The Hidden Costs of Layoffs at MetLife: What Employees and Retirees Need to Know

Healthcare Provider Update: Healthcare Provider for MetLife: MetLife partners with a variety of healthcare providers and networks to deliver its health insurance products. These generally include extensive networks of hospitals, physicians, and specialists under the MetLife brand, often incorporating regional healthcare systems to ensure members have access to a broad range of services. Specific providers may vary based on the plan and location chosen by the member. Potential Healthcare Cost Increases for 2026: As healthcare costs continue to rise, projections indicate that premiums for Affordable Care Act (ACA) plans could increase sharply in 2026, with the median hike estimated at 18%-the largest seen since 2018. This surge is fueled by factors such as escalating medical expenses, the looming expiration of enhanced federal premium subsidies, and recent aggressive rate hikes from major insurers like MetLife. Without these subsidies, many enrollees could face even steeper out-of-pocket costs, potentially exceeding 75%, underscoring the urgent need for consumers to prepare financially for the upcoming changes. Click here to learn more

When a significant company like MetLife faces the tough decision of layoffs, the immediate financial consequences can often be surprising. For example, when a tech giant announced cuts in November 2022 involving 11,000 employees, the separation expenses alone amounted to nearly $975 million, averaging over $88,000 per affected employee. While these costs are substantial, they were reported to be offset by reductions in current expenses such as salaries, bonuses, and other benefits.

The Real Price of Layoffs at MetLife

Accounting for layoffs by simply calculating cost reductions and immediate savings can often overlook the deeper, more hidden costs. Research and expert analysis suggest that layoffs can disrupt productivity, morale, and overall company performance. MetLife employees might experience fear and a decline in morale, resulting in decreased work quality and an increase in workplace accidents and product defects. Additionally, companies like MetLife often face higher turnover rates, necessitating extra expenses to hire and train new employees. Other financial consequences include increased unemployment insurance tax rates and potential legal costs from discrimination lawsuits.

Indirect Costs and Long-term Impact for MetLife

According to Wayne Cascio, a renowned professor at the University of Colorado-Denver Business School, companies that opt for temporary measures such as furloughs instead of direct layoffs tend to regenerate and perform better financially up to two years later. This finding could be relevant for MetLife when considering different strategies to manage workforce reductions.

Separation Practices Across Industries and at MetLife

The approach to separation varies significantly across industries and geographic regions, and MetLife's practices might reflect this diversity. For instance, a quarter of U.S. companies ensure separation for all employees, while the global rate is slightly over 42%. In the healthcare sector, companies often offer more favorable terms, which can include extended medical benefits and compensation for increased leave time. As an example, Theseus Pharmaceuticals Inc. provided a severance package averaging $212,000 to each laid-off employee, one of the highest recorded by Bloomberg’s analysis. Understanding how MetLife's approach compares can provide insights into industry best practices.

Productivity Decline Post-Layoff at MetLife

Data from ActivTrak, which monitors employee efficiency through software, shows a tangible decrease in productivity following layoffs. For instance, among  seven companies  studied from January 2022 to April 2024, the average working time dropped by nearly an hour per day. This results in a loss of about 18 hours per month per employee, leading to significant financial losses over time. MetLife might need to consider these productivity impacts when planning workforce reductions.

Long-term Costs of Increased Turnover at MetLife

Implementing layoffs leads to an increase in voluntary turnover rates, which can be more costly than the layoffs themselves. According to a  hypothetical study  based on a company of 10,000 employees, if 10% of its workforce were laid off, voluntary quit rates could increase by 49%, leading to significant costs to replace these individuals, often amounting to 1.25 times their annual salary. MetLife could face similar challenges, requiring careful planning to mitigate these long-term costs.

Featured Video

Articles you may find interesting:

Legal and Compliance Costs for MetLife

The legal framework related to layoffs is complex and varies by state. Companies like MetLife engage external experts to ensure compliance with employment laws and to minimize the risk of discrimination lawsuits. Labor economists like Mike DuMond from the Berkeley Research Group often conduct several rounds of demographic analysis to ensure layoffs do not unfairly target protected groups. Additionally, the costs related to legal compliance, including the requirement for WARN Act notifications for mass layoffs, add another layer of expense.

Conclusion for MetLife Employees

The decision to proceed with layoffs, although often seen as a necessary step to cut expenses, involves many hidden and delayed costs. These encompass not only direct financial burdens such as separation and legal fees but also long-term consequences on employee productivity and MetLife's reputation. Understanding these complex dynamics is crucial for MetLife when contemplating workforce reductions as a strategy to cope with financial difficulties.