The Hidden Costs of Layoffs at Waters: What Employees and Retirees Need to Know

Healthcare Provider Update: Waters provides health insurance coverage to its U.S.-based employees through a selection of medical plans that include options for dental, vision, and life insurance. Employees can access Health Savings Accounts (HSAs) with employer contributions, along with wellness programs, disability coverage, and retirement savings plans. The company emphasizes preventive care and offers resources to support physical and mental well-being. Waters Healthcare costs in the United States are projected to continue rising through 2026, with insurers proposing significant premium increases for Affordable Care Act (ACA) plans. A recent analysis found that ACA insurers are seeking a median premium increase of 15% for 2026, marking the largest hike since 2018. This surge is attributed to factors such as the anticipated expiration of enhanced premium tax credits, rising medical costsincluding expensive medications and increased hospital staysand a shift in the risk pool towards higher-cost enrollees. Without the renewal of enhanced subsidies, out-of-pocket premiums for ACA marketplace enrollees could increase by more than 75% on average. Click here to learn more

When a significant company like Waters faces the tough decision of layoffs, the immediate financial consequences can often be surprising. For example, when a tech giant announced cuts in November 2022 involving 11,000 employees, the separation expenses alone amounted to nearly $975 million, averaging over $88,000 per affected employee. While these costs are substantial, they were reported to be offset by reductions in current expenses such as salaries, bonuses, and other benefits.

The Real Price of Layoffs at Waters

Accounting for layoffs by simply calculating cost reductions and immediate savings can often overlook the deeper, more hidden costs. Research and expert analysis suggest that layoffs can disrupt productivity, morale, and overall company performance. Waters employees might experience fear and a decline in morale, resulting in decreased work quality and an increase in workplace accidents and product defects. Additionally, companies like Waters often face higher turnover rates, necessitating extra expenses to hire and train new employees. Other financial consequences include increased unemployment insurance tax rates and potential legal costs from discrimination lawsuits.

Indirect Costs and Long-term Impact for Waters

According to Wayne Cascio, a renowned professor at the University of Colorado-Denver Business School, companies that opt for temporary measures such as furloughs instead of direct layoffs tend to regenerate and perform better financially up to two years later. This finding could be relevant for Waters when considering different strategies to manage workforce reductions.

Separation Practices Across Industries and at Waters

The approach to separation varies significantly across industries and geographic regions, and Waters's practices might reflect this diversity. For instance, a quarter of U.S. companies ensure separation for all employees, while the global rate is slightly over 42%. In the healthcare sector, companies often offer more favorable terms, which can include extended medical benefits and compensation for increased leave time. As an example, Theseus Pharmaceuticals Inc. provided a severance package averaging $212,000 to each laid-off employee, one of the highest recorded by Bloomberg’s analysis. Understanding how Waters's approach compares can provide insights into industry best practices.

Productivity Decline Post-Layoff at Waters

Data from ActivTrak, which monitors employee efficiency through software, shows a tangible decrease in productivity following layoffs. For instance, among  seven companies  studied from January 2022 to April 2024, the average working time dropped by nearly an hour per day. This results in a loss of about 18 hours per month per employee, leading to significant financial losses over time. Waters might need to consider these productivity impacts when planning workforce reductions.

Long-term Costs of Increased Turnover at Waters

Implementing layoffs leads to an increase in voluntary turnover rates, which can be more costly than the layoffs themselves. According to a  hypothetical study  based on a company of 10,000 employees, if 10% of its workforce were laid off, voluntary quit rates could increase by 49%, leading to significant costs to replace these individuals, often amounting to 1.25 times their annual salary. Waters could face similar challenges, requiring careful planning to mitigate these long-term costs.

Featured Video

Articles you may find interesting:

Legal and Compliance Costs for Waters

The legal framework related to layoffs is complex and varies by state. Companies like Waters engage external experts to ensure compliance with employment laws and to minimize the risk of discrimination lawsuits. Labor economists like Mike DuMond from the Berkeley Research Group often conduct several rounds of demographic analysis to ensure layoffs do not unfairly target protected groups. Additionally, the costs related to legal compliance, including the requirement for WARN Act notifications for mass layoffs, add another layer of expense.

Conclusion for Waters Employees

The decision to proceed with layoffs, although often seen as a necessary step to cut expenses, involves many hidden and delayed costs. These encompass not only direct financial burdens such as separation and legal fees but also long-term consequences on employee productivity and Waters's reputation. Understanding these complex dynamics is crucial for Waters when contemplating workforce reductions as a strategy to cope with financial difficulties.