New Update: Healthcare Costs Increasing by Over 60% in Some States. Will you be impacted?

Navigating the Retirement Income Valley for Conagra Brands Employees

'Understanding the 'income valley' offers Conagra Brands employees a critical opportunity to strategically manage their tax burdens during retirement, and with the recent SECURE 2.0 Act changes, it's more important than ever to implement tax-efficient strategies well in advance of required minimum distributions.' – Paul Bergeron, a representative of The Retirement Group, a division of Wealth Enhancement Group.

'Conagra Brands employees approaching retirement can significantly benefit from planning during the 'income valley,' utilizing tax-saving strategies and Roth conversions to lower their overall tax burden, especially with the SECURE 2.0 Act providing more flexibility before RMDs begin.' – Tyson Mavar, a representative of The Retirement Group, a division of Wealth Enhancement Group.

In this article, we will discuss:

The concept of the 'income valley' and its significance for retirement planning.
Tax-efficient strategies such as tax-saving withdrawals, Roth conversions, and charitable giving during the income valley.
The impact of the SECURE 2.0 Act on retirement planning and RMDs.

When it comes to retirement planning, time is one of our most precious resources. Building a nest egg that can support a comfortable retirement requires effective use of time, particularly in the form of compound profits. Traditional and Roth retirement savings, taxable accounts, and Social Security income are frequently used to finance retirement. But for many people, retirement doesn't always begin at a specific age, and when to make key retirement-related decisions can significantly affect increasing retirement income and reducing taxes.

For Conagra Brands employees born in 1960 or later, the full retirement age for Social Security benefits is 67. However, recent legislative amendments have added additional factors to retirement planning. The required minimum distribution (RMD) age was raised from 72 to 73 by the SECURE 2.0 Act, which went into effect in 2023. This presents new opportunities for tax planning by allowing those who retire at age 67 to delay RMDs for an additional year.

Starting in 2033, the RMD age for individuals born in 1960 or later will rise to 75, providing more time to manage taxes before required withdrawals from tax-deferred retirement plans like 401(k)s and IRAs. Though this change is still years away, it will significantly affect how retirees manage their taxes and income in the years before RMDs.

For tax planning, understanding this time frame—known as the 'income valley'—can be quite beneficial. The period between retirement and the start of mandatory minimum distributions is called the 'income valley.' During this time, a retiree may find themselves in a lower tax bracket due to reduced taxable income. Depending on the retirement income sources and withdrawal strategy, this period can vary significantly.

Consider the situation of Sally and Carl, a Conagra Brands couple in their early 60s preparing for retirement. With a total pre-retirement income of $150,000, Sally and Carl plan to retire at age 67. They have $55,000 in available income, drawn from a mix of Social Security, their 401(k), and taxable assets, to cover their estimated $95,000 in yearly retirement needs. However, their taxable income may be much lower in the early years of retirement than later on, as they begin their retirement before the mandatory minimum distributions start.

The Income Valley's Mechanisms

In this example, Sally and Carl plan to use their $250,000 bank account and $1,000,000 401(k) to pay for their living expenses in the first few years of retirement. They can tap into their taxable accounts and take withdrawals from their checking accounts during this income valley period without incurring significant tax liabilities. Sally and Carl would be able to live on relatively low taxable income during this time since withdrawals from non-tax-deferred accounts, such as their bank or brokerage account, would not be counted as taxable income.

Since their Social Security payouts are taxed up to 85%, using non-taxable funds first can provide substantial tax relief before RMDs begin. This period also offers them a chance to figure out the most tax-efficient way to manage their 401(k) withdrawals. The scenario changes when they start taking withdrawals from their 401(k) at age 72, as they will be taxed as ordinary income, which may push them into a higher tax bracket.

Handling the Income Valley

For retirees, the income valley presents a unique opportunity to implement strategies that can lower overall tax burdens. Retirees like Sally and Carl might want to consider three tax solutions during the income valley years:

Tax-Saving Withdrawals

Making tax-efficient withdrawals is one of the best ways to manage taxes in retirement. This involves carefully selecting the source of the money used to cover living expenses based on tax treatment. For example, a retiree might withdraw from taxable assets first, followed by tax-deferred accounts like a 401(k), and finally, tax-free Roth accounts. This strategy organizes withdrawals in the most tax-efficient order.

Another tactic is proportional withdrawals, where money is withdrawn from each account based on their total amounts. This strategy helps reduce the chances of being pushed into a higher tax bracket later in retirement and maintains a more stable income stream. By carefully managing withdrawals from tax-deferred accounts, retirees can reduce lifetime taxes and future RMDs while in lower tax brackets.

However, this strategy's impact on Social Security taxes must be carefully considered. Withdrawals from tax-deferred accounts raise taxable income, which could result in higher taxes on Social Security benefits. Additionally, the retiree might be placed in a higher Medicare premium bracket due to increasing income. It is essential to consult with a tax professional before making any retirement planning decisions.

Roth Conversions

Converting tax-deferred retirement funds (like an IRA or 401(k)) into a Roth IRA is known as a Roth conversion. While Roth accounts grow tax-free and allow for tax-free withdrawals in retirement, retirees must pay taxes on the converted amount today. Conducting a Roth conversion during a period of low taxable income, such as the income valley, is especially advantageous.

Retirees can reduce the size of their tax-deferred accounts and, consequently, their RMDs (and related taxes) after they start by transferring a portion of their 401(k) funds into a Roth IRA during the income valley. Roth IRAs provide more control over retirement income in later years since they are not subject to RMDs.

However, like tax-efficient withdrawals, Roth conversions may temporarily increase taxable income, which could lead to higher Social Security taxes and higher Medicare premiums. Future tax implications should be carefully considered before deciding to convert funds into a Roth IRA, as the timing of the conversion can significantly impact its outcome.

Charitable Giving

Charitable donations can substantially lower taxable income during the income valley for retirees who are philanthropically inclined. By contributing to charities, retirees can support causes they care about while lowering their taxable income. Donations can dramatically reduce tax liabilities if the retiree itemizes deductions.

The Qualified Charitable Distribution (QCD) is particularly beneficial for retirees. A QCD allows individuals to donate up to $100,000 per year to a qualified charity directly from their IRA. The QCD is not included in taxable income but counts as a distribution for RMD purposes. This strategy allows retirees to meet their RMD requirement without increasing their taxable income. As of 2025, retirees may be able to lower their RMD levels and further reduce their tax burden by using QCDs.

QCDs are a simple method to give back while lowering taxable income because they don't need to be itemized, unlike traditional charity donations.

Considerations & Restrictions

While these strategies can be effective in reducing taxes during retirement, not all retirees will have the same flexibility in managing their retirement income. Some retirees may have limited options for withdrawing funds, particularly if they mostly rely on tax-deferred accounts like 401(k)s or IRAs. In such cases, the ability to strategically withdraw from taxable or tax-free funds may be limited, reducing their ability to lower taxable income.

Articles you may find interesting:

Moreover, retirees with additional income sources—such as pensions, annuities, or rental income—may find their taxable income increases, making it more difficult to implement these tax-efficient strategies. While they may still be able to manage their withdrawals, they have little control over the taxation of their other income sources.

The SECURE 2.0 Act's delay of RMDs provides retirees more time to strategize their tax planning. It is crucial to consult with financial professionals to understand how these changes might impact individual situations.

In summary, the income valley offers retirees a valuable window to manage taxes before RMDs begin. By implementing strategies like tax-efficient withdrawals, Roth conversions, and charitable giving, retirees can reduce their tax burden, spread out tax payments, and preserve more of their hard-earned savings.

Conagra Brands employees should also consider healthcare expenses as they approach the income valley. According to a Fidelity Investments study, excluding long-term care, the average couple retiring at age 65 in 2023 will need approximately $315,000 for healthcare expenses during retirement. By planning for these needs during the income valley, when taxable income is lower, retirees can better manage their resources and avoid financial strain. Planning for healthcare is essential to long-term financial well-being.

Learn how to navigate the retirement income valley with smart withdrawal strategies and tax-saving solutions. Discover how you can lower your tax burden, enhance your retirement savings, and take advantage of the SECURE 2.0 Act's provisions to safeguard your financial future. By making informed choices today, you can plan for a more comfortable retirement.

Consider the retirement income valley as a calm stretch of a long journey. Just as a driver might ease off the pedal to conserve fuel on a flat, easy stretch of road, retirees can reduce taxes and preserve wealth during this period before RMDs begin.

Source:

1. 'What the Wealthy Get Right About Retirement Withdrawals.' Investopedia , 2 May 2025, www.investopedia.com/articles/retirement/101/wealthy-get-right-about-retirement-withdrawals . Accessed 4 May 2025.

2. 'Charitable Trusts vs. Private Foundations: What Is Right for You?' Investopedia , 2 May 2025, www.investopedia.com/articles/retirement/101/charitable-trusts-vs-private-foundations . Accessed 4 May 2025.

3. Foster, Lauren. 'The Market Is Swinging Wildly. Should Retirees Wait to Take RMDs?' Barron's , 1 May 2025, www.barrons.com/articles/market-swinging-wildly-rmds-should-retirees-wait . Accessed 4 May 2025.

4. 'Understanding the Retirement Income Valley.' Fidelity Investments , 30 Apr. 2025, www.fidelity.com/retirement-planning/retirement-income-valley . Accessed 4 May 2025.

5. 'SECURE 2.0 Act Changes RMD Rules.' Ascensus , 25 Oct. 2023, www.ascensus.com/news/secure-2-0-act-rmd-changes . Accessed 4 May 2025.

How does Conagra Brands, Inc. ensure that employees understand their retirement benefits, particularly the nuances of the Conagra Foods Inc. Pension Plan and the historical obligations from the Beatrice Retirement Income Plan (BRIP)? Are there specific communication strategies or resources provided to employees to navigate their eligibility and benefits?

Conagra Brands has not provided consistent documentation of the Beatrice Retirement Income Plan (BRIP), as evidenced by a lost BRIP Plan document, which has created confusion among former Beatrice employees. Conagra relies on internal committees like the Conagra Brands Employee Benefits Administrative Committee to oversee the administration of the Conagra Foods Inc. Pension Plan and the historical obligations from BRIP. However, there are allegations in the class action that Conagra has failed to communicate certain benefit entitlements, particularly the age at which unreduced benefits should commence(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).

In light of regulatory compliance, what measures does Conagra Brands, Inc. take to maintain the integrity and security of pension plan documents, especially considering the historical loss of the BRIP Plan document? How do the missing documents impact employee knowledge of their benefits?

The loss of the BRIP Plan document represents a significant failure in document retention and regulatory compliance. Under ERISA, Conagra is required to maintain and distribute these documents upon request. The missing BRIP documents have caused discrepancies in the administration of retirement benefits, particularly regarding the age of eligibility for unreduced benefits. Conagra has been criticized for not informing employees that these documents were lost, leading to confusion and underpayment of benefits(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).

What resources does Conagra Brands, Inc. offer to its employees who have questions about their pension benefits or discrepancies that may arise from the transition from the Beatrice Retirement Income Plan to the Conagra Foods Inc. Pension Plan? How can employees best utilize these resources?

Conagra directs employees to contact the Plan service center for inquiries related to their pension benefits. However, based on the complaints filed in court, there have been issues with transparency and the accessibility of important plan documents, including the BRIP. Employees have had to appeal their benefit decisions and deal with insufficient guidance on navigating the discrepancies between the old BRIP and the Conagra Plan. Resources like benefit calculators and service centers have sometimes provided inaccurate or incomplete information(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).

How does Conagra Brands, Inc. handle the potential discrepancies regarding the pension benefits related to the age eligibility for receiving unreduced benefits in the context of both the Conagra Plan and the Beatrice plan? What steps have been taken to prevent similar issues in the future?

Conagra has been handling discrepancies poorly, particularly around the age at which participants in the BRIP are entitled to receive unreduced benefits. The company's adjustment of the eligibility age from 60 to 65 without properly consulting or notifying employees has led to underpayment of benefits. The ongoing class action lawsuit seeks to address these discrepancies and prevent future issues by clarifying benefit entitlements under the terms of both plans(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).

Can you elaborate on the process that Conagra Brands, Inc. utilizes to communicate with employees about plan amendments and to clarify their rights under the Conagra Foods Inc. Pension Plan? What specific improvements have been made to this communication strategy in recent years?

The communication process regarding plan amendments at Conagra has been criticized as insufficient, particularly concerning the transition from the BRIP to the Conagra Plan. Employees have filed complaints about not receiving adequate notice of important changes, such as the shift in eligibility age for unreduced benefits. Conagra has failed to provide clear documentation, leading to confusion among employees. There is no evidence of significant improvements in recent years(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).

How does Conagra Brands, Inc. ensure compliance with the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), especially regarding the fiduciary duties of the Conagra Brands Employee Benefits Administrative Committee? What protocols are in place to guarantee that employeesâ€™ rights are consistently protected?

Conagra's compliance with ERISA has been challenged in court, with allegations of fiduciary breaches related to the loss of critical plan documents like the BRIP. The Conagra Brands Employee Benefits Administrative Committee is responsible for maintaining the integrity of the pension plan, but the loss of documents and failure to notify employees of their rights raise questions about the adequacy of these protocols. The lawsuit highlights a need for improved oversight and adherence to ERISA's fiduciary requirements(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).

What options are currently available for former Beatrice employees and other participants in the Conagra Foods Inc. Pension Plan to claim benefits they believe they are entitled to? How does Conagra Brands, Inc. facilitate this process?

Former Beatrice employees can contact the Pension Service Center to inquire about their benefits and initiate claims. However, the process has been complicated by missing documentation and conflicting information about eligibility. Some employees have been forced to file legal claims to recover benefits owed to them, as in the case of the ongoing class action lawsuit. The lack of clear and accessible resources has made it difficult for employees to navigate the process effectively(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).

In what ways does Conagra Brands, Inc. provide support or guidance for employees approaching retirement, particularly in understanding the timelines and responsibilities associated with electing benefits from the Conagra Foods Inc. Pension Plan?

Conagra provides online calculators and service center assistance for employees approaching retirement, but these tools have proven unreliable for some participants. Employees have reported being unable to calculate their benefits accurately or being told they were ineligible for benefits before age 65, despite the terms of the BRIP allowing benefits to begin at age 60. The class action complaint highlights deficiencies in the guidance provided to employees regarding their benefits(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).

How can employees at Conagra Brands, Inc. contact the Employee Benefits Administrative Committee for inquiries related to their benefits? What are the most efficient avenues for addressing concerns about the Conagra Foods Inc. Pension Plan or the transitions from the Beatrice plan?

Employees can contact the Plan service center for inquiries related to their benefits, but accessing the Employee Benefits Administrative Committee directly appears to be more challenging. The lawsuit indicates that employees seeking to address discrepancies with their benefits have not received timely or effective communication from the committee, often requiring legal action to resolve their concerns(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).

How does Conagra Brands, Inc. evaluate its pension plan's performance and benefits offerings in relation to industry standards? What methods are used to ensure the company remains competitive while protecting employee benefits under the Conagra Foods Inc. Pension Plan?

There is little publicly available information regarding how Conagra evaluates its pension plan's performance against industry standards. The company's handling of historical pension obligations, particularly from the Beatrice acquisition, suggests that its methods for protecting employee benefits have been insufficient. Ongoing litigation regarding underpayment of benefits and loss of critical documents indicates that the company may need to improve its evaluation methods and compliance efforts to remain competitive(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).

Additional Articles

Check Out Articles for Conagra Brands employees

For more information you can reach the plan administrator for Conagra Brands at 222 W. Merchandise Mart Plaza Chicago, IL 60654; or by calling them at (312) 549-5000.