<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=314834185700910&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">

New Update: Healthcare Costs Increasing by Over 60% in Some States. Will you be impacted?

Learn More

Discover the Best Countries for USG Corporation Retirees: Top Global Destinations for Your Next Adventure

image-table

Evaluating Global Retirement Index (GRI): The Top Places for Retirement

As the year unfolds, the Global Retirement Index (GRI) by the esteemed investment bank Natixis provides invaluable insights into potential retirement destinations for USG Corporation retirees. Examining 44 countries, the GRI accounts for pivotal factors such as health, post-retirement financial security, quality of life, and overall well-being during the golden years. Each country is subsequently rated on a scale, with the apex being 100 points.

To better inform decisions, let's delve deeper into the top five nations according to the GRI:

1. Norway:  Leading the list, Norway scored 81% on the GRI, reclaiming its top position after a brief stint in third place for four years. Although it has seen a dip from its 87% in 2012, Norway's commendable consistency across all four subindices, especially finance, is noteworthy. The country leaped from 25th to eighth place, attributed to its shift to a positive five-year interest rate average. Additionally, advances in life expectancy and insured health expenditure are also worth highlighting. Even though there was a slight surge in unemployment, Norway's robust healthcare infrastructure lends it a sturdy foundation.

2. Switzerland:  With a score of 80%, Switzerland took the second spot, showing a marginal decline from 81% in the preceding year. The most significant decrease emanated from its material well-being metrics, particularly in income equality and unemployment. However, it continues to have the fourth-highest income per capita. The finance sub-index may have seen a slight dip, but Switzerland’s scores in environmental and happiness factors, as well as health expenditure per capita indicators, showcased improvement.

3. Iceland:  Iceland, having achieved the pinnacle in 2021, witnessed a significant drop to 79%, placing it third. The primary determinants for this decline were in its financial and material well-being metrics. A significant contributor to the dip was the upswing in government indebtedness. Yet, it still achieved second place in income equality and boasted commendable scores in environmental and happiness metrics.

4. Ireland:  Consistently at fourth place, Ireland recorded a GRI score of 76%, marking a minor drop from 78% the previous year. The decline primarily stemmed from its finances and material well-being. While there was a surge in unemployment and income equality metrics, Ireland still boasts the third-highest income per capita globally. The nation also secured remarkable placements in the happiness and health indices, propelled by its air quality and environmental initiatives, and advancements in health expenditure.

5. Australia:  Completing the top five, Australia posted a score of 75%, a slight decrease from 76% in 2021. The downtrend, akin to other countries, is mainly attributed to its financial and material well-being indices. However, there was a discernible decline in its quality of life metrics. Australia's achievements in income per capita and unemployment metrics were offset by a diminished income equality score. Yet, the nation boasts some of the most impressive air quality metrics, albeit with a minimal uptick in environmental initiatives. The strength of its healthcare infrastructure, with life expectancy being a predominant factor, has solidified its place in the top five.

The United States' Position:

A pivotal inquiry remains – where does the U.S. stand? The nation has settled at the 18th position, descending to 69% from 71% in 2021. The primary contributors to this placement are unemployment and income equality metrics. While the U.S. secured the sixth-highest income per capita, this was overshadowed by its subpar performance in income equality. Factors like government indebtedness, old-age dependency, and tax pressures further dragged the U.S. down the list. On a positive note, the nation saw an uplift in its life expectancy metrics for 2022, with the highest score in health expenditure per capita and the fourth-highest in insured health expenditure globally. This implies that while there is a decline in finance and material well-being, quality of life, encapsulating healthcare, environmental, and happiness factors, is showing signs of amelioration.

According to the World Health Organization's Global Age-friendly Cities Guide published in 2007, the environment plays a crucial role in determining the health and well-being of older individuals. The infrastructure, services, and community connections in a country can significantly influence retirees' quality of life. For USG Corporation professionals considering retirement, it's essential to evaluate not just a nation's ranking on indices but also its compatibility with age-friendly infrastructures. This includes ease of transportation, accessible healthcare facilities, and opportunities for social engagement, ensuring a fruitful and active retirement.

Articles you may find interesting:

Loading...

In conclusion, while each country has its strengths and areas of improvement, this index serves as a guide for USG Corporation employees considering their retirement options. With a holistic understanding of each nation’s standing, USG Corporation employees are better equipped to make informed decisions for their future.

Selecting a country to retire in is much like choosing the perfect wine for a connoisseur's collection. Norway is the vintage Bordeaux - consistently exquisite with a history of rich offerings. Switzerland and Iceland are akin to fine Chardonnays, providing elegance and a hint of robust adventure. Ireland resembles a well-aged Cabernet, deep in tradition yet with layers of modern vibrancy. Australia, with its sunny disposition, can be likened to a crisp Sauvignon Blanc. Meanwhile, the U.S., though a popular choice like a classic Pinot Noir, doesn't quite make it to the top shelf in this year's selection. Choose wisely for the perfect USG Corporation retirement toast.

How does the retirement plan structure at USG Corporation impact both final average earnings participants and cash balance participants, especially regarding their eligibility and benefits accrued over time? In what ways does the differentiation between these two categories influence the retirement outcomes for employees of USG Corporation?

Retirement Plan Structure: USG Corporation's retirement plan differentiates between Final Average Earnings Participants and Cash Balance Participants. Final Average Earnings participants, who joined before January 1, 2011, accrue benefits based on their final average earnings and years of service, which can result in higher benefits for longer-serving employees. Cash Balance participants, who joined after January 1, 2011, have their benefits calculated based on a cash balance account, which grows with contributions and interest credits. These differences affect retirement outcomes, as Final Average Earnings participants may see higher pension payments if they have longer service or higher wages, while Cash Balance participants have more predictable but potentially lower benefits based on their account balance​(USG Corporation_Retirem…).

USG Corporation's Retirement Plan allows for different age-specific rules regarding early retirement. How do the "Rule of 90" and "Rule of 82" affect the financial planning of employees considering an early retirement option, and what should they consider regarding their long-term financial security?

Rule of 90 and Rule of 82: The "Rule of 90" allows employees to retire early without a reduction in benefits if their age plus years of service total 90, provided they retire at or after age 62. The "Rule of 82" permits early retirement with reduced benefits for those whose age and years of service total 82. Employees planning early retirement must consider these rules as they directly affect the amount of benefits they receive, making it important to assess how long-term financial security will be impacted, especially if they retire before age 62​(USG Corporation_Retirem…).

Could you elaborate on the process through which employees at USG Corporation can change their beneficiaries within the retirement plan? What steps need to be taken, and what are the implications of these changes on the benefits received upon the participant's death?

Changing Beneficiaries: To change beneficiaries, USG Corporation employees must contact Your Benefits Resources™, where they can designate a primary and contingent beneficiary. If married, the spouse must provide notarized consent to name a different primary beneficiary. The process involves completing a form, and any changes affect who receives benefits upon the participant's death. Failing to update the beneficiary could result in benefits being paid to unintended individuals​(USG Corporation_Retirem…).

As part of the retirement process at USG Corporation, how are pensionable earnings calculated? What factors are included in this determination, and how might they vary among different employees based on their roles within the organization?

Pensionable Earnings Calculation: Pensionable earnings at USG Corporation include regular pay, shift differentials, and bonuses but exclude items like nonqualified deferred compensation, severance, and stock awards. These earnings are used to calculate benefits based on formulas that take into account an employee’s service years and earnings over the 36 highest consecutive months of the last 15 years of participation​(USG Corporation_Retirem…).

How does the automatic enrollment in the USG Corporation Retirement Plan work, and what options do employees have if they initially chose not to participate? What implications might this have for their retirement savings strategy?

Automatic Enrollment and Opting In: Employees at USG Corporation are automatically enrolled in the retirement plan unless they choose to opt out. If employees decide not to participate initially, they can enroll later by contacting Your Benefits Resources™. Failure to participate from the start could result in lower retirement savings due to fewer years of contributions​(USG Corporation_Retirem…).

In the context of USG Corporation, what are the potential tax consequences for employees withdrawing their retirement benefits, especially regarding the mandatory withholdings? How might employees effectively manage these tax liabilities when planning for retirement?

Tax Consequences of Withdrawals: Employees withdrawing their retirement benefits from USG Corporation will face mandatory federal income tax withholdings, typically 20% for lump sum distributions, unless the distribution is rolled over into an IRA. Employees must plan for these taxes when withdrawing to avoid unexpected liabilities and ensure they maximize their after-tax retirement income​(USG Corporation_Retirem…).

How do employees at USG Corporation access the necessary documents related to their retirement benefits, and what is the process for obtaining copies of these documents if needed? What are the responsibilities of the Plan Administrator in this process?

Accessing Retirement Documents: Employees can access documents related to their retirement benefits through Your Benefits Resources™ online or via phone. If additional copies are needed, employees can request them from the Plan Administrator for a small fee. The Plan Administrator oversees ensuring these documents are provided to participants as required by ERISA​(USG Corporation_Retirem…).

What unique provisions exist for USG Corporation employees who experience a break in service? How do these provisions impact their accumulated benefit service and overall benefits upon reemployment?

Break in Service Provisions: USG Corporation allows employees who experience a break in service to retain their accumulated benefits if they are reemployed within one year. If reemployed after one year, their previous service may not count toward future benefits unless they were vested prior to termination. This can affect the total benefits an employee accrues if they leave and later return​(USG Corporation_Retirem…).

What options do employees of USG Corporation have for managing their benefits if they return to work after retirement? How does this affect their pension benefits and the overall strategy for maximizing retirement income?

Returning to Work After Retirement: Employees returning to work after retirement at USG Corporation will have their pension payments suspended and recalculated based on additional years of service. This recalculation takes into account prior payments, meaning employees should consider the impact of returning to work on their long-term pension strategy​(USG Corporation_Retirem…)​(USG Corporation_Retirem…).

How can employees of USG Corporation contact their Benefits Resourcesâ„¢ for more information on their retirement plan options? Are there specific channels preferred for different types of inquiries, and what resources are available to assist them?

Contacting Benefits Resources™: Employees can contact Your Benefits Resources™ via the web or a toll-free number to inquire about retirement plan options. Different inquiries, such as changes to beneficiaries or requesting benefit estimates, can be handled through these channels. Resources such as detailed benefit estimates are available to help employees plan for retirement​(USG Corporation_Retirem…).

New call-to-action

Additional Articles

Check Out Articles for USG Corporation employees

Loading...

For more information you can reach the plan administrator for USG Corporation at , ; or by calling them at .

*Please see disclaimer for more information

Relevant Articles

Check Out Articles for USG Corporation employees