Monsanto Employees: What You Need to Know About the New IRS Rules Impacting Your Inherited IRAs

Healthcare Provider Update: Monsanto, a major player in agricultural biotechnology, is covered by various health insurance providers, with many employees accessing coverage through employer-sponsored plans. However, healthcare costs for employers, including those at Monsanto, are projected to rise significantly in 2026. This surge is attributed to a combination of factors such as escalating medical expenses, an expected 8.5% increase in employer-sponsored insurance costs, and possible reductions in federal subsidies for ACA plans. Moreover, with insurers foreseeing double-digit premium increases, many employees could face a substantial financial burden if these trends continue, as both employers and employees adjust to these rapidly increasing costs. Click here to learn more

Understanding the Recent Changes to Inherited IRAs

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has provided clarity on the new rules for inherited Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs). This development addresses the SECURE Act regulations, which have been a source of confusion for many Monsanto employees.

The Crux of the Dispute

At the heart of this matter is the interpretation of the SECURE Act's rules on the withdrawal pattern for inherited IRAs. Prior to the regulations, many beneficiaries believed they had a decade to draw down their inherited IRA balances at their discretion. Contrary to this, the IRS was of the view that annual withdrawals were necessary.

Edward Renn, from Withers' tax team, observed, 'The recent IRS clarification has greatly simplified the process for accountants who were previously uncertain about the procedures for inherited IRAs.'

Given the approximately $12 trillion held in individual retirement accounts, a significant portion of which is destined for beneficiaries, understanding these new IRS rules is crucial.

SECURE Act's Influence on Inherited IRAs

When an IRA owner dies, their account might be transferred to a beneficiary, making it an inherited IRA, which operates under its own set of guidelines.

Historically, if the beneficiary was the spouse of the deceased, they could utilize the “stretch strategy” to determine required minimum distributions (RMDs) based on their life expectancy. This strategy offered substantial tax benefits since distributions from IRAs are taxed at marginal income rates. Therefore, extending the withdrawal period minimized the income tax burden.

However, the SECURE Act of 2020 limited the application of this strategy. The reformed rules stipulate that aside from spouses, all other beneficiaries must complete their withdrawals from an inherited IRA within a 10-year timeframe. Notable exceptions include minor children, those who are disabled or chronically ill, and beneficiaries within 10 years of the deceased’s age.

This adjustment posed challenges for non-spousal beneficiaries due to shorter withdrawal periods. Consequently, they faced the prospect of larger annual RMDs and, by extension, increased income tax bills.

The Timing Dilemma

To optimize tax implications, many accountants advised beneficiaries to time their larger distributions for years with minimal income. Essentially, one could avoid distributions for nine years and deplete the account in the tenth year.

However, this strategy was disrupted in February 2022. The IRS introduced guidelines necessitating annual RMDs for inherited IRAs throughout the 10-year window. This change caused distress among tax professionals.

Rob Williams of Charles Schwab noted the ambiguous messaging from the IRS led to confusion for investors and advisors. This miscommunication led many beneficiaries to delay their distributions, subsequently raising concerns about IRS non-compliance.

The typical IRS penalty for non-withdrawal is 50% of the amount that should have been taken out. So, beneficiaries who didn't withdraw for multiple years potentially faced hefty fines. Fortunately, the new guidelines grant beneficiaries a grace period—penalties won't be applied retroactively, and those who incurred fines can pursue refunds.

According to a 2021 study from the Employee Benefit Research Institute, individuals aged 55-64 have an average IRA balance of $255,000. For Monsanto workers nearing retirement, and those already in their retirement years, this substantial amount reinforces the significance of comprehending the new IRS rules for inherited IRAs. Properly managing and distributing these assets can substantially affect one's retirement lifestyle and legacy. By staying informed, beneficiaries can avoid undue tax burdens and make the most of their inheritance.

Featured Video

Articles you may find interesting:

Navigating Inherited IRAs: Next Steps

The primary driver behind these rules is generating tax revenue. Although these changes might elevate your tax obligations, there are ways to navigate them efficiently.

Beneficiaries are advised to consult fee-only financial advisors. These professionals can provide guidance on intricate details of RMD management, such as addressing the original owner's pending RMDs or transitioning the funds to an account in the beneficiary's name.

Timing remains essential. For younger beneficiaries at the onset of their careers, larger distributions might be preferable, anticipating their income growth. Conversely, those approaching Monsanto retirement could strategically use their inherited IRA for income before tapping into their 401(k)s. While the circumstances of inheriting an IRA might be emotionally charged, it is paramount to strategize for your financial future—another compelling reason to engage a financial professional.