The 5% Withdrawal Rule Explained: Financial Security for Parsons Employees

Healthcare Provider Update: For Parsons, the primary healthcare provider is the UnitedHealthcare plan, particularly significant as it is one of the largest insurers in the country, alongside others that may service Parsons employees depending on their locations. As we move into 2026, healthcare costs are expected to escalate dramatically due to a combination of factors affecting the Affordable Care Act (ACA) marketplace. Reports anticipate substantial premium increases, with some states seeing hikes of over 60%. This surge is primarily driven by deteriorating medical cost trends and the looming expiration of enhanced federal premium subsidies, which could result in out-of-pocket premium payments rising by an average of over 75% for approximately 92% of marketplace enrollees - a situation that poses significant financial challenges for individuals relying on ACA coverage. Thus, Parsons employees are advised to consider these developments carefully as they plan their healthcare for the upcoming year. Click here to learn more

For decades, the 4% withdrawal rule has played a key role in retirement savings strategies, originally introduced by financial planner Bill Bengen in the 1990s. According to this rule, retirees could withdraw 4% of their initial retirement balance, with annual adjustments for inflation, to stretch their savings over 30 years. For example, from a $1 million portfolio, one could withdraw $40,000 in the first year, adjusting for inflation in subsequent years.

Due to shifts in economic conditions, this traditional approach is now seen by some as too conservative. Financial professionals, including those at Parsons, are increasingly discussing a 5% withdrawal rate, offering higher income potential while maintaining long-term sustainability. This article explores the benefits of the 5% rule, its enhancement through guardrails, and the bucket strategy for effectively managing retirement funds.

Shifting to a 5% Withdrawal Rate

Recent studies challenge the 4% rate, suggesting a 5% withdrawal rate as a more suitable starting point in today’s financial landscape. Even Bill Bengen has adjusted his initial recommendation to a figure “very close to 5%,” reflecting current market conditions. Financial professionals like those at Parsons, and elsewhere, emphasize the need for retirees to revisit their strategies in response to the evolving economic climate.

The Case for a 5% Withdrawal Rate

The potential for a 5% rate largely depends on expected returns from stocks and bonds, which are key components of most retirement portfolios. Firms like  estimate 8% returns on U.S. stocks and about 5% on bonds over the next two decades, aligning with historical data that supports a 5% withdrawal strategy over a 30-year period .

However, risks remain, such as the current valuation of U.S. equities (measured by the cyclically adjusted price-to-earnings ratio) and historically low debt yields, which could undermine projected returns.

Adding Guardrails to the 5% Rule

To enhance the resilience of the 5% withdrawal strategy, integrating guardrails helps adjust withdrawal amounts based on actual market performance, this can help with income stability and portfolio longevity. These guardrails act as benchmarks for adjusting spending depending on portfolio performance, typically set at 25% above and below the initial margin:

- Lower Guardrail: Reducing to 3.75% if the portfolio underperforms.

- Upper Guardrail: Increasing to 6.25% if the portfolio exceeds expectations.

Adjusting Portfolio Composition

To support a 5% withdrawal rate, adjusting the portfolio mix is essential. Bengen's updated recommendation favors a slightly more aggressive allocation, suggesting a 55% investment in stocks, particularly in small and mid-cap U.S. equities, to enhance long-term sustainability. Alternatively, J.P. Morgan advocates a more cautious approach, recommending a 30/70 stock-to-bond ratio, considering longer life expectancies.

The Bucket Approach for Managing Risk and Liquidity

The bucket strategy, embraced by many financial professionals, including those at Parsons, divides a retiree's portfolio into segments for specific timeframes:

Bucket 1 : Immediate needs—holding 1-2 years of cash to avoid selling investments during market downturns.

Bucket 2 : Intermediate needs—5-8 years of investments in bonds and dividend-paying stocks to navigate short-term market volatility.

Bucket 3 : Long-term growth—higher-risk assets to outpace inflation and support extended retirement periods.

Bucket 4 : Health and long-term care—a special reserve for unforeseen medical expenses, crucial given rising healthcare costs.

Featured Video

Articles you may find interesting:

Managing Withdrawals and Rebalancing

Ongoing management involves refilling previous buckets by taking advantage of favorable market conditions or limiting shortfalls when market performance declines. This flexibility helps build financial stability during economic uncertainty, something Parsons retirees should prioritize.

Stress Testing Retirement Strategies

A comprehensive retirement plan should include stress tests to evaluate the strength of the withdrawal strategy under various market scenarios. This analysis helps refine the approach, aligning it with personal financial goals and market realities.

Conclusion: Encouraging Flexibility in Retirement Planning

Implementing a 5% withdrawal rate, alongside strategic guardrails and the bucket strategy, offers retirees a more adaptable way to manage their retirement finances. This structure not only increases the initial withdrawal rate but also provides mechanisms for adjusting spending in response to market fluctuations, leading too a balance between enjoying retirement and preserving financial resources.

While retirement planning is highly personalized, adopting flexible strategies such as the 5% rule with guardrails and the bucket approach can significantly enhance financial independence and quality of life for retirees, including Parsons employees, and aid in the optimization of their savings throughout their retirement years.

Recent studies, such as the one published by the Boston College Center for Retirement Research in May 2024, highlight the importance of tax-efficient withdrawal strategies to complement the 5% rule . Their findings indicate that retirees who strategically withdraw from taxable, deductible, and Roth accounts can extend the lifespan of their portfolios by reducing tax liabilities. This method is particularly valuable in a time of fluctuating tax rates and could potentially increase net retirement income by 15%, making it an essential consideration for those looking to optimize their retirement strategies in light of the 5% rule.

Navigating retirement with the 5% withdrawal rule and guardrails is akin to sailing a well-equipped boat. Just as a vessel is designed to adjust to changing weather conditions with stabilizers and advanced navigation systems, the 5% rule with guardrails allows retirees to adapt their financial savings based on market performance. This strategy can help with a smooth journey, optimizing gains during favorable periods and preserving capital during downturns, much like a ship adjusting its course and speed to aid in a  pleasant voyage across uncertain seas.

The information is not intended as a recommendation. The opinions are subject to change at any time and no forecasts can be guaranteed. Investment decisions should always be made based on an investor's specific circumstances. Investing involves risk including possible loss of principal.