New Update: Healthcare Costs Increasing by Over 60% in Some States. Will you be impacted?

How Conagra Brands Employees Can Avoid Costly Retirement Mistakes

Healthcare Provider Update: Healthcare Provider for Conagra Brands: For Conagra Brands, the healthcare provider information is typically linked to their employment benefits and can vary based on the location and specific plans offered to employees. Generally, large companies like Conagra may partner with major insurers such as UnitedHealthcare, Anthem (Elevance Health), or Aetna to provide health insurance benefits to their employees. It is advisable for Enrolled members to refer to their HR department or employee benefit documentation for specific provider details. Potential Healthcare Cost Increases in 2026: As we look ahead to 2026, significant increases in healthcare costs are anticipated, largely influenced by the expiration of enhanced federal subsidies under the Affordable Care Act (ACA). Reports indicate that premium rates for ACA marketplace plans could rise by over 60% in certain states due to higher medical expenses and market adjustments. Notably, a staggering 92% of policyholders may face a potential increase in their out-of-pocket premiums by more than 75%, reflecting the compounded effect of expiring subsidies and aggressive rate hikes from leading insurers. This perfect storm may lead to many consumers being priced out of essential healthcare coverage, forcing a reevaluation of their insurance options as financial pressures mount. Click here to learn more

'Conagra Brands employees should focus on long-term investment strategies that are grounded in historical performance rather than reacting to market trends or the allure of fleeting opportunities like gold or real estate, as these can lead to poor financial outcomes in retirement.' – Michael Corgiat, a representative of The Retirement Group, a division of Wealth Enhancement.

'Conagra Brands employees can strengthen their retirement outlook by avoiding the common pitfall of buying high and selling low, instead embracing a disciplined, long-term approach to investing that prioritizes sound financial principles over market speculation.' – Brent Wolf, a representative of The Retirement Group, a division of Wealth Enhancement.

In this article, we will discuss:

The pitfalls of overvaluing gold, real estate, and savings accounts in retirement planning.
The risks associated with the common mistake of buying high and selling low.
Strategies to make smarter long-term investment decisions to strengthen your financial outlook.

The most recent Gallup poll provides yet another concerning look at how many American investors, including those with Conagra Brands, make retirement investment choices that could ultimately cost them a lot of money. For decades, countless investors have placed their financial future at risk by making ill-timed investments in assets such as real estate, savings accounts, or gold that are frequently volatile or fail to deliver long-term returns. Despite the age-old adage to avoid buying high and selling low, the most recent research indicates that many investors have not learned from their mistakes.

Gold: A Cautionary Tale

Depending on the state of the market, gold has been a recurrent trend in the financial sector, going up and down in value. Despite its inherent volatility, many investors appear to accept it as a long-term investment, particularly as its price rises. Gold is now regarded by 23% respondents as the best long-term investment, up from 14% only a few years ago, according to the most recent Gallup poll. The recent spike in gold prices, which hit a record high of $3,444 an ounce, is likely the cause of this increase. Historical evidence, however, presents a different image.

When gold hit its previous high in 2011, 34% of Gallup survey respondents said it was the best investment option. Over the following few years, however, the value of gold fell by almost 50%, leaving many investors with large losses. In actuality, gold, like many other assets, has the potential to be a bubble—its value can fluctuate significantly, putting investors at risk of purchasing at the peak and selling at a loss.

Gold is not the only metal that goes through this cycle of purchasing high and selling low. It exhibits the same pattern as other assets, such as stocks and real estate. The price swings of gold serve as a warning: chasing assets after they have already experienced a sharp increase in value might have devastating results, especially for Conagra Brands employees looking to improve their financial outlook.

Misplaced Confidence in CDs and Savings Accounts

The pervasive notion that certificates of deposit (CDs) and savings accounts are sound long-term investments is one of the most concerning trends identified by Gallup's survey. These low-risk, low-return solutions were the top pick for long-term gain for 13% of respondents. There is a clear misinterpretation of how investments operate here.

These financial instruments have not historically produced sufficient long-term returns. In actuality, the S&P 500 has beaten short-term deposits in over 75% of five-year periods, 85% of 10-year periods, and more than 90% of 15-year periods since the 1920s. For example, over a 10-year period, the S&P 500 has, on average, tripled in value, yielding a 200% return. Conversely, throughout the same time span, CDs and savings accounts have only produced returns of 45% to 70%. Simply stated, it is unlikely that money held in a CD or savings account will grow at the pace required for a comfortable retirement, a key concern for Conagra Brands employees nearing retirement.

The Stock Market: A Lost Chance

The relationship between the stock market and investors has also been troubling. According to Gallup's survey, even in bull markets, many are generally hesitant or completely skeptical about investing $1,000 in the stock market. One of the greatest strategies to build wealth over time has been the stock market, especially the S&P 500. The Dow Jones Industrial Average has risen from about 2,700 to about 42,800 since 1990. Public mood has, however, been especially positive at the wrong times, most notably in the late 1990s and right before the market crashed in 2007.

The time frame before January 2000, when 67% of Gallup respondents said they were confident in the stock market, is a revealing illustration. For those who had invested at the peak of the market, this was just before the dot-com bubble burst, wiping out a significant amount of value. The public has frequently expressed confidence about the stock market after it has already increased, only to be let down when the market corrects itself, despite this history. For Conagra Brands employees, understanding this pattern is critical for making smarter investment choices.

The Most Overrated Investment Is Real Estate?

This year, 37% of respondents chose real estate as the 'best long-term investment,' continuing its 13-year trend at the top of the Gallup poll. Given the historical propensity of the property market to rise in value, this trend is not surprising. However, from a financial perspective, real estate has frequently performed worse than other investments.

Real estate has only increased in value at an average annual pace of 4.2% since the 1920s. Long-term returns from the stock market, gold, and even Treasury bonds are higher than this rate. Nonetheless, there are non-monetary advantages to property, such as the opportunity to live rent-free. Those who own their homes and are exempt from paying a landlord will find this especially alluring.

However, there are other expenses to take into account. The costs associated with owning, such as upkeep, property taxes, insurance, and real estate agents' fees, may reduce the returns. Additional expenses for rental properties include hiring a property manager and managing renters, some of whom may suddenly vacate or fall behind on their payments.

The leverage that real estate provides—buying a property with 20% down and borrowing the remaining 80%—is frequently linked to its allure. Real estate prices have increased in recent decades as home ownership has become more affordable due to declining mortgage rates. However, the benefit of leverage is lessened now that mortgage rates are higher than they were 20 years ago. Given the possibility of future price drops and the fact that housing costs are still at all-time highs, it is uncertain if real estate will continue to yield substantial returns. This uncertainty should be carefully considered by Conagra Brands employees planning for retirement.

Purchasing High and Selling Low: The Risk

In the stock market, real estate, or gold, investors have frequently made the mistake of buying high and selling low. Many make the basic error of acting in this way. Real estate was the go-to investment during the height of the housing boom in 2000. However, the public abandoned the market when it crashed in 2008, at the same time that mortgage rates dropped and housing became more affordable. The gold market followed the same pattern, and the stock market is showing comparable patterns.

The takeaway from this is straightforward: rather than following trends and responding to market swings, investors should create a long-term plan founded on sound financial principles. This is true even though real estate is frequently a wise investment in specific situations. Focusing on the fundamentals, such as an asset's potential for long-term growth rather than its immediate price fluctuations, is essential for making wise investment decisions—especially for Conagra Brands employees.

In Conclusion

A clear reminder of how investors continue to mismanage their retirement funds can be found in the Gallup survey. Whether it’s overvaluing gold, placing too much trust in savings accounts and CDs, or repeatedly misjudging the stock market and real estate, these mistakes can have long-term consequences. It’s important to understand that investments should be chosen based on their historical performance and long-term potential, not based on short-term trends or hype. By making informed, rational decisions and sidestepping the pitfalls of buying high and selling low, Conagra Brands employees can better strengthen their financial outlook.

Featured Video

Articles you may find interesting:

Sources:

1. Arends, Brett. 'This is How Americans are Blowing Their Retirement Money — Again.' MarketWatch, 20 May 2025, www.marketwatch.com/retirement-blunders-2025 .

2. Brenan, Megan. 'Stocks Fall, Gold Rises; Real Estate Still Best Investment.' Gallup, 5 May 2025, www.gallup.com/retirement-investments .

3. Advisor Perspectives Team. 'Gold Gains in Gallup's Latest Poll.' Advisor Perspectives, 18 May 2025, www.advisorperspectives.com/gallup-gold-investment .

4. CBS News Staff. 'Should Seniors Invest in Gold with the Price So High?' CBS News, 22 May 2025, www.cbsnews.com/gold-investment .

5. Kiplinger Staff. 'Is Financial Advice From a Professional Worth $8,000?' Kiplinger, 26 May 2025, www.kiplinger.com/financial-advice-worth.

How does Conagra Brands, Inc. ensure that employees understand their retirement benefits, particularly the nuances of the Conagra Foods Inc. Pension Plan and the historical obligations from the Beatrice Retirement Income Plan (BRIP)? Are there specific communication strategies or resources provided to employees to navigate their eligibility and benefits?

Conagra Brands has not provided consistent documentation of the Beatrice Retirement Income Plan (BRIP), as evidenced by a lost BRIP Plan document, which has created confusion among former Beatrice employees. Conagra relies on internal committees like the Conagra Brands Employee Benefits Administrative Committee to oversee the administration of the Conagra Foods Inc. Pension Plan and the historical obligations from BRIP. However, there are allegations in the class action that Conagra has failed to communicate certain benefit entitlements, particularly the age at which unreduced benefits should commence(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).

In light of regulatory compliance, what measures does Conagra Brands, Inc. take to maintain the integrity and security of pension plan documents, especially considering the historical loss of the BRIP Plan document? How do the missing documents impact employee knowledge of their benefits?

The loss of the BRIP Plan document represents a significant failure in document retention and regulatory compliance. Under ERISA, Conagra is required to maintain and distribute these documents upon request. The missing BRIP documents have caused discrepancies in the administration of retirement benefits, particularly regarding the age of eligibility for unreduced benefits. Conagra has been criticized for not informing employees that these documents were lost, leading to confusion and underpayment of benefits(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).

What resources does Conagra Brands, Inc. offer to its employees who have questions about their pension benefits or discrepancies that may arise from the transition from the Beatrice Retirement Income Plan to the Conagra Foods Inc. Pension Plan? How can employees best utilize these resources?

Conagra directs employees to contact the Plan service center for inquiries related to their pension benefits. However, based on the complaints filed in court, there have been issues with transparency and the accessibility of important plan documents, including the BRIP. Employees have had to appeal their benefit decisions and deal with insufficient guidance on navigating the discrepancies between the old BRIP and the Conagra Plan. Resources like benefit calculators and service centers have sometimes provided inaccurate or incomplete information(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).

How does Conagra Brands, Inc. handle the potential discrepancies regarding the pension benefits related to the age eligibility for receiving unreduced benefits in the context of both the Conagra Plan and the Beatrice plan? What steps have been taken to prevent similar issues in the future?

Conagra has been handling discrepancies poorly, particularly around the age at which participants in the BRIP are entitled to receive unreduced benefits. The company's adjustment of the eligibility age from 60 to 65 without properly consulting or notifying employees has led to underpayment of benefits. The ongoing class action lawsuit seeks to address these discrepancies and prevent future issues by clarifying benefit entitlements under the terms of both plans(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).

Can you elaborate on the process that Conagra Brands, Inc. utilizes to communicate with employees about plan amendments and to clarify their rights under the Conagra Foods Inc. Pension Plan? What specific improvements have been made to this communication strategy in recent years?

The communication process regarding plan amendments at Conagra has been criticized as insufficient, particularly concerning the transition from the BRIP to the Conagra Plan. Employees have filed complaints about not receiving adequate notice of important changes, such as the shift in eligibility age for unreduced benefits. Conagra has failed to provide clear documentation, leading to confusion among employees. There is no evidence of significant improvements in recent years(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).

How does Conagra Brands, Inc. ensure compliance with the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), especially regarding the fiduciary duties of the Conagra Brands Employee Benefits Administrative Committee? What protocols are in place to guarantee that employeesâ€™ rights are consistently protected?

Conagra's compliance with ERISA has been challenged in court, with allegations of fiduciary breaches related to the loss of critical plan documents like the BRIP. The Conagra Brands Employee Benefits Administrative Committee is responsible for maintaining the integrity of the pension plan, but the loss of documents and failure to notify employees of their rights raise questions about the adequacy of these protocols. The lawsuit highlights a need for improved oversight and adherence to ERISA's fiduciary requirements(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).

What options are currently available for former Beatrice employees and other participants in the Conagra Foods Inc. Pension Plan to claim benefits they believe they are entitled to? How does Conagra Brands, Inc. facilitate this process?

Former Beatrice employees can contact the Pension Service Center to inquire about their benefits and initiate claims. However, the process has been complicated by missing documentation and conflicting information about eligibility. Some employees have been forced to file legal claims to recover benefits owed to them, as in the case of the ongoing class action lawsuit. The lack of clear and accessible resources has made it difficult for employees to navigate the process effectively(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).

In what ways does Conagra Brands, Inc. provide support or guidance for employees approaching retirement, particularly in understanding the timelines and responsibilities associated with electing benefits from the Conagra Foods Inc. Pension Plan?

Conagra provides online calculators and service center assistance for employees approaching retirement, but these tools have proven unreliable for some participants. Employees have reported being unable to calculate their benefits accurately or being told they were ineligible for benefits before age 65, despite the terms of the BRIP allowing benefits to begin at age 60. The class action complaint highlights deficiencies in the guidance provided to employees regarding their benefits(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).

How can employees at Conagra Brands, Inc. contact the Employee Benefits Administrative Committee for inquiries related to their benefits? What are the most efficient avenues for addressing concerns about the Conagra Foods Inc. Pension Plan or the transitions from the Beatrice plan?

Employees can contact the Plan service center for inquiries related to their benefits, but accessing the Employee Benefits Administrative Committee directly appears to be more challenging. The lawsuit indicates that employees seeking to address discrepancies with their benefits have not received timely or effective communication from the committee, often requiring legal action to resolve their concerns(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).

How does Conagra Brands, Inc. evaluate its pension plan's performance and benefits offerings in relation to industry standards? What methods are used to ensure the company remains competitive while protecting employee benefits under the Conagra Foods Inc. Pension Plan?

There is little publicly available information regarding how Conagra evaluates its pension plan's performance against industry standards. The company's handling of historical pension obligations, particularly from the Beatrice acquisition, suggests that its methods for protecting employee benefits have been insufficient. Ongoing litigation regarding underpayment of benefits and loss of critical documents indicates that the company may need to improve its evaluation methods and compliance efforts to remain competitive(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).

With the current political climate we are in it is important to keep up with current news and remain knowledgeable about your benefits.

Conagra Brands announced a restructuring plan aiming to streamline operations and reduce costs. This includes layoffs impacting various departments and potential changes to employee benefits.

Additional Articles

Check Out Articles for Conagra Brands employees

For more information you can reach the plan administrator for Conagra Brands at 222 W. Merchandise Mart Plaza Chicago, IL 60654; or by calling them at (312) 549-5000.