Protecting Your Baker Hughes Retirement: Managing Long-Term Care Costs

“Baker Hughes employees who establish a dedicated health care reserve and explore flexible hybrid care solutions can help manage potential long-term care costs while addressing their overall retirement goals.”– Michael Corgiat, a representative of The Retirement Group, a division of Wealth Enhancement.

“By proactively allocating a targeted health care contingency fund and evaluating adaptable long-term care policy options, Baker Hughes employees can mitigate the financial shock of extended care expenses while aligning with their broader retirement strategy.” – Brent Wolf, a representative of The Retirement Group, a division of Wealth Enhancement.

In this article we will discuss:

1. The financial impact of long-term care risk

2. Hybrid insurance solutions for long-term care (LTC) coverage

3. Strategies for building a dedicated health care contingency buffer

As Baker Hughes employees approach retirement, many will face unexpected health challenges with age. Long-term care (LTC) costs can be extremely high for a small portion of retirees, and those exceptional cases can skew the average for everyone else. This insight—shared by Tyson Mavar, a financial advisor with Wealth Enhancement—highlights an often-overlooked aspect of retirement planning: the possibility that extended care and prolonged medical expenses can resemble a financial balloon payment.

Assistance with tasks such as eating, dressing, and bathing that are not covered by traditional medical treatment is referred to as long-term care. Unlike acute medical services, LTC is typically not included under Medicare or most standard health insurance policies, placing the financial burden on individuals. Around 70% of people over age 65 will need some form of LTC, ¹  yet only about 20% will require services lasting more than two years. ¹  Roughly 4–9% are expected to face extreme LTC costs exceeding $250,000 ² —something Baker Hughes employees should account for.

Marital status also affects long-term care needs: individuals 65 and older who are single have a 51% chance of requiring paid LTC services, while those who are married face a 43% chance. ³

These numbers underscore the potential scope and cost of LTC needs. While the most expensive cases are uncommon, they can heavily influence financial assumptions, creating undue anxiety for those trying to prepare thoughtfully. Mavar’s key guidance is to “prepare, not panic,” advocating for balanced planning that manages costs without overcommitting resources for Baker Hughes employees.

A core part of that approach is using cautious, reasoned assumptions when estimating future care expenses. Instead of preparing for worst-case scenarios, individuals might start with a baseline such as one year of full-time care at current local prices, then adjust only if there are clear indicators—like a family history of chronic illness—that prolonged care is more likely.

Mavar also encourages exploring hybrid insurance solutions rather than only traditional LTC insurance, which may come with rising premiums and limited flexibility. Hybrid plans—such as annuities with LTC features or life insurance policies—can offer care benefits if needed, or a legacy component if unused, potentially offering Baker Hughes retirees a more adaptable approach.

Another helpful method is to allocate a separate portion of one’s assets specifically for future medical and care-related expenses. Creating a distinct “health care buffer” within the broader retirement plan can help retirees address those costs separately from other retirement needs. Baker Hughes employees may want to consider liquid, lower-risk investments—like high-yield savings accounts or short-term government bonds—for this segment, allowing easier access to funds while limiting exposure to significant market fluctuations.

Mavar also cautions against letting rare but costly events dominate overall retirement preparation. “You don’t want to underfund the rest of your retirement and dedicate too much for something that may never occur,” he notes—practical guidance to help Baker Hughes workers build adaptable, long-term spending strategies.

Ultimately, it’s wise to treat long-term care as both a health-related challenge and a factor that can influence estate and retirement outcomes. By estimating conservatively, examining hybrid policy options, and establishing a separate fund for care-related needs, Baker Hughes employees can construct resilient retirement strategies that take LTC into account while still addressing their overall financial objectives.

Sources:

1. Administration for Community Living, Department of Health & Human Services. ' How Much Care Will YOu Need? ' 18 Feb. 2020.

2. Simply Insurance. ' How Many People Need Long Term Care in America? ' 12 June 2025. 

3. Morningstar. ' How Likely Are You to Need Long-Term Care? ' by Christine Benz. 12 Jul. 2024. 

Things I suggest deleting:

Baker Hughes retirees are encouraged to dedicate a portion of their assets to health care expenses in a flexible and targeted way, research hybrid LTC policies, and use reasonable estimates for care-related costs as they approach retirement.

Featured Video

Articles you may find interesting:

Keywords:  healthcare contingency, hybrid LTC insurance, retirement income options, long-term care planning

Planning for long-term care is similar to installing a backup generator for your home: when the power goes out, those who live alone face added challenges. Similarly, individuals over age 65 who are unmarried have a 51% chance of needing paid long-term care, compared to 43% for their married counterparts.

Just as a generator provides continuity during occasional outages, a carefully constructed LTC plan helps manage costly care needs while maintaining flexibility for other goals.

1. Genworth Financial, Inc., and CareScout.  Cost of Care Survey 2024 . Genworth Financial, 4 Mar. 2025, pp. 1–2.

2. Cavanaugh, Lynn. “2024 Retiree Health Care Cost Estimate Is $165,000.”  Fidelity Investments , 15 Aug. 2024, p. 1.

3. Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation (ASPE). “What Is the Lifetime Risk of Needing and Receiving Long-Term Services & Supports?”  U.S. Department of Health & Human Services , Dec. 2018, pp. 3–4.

4. American Association for Long-Term Care Insurance. “Long-Term Care Need Data for Men and Women.”  AALTCI , July 2024, sec. “Married Couples Have Less Long-Term Care Need.”

5. Carroll, John. “Five Reasons to Discuss Long-Term Care Insurance Options with Your Clients.”  LIMRA & LOMA , Dec. 2023, sec. “Life Combination Products.”