Is Retirement in a Lower-Tax State Actually More Affordable for Southern California Edison Employees?

Southern California Edison employees weighing a move to a no-income-tax state should consider the full financial picture beyond tax headlines, as higher housing, insurance, and property expenses can quickly offset perceived savings. – Tyson Mavar, a representative of The Retirement Group, a division of Wealth Enhancement.

For Southern California Edison employees considering retirement relocation, the key takeaway is that lower income taxes don't always translate into lower living costs—comprehensive financial planning is vital to avoid unexpected burdens. – Wesley Boudreaux, a representative of The Retirement Group, a division of Wealth Enhancement.

In this article we will discuss:

1. The financial considerations of relocating to a no-income-tax state during retirement.

2. How property taxes, housing costs, and insurance can offset tax savings.

3. The importance of strategic tax and estate planning before making a move.

The Financial Considerations of Relocating to a No-Income-Tax State

Retiring in a state without income tax is often viewed as financially advantageous. However, for Southern California Edison employees planning their next chapter, it's essential to consider the overall cost of living. While the absence of state income tax is appealing, other expenses such as housing, insurance, and maintenance can significantly impact your budget.

In 2024, a couple in their mid-sixties moved from Indianapolis to St. Petersburg, Florida, to be closer to their adult children. Florida's lack of state income tax was a major draw. However, after relocating, they encountered high insurance premiums, elevated home prices, and unexpected repair costs following Hurricane Helene. Brad Clark, founder of Solomon Financial in Carmel, Indiana, noted that the husband had to return to work, altering their retirement plans considerably.

They were in a pretty good position up here, and now it's just not a pretty picture, said Clark. This example serves as a reminder that working longer may become necessary if key relocation costs are not thoroughly evaluated.

Beyond Just Income Taxes

The significance of income taxes in retirement largely depends on the size and type of income streams. Southern California Edison retirees with substantial investment income might find benefits in no-income-tax states, but middle-income households often discover that income taxes play a smaller role than anticipated. Jared Walczak from the Tax Foundation emphasizes that sales and property taxes often take center stage in these states.

For instance, Tennessee has no income tax but has a combined state and local sales tax rate of 9.55%, the second-highest in the nation.

Property taxes are another critical factor. Texas, a popular retirement destination, has an average property tax rate of 1.60%, more than double Florida's 0.80%. This can be an unexpected expense for retirees transitioning into a fixed income.

Financial planner Caitlin Frederick of Ullman Wealth Partners in Florida advises that new homeowners may face higher tax bills than expected. Long-term residents benefit from property tax caps, but these reset when homes are sold, and the reassessment may not occur until the second tax cycle. Relying solely on online listings for tax estimates can be misleading; consulting with agents and planners can provide clarity on potential increases.

Hidden Costs of Housing and Insurance

Housing affordability is just one aspect of the retirement equation. According to Bankrate, shelter costs can easily offset any income tax savings.

This is especially true in states prone to severe weather. Florida has experienced rising insurance costs due to hurricanes and climate-related threats. For example, a Michigan couple who relocated to Sarasota found themselves paying $35,000 annually in homeowners insurance, HOA dues, and property taxes.

Nationally, Bankrate reports the average annual premium for a $300,000 policy is $2,267. In Florida, it's more than double at $5,527, second only to Nebraska. These increased costs can greatly impact retirement budgets, particularly for Southern California Edison employees accustomed to more stable expenses.

Planning for Taxes and Estates

Many of these challenges can be addressed through careful financial planning before relocating. Strategies such as converting traditional retirement accounts into Roth IRAs can help manage taxable income and control state tax exposure in retirement. For Southern California Edison employees, timing and proactive tax planning can be instrumental in maintaining income levels.

Each state taxes retirement income differently. Some, like Illinois, exempt income from 401(k)s, IRAs, and pensions. Others, such as Colorado and New Mexico, impose taxes on Social Security for higher earners. Understanding how your benefits are treated at the state level is crucial before choosing a destination.

Tools from the Tax Foundation and Bankrate can assist in comparing taxes, housing, health care, and other costs across states. These calculators provide Southern California Edison employees with side-by-side insights into how far their income may extend in different regions.

Estate and inheritance taxes are additional considerations. Tony Owens from AlphaCore notes that while federal inheritance tax applies only to estates above approximately $14 million, many states have much lower thresholds. In Oregon, for example, any estate above $1 million can be taxed. Southern California Edison retirees intending to leave assets to family should account for these potential state-level obligations.

Owens also points out that even California's 13.3% top income tax rate doesn't always make other states a financial advantage. Southern California Edison retirees might not experience significant relief unless they are in the highest tax bracket. Understanding how each state handles marginal tax rates is essential to making an informed decision.

Bottom Line for Southern California Edison Employees

Assuming that moving to a state with no income tax will result in savings can be misleading. While taxes may be lower, costs such as housing, insurance, and property taxes often increase simultaneously—and may even surpass the savings.

Featured Video

Articles you may find interesting:

Sources:

1. Carlson, Debbie. “Retirees Who Move to Lower-Tax States May Not Save as Much as They Think.” The Wall Street Journal , 9 Apr. 2025, www.wsj.com .

2. Costa, Moriah. “6 Important Costs to Consider When Planning for Retirement.” Synchrony Bank , 20 Feb. 2024, www.synchrony.com .

3. “Financial Fact vs Fiction: This Roth Conversion Myth Could Cost You.” Kiplinger , 6 Apr. 2025, www.kiplinger.com .

4. “Skyrocketing Housing Costs Pose Major Threat to Retirees.” TheStreet , Jan. 2025, www.thestreet.com .

5. Parkshore Wealth Management. “Tax Considerations When Downsizing or Relocating in Retirement.” Parkshore Wealth , Sept. 2024, www.parkshorewealth.com