New Update: Healthcare Costs Increasing by Over 60% in Some States. Will you be impacted?

Unlocking Real Estate Opportunities for University of Chicago Employees: A Guide to Building Wealth in Retirement

If you are a University of Chicago employee looking to buy real estate as a part of your retirement planning, then you should know that such an approach has its advantages and disadvantages,' says Michael Corgiat of The Retirement Group, a division of Wealth Enhancement Group.

Brent Wolf from The Retirement Group, a division of Wealth Enhancement Group advises University of Chicago employees who want to diversify their retirement portfolio with real estate to focus on due diligence and the local market dynamics.

In this article, we will discuss:

1. Diverse Retirement Investment Strategies: We compare the conventional stock market investments with the real estate options for retirees and emphasize the tangible benefits and the stability that comes with real estate.
2. Challenges and Benefits of Real Estate Investment for Retirement: We explore the possible drawbacks, such as problem tenants and repair costs, against the background of healthy rental yields and tax advantages.
3. Real Estate Retirement Stories: Real tales from four people over the age of 65 who have invested heavily in real estate, including their stories, approaches, and results.
While on Wall Street, many people save for their retirement, some of the University of Chicago employees may decide to own real estate, which is a more tangible asset, with a better curb appeal. Having kitchens, doors, and walls around their nest egg makes retirees more comfortable. These retirement investors like the property rental income and the tax benefits that come with being a landlord even though many still rely on the stock market to fund their retirement. Some of them also derive joy from the process of property rehabilitation.

The Boston College's Center for Retirement Research, in its analysis of Federal Reserve data, reported that in 2022, 10% of American homes belonged to an individual 65 years of age or older who received rental income, while just 7% of households with an individual under 65 years of age did the same. Managing properties is a job during retirement. Tenants may not pay or may cause damage, units may stay vacant, and repairs may be immediate. In addition, the costs of property ownership such as insurance and property taxes are also rising.

University of Chicago employees should take these into consideration when investing in real estate. Though there are such problems, there are still many retirees who believe that the advantages are greater than the disadvantages. Due to the years of increasing property values and relatively low mortgage rates, a large number of people are retiring on real estate today.

These four real estate retirees share their experiences, the expenses, the worries, and the pleasures of living off a portfolio of properties.

Josh Bottfeld: San Diego, California.

Properties: 7. Mortgage Debt: $1 million. Annual Spending: $120,000. Josh Bottfeld bought a San Diego studio apartment in 1982 using money he had taken out of his retirement account. At 29, he thought that this would provide retirement money from a portfolio. Several years later, he sold the studio and used the proceeds to buy a house in San Francisco, which he and a friend later sold for $125,000 after purchasing for $103,000.

From these earnings, a three-family home in a gentrifying neighborhood was purchased. By the year 2000, Bottfeld owned fifteen properties in Portland, Oregon, Las Vegas, and San Francisco. He was also able to take advantage of a tax loophole that deferred capital gains taxes while investing in another piece of real estate. In 1997, Bottfeld left his job in human resources to become a realtor.

In 2004, he moved to San Diego to run a real estate company and at 53 he retired after retiring from working and from investments and rentals. During the financial crisis, there was a need to return to work for a short time but in 2012, he retired for good. According to Bottfeld, real estate is a good inflation protector and therefore investment in it is better than in equities. He and his spouse, Brent Butler, currently own three rentals in a San Diego home and 14 units in seven buildings. Property managers receive between 6-10% of the rent to take care of the repair and tenant issues.

He has controlled his expenses, but his house equity is only $8 million after mortgages. His four properties are mortgaged and his fixed interest rates are about 3.5%. He has $4.8 million in equities and other interests including bridge loans that pay 8% to 15% to house flippers. He receives about $20,000 a month in rent, $8,000 a month in bridge loans, and $3,200 in Social Security. His lifestyle includes a Danube River cruise this summer at $10,000 per month in expenses.

Sarah McLane: Stowe, Vermont, and Nantucket, Massachusetts.

Properties: 2. Mortgage Debt: $0. Annual Spending: $100,000. Sarah McLane instead chose to build her fortune for retirement in historic homes in Nantucket and Stowe, Vermont while working on Wall Street. She quit her job in financial services in 2017 to become a builder in Vermont and stopped tracking the stock market. Instead, she focused on real estate, which she knew and could improve.

When McLane withdrew most of her $250,000 retirement funds in 2007 to use as a down payment and remodel an 1813 farmhouse in Stowe, she began her real estate career. She used the money for her house rather than withdraw it from her retirement account and pay the 10% early withdrawal penalty though she had to pay income tax on it. The Stowe property is worth $3 million and was purchased by McLane for $2 million. Her passion for establishing a permanent presence in an area she believes her kids would love drove her to peel off wallpaper and finish wood floors while spending her weekends. In 2018, she spent $1.6 million to purchase a historic Nantucket home and $2.5 million to renovate it to rent it out.

To rent out the Nantucket house during the busiest travel season, she intends to live in Vermont for the summer. She expects to generate $250,000 per year, which will be more than enough to cover her $100,000 in expenses. She also holds $1.3 million in bank accounts with 6% interest. During the winter, McLane plans to rent out her Stowe home and use the rental income to maintain it. She intends to live in Nantucket from fall to spring, claiming that it is the perfect place to retire and that he plans to live there. The house is ideal for her future as it is close to Boston and her grandson and has facilities nearby.

Augusta, Georgia / Bryan Haltermann.

Properties: 12 Mortgage Debt: $2 million Annual Spending: $150,000 Even two years after retiring, Haltermann still goes to the office every day to check on his holdings. The former developer of commercial real estate enjoys walking around his properties and talking to his four employees who manage his properties and responding to emails. Playing tennis on the court and having lunch with friends are his slow pace example. Four decades ago, Haltermann's business started when it paid approximately $50,000 for a 10,000 square foot facility that is currently valued at $500,000.

Featured Video

Articles you may find interesting:

He was well versed in historic properties and was able to restore them with significant tax benefits. He bought out his company partner about 15 years ago. After retirement, he invested the $5 million profit from the sale of ten buildings for about $10 million. An additional $5 million represents the value of his remaining rents, house, and vacation property, along with $2 million in low-rate mortgages. His insurance, taxes, and mortgage are all paid for by rental income.

He and his spouse, Alicia, are primarily spending on travel and are spending $150,000 a year, or $50,000 more than they did before retirement. Italy and Spain have been their recent favorite travel destinations. Due to the rising costs and interest rates, Haltermann has no plan to purchase any other real estate.

David Zach: California, Sierra Madre.

Properties: 4 Mortgage Debt: $850,000 Annual Spending: $66,000 David Zach didn't see the need for any other investments and put all of his retirement money into real estate. He preferred tangible and touchable assets. The majority of his assets are held by Zach, who is 63, and they are mostly centered on three lots in Sierra Madre: his house, a rental property nearby, and an auxiliary dwelling unit (ADU) that is currently being constructed. His current rents yield about $7,000 per month, and once the new ADU is finished, he expects to receive an additional $2,000. He is happy with his real estate investment of homes worth approximately $3.3 million and $850,000 low-rate mortgages.

Working about ten hours a month, he sells shower parts through his business and earns $84,000 a year. He spends about $5,500 a month on food, property taxes, and mortgage payments. He has invested all of his money in housing, and he has learned from the experiences. He lost a property to foreclosure 16 years ago, and he incurred $300,000 in losses.

He has kept a lean real estate portfolio, given that labor shortages and inflation have increased the cost of building an ADU to $100,000. Recently, when construction expense overruns forced him to preserve his older cars instead of ordering a new one. His two adult children will help to finance his retirement and inherit his rental properties. In his words, 'buy the worst property in the nicest neighborhood that you can afford.'

These anecdotes demonstrate that although investing in real estate is a work and risk that can produce a steady stream of income in retirement for University of Chicago employees. Every investor's journey is unique and reflects that of his or her circumstances and preferences in the path towards retirement financial security and satisfaction. Real estate investments for retirement offer University of Chicago retirees substantial tax benefits in addition to stable rental income.

The IRS explains that owners of rental properties may be able to lower their overall tax burden by claiming expenses such as property taxes, mortgage interest, depreciation, and repairs on their taxable income (IRS, 2023). This can be particularly helpful for people trying to reduce their tax liabilities and therefore increase their retirement wealth because it can generate a steadier and more reliable source of retirement income.

References:

1. Dalton, Michael J. Retirement Planning and Employee Benefits. 20th ed., Money Education, 2025. UCLA Extension. www.uclaextension.edu .

2. 'Real Estate Investing for Beginners: 5 Skills of Successful Investors.' Harvard Division of Continuing Education, 2023. professional.dce.harvard.edu.

3. 'Why ASPPA Number So Low and 2012 Budget Number So High?' Center for Retirement Research at Boston College, 2023. crr.bc.edu.

4. 'Retirement Planning Today.' Virginia Commonwealth University, School of Business, 2023. business.vcu.edu.

5. Grainger, Lauren. 'Retirement Planning Today Course Details.' Virginia Commonwealth University, 2023. connect.business.vcu.edu.

What are the eligibility criteria for participation in the SEPP plan for employees of The University of Chicago, and how can factors like years of service and age impact an employee's benefits under this plan? Discuss how these criteria might have changed for new employees post-2016 and what implications this has for retirement planning.

Eligibility Criteria for SEPP: Employees at The University of Chicago become eligible to participate in the SEPP upon meeting age and service requirements: being at least 21 years old and completing one year of service. For employees hired after the plan freeze on October 31, 2016, these criteria have been crucial in determining eligibility for newer employees, impacting their retirement planning as they do not accrue benefits under SEPP beyond this freeze date.

In what ways does the SEPP (Staff Employees Pension Plan) benefit calculation at The University of Chicago reflect an employee's years of service and final average pay? Examine the formulas involved in the benefits determination process, including how outside factors such as Social Security compensation can affect the total pension benefits an employee receives at retirement.

Benefit Calculation Reflecting Service and Pay: The SEPP benefits are calculated based on the final average pay and years of participation, factoring in Social Security covered compensation. Changes post-2016 have frozen benefits accrual, meaning that current employees’ benefits are calculated only up to this freeze date, affecting long-term benefits despite continued employment.

How can employees at The University of Chicago expect their SEPP benefits to be paid out upon their retirement, especially in terms of the options between lump sum distributions and annuities? Analyze the advantages and disadvantages of each payment option, and how these choices can impact an employee's financial situation in retirement.

Payout Options (Lump Sum vs. Annuities): Upon retirement, employees can opt for a lump sum payment or annuities. Each option presents financial implications; lump sums provide immediate access to funds but annuities offer sustained income. This choice is significant for financial stability in retirement, particularly under the constraints post the 2016 plan changes.

Can you elaborate on the spousal rights associated with the pension benefits under the SEPP plan at The University of Chicago? Discuss how marital status influences annuity payments and the required spousal consent when considering changes to beneficiary designations.

Spousal Rights in SEPP Benefits: Spouses have rights to pension benefits, requiring spousal consent for altering beneficiary arrangements under the SEPP. Changes post-2016 do not impact these rights, but understanding these is vital for making informed decisions about pension benefits and beneficiary designations.

As an employee nearing retirement at The University of Chicago, what considerations should one keep in mind regarding taxes on pension benefits received from the SEPP? Explore the tax implications of different types of distributions and how they align with current IRS regulations for the 2024 tax year.

Tax Considerations for SEPP Benefits: SEPP distributions are taxable income. Employees must consider the tax implications of their chosen payout method—lump sum or annuities—and plan for potential tax liabilities. This understanding is crucial, especially with the plan’s benefit accrual freeze affecting the retirement timeline.

What resources are available for employees of The University of Chicago wishing to understand more about their retirement benefits under SEPP? Discuss the types of information that can be requested from the Benefits Office and highlight the contact methods for obtaining more detailed assistance.

Resources for Understanding SEPP Benefits: The University provides resources for employees to understand their SEPP benefits, including access to the Benefits Office for personalized queries. Utilizing these resources is essential for employees, especially newer ones post-2016, to fully understand their retirement benefits under the current plan structure.

How does The University of Chicago address benefits for employees upon their death, and what provisions exist for both spouses and non-spouse beneficiaries under the SEPP plan? Analyze the specific benefits and payment structures available to beneficiaries and the conditions under which these benefits are distributed.

Posthumous Benefits: The SEPP includes provisions for spouses and non-spouse beneficiaries, detailing the continuation or lump sum payments upon the death of the employee. Understanding these provisions is crucial for estate planning and ensuring financial security for beneficiaries.

What factors ensure an employee remains fully vested in their pension benefits with The University of Chicago, and how does the vesting schedule affect retirement planning strategies? Consider the implications of not fulfilling the vesting criteria and how this might influence decisions around employment tenure and retirement timing.

Vesting and Retirement Planning: Vesting in SEPP requires three years of service, with full benefits contingent on meeting this criterion. For employees navigating post-2016 changes, understanding vesting is crucial for retirement planning, particularly as no additional benefits accrue beyond the freeze date.

Discuss the impact of a Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO) on the SEPP benefits for employees at The University of Chicago. How do divorce or separation proceedings influence pension benefits, and what steps should employees take to ensure compliance with a QDRO?

Impact of QDROs on SEPP Benefits: SEPP complies with Qualified Domestic Relations Orders, which can allocate pension benefits to alternate payees. Understanding how QDROs affect one’s benefits is crucial for financial planning, especially in the context of marital dissolution.

How can employees at The University of Chicago, who have questions about their benefits under the SEPP plan, effectively communicate with the Benefits Office for clarity and assistance? Specify the various communication methods available for employees and what kind of information or support they can expect to receive.

Communicating with the Benefits Office: Employees can reach out to the Benefits Office via email or phone for detailed assistance on their SEPP benefits. Effective communication with this office is vital for employees to clarify their benefits status, particularly in light of the post-2016 changes to the plan.