The Best States for Ernst & Young Employees to Retire

Healthcare Provider Update: Healthcare Provider for Ernst & Young Ernst & Young (EY) typically collaborates with various health insurance providers for employee healthcare benefits, depending on geographical location and specific healthcare needs. Major insurers that may be associated with EY include UnitedHealthcare, Aetna, and Blue Cross Blue Shield, among others. The specific provider may vary based on individual employee requirements and the location of the business unit. Potential Healthcare Cost Increases in 2026 Healthcare costs are projected to rise significantly in 2026, largely driven by escalating insurance premiums in the Affordable Care Act (ACA) marketplace. Recent analyses indicate that some states may see premium hikes exceeding 60%, as major insurers cite rising medical costs and the potential lapse of enhanced federal subsidies as key contributors. Without these subsidies, over 22 million enrollees could face out-of-pocket premium increases of upwards of 75%, creating a challenging financial landscape for many consumers as they navigate their healthcare expenses. Click here to learn more

As Ernst & Young employees approach retirement, selecting a place to live becomes a blend of pragmatic and aspirational considerations. Whether you envision tranquil coastal retreats or vibrant mountain towns, practical aspects like access to services, cost of living, healthcare availability, and importantly, tax implications, are crucial in decision-making.

The US Census Bureau highlighted a 2023 trend where migratory patterns were influenced by state tax rates. Regions like the Sunbelt saw population boosts due to their lower taxes . For instance, Florida welcomed 365,000 newcomers, while Texas added 473,000. Conversely, high-tax states such as New York and California saw declines, with losses of 102,000 and 75,000 residents, respectively.

State income taxes significantly affect savings and disposable income, crucial for anyone considering relocation. States like Alaska, Florida, Nevada, New Hampshire, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Washington, and Wyoming, which do not levy income taxes, often compensate through higher property or sales taxes. Nevertheless, these states can still offer substantial savings, especially for higher earners.

For a Ernst & Young employee earning $250,000, moving from Vermont to New Hampshire could lead to annual state income tax savings of over $15,400. This could accumulate to nearly $213,000 over ten years with a 7% investment return. Similarly, an employee earning $100,000 could save approximately $7,200 annually by moving from Oregon to tax-free states like Florida or Texas. However, relocating from Utah to Nevada might reduce the annual tax burden by about $4,000 due to different state tax rates.

It’s essential to understand that some states, while free from income taxes, may rank high in overall tax burden when considering other taxes. The highest marginal state tax rates, which apply to the last dollar of income, show significant regional variation. For example, California’s top rate is 9.3% for a single filer earning $100,000, compared to just 1.95% in North Dakota.

To grasp the tax environment better, consider the effective federal and state tax rates, which reflect the actual percentage of your income paid in taxes after all deductions and credits. These rates can vary significantly; for instance, a single filer earning $100,000 faces a 29.16% rate in Oregon versus 22.72% in North Dakota.

While states like Oregon and Hawaii have high effective tax rates, California offers slightly better rates for married couples. On the other hand, New Jersey and Rhode Island present some of the lowest effective rates for married filers, showcasing the diversity in the tax landscape.

For Ernst & Young employees contemplating a move, especially in retirement, it's crucial to weigh tax implications against other factors like healthcare, proximity to family, and overall quality of life. States like North Dakota and Ohio remain attractive due to favorable tax policies, while Florida and Texas continue to attract new residents with their lower tax rates, despite rising living costs. California and New Jersey might appeal to those willing to pay a bit more in state taxes.

Featured Video

Articles you may find interesting:

Ultimately, each person’s financial and tax situation is unique, so what works for one might not suit another. Consulting a financial or tax advisor is recommended to ensure any relocation aligns with your long-term financial and retirement goals. This tailored advice is invaluable, particularly given the substantial impact taxes can have on your future earnings and retirement quality of life.

In 2023, U.S. News & World Report indicated that the top factor for retirees choosing a state is the healthcare system's quality.  States like Connecticut, Massachusetts, and Minnesota were noted for their superior healthcare services, an essential consideration for those in their sixties with more complex medical needs.

For Ernst & Young employees examining retirement locales, balance the short-term tax benefits found in states like Florida or Texas with the long-term livability factors such as healthcare and lifestyle amenities. Like selecting the perfect vintage wine, choosing your retirement state involves balancing immediate perks against future benefits, ensuring your chosen state matures into a rewarding and enriching place to enjoy your retirement years.

Disclosure: Not tax advice. Discuss your individual situation with a qualified tax professional.