'University of Missouri employees should focus on long-term investment strategies that are grounded in historical performance rather than reacting to market trends or the allure of fleeting opportunities like gold or real estate, as these can lead to poor financial outcomes in retirement.' – Michael Corgiat, a representative of The Retirement Group, a division of Wealth Enhancement.
'University of Missouri employees can strengthen their retirement outlook by avoiding the common pitfall of buying high and selling low, instead embracing a disciplined, long-term approach to investing that prioritizes sound financial principles over market speculation.' – Brent Wolf, a representative of The Retirement Group, a division of Wealth Enhancement.
In this article, we will discuss:
-
The pitfalls of overvaluing gold, real estate, and savings accounts in retirement planning.
-
The risks associated with the common mistake of buying high and selling low.
-
Strategies to make smarter long-term investment decisions to strengthen your financial outlook.
The most recent Gallup poll provides yet another concerning look at how many American investors, including those with University of Missouri, make retirement investment choices that could ultimately cost them a lot of money. For decades, countless investors have placed their financial future at risk by making ill-timed investments in assets such as real estate, savings accounts, or gold that are frequently volatile or fail to deliver long-term returns. Despite the age-old adage to avoid buying high and selling low, the most recent research indicates that many investors have not learned from their mistakes.
Gold: A Cautionary Tale
Depending on the state of the market, gold has been a recurrent trend in the financial sector, going up and down in value. Despite its inherent volatility, many investors appear to accept it as a long-term investment, particularly as its price rises. Gold is now regarded by 23% respondents as the best long-term investment, up from 14% only a few years ago, according to the most recent Gallup poll. The recent spike in gold prices, which hit a record high of $3,444 an ounce, is likely the cause of this increase. Historical evidence, however, presents a different image.
When gold hit its previous high in 2011, 34% of Gallup survey respondents said it was the best investment option. Over the following few years, however, the value of gold fell by almost 50%, leaving many investors with large losses. In actuality, gold, like many other assets, has the potential to be a bubble—its value can fluctuate significantly, putting investors at risk of purchasing at the peak and selling at a loss.
Gold is not the only metal that goes through this cycle of purchasing high and selling low. It exhibits the same pattern as other assets, such as stocks and real estate. The price swings of gold serve as a warning: chasing assets after they have already experienced a sharp increase in value might have devastating results, especially for University of Missouri employees looking to improve their financial outlook.
Misplaced Confidence in CDs and Savings Accounts
The pervasive notion that certificates of deposit (CDs) and savings accounts are sound long-term investments is one of the most concerning trends identified by Gallup's survey. These low-risk, low-return solutions were the top pick for long-term gain for 13% of respondents. There is a clear misinterpretation of how investments operate here.
These financial instruments have not historically produced sufficient long-term returns. In actuality, the S&P 500 has beaten short-term deposits in over 75% of five-year periods, 85% of 10-year periods, and more than 90% of 15-year periods since the 1920s. For example, over a 10-year period, the S&P 500 has, on average, tripled in value, yielding a 200% return. Conversely, throughout the same time span, CDs and savings accounts have only produced returns of 45% to 70%. Simply stated, it is unlikely that money held in a CD or savings account will grow at the pace required for a comfortable retirement, a key concern for University of Missouri employees nearing retirement.
The Stock Market: A Lost Chance
The relationship between the stock market and investors has also been troubling. According to Gallup's survey, even in bull markets, many are generally hesitant or completely skeptical about investing $1,000 in the stock market. One of the greatest strategies to build wealth over time has been the stock market, especially the S&P 500. The Dow Jones Industrial Average has risen from about 2,700 to about 42,800 since 1990. Public mood has, however, been especially positive at the wrong times, most notably in the late 1990s and right before the market crashed in 2007.
The time frame before January 2000, when 67% of Gallup respondents said they were confident in the stock market, is a revealing illustration. For those who had invested at the peak of the market, this was just before the dot-com bubble burst, wiping out a significant amount of value. The public has frequently expressed confidence about the stock market after it has already increased, only to be let down when the market corrects itself, despite this history. For University of Missouri employees, understanding this pattern is critical for making smarter investment choices.
The Most Overrated Investment Is Real Estate?
This year, 37% of respondents chose real estate as the 'best long-term investment,' continuing its 13-year trend at the top of the Gallup poll. Given the historical propensity of the property market to rise in value, this trend is not surprising. However, from a financial perspective, real estate has frequently performed worse than other investments.
Real estate has only increased in value at an average annual pace of 4.2% since the 1920s. Long-term returns from the stock market, gold, and even Treasury bonds are higher than this rate. Nonetheless, there are non-monetary advantages to property, such as the opportunity to live rent-free. Those who own their homes and are exempt from paying a landlord will find this especially alluring.
However, there are other expenses to take into account. The costs associated with owning, such as upkeep, property taxes, insurance, and real estate agents' fees, may reduce the returns. Additional expenses for rental properties include hiring a property manager and managing renters, some of whom may suddenly vacate or fall behind on their payments.
The leverage that real estate provides—buying a property with 20% down and borrowing the remaining 80%—is frequently linked to its allure. Real estate prices have increased in recent decades as home ownership has become more affordable due to declining mortgage rates. However, the benefit of leverage is lessened now that mortgage rates are higher than they were 20 years ago. Given the possibility of future price drops and the fact that housing costs are still at all-time highs, it is uncertain if real estate will continue to yield substantial returns. This uncertainty should be carefully considered by University of Missouri employees planning for retirement.
Purchasing High and Selling Low: The Risk
In the stock market, real estate, or gold, investors have frequently made the mistake of buying high and selling low. Many make the basic error of acting in this way. Real estate was the go-to investment during the height of the housing boom in 2000. However, the public abandoned the market when it crashed in 2008, at the same time that mortgage rates dropped and housing became more affordable. The gold market followed the same pattern, and the stock market is showing comparable patterns.
The takeaway from this is straightforward: rather than following trends and responding to market swings, investors should create a long-term plan founded on sound financial principles. This is true even though real estate is frequently a wise investment in specific situations. Focusing on the fundamentals, such as an asset's potential for long-term growth rather than its immediate price fluctuations, is essential for making wise investment decisions—especially for University of Missouri employees.
In Conclusion
A clear reminder of how investors continue to mismanage their retirement funds can be found in the Gallup survey. Whether it’s overvaluing gold, placing too much trust in savings accounts and CDs, or repeatedly misjudging the stock market and real estate, these mistakes can have long-term consequences. It’s important to understand that investments should be chosen based on their historical performance and long-term potential, not based on short-term trends or hype. By making informed, rational decisions and sidestepping the pitfalls of buying high and selling low, University of Missouri employees can better strengthen their financial outlook.
Featured Video
Articles you may find interesting:
- Corporate Employees: 8 Factors When Choosing a Mutual Fund
- Use of Escrow Accounts: Divorce
- Medicare Open Enrollment for Corporate Employees: Cost Changes in 2024!
- Stages of Retirement for Corporate Employees
- 7 Things to Consider Before Leaving Your Company
- How Are Workers Impacted by Inflation & Rising Interest Rates?
- Lump-Sum vs Annuity and Rising Interest Rates
- Internal Revenue Code Section 409A (Governing Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans)
- Corporate Employees: Do NOT Believe These 6 Retirement Myths!
- 401K, Social Security, Pension – How to Maximize Your Options
- Have You Looked at Your 401(k) Plan Recently?
- 11 Questions You Should Ask Yourself When Planning for Retirement
- Worst Month of Layoffs In Over a Year!
- Corporate Employees: 8 Factors When Choosing a Mutual Fund
- Use of Escrow Accounts: Divorce
- Medicare Open Enrollment for Corporate Employees: Cost Changes in 2024!
- Stages of Retirement for Corporate Employees
- 7 Things to Consider Before Leaving Your Company
- How Are Workers Impacted by Inflation & Rising Interest Rates?
- Lump-Sum vs Annuity and Rising Interest Rates
- Internal Revenue Code Section 409A (Governing Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans)
- Corporate Employees: Do NOT Believe These 6 Retirement Myths!
- 401K, Social Security, Pension – How to Maximize Your Options
- Have You Looked at Your 401(k) Plan Recently?
- 11 Questions You Should Ask Yourself When Planning for Retirement
- Worst Month of Layoffs In Over a Year!
Sources:
1. Arends, Brett. 'This is How Americans are Blowing Their Retirement Money — Again.' MarketWatch, 20 May 2025, www.marketwatch.com/retirement-blunders-2025 .
2. Brenan, Megan. 'Stocks Fall, Gold Rises; Real Estate Still Best Investment.' Gallup, 5 May 2025, www.gallup.com/retirement-investments .
3. Advisor Perspectives Team. 'Gold Gains in Gallup's Latest Poll.' Advisor Perspectives, 18 May 2025, www.advisorperspectives.com/gallup-gold-investment .
4. CBS News Staff. 'Should Seniors Invest in Gold with the Price So High?' CBS News, 22 May 2025, www.cbsnews.com/gold-investment .
5. Kiplinger Staff. 'Is Financial Advice From a Professional Worth $8,000?' Kiplinger, 26 May 2025, www.kiplinger.com/financial-advice-worth.
How does the eligibility criteria for the Defined Benefit Retirement Plan at the University of Missouri System differ for Level One and Level Two members, particularly in regard to their hire or rehire dates?
Eligibility Criteria for Level One and Level Two Members: Level One members are employees hired before October 1, 2012, or those rehired before October 1, 2019, who had earned a vested benefit but did not receive a lump sum. Level Two members are those hired or rehired between October 1, 2012, and October 1, 2019, without eligibility for Level One benefits. Employees hired after October 1, 2019, do not accrue service credit under the DB Plan(University of Missouri …).
In what ways do service credits accumulated at the University of Missouri System impact an employee's retirement benefits, and how can employees ensure that they effectively maximize their service credit over the years?
Impact of Service Credits on Retirement Benefits: Service credits are critical in calculating retirement benefits at the University of Missouri System. Employees accumulate service credits based on their years of service, which directly affect their pension calculations. Maximizing service credits involves consistent full-time employment without breaks, as any leave of absence or part-time status may impact the total service credits earned(University of Missouri …)(University of Missouri …).
What are the various options available to employees at the University of Missouri System for receiving their retirement benefits upon reaching normal retirement age, and how do these options influence long-term financial planning for retirement?
Retirement Benefit Options: Upon reaching normal retirement age, employees can choose between a Single Life Annuity or a Joint and Survivor Annuity, both with options for lump-sum payments of 10%, 20%, or 30% of the actuarial present value. These choices influence monthly payout amounts, and selecting a lump sum reduces future monthly benefits proportionally(University of Missouri …).
With respect to the University of Missouri System's Defined Benefit Plan, how are employees' contributions structured, and what implications does this have for their overall retirement savings strategy?
Employee Contributions: Employees contribute 1% of their salary up to $50,000 and 2% for earnings beyond that threshold. This structure helps fund the DB Plan, with the University covering the majority of the cost. Employees need to factor in these contributions as part of their overall retirement savings strategy(University of Missouri …).
How can employees at the University of Missouri System assess their eligibility for early retirement benefits, and what considerations should be taken into account when planning for an early retirement?
Early Retirement Eligibility: Employees may retire early if they meet specific criteria: at least 10 years of service credit for ages 55–60 or at least 5 years of service credit for ages 60–65. Early retirees will receive a reduced benefit to account for the longer payout period(University of Missouri …).
What tax implications should employees of the University of Missouri System be aware of when it comes to distributions from their retirement plans, and how can they effectively navigate these implications?
Tax Implications of Retirement Plan Distributions: Distributions from the University of Missouri System’s DB Plan are subject to federal taxes. Employees can mitigate tax burdens by electing to roll over lump-sum distributions to a qualified retirement account, such as an IRA, to avoid immediate tax liability(University of Missouri …).
What are the policies regarding the continuation of benefits for employees who leave the University of Missouri System, particularly for those who are not vested or are classified as non-vested members?
Non-Vested Employee Policies: Employees who leave the University before vesting in the DB Plan (fewer than 5 years of service) are not eligible for retirement benefits but can receive a refund of their contributions. These non-vested employees must decide whether to receive their refunded contributions as a lump sum or through a rollover to another retirement account(University of Missouri …).
How might changes in employment status, such as taking a leave of absence or returning to work after a break, affect the service credit calculation for an employee at the University of Missouri System?
Impact of Employment Status Changes on Service Credit: Employees who take leaves of absence or return after breaks in employment may experience reductions in service credit. However, certain types of leave, such as military service or medical leave, may allow employees to continue earning service credit(University of Missouri …)(University of Missouri …).
In the event of an employee's death prior to retirement, what benefits are available to their survivors under the University of Missouri System's Defined Benefit Plan, and how can members ensure their wishes are respected?
Survivor Benefits: In the event of an employee’s death before retirement, survivors may be eligible for either a lump sum or monthly payments. Employees can designate beneficiaries to ensure that their wishes are honored, providing financial protection for dependents(University of Missouri …).
How can an employee at the University of Missouri System contact the Human Resources Service Center to obtain personalized assistance regarding their retirement options and any inquiries related to their retirement plan details? These questions require detailed answers and are designed to facilitate a comprehensive understanding of retirement processes and options for employees of the University of Missouri System.
Contacting HR for Assistance: Employees can contact the Human Resources Service Center for personalized assistance regarding their retirement options by emailing hrservicecenter@umsystem.edu or visiting the myHR portal for further details(University of Missouri …).