New Update: Healthcare Costs Increasing by Over 60% in Some States. Will you be impacted?

Conagra Brands Employees: The 4% Rule is Outdated—Here's How to Spend More in Retirement

Healthcare Provider Update: Healthcare Provider for Conagra Brands: For Conagra Brands, the healthcare provider information is typically linked to their employment benefits and can vary based on the location and specific plans offered to employees. Generally, large companies like Conagra may partner with major insurers such as UnitedHealthcare, Anthem (Elevance Health), or Aetna to provide health insurance benefits to their employees. It is advisable for Enrolled members to refer to their HR department or employee benefit documentation for specific provider details. Potential Healthcare Cost Increases in 2026: As we look ahead to 2026, significant increases in healthcare costs are anticipated, largely influenced by the expiration of enhanced federal subsidies under the Affordable Care Act (ACA). Reports indicate that premium rates for ACA marketplace plans could rise by over 60% in certain states due to higher medical expenses and market adjustments. Notably, a staggering 92% of policyholders may face a potential increase in their out-of-pocket premiums by more than 75%, reflecting the compounded effect of expiring subsidies and aggressive rate hikes from leading insurers. This perfect storm may lead to many consumers being priced out of essential healthcare coverage, forcing a reevaluation of their insurance options as financial pressures mount. Click here to learn more

'Conagra Brands employees, by embracing a more diversified retirement portfolio and the updated 4.7% withdrawal rule, can potentially create a sustainable retirement income aligned with today's economic conditions, enabling them to live more comfortably without outliving their savings.' – Wesley Boudreaux, a representative of The Retirement Group, a division of Wealth Enhancement.

'Conagra Brands employees can benefit from adopting Bengen's updated 4.7% withdrawal rule, as it provides a more flexible and sustainable approach to retirement planning, allowing them to withdraw larger amounts while still focusing on their long-term financial goals.' – Patrick Ray, a representative of The Retirement Group, a division of Wealth Enhancement.

In this article, we will discuss:

The evolution of the 4% withdrawal rule and its updates.
The importance of diversification in retirement portfolios.
How retirees, especially those at Conagra Brands, can benefit from the revised withdrawal strategy.

For many years, both pensioners and financial advisers have debated the idea of a sustainable withdrawal rate for retirement funds. The 4% rule, first proposed by Bill Bengen in 1994, quickly became a key guideline in retirement planning. According to this approach, in the first year of retirement, pensioners could withdraw 4% of their retirement funds; each year after that, the amount would be adjusted for inflation. The goal was simple: help pensioners live for 30 years without depleting their funds. However, after decades of success with this technique, Bengen has recently re-examined his strategy and concluded that retirees may be able to spend more than originally thought.

The 4% Rule’s Evolution

The financial community quickly embraced Bengen's original study after its publication in the Journal of Financial Planning in 1994. Using a straightforward portfolio of U.S. large-company equities and U.S. 5-year bonds, Bengen offered a simple method for pensioners to determine how much they could withdraw from their retirement savings. However, even as the 4% rule gained popularity, it overlooked important factors like inflation rates, asset allocation, and market volatility—issues that could arise in retirement.

By 2022, Bengen revisited his decades-old guideline. After a long career of studying retirement planning, he experienced what he called a 'breakthrough moment.' Instead of viewing stock returns as the primary factor in withdrawal rate calculations, Bengen realized that inflation should be given more weight. Consequently, he revised the 4% rule, raising the withdrawal rate to 4.7%. This change accounts for a more diversified portfolio and a broader mix of asset classes, offering retirees a more sustainable and generous approach.

Introducing the New 4.7% Rule

Under the updated approach, a retiree with $1 million in savings could withdraw $47,000 in their first year of retirement. This amount would then be adjusted for inflation in subsequent years, just as in the original 4% rule. However, the key change lies in asset allocation. The original rule was based on a basic stock and bond portfolio, while Bengen's revised model includes a diverse mix of asset classes such as international equities, bonds, small-cap stocks, and large-cap U.S. stocks. With this diversification, the 4.7% rule is considered a “worst-case scenario” for retirees hoping to avoid exhausting their funds within 30 years.

The Importance of Diversification

Bengen’s updated approach is backed by years of research and portfolio optimization. The more diversified portfolio—comprising U.S. stocks, foreign equities, bonds, and small-cap stocks—aims to offer greater stability. Bengen’s findings show that, under certain conditions, retirees could withdraw as much as 7% of their savings annually, especially if their portfolios were well-diversified. However, Bengen's study also emphasized the importance of rebalancing your portfolio regularly to align with your financial goals and risk tolerance as a retiree.

For those at Conagra Brands, this revised withdrawal rate carries real implications. With the 4.7% rule, you can notionally spend more during retirement without depleting your funds—provided your portfolio is well-diversified. Given the changing financial landscape, Bengen believes retirees today, even those from large corporations like Conagra Brands, may be able to withdraw between 5.25% and 5.5%, particularly in times of moderate inflation and high market valuations.

A Historical Perspective on the 4% Rule

Despite its appeal, the original 4% rule wasn’t without flaws. Bengen’s initial model didn’t account for prolonged low interest rates, market crashes, or long stretches of low inflation, all of which could impact a retiree’s financial stability. In response, Bengen began to expand his research and include more types of assets to increase stability.

His updated model showed that retirees who retired during economic downturns, like in the 1970s, needed to take a more cautious approach to withdrawals. In such circumstances, a 4.7% withdrawal rate would have been the most prudent option. On the other hand, retirees who experienced more stable financial times could comfortably withdraw around 7% of their savings. This illustrates how critical it is to account for the state of the economy when planning for retirement.

Adapting to Today's Economic Climate

The economic climate today is vastly different from the turbulent 1970s. Inflation is coming back under control, and stock market valuations are high. According to Bengen’s latest research, retirees today can potentially withdraw between 5.25% and 5.5% of their savings each year, depending on market conditions. This adjustment makes sure that retirees maintain their purchasing power and enjoy a fulfilling retirement over the long term.

Even with the current market conditions, Bengen remains cautious. Given the high market valuations, he advises retirees, including those working for large companies like Conagra Brands, to remain mindful. While the 4.7% rule might still be a reliable option in the long run, it’s crucial for retirees to diversify their holdings and periodically revisit their withdrawal plans.

A Shift in Perspective

Bengen’s updated strategy might seem bold or controversial to those who have relied on the 4% rule for decades. After all, the 4% rule became a widely accepted approach, praised for its reliability and simplicity. However, Bengen believes in challenging long-held assumptions to improve financial planning, which includes adapting strategies to reflect changing market conditions. He encourages open discussions and critical thinking about retirement strategies, as this will ultimately lead to better planning and more financial independence for retirees.

In Conclusion

Bengen’s revised 4.7% rule offers retirees, including those at Conagra Brands, a more generous and adaptable framework for managing retirement funds. By diversifying portfolios, rebalancing regularly, and staying attuned to current economic conditions, retirees can potentially take out larger withdrawals without fearing their money will run out too soon. While the 4% rule still holds historical value, it’s time for retirement strategies to evolve, reflecting the changing economic landscape. This updated strategy empowers retirees to live with greater financial independence and potentially enjoy a higher standard of living during retirement.

Research by the Financial Planning Association (FPA) also highlights how diversification can help enhance retirement stability. Incorporating alternative assets like commodities, bonds, and real estate into traditional portfolios can help retirees manage risk and maintain higher withdrawal rates. By diversifying, retirees may be better able to support their financial well-being, even during periods of economic uncertainty.

Conagra Brands employees can now benefit from a more sustainable retirement withdrawal strategy thanks to Bengen’s 4.7% rule. The updated approach allows retirees to withdraw more money each year, benefiting from better asset diversification and a more comprehensive understanding of current market dynamics. It’s time to adjust your retirement strategy to reflect the current economy—so you can enjoy a more independent and fulfilling retirement.

Featured Video

Articles you may find interesting:

Sources:

1. The Wealth Advisor Staff. 'The 4% Rule Creator Reveals the New Safe Retirement Withdrawal Rate.' The Wealth Advisor, April 2025.

2. 'Diversify or Risk Running Dry: 12 Additional Income Streams For Your Retirement.' Investopedia, May 2025.

3. Kiplinger Staff. 'Why Keeping Growth in Your Portfolio After 70 Is Crucial for Your Financial Health.' Kiplinger, June 2025.

4. Financial Planning Association. 'Retirement Withdrawals: The 4% Rule Has Gotten a Boost.' YouTube, March 2025.

5. Nasdaq Staff. 'The Importance of Diversifying Your Retirement Portfolio.' Nasdaq, July 2025.

How does Conagra Brands, Inc. ensure that employees understand their retirement benefits, particularly the nuances of the Conagra Foods Inc. Pension Plan and the historical obligations from the Beatrice Retirement Income Plan (BRIP)? Are there specific communication strategies or resources provided to employees to navigate their eligibility and benefits?

Conagra Brands has not provided consistent documentation of the Beatrice Retirement Income Plan (BRIP), as evidenced by a lost BRIP Plan document, which has created confusion among former Beatrice employees. Conagra relies on internal committees like the Conagra Brands Employee Benefits Administrative Committee to oversee the administration of the Conagra Foods Inc. Pension Plan and the historical obligations from BRIP. However, there are allegations in the class action that Conagra has failed to communicate certain benefit entitlements, particularly the age at which unreduced benefits should commence(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).

In light of regulatory compliance, what measures does Conagra Brands, Inc. take to maintain the integrity and security of pension plan documents, especially considering the historical loss of the BRIP Plan document? How do the missing documents impact employee knowledge of their benefits?

The loss of the BRIP Plan document represents a significant failure in document retention and regulatory compliance. Under ERISA, Conagra is required to maintain and distribute these documents upon request. The missing BRIP documents have caused discrepancies in the administration of retirement benefits, particularly regarding the age of eligibility for unreduced benefits. Conagra has been criticized for not informing employees that these documents were lost, leading to confusion and underpayment of benefits(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).

What resources does Conagra Brands, Inc. offer to its employees who have questions about their pension benefits or discrepancies that may arise from the transition from the Beatrice Retirement Income Plan to the Conagra Foods Inc. Pension Plan? How can employees best utilize these resources?

Conagra directs employees to contact the Plan service center for inquiries related to their pension benefits. However, based on the complaints filed in court, there have been issues with transparency and the accessibility of important plan documents, including the BRIP. Employees have had to appeal their benefit decisions and deal with insufficient guidance on navigating the discrepancies between the old BRIP and the Conagra Plan. Resources like benefit calculators and service centers have sometimes provided inaccurate or incomplete information(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).

How does Conagra Brands, Inc. handle the potential discrepancies regarding the pension benefits related to the age eligibility for receiving unreduced benefits in the context of both the Conagra Plan and the Beatrice plan? What steps have been taken to prevent similar issues in the future?

Conagra has been handling discrepancies poorly, particularly around the age at which participants in the BRIP are entitled to receive unreduced benefits. The company's adjustment of the eligibility age from 60 to 65 without properly consulting or notifying employees has led to underpayment of benefits. The ongoing class action lawsuit seeks to address these discrepancies and prevent future issues by clarifying benefit entitlements under the terms of both plans(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).

Can you elaborate on the process that Conagra Brands, Inc. utilizes to communicate with employees about plan amendments and to clarify their rights under the Conagra Foods Inc. Pension Plan? What specific improvements have been made to this communication strategy in recent years?

The communication process regarding plan amendments at Conagra has been criticized as insufficient, particularly concerning the transition from the BRIP to the Conagra Plan. Employees have filed complaints about not receiving adequate notice of important changes, such as the shift in eligibility age for unreduced benefits. Conagra has failed to provide clear documentation, leading to confusion among employees. There is no evidence of significant improvements in recent years(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).

How does Conagra Brands, Inc. ensure compliance with the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), especially regarding the fiduciary duties of the Conagra Brands Employee Benefits Administrative Committee? What protocols are in place to guarantee that employeesâ€™ rights are consistently protected?

Conagra's compliance with ERISA has been challenged in court, with allegations of fiduciary breaches related to the loss of critical plan documents like the BRIP. The Conagra Brands Employee Benefits Administrative Committee is responsible for maintaining the integrity of the pension plan, but the loss of documents and failure to notify employees of their rights raise questions about the adequacy of these protocols. The lawsuit highlights a need for improved oversight and adherence to ERISA's fiduciary requirements(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).

What options are currently available for former Beatrice employees and other participants in the Conagra Foods Inc. Pension Plan to claim benefits they believe they are entitled to? How does Conagra Brands, Inc. facilitate this process?

Former Beatrice employees can contact the Pension Service Center to inquire about their benefits and initiate claims. However, the process has been complicated by missing documentation and conflicting information about eligibility. Some employees have been forced to file legal claims to recover benefits owed to them, as in the case of the ongoing class action lawsuit. The lack of clear and accessible resources has made it difficult for employees to navigate the process effectively(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).

In what ways does Conagra Brands, Inc. provide support or guidance for employees approaching retirement, particularly in understanding the timelines and responsibilities associated with electing benefits from the Conagra Foods Inc. Pension Plan?

Conagra provides online calculators and service center assistance for employees approaching retirement, but these tools have proven unreliable for some participants. Employees have reported being unable to calculate their benefits accurately or being told they were ineligible for benefits before age 65, despite the terms of the BRIP allowing benefits to begin at age 60. The class action complaint highlights deficiencies in the guidance provided to employees regarding their benefits(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).

How can employees at Conagra Brands, Inc. contact the Employee Benefits Administrative Committee for inquiries related to their benefits? What are the most efficient avenues for addressing concerns about the Conagra Foods Inc. Pension Plan or the transitions from the Beatrice plan?

Employees can contact the Plan service center for inquiries related to their benefits, but accessing the Employee Benefits Administrative Committee directly appears to be more challenging. The lawsuit indicates that employees seeking to address discrepancies with their benefits have not received timely or effective communication from the committee, often requiring legal action to resolve their concerns(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).

How does Conagra Brands, Inc. evaluate its pension plan's performance and benefits offerings in relation to industry standards? What methods are used to ensure the company remains competitive while protecting employee benefits under the Conagra Foods Inc. Pension Plan?

There is little publicly available information regarding how Conagra evaluates its pension plan's performance against industry standards. The company's handling of historical pension obligations, particularly from the Beatrice acquisition, suggests that its methods for protecting employee benefits have been insufficient. Ongoing litigation regarding underpayment of benefits and loss of critical documents indicates that the company may need to improve its evaluation methods and compliance efforts to remain competitive(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).

With the current political climate we are in it is important to keep up with current news and remain knowledgeable about your benefits.

Conagra Brands announced a restructuring plan aiming to streamline operations and reduce costs. This includes layoffs impacting various departments and potential changes to employee benefits.

Additional Articles

Check Out Articles for Conagra Brands employees

For more information you can reach the plan administrator for Conagra Brands at 222 W. Merchandise Mart Plaza Chicago, IL 60654; or by calling them at (312) 549-5000.