How the End of this Tax Break Will Benefit High-Earning Ernst & Young Workers

In the realm of financial planning, particularly as it pertains to retirement, recent legislative changes are poised to significantly alter the landscape for diligent savers, especially Ernst & Young professionals who have been strategically utilizing catch-up contributions in traditional 401(k) plans to secure their financial futures.

A newly enacted law, which will be operational as of January, introduces a pivotal shift in the retirement saving strategy for Ernst & Young workers who, in the year prior, earned $145,000 or more and are aged 50 or above. Previously, these individuals were entitled to make catch-up contributions to their traditional 401(k) or analogous plans. These contributions, currently permitting an additional $7,500 above the standard $22,500 annual limit, offered an upfront tax deduction while deferring income taxes on withdrawals until retirement.

However, under the new statute, these high-earning Ernst & Young workers will be redirected exclusively towards Roth 401(k) accounts for their catch-up contributions. Contributions to these accounts are made with after-tax dollars, meaning they do not benefit from the immediate tax deduction. However, they do offer the advantage of potentially tax-free withdrawals in the future.

This shift is causing considerable stir, particularly among those in their peak earning years. For this demographic, channeling after-tax dollars into a Roth account amidst a high tax rate environment can diminish, or entirely negate, the advantages of tax-free withdrawals later in retirement.

Despite the initial disapproval, financial professionals are shedding a different light on this legislative alteration. Betty Wang, a financial adviser based in Denver, encourages a perspective shift: “Congress is doing you a favor by forcing you to save in a Roth account. In the long run, you’ll likely come out ahead.”

Corroborating this, Matt Hylland, a financial planner from Cedar Rapids, Iowa, observes that the immediate gratification of a tax deduction can often lead to more substantial tax burdens in the future. This viewpoint isn't a blanket statement for all Americans preparing for retirement but rather is a nuanced strategy for super-savers who consistently maximize contributions to their tax-deductible retirement accounts.

While the traditional vs. Roth debate isn't new, these experts are not disputing the conventional wisdom that favors Roth contributions when current tax rates are lower than those expected during retirement. Rather, they're highlighting the complexities and uncertainties that accompany retirement planning. Predicting future employment status, retirement location, income levels, and tax implications involves a high degree of speculation.

The unforeseen can significantly impact financial outcomes for Ernst & Young professionals. For instance, an early retirement can lower taxable income, presenting an opportune moment to transfer savings from traditional to Roth accounts at a reduced tax cost. Conversely, a delay in retirement or decision to remain in a high-tax state can escalate the tax costs associated with Roth conversions.

This unpredictability underscores the importance of tax diversification, akin to the principle of investment diversification. By having assets in various types of accounts, savers can maneuver more strategically around the shifting parameters of tax rates and personal circumstances.

Furthermore, the implications of Required Minimum Distributions (RMDs) are often underestimated, especially for married savers. Following the death of a spouse, the surviving individual must often adopt a single-filer tax status, which applies higher tax rates at reduced income levels. However, RMDs may not significantly decrease, thrusting the survivor into elevated tax brackets as these distributions increase with age.

Featured Video

Articles you may find interesting:

Recent research underscores the importance of tax strategies in retirement planning, especially with the recent legislative changes. A study by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) found that retirees who strategically balance withdrawals from Roth and traditional accounts can potentially reduce their lifetime tax bills significantly ('Improving the Federal Tax System,' GAO, April 2021). Especially for higher earners, understanding the interplay between different income sources and tax implications becomes crucial in maximizing retirement income and preserving wealth for future generations. This strategic approach to disbursements underscores the unexpected benefits of Congress's recent decision to incentivize Roth contributions.

For instance, Hylland cites an example of an early 80s couple with $4 million in traditional IRAs or 401(k)s, facing RMDs of around $200,000 annually. This couple might experience a top tax rate of 24%. However, should one spouse pass away, the remaining partner could see their top rate surge to 35%.

Wang encountered a real-world instance of this with a widow who, despite needing less than $150,000 for living expenses, was obligated to take taxable RMDs of $370,000. Availability of funds in a Roth account, which doesn't mandate RMDs, would have offered her both a lower tax rate and greater financial flexibility.

It’s important to acknowledge that the legislative shift towards Roth accounts was not primarily designed to benefit high earners. Indeed, the appeal for lawmakers lies in the immediate tax revenue generated within a 10-year budget window, in stark contrast to the deferred tax revenue associated with traditional IRAs and 401(k)s. This upfront revenue is likely a significant factor in the legislative favor shown towards Roth accounts, and it presents a complex challenge should Congress decide to impose restrictions.

The effective date for this Roth 401(k) transition might be postponed to allow employers adequate preparation time and to address potential legislative or IRS-driven revisions due to current provision anomalies.

Beyond these considerations, Roth accounts carry additional strategic benefits in retirement planning:

1. Roth 401(k)s enable contributions that might otherwise be restricted due to high income or the complexities and tax implications of 'backdoor' Roth IRA contributions. Additionally, they allow for significantly higher contributions compared to Roth IRAs.

2. Withdrawals from Roth accounts do not count as income, thereby avoiding potential Medicare surcharges and the 3.8% net investment income tax.

3. Contributions to Roth accounts initiate the five-year period required for penalty-free, tax-exempt withdrawals, once the account holder is over 59 ½.

4. Compared to regular investment accounts, Roth accounts offer superior benefits, such as tax-free earnings and contributions that can be withdrawn without penalties, subject to certain conditions.

5. For heirs, Roth accounts provide a more favorable scenario. Non-spouse beneficiaries of traditional IRAs or 401(k)s are typically mandated to deplete these accounts within ten years of the original owner's death, often requiring taxable withdrawals each year. In contrast, heirs of Roth accounts can defer withdrawals until the end, free of tax implications.

In conclusion, while the new legislative change pivoting towards Roth 401(k)s for high earning Ernst & Young workers may initially seem disadvantageous, a deeper analysis reveals potential long-term benefits. Financial diversification, especially concerning tax implications, remains a critical strategy for robust retirement planning. This approach, coupled with the inherent advantages of Roth accounts, may position savers for a more secure and flexible financial future.