Healthcare Provider Update: Healthcare Provider for Merck Merck & Co., Inc., commonly known as Merck, is a global leader in the healthcare sector, renowned for its innovative pharmaceuticals, vaccines, and biologic therapies. As a prominent healthcare provider, Merck delivers a wide array of health solutions targeting various health conditions, particularly in areas such as immunology, oncology, and infectious diseases. Potential Healthcare Cost Increases in 2026 In 2026, healthcare costs are projected to rise significantly, primarily driven by the anticipated expiration of enhanced federal premium subsidies associated with the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and growing medical expenses. Faced with an average premium increase of 18%, healthcare consumers may experience out-of-pocket costs climbing by over 75%. This situation is exacerbated by surging medical care prices, as hospitals and providers seek to balance inflationary pressures while maintaining profitability. As a result, many individuals may find themselves priced out of adequate health coverage, prompting essential discussions on the need for policy interventions. Click here to learn more
'Merck employees weighing a move from California to Oklahoma should recognize that differences in state taxes, property values, and cost of living can influence how long their retirement savings last.' — Wesley Boudreaux, a representative of The Retirement Group, a division of Wealth Enhancement.
'Merck employees evaluating retirement options can benefit from comparing states like California and Oklahoma, where differences in taxation and living expenses may directly impact long-term financial stability.' — Patrick Ray, a representative of The Retirement Group, a division of Wealth Enhancement.
In this article we will discuss:
-
How taxes in California and Oklahoma impact retirees and their income.
-
The differences in cost of living, property values, and daily expenses between the two states.
-
Programs and lifestyle considerations, such as Tulsa Remote and health care access, that may influence relocation decisions.
The thought of leaving behind California's vibrant cities, golden beaches, and Mediterranean-like climate may seem unthinkable to many residents. The state continues to draw attention from around the world because of its world-class amenities, varied cultural life, and natural beauty. However, California's growing cost of living, high state taxes, and skyrocketing housing costs have put a heavy financial burden on those on fixed incomes like Social Security and pensions. Some employees at Merck are therefore looking at alternatives that offer a more sustainable retirement way of life. Oklahoma is one place that is becoming more popular.
Due to advantageous tax laws, reduced housing prices, and even incentive programs like Tulsa Remote, hundreds of Californians have moved to Oklahoma in recent years. 1 While Oklahoma may not be the best option for every retiree, there are sufficient financial differences between the two states that they should be carefully considered.
California versus Oklahoma Tax Comparisons
Retirement planning heavily relies on taxes, and there are significant disparities between California and Oklahoma. The tax code in California is particularly difficult for retirees who have several sources of income, according to Carlos Hernandez of Wealth Enhancement. Although Social Security benefits are not taxed in California, the state's progressive tax system applies to pensions, 401k contributions, and other retirement income. Rates can reach 12.3% for many taxpayers, while the highest incomes can pay up to 13.3%, 2 which is the highest state income tax rate in the country.
In contrast, Oklahoma offers retirees 65 and older a $10,000 deduction on other types of retirement income in addition to exempting Social Security income from taxes. 3 Oklahoma's highest marginal income tax rate is 4.75%, 3 which is far lower than California's even without taking this deduction into account.
These differences can result in annual tax savings of thousands of dollars for seniors who receive both Social Security and pensions. Take, for instance, a person who receives $30,000 in Social Security benefits in addition to a $40,000 pension. The pension income would be subject to full state taxation in California. In Oklahoma, Social Security would be completely untaxed, $10,000 of the pension income would be exempt, and the remaining taxable pension amount would be subject to significantly lower rates. As a result, the tax burden is considerably lighter, giving the household budget more flexibility.
Cost of Living and Property Values
The financial equation consists of more than just taxes. The housing market in California puts additional financial strain on seniors, claims Kevin Won of Wealth Enhancement. California routinely has some of the highest property values in the country. The base property tax payment is still correlated with high market values, despite the fact that established safeguards like Proposition 13 restrict yearly increases in property tax assessments. The absolute cost is nevertheless high in comparison to national norms, even if householders 55 and older may relocate their tax base under specific circumstances. 4
The problem is made worse by insurance premiums. In California, plans that cover the danger of earthquakes or wildfires are not only costly, but they are also getting harder to obtain in high-risk locations.
The real estate market in Oklahoma paints a completely different picture. Compared to many California regions, the median home value is less than half. 5 Reduced property taxes are a direct result of lower property prices. Although Oklahoma does not provide tax-base transfers or unique senior exemptions like California does, retirees frequently still benefit from lower total valuations.
Additionally, Oklahoma benefits from a lower overall cost of living. Daily costs, such as groceries, utilities, and medical care, are often less than in California. Retirement savings can extend further thanks to the combined impact of lower housing, insurance, and daily expenses, which gives people greater flexibility in choosing their spending and lifestyle preferences.
Rewards Initiatives: Tulsa Remote
Tulsa Remote is one distinctive program contributing to Oklahoma's rising popularity. This program was started in 2018 with the goal of luring remote workers to Tulsa by providing cash incentives and opportunities for community integration. The program offers $10,000 to participants who agree to stay in Tulsa for a minimum of one year.
Over 60,000 applications have been submitted to Tulsa Remote since its launch, with almost 8,000 of those applications coming from California. 6 As a result, nearly 3,600 participants have relocated to Tulsa. 6 Despite focusing on working professionals rather than retirees, this program has helped spread awareness about Oklahoma's affordability and livability.
The Practical Financial Impact
The practical impact is better demonstrated by going over the previous financial case again. In California, a retiree with $40,000 in pension income and $30,000 in Social Security would pay high taxes; nevertheless, in Oklahoma, they would receive large benefits. Once the $10,000 exemption and reduced marginal rates are applied, the difference could result in yearly savings of thousands of dollars.
Beyond taxes, long-term financial consistency is strengthened by being able to buy a home for half as much, or less, than in many California markets. Over time, lower utility costs, lower insurance premiums, and overall cost-of-living reductions can add up to provide more discretionary income for leisure, travel, or building retirement stability.
In Conclusion
Although California is still a popular place to live, seniors are finding it increasingly difficult to keep up with the state's high taxes, high property values, and overall cost of living. Oklahoma is a strong alternative because of its low tax rates, $10,000 retirement income exemption, reasonably priced housing market, and lower cost of living.
According to a recent analysis, retirees in Oklahoma could maintain their financial resources for roughly 51 years with $1.5 million in savings and Social Security benefits, far exceeding the 24 years estimated in California. 7 This difference is primarily due to Oklahoma's significantly lower annual cost of living (about $29,666) 7 than to California's high expenses.
Featured Video
Articles you may find interesting:
- Corporate Employees: 8 Factors When Choosing a Mutual Fund
- Use of Escrow Accounts: Divorce
- Medicare Open Enrollment for Corporate Employees: Cost Changes in 2024!
- Stages of Retirement for Corporate Employees
- 7 Things to Consider Before Leaving Your Company
- How Are Workers Impacted by Inflation & Rising Interest Rates?
- Lump-Sum vs Annuity and Rising Interest Rates
- Internal Revenue Code Section 409A (Governing Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans)
- Corporate Employees: Do NOT Believe These 6 Retirement Myths!
- 401K, Social Security, Pension – How to Maximize Your Options
- Have You Looked at Your 401(k) Plan Recently?
- 11 Questions You Should Ask Yourself When Planning for Retirement
- Worst Month of Layoffs In Over a Year!
- Corporate Employees: 8 Factors When Choosing a Mutual Fund
- Use of Escrow Accounts: Divorce
- Medicare Open Enrollment for Corporate Employees: Cost Changes in 2024!
- Stages of Retirement for Corporate Employees
- 7 Things to Consider Before Leaving Your Company
- How Are Workers Impacted by Inflation & Rising Interest Rates?
- Lump-Sum vs Annuity and Rising Interest Rates
- Internal Revenue Code Section 409A (Governing Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans)
- Corporate Employees: Do NOT Believe These 6 Retirement Myths!
- 401K, Social Security, Pension – How to Maximize Your Options
- Have You Looked at Your 401(k) Plan Recently?
- 11 Questions You Should Ask Yourself When Planning for Retirement
- Worst Month of Layoffs In Over a Year!
Sources:
1. MSN. ' Hundreds of Californians have been paid $10,000 to relocate to Oklahoma ,' by Hannah Fry. August 15, 2025.
2. Nerdwallet. ' California State Income Tax Rates and Brackets for 2024-2025 ,' by Sabrina Parys. June 5, 2025.
3. SmartAsset. ' Oklahoma Retirement Tax Friendliness .' 2025.
4. California State Board of Equalization. ' Transfer of Base Year Value for Persons Age 55 and Over - Propositions 60/90 .' 2025.
5. Forbes. ' Median Home Price by State ,' by Kiah Treece. July 29, 2025.
6. SF Gate. ' The surprising destination luring California transplants with $10,000 ,' by Tessa McLean. August 4, 2025.
7. CNBC. ' $1.5 million is the 'magic number' for retirement savings--here's how long it lasts in every U.S. state ,' by Mike Winters. Mar. 15, 2025.
How does Merck's new retirement benefits program support long-term financial security for employees, particularly regarding the changes to the pension and savings plans introduced in 2013? Can you elaborate on how Merck's commitment to these plans is designed to help employees plan for retirement effectively?
Merck's New Retirement Benefits Program: Starting in 2013, Merck introduced a comprehensive retirement benefits program aimed at providing all eligible employees, irrespective of their legacy company, uniform benefits. This initiative supports Merck's commitment to financial security by integrating pension plans, savings plans, and retiree medical coverage. This approach not only aims to help employees plan effectively for retirement but also aligns with Merck’s post-merger goal of standardizing benefits across the board.
What are the key differences between the legacy pension benefits offered by Merck before 2013 and the new cash balance formula implemented in the current retirement program? In what ways do these changes reflect Merck's broader goal of harmonizing benefits across various employee groups?
Differences in Pension Formulas: Before 2013, Merck calculated pensions using a final average pay formula which typically favored longer-term, older employees. The new scheme introduced a cash balance formula, reflecting a shift towards a more uniform accumulation of retirement benefits throughout an employee's career. This change was part of Merck's broader strategy to harmonize benefits across various employee groups, making it easier for employees to understand and track their pension growth.
In terms of eligibility, how have Merck's pension and savings plans adjusted for years of service and age of retirement since the introduction of the new program? Can you explain how these adjustments might affect employees nearing retirement age compared to newer employees at Merck?
Adjustments in Eligibility: The new retirement program revised eligibility criteria for pension and savings plans to accommodate a wider range of employees. Notably, the pension benefits under the new program are designed to be at least equal to the prior benefits for services rendered until the end of 2019, provided employees contribute a minimum of 6% to the savings plan. This adjustment aids both long-term employees and those newer to the company by offering equitable benefits.
Can you describe the transition provisions that apply to legacy Merck employees hired before January 1, 2013? How does Merck plan to ensure that these provisions protect employees from potential reductions in retirement benefits during the transition period?
Transition Provisions for Legacy Employees: For employees who were part of legacy Merck plans before January 1, 2013, Merck established transition provisions that allow them to earn retirement income benefits at least equal to their current pension and savings plan benefits through December 31, 2019. This ensures that these employees do not suffer a reduction in benefits during the transition period, offering a sense of security as they adapt to the new program.
How does employee contribution to the retirement savings plan affect the overall retirement benefits that Merck provides? Can you discuss the implications of Merck's matching contributions for employees who maximize their savings under the new retirement benefits structure?
Impact of Employee Contribution to Retirement Savings: In the new program, Merck encourages personal contributions to the retirement savings plan by matching up to 6% of employee contributions. This mutual contribution strategy enhances the overall retirement benefits, incentivizing employees to maximize their savings for a more robust financial future post-retirement.
What role does Merck's Financial Planning Benefit, offered through Ernst & Young, play in assisting employees with their retirement planning? Can you highlight how engaging with this benefit changes the financial landscapes for employees approaching retirement?
Role of Merck’s Financial Planning Benefit: Offered through Ernst & Young, this benefit plays a critical role in assisting Merck employees with retirement planning. It provides personalized financial planning services, helping employees understand and optimize their benefits under the new retirement framework. Engaging with this service can significantly alter an employee’s financial landscape by providing expert guidance tailored to individual retirement goals.
How should employees evaluate their options for retiree medical coverage under the new program compared to previous offerings? What considerations should be taken into account regarding the potential costs and benefits of the retiree medical plan provided by Merck?
Options for Retiree Medical Coverage: With the new program, employees must evaluate both subsidized and unsubsidized retiree medical coverage options based on their age, service length, and retirement needs. The program offers different levels of company support depending on these factors, making it crucial for employees to understand the potential costs and benefits to choose the best option for their circumstances.
In what ways does the introduction of voluntary, unsubsidized dental coverage through MetLife modify the previous dental benefits structure for Merck retirees? Can you detail how these changes promote cost efficiency while still providing valuable options for employees?
Introduction of Voluntary Dental Coverage: Starting January 2013, Merck shifted from sponsored to voluntary, unsubsidized dental coverage through MetLife for retirees. This change aligns with Merck’s strategy to promote cost efficiency while still providing valuable dental care options, allowing retirees to choose plans that best meet their needs without company subsidy.
How can employees actively engage with Merck's resources to maximize their retirement benefits? What specific tools or platforms are recommended for employees to track their savings and retirement progress effectively within the new benefits framework?
Engaging with Merck’s Retirement Resources: Merck provides various tools and platforms for employees to effectively manage and track their retirement savings and benefits. Employees are encouraged to utilize resources like the Merck Financial Planning Benefit and online benefit portals to make informed decisions and maximize their retirement outcomes.
For employees seeking additional information about the retirement benefits program, what are the best ways to contact Merck? Can you provide details on whom to reach out to, including any relevant phone numbers or online resources offered by Merck for inquiries related to the retirement plans?
Contacting Merck for Retirement Plan Information: Employees seeking more information about their retirement benefits can contact Merck through dedicated phone lines provided in the benefits documentation or by accessing detailed plan information online through Merck's official benefits portal. This ensures employees have ready access to assistance and comprehensive details regarding their retirement planning options.