The Hidden Costs of Layoffs at Performance Food Group: What Employees and Retirees Need to Know

Healthcare Provider Update: Healthcare Provider for Performance Food Group Performance Food Group (PFG) collaborates with Vizient, Inc., a leading healthcare performance improvement company, to enhance its healthcare solutions for its employees. Vizient serves a significant portion of acute care providers and assists healthcare organizations in achieving cost-effective care and operational excellence. Potential Healthcare Cost Increases in 2026 As the healthcare landscape evolves, significant increases in costs are anticipated for 2026, particularly for consumers utilizing Affordable Care Act (ACA) plans. With potential hikes in premiums exceeding 60% in some states, the expiration of enhanced federal subsidies could leave over 22 million marketplace enrollees facing out-of-pocket premium increases of more than 75%. This scenario, compounded by rising medical costs and substantial profit margins reported by major insurers, signals a challenging economic environment for healthcare consumers in the upcoming year. Addressing these anticipated changes early will be critical for both individuals and businesses to mitigate potential financial burdens. Click here to learn more

When a significant company like Performance Food Group faces the tough decision of layoffs, the immediate financial consequences can often be surprising. For example, when a tech giant announced cuts in November 2022 involving 11,000 employees, the separation expenses alone amounted to nearly $975 million, averaging over $88,000 per affected employee. While these costs are substantial, they were reported to be offset by reductions in current expenses such as salaries, bonuses, and other benefits.

The Real Price of Layoffs at Performance Food Group

Accounting for layoffs by simply calculating cost reductions and immediate savings can often overlook the deeper, more hidden costs. Research and expert analysis suggest that layoffs can disrupt productivity, morale, and overall company performance. Performance Food Group employees might experience fear and a decline in morale, resulting in decreased work quality and an increase in workplace accidents and product defects. Additionally, companies like Performance Food Group often face higher turnover rates, necessitating extra expenses to hire and train new employees. Other financial consequences include increased unemployment insurance tax rates and potential legal costs from discrimination lawsuits.

Indirect Costs and Long-term Impact for Performance Food Group

According to Wayne Cascio, a renowned professor at the University of Colorado-Denver Business School, companies that opt for temporary measures such as furloughs instead of direct layoffs tend to regenerate and perform better financially up to two years later. This finding could be relevant for Performance Food Group when considering different strategies to manage workforce reductions.

Separation Practices Across Industries and at Performance Food Group

The approach to separation varies significantly across industries and geographic regions, and Performance Food Group's practices might reflect this diversity. For instance, a quarter of U.S. companies ensure separation for all employees, while the global rate is slightly over 42%. In the healthcare sector, companies often offer more favorable terms, which can include extended medical benefits and compensation for increased leave time. As an example, Theseus Pharmaceuticals Inc. provided a severance package averaging $212,000 to each laid-off employee, one of the highest recorded by Bloomberg’s analysis. Understanding how Performance Food Group's approach compares can provide insights into industry best practices.

Productivity Decline Post-Layoff at Performance Food Group

Data from ActivTrak, which monitors employee efficiency through software, shows a tangible decrease in productivity following layoffs. For instance, among  seven companies  studied from January 2022 to April 2024, the average working time dropped by nearly an hour per day. This results in a loss of about 18 hours per month per employee, leading to significant financial losses over time. Performance Food Group might need to consider these productivity impacts when planning workforce reductions.

Long-term Costs of Increased Turnover at Performance Food Group

Implementing layoffs leads to an increase in voluntary turnover rates, which can be more costly than the layoffs themselves. According to a  hypothetical study  based on a company of 10,000 employees, if 10% of its workforce were laid off, voluntary quit rates could increase by 49%, leading to significant costs to replace these individuals, often amounting to 1.25 times their annual salary. Performance Food Group could face similar challenges, requiring careful planning to mitigate these long-term costs.

Featured Video

Articles you may find interesting:

Legal and Compliance Costs for Performance Food Group

The legal framework related to layoffs is complex and varies by state. Companies like Performance Food Group engage external experts to ensure compliance with employment laws and to minimize the risk of discrimination lawsuits. Labor economists like Mike DuMond from the Berkeley Research Group often conduct several rounds of demographic analysis to ensure layoffs do not unfairly target protected groups. Additionally, the costs related to legal compliance, including the requirement for WARN Act notifications for mass layoffs, add another layer of expense.

Conclusion for Performance Food Group Employees

The decision to proceed with layoffs, although often seen as a necessary step to cut expenses, involves many hidden and delayed costs. These encompass not only direct financial burdens such as separation and legal fees but also long-term consequences on employee productivity and Performance Food Group's reputation. Understanding these complex dynamics is crucial for Performance Food Group when contemplating workforce reductions as a strategy to cope with financial difficulties.