group, a division of Wealth Enhancement.

In this article, we will discuss:

How rising costs and shifting market conditions have changed the financial landscape for Los Angeles homeowners.
What today’s inheritance and property tax rules mean for families passing real estate to the next generation.
How liquidity, insurance, and long-term planning may influence real estate decisions for University of Chicago employees.

Owning a home in California, particularly in Los Angeles, was once seen as a clear path to wealth. You made a purchase, waited, and appreciation seemed to do most of the heavy lifting. As a result, many University of Chicago employees who built careers in Southern California have long considered real estate a central part of their long-term financial planning.

The math has shifted.

From the Westside to the San Gabriel Valley to the South Bay, families across Los Angeles are experiencing a very different housing environment than they did just a few decades ago. While property holdings still typically continue to appreciate, rising costs in other areas may be chipping away at the financial foundations. The good news is that meaningful financial opportunities still exist for University of Chicago employees willing to engage in proactive retirement and legacy planning.

Here are some things to consider if you currently own property in Los Angeles or expect to pass it on to the next generation.

Appreciation Still Tells a Story—But Context Matters

A family could have bought a home in Torrance or Pasadena for under $300,000 in the late 1990s or early 2000s. ¹ Today, that same property may be worth between $1.5 million and $2 million. ² As of 2026, the median home price in Los Angeles County was $950,000. ³ On paper, that represents significant accumulated value. However, today’s landscape looks different than in the past:

- A 3% mortgage rate is no longer typical. Freddie Mac reports that 30-year fixed mortgage rates have averaged well above 6% in recent years. ⁴
- Property insurance costs have risen substantially, with several insurers limiting new policies in California.
- Proposition 13 limits property taxes for long-term owners but resets upon sale.
- Los Angeles renovation costs rank among the highest nationwide. ⁵
- Maintaining an older home can cost tens of thousands annually depending on condition and location.

For University of Chicago employees, appreciation alone is no longer sufficient reason to hold real estate. Decisions now involve long-term planning, risk assessment, tax considerations, and liquidity analysis.

The Inheritance Formula Has Changed

Many families assume inheriting a Los Angeles property is automatically beneficial. Financially, it can be—but the calculations are more complex today.

Under Proposition 19, children who inherit a primary residence must meet certain requirements to limit property tax reassessment. ⁶ They generally must:

- Occupy the home as their primary residence.
- File for the homeowner’s exemption within one year of the transfer.
- Stay within specific assessed value limits.
If they move out, property taxes will reset to market value. California’s statewide property tax rate averages approximately 1% of assessed value (plus local assessments). ⁷ On a $2 million Los Angeles home, that could mean annual property taxes of $20,000 or more.

For adult children who already own homes elsewhere, retaining inherited property in Los Angeles County can become financially demanding. As a result, properties originally intended to remain in the family are frequently sold.

Property Taxes: The Quiet Divide

Proposition 13 has created two very different homeowner experiences in Los Angeles. A couple who purchased a home in 1995 now worth $1.8 million may pay a fraction of what a new buyer would pay in property taxes. Although California limits annual assessed value increases to 2% under Proposition 13, a buyer purchasing the same home today would pay property taxes based on current market value.

Economists often refer to this dynamic as the “lock-in effect,” where homeowners remain in place due to tax advantages tied to long-held property. From a planning standpoint, this often leads to:

- Reduced housing mobility.
- Wealth concentrated heavily in real estate.
- Reluctance to downsize during retirement.

For many University of Chicago retirees, the emotional and financial aspects of homeownership become closely connected.

Risk and Insurance Are Now Major Factors

Earthquake exposure, wildfire risk, and tightening insurance markets have also changed property cost structures in Southern California.

In recent years, several major insurers paused or limited new homeowner policies in California. ⁸ Even where insurance is available, premiums in high-risk areas have increased substantially. ⁸

In light of these factors, owning property in Los Angeles is no longer viewed as a low volatility asset. Like any major investment, it carries ongoing costs and regional risks that must be evaluated carefully.

Liquidity Matters More Than Ever

Many Los Angeles homeowners are “house rich, cash flow tight.” Despite significant home equity, families may still feel financially constrained. Retirement income planning, health care expenses, college costs, and multigenerational support all require accessible capital—something a home does not easily provide.

Unlike a diversified investment portfolio, a home:

- Does not generate consistent income
- Cannot be partially sold
- Requires ongoing maintenance
- May take months to sell

From a planning standpoint, it is important to determine whether the home supports your long-term financial objectives or primarily serves as a legacy and emotional anchor.

Capital Gains: A Limited Advantage

Homeowners may exclude up to $250,000 (single) or $500,000 (married filing jointly) of capital gains when selling a primary residence. ⁹

However, decades of appreciation in Los Angeles can exceed these limits quickly. If a home purchased for $400,000 is sold for $2 million, that creates a $1.6 million gain. After applying the exclusion, a significant taxable amount may remain.

Coordinating sale timing with a broader tax strategy can make a meaningful difference.

Has Homeownership Lost Its Appeal?

Not entirely—but the advantages are no longer automatic.

Los Angeles real estate can still offer:

- Long-term appreciation potential
- Housing cost stability for long-term owners
- Emotional and legacy value
- The ability to build equity over time

What has changed is the level of planning required:

- Estate plan coordination

- Understanding Proposition 19

- Liquidity planning

- Risk evaluation

- Tax review before transferring or gifting property

What was once a simple “buy and hold” decision has evolved into a more detailed financial strategy.

Planning Ahead

If you own property in Los Angeles or intend to pass it to your children, consider:

- Will your children realistically live in the home?

- Have you calculated potential reassessed property taxes?

- Does real estate represent too much of your net worth?

- Would selling during your lifetime provide greater flexibility?

- Is your property title aligned with your trust and estate plan?

For some families, keeping the property remains appropriate. For others, converting equity and diversifying assets may better support retirement income, intergenerational wealth objectives, or charitable planning.

Final Thoughts

California real estate has a long history of appreciation and opportunity. That remains true in Los Angeles—but the financial landscape is more complex than it once was.

Homeownership today involves understanding cash flow, tax exposure, policy changes, insurance risk, and family dynamics. For University of Chicago employees approaching retirement or already retired, these factors can influence estate planning outcomes.

The advantages are still there—but they require careful planning.

If you are evaluating how your Los Angeles property fits into your broader retirement and estate plan, it may be time to revisit the numbers.

You can get retirement planning assistance from The Retirement Group. Give us a call at (800) 900-5867 to learn more.

Featured Video

Articles you may find interesting:

Sources:

1. Patch. ' Home Prices Have Nearly Tripled In LA Since 2000: Report ,' by Kat Schuster. April 4, 2022.

2. Zillow. ' Pasadena, CA Housing Market ,' January 31, 2026.

3. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (FRED). ' Housing Inventory: Median Listing Price in Los Angeles County, CA ,' February 6, 2026.

4. Freddie Mac. “Primary Mortgage Market Survey® (PMMS®) Archives.” Freddie Mac , 2026, https://www.freddiemac.com/pmms/pmms_archives .

5. House Beautiful. ' Experts Say Renovations Are the Most Expensive in These States ,' by Sarah Lyon. Feb. 14, 2025.

6. Fennemore Law. ' California Proposition 19's Impact on Estate Planning and Gifting of Real Property ,' by Judith Tang. Feb. 17, 2025.

7. reAlpha. ' California Property Tax (2026): Rates, Prop 13 & Cost ,' by Daniel Ares. Feb. 2, 2026.

8. Kiplinger. ' California's Home Insurance Crisis: Rising Risks, Soaring Costs and Limited Options ,' by Carla Ayers. Jan. 16, 2025.

9. IRS. ' Topic no. 701, Sale of your home. ' Jan. 22, 2026.

What are the eligibility criteria for participation in the SEPP plan for employees of The University of Chicago, and how can factors like years of service and age impact an employee's benefits under this plan? Discuss how these criteria might have changed for new employees post-2016 and what implications this has for retirement planning.

Eligibility Criteria for SEPP: Employees at The University of Chicago become eligible to participate in the SEPP upon meeting age and service requirements: being at least 21 years old and completing one year of service. For employees hired after the plan freeze on October 31, 2016, these criteria have been crucial in determining eligibility for newer employees, impacting their retirement planning as they do not accrue benefits under SEPP beyond this freeze date.

In what ways does the SEPP (Staff Employees Pension Plan) benefit calculation at The University of Chicago reflect an employee's years of service and final average pay? Examine the formulas involved in the benefits determination process, including how outside factors such as Social Security compensation can affect the total pension benefits an employee receives at retirement.

Benefit Calculation Reflecting Service and Pay: The SEPP benefits are calculated based on the final average pay and years of participation, factoring in Social Security covered compensation. Changes post-2016 have frozen benefits accrual, meaning that current employees’ benefits are calculated only up to this freeze date, affecting long-term benefits despite continued employment.

How can employees at The University of Chicago expect their SEPP benefits to be paid out upon their retirement, especially in terms of the options between lump sum distributions and annuities? Analyze the advantages and disadvantages of each payment option, and how these choices can impact an employee's financial situation in retirement.

Payout Options (Lump Sum vs. Annuities): Upon retirement, employees can opt for a lump sum payment or annuities. Each option presents financial implications; lump sums provide immediate access to funds but annuities offer sustained income. This choice is significant for financial stability in retirement, particularly under the constraints post the 2016 plan changes.

Can you elaborate on the spousal rights associated with the pension benefits under the SEPP plan at The University of Chicago? Discuss how marital status influences annuity payments and the required spousal consent when considering changes to beneficiary designations.

Spousal Rights in SEPP Benefits: Spouses have rights to pension benefits, requiring spousal consent for altering beneficiary arrangements under the SEPP. Changes post-2016 do not impact these rights, but understanding these is vital for making informed decisions about pension benefits and beneficiary designations.

As an employee nearing retirement at The University of Chicago, what considerations should one keep in mind regarding taxes on pension benefits received from the SEPP? Explore the tax implications of different types of distributions and how they align with current IRS regulations for the 2024 tax year.

Tax Considerations for SEPP Benefits: SEPP distributions are taxable income. Employees must consider the tax implications of their chosen payout method—lump sum or annuities—and plan for potential tax liabilities. This understanding is crucial, especially with the plan’s benefit accrual freeze affecting the retirement timeline.

What resources are available for employees of The University of Chicago wishing to understand more about their retirement benefits under SEPP? Discuss the types of information that can be requested from the Benefits Office and highlight the contact methods for obtaining more detailed assistance.

Resources for Understanding SEPP Benefits: The University provides resources for employees to understand their SEPP benefits, including access to the Benefits Office for personalized queries. Utilizing these resources is essential for employees, especially newer ones post-2016, to fully understand their retirement benefits under the current plan structure.

How does The University of Chicago address benefits for employees upon their death, and what provisions exist for both spouses and non-spouse beneficiaries under the SEPP plan? Analyze the specific benefits and payment structures available to beneficiaries and the conditions under which these benefits are distributed.

Posthumous Benefits: The SEPP includes provisions for spouses and non-spouse beneficiaries, detailing the continuation or lump sum payments upon the death of the employee. Understanding these provisions is crucial for estate planning and ensuring financial security for beneficiaries.

What factors ensure an employee remains fully vested in their pension benefits with The University of Chicago, and how does the vesting schedule affect retirement planning strategies? Consider the implications of not fulfilling the vesting criteria and how this might influence decisions around employment tenure and retirement timing.

Vesting and Retirement Planning: Vesting in SEPP requires three years of service, with full benefits contingent on meeting this criterion. For employees navigating post-2016 changes, understanding vesting is crucial for retirement planning, particularly as no additional benefits accrue beyond the freeze date.

Discuss the impact of a Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO) on the SEPP benefits for employees at The University of Chicago. How do divorce or separation proceedings influence pension benefits, and what steps should employees take to ensure compliance with a QDRO?

Impact of QDROs on SEPP Benefits: SEPP complies with Qualified Domestic Relations Orders, which can allocate pension benefits to alternate payees. Understanding how QDROs affect one’s benefits is crucial for financial planning, especially in the context of marital dissolution.

How can employees at The University of Chicago, who have questions about their benefits under the SEPP plan, effectively communicate with the Benefits Office for clarity and assistance? Specify the various communication methods available for employees and what kind of information or support they can expect to receive.

Communicating with the Benefits Office: Employees can reach out to the Benefits Office via email or phone for detailed assistance on their SEPP benefits. Effective communication with this office is vital for employees to clarify their benefits status, particularly in light of the post-2016 changes to the plan.