New Update: Healthcare Costs Increasing by Over 60% in Some States. Will you be impacted?

Becton Dickinson Employees and the Changing Future of Social Security

“Given the potential for Social Security reforms to reshape retirement income, Becton Dickinson employees should regularly revisit their savings strategies and consider a broader range of planning tools to adapt to evolving benefits trends.” – Michael Corgiat, a representative of The Retirement Group, a division of Wealth Enhancement.

“Becton Dickinson employees can strengthen their retirement outlook by staying updated on Social Security developments and by integrating flexible planning strategies that account for possible changes to future benefits.” – Brent Wolf, a representative of The Retirement Group, a division of Wealth Enhancement.

In this article we will discuss:

The possible insolvency of the Social Security Trust Fund and its potential impact on future retirement benefits
Proposed legislative reforms, including raising the full retirement age and alternative funding strategies
Retirement planning actions Becton Dickinson employees can consider to prepare for potentially reduced Social Security support

The financial situation facing Social Security continues to worsen. Without major reforms—such as raising the full retirement age (FRA), adjusting taxes, or implementing corrective policies—the program is expected to become insolvent within the next decade. ¹ The following five data-driven insights highlight the urgency for Becton Dickinson employees and others to reconsider their retirement outlook:

Trust Fund Insolvency by 2034

According to the Social Security Administration’s 2024 Trustees Report, the Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) Trust Fund is anticipated to be depleted by 2034. ² At that point, only about 77% of scheduled benefits would be available using existing payroll tax revenue. ³ This development means those at Becton Dickinson nearing retirement should review income expectations and long-term planning.

Shrinking Workforce-to-Retiree Ratio

In 1960, 5.1 workers supported each retiree. ⁴ By 2025, the ratio is expected to drop to 2.7 and further decrease to 2.1 by 2035. ⁴ This demographic trend places additional pressure on the system, meaning current employees at Becton Dickinson may experience increased unpredictability in their retirement timelines.

Persistent Annual Deficits Since 2021

Since 2021, Social Security has paid out more in benefits than it has received in tax revenue, ⁵ causing the ongoing depletion of Trust Fund reserves. Becton Dickinson professionals should be aware that without reforms, these annual shortfalls are likely to increase.

Life Expectancy Outpaces Retirement Age

When the program started in 1940, average life expectancy at age 65 was 13 years. As of 2025, it is over 18 years. ² However, adjustments to the FRA have not kept pace, adding long-term financial pressures. Becton Dickinson retirees should consider this trend when reviewing how their pension and Social Security benefits may work together.

Automatic 23% Benefit Cuts in 2034 Without Reform

If no legislative action occurs, federal law requires that all Social Security benefits be reduced by 23% beginning in 2034. ² These changes would affect millions—including many Becton Dickinson employees—making it necessary to plan for potential reductions in retirement income.

Reform Proposals from Policymakers

Multiple proposals to address Social Security are being discussed, with the most debated change involving adjustments to the FRA. The House Republican Study Committee recommends gradually increasing the FRA from 67 to 69 by 2033. ⁶ For a typical Becton Dickinson worker, this could translate to $3,500 less in annual benefits over a 30-year retirement—approximately a 13% overall reduction.

Senator Rand Paul has proposed a more aggressive plan, calling for an FRA of 70 or 71, arguing that this aligns with longer life expectancies and addresses long-term fiscal demands.

Impact on Physically Demanding Jobs

If these proposals move forward, up to 257 million Americans could be affected. ⁷ Becton Dickinson team members in operational or field-based roles may find it difficult to work into their late 60s or 70s due to health limitations. In such cases, some may turn to Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI), which could further strain the system.

Even though increasing the FRA to 69 would reduce benefits, it would only delay insolvency by one year—from 2034 to 2035—according to the Congressional Budget Office.

Arguments Supporting an FRA Increase

Proponents point to:

- Demographic strain: With fewer workers supporting more retirees, the program timeline needs to be reviewed.
- Extended longevity: Aligning FRA with life expectancy could help maintain balance in the program.
- Fiscal restraint: A higher FRA may lower overall outflows and reduce future tax increases or benefit reductions.

Critics Raise Equity and Health Concerns

Opponents note the regressive impact of these reforms:

- Occupational health disparities: Many physical laborers or lower-income workers—including some at Becton Dickinson—face health challenges that make extended work lives difficult.
- Income-based longevity gaps: Delaying the FRA disproportionately affects those with shorter life expectancies and poorer health.
- Alternative funding ideas: Proposals include increasing payroll taxes for high earners or removing the wage cap on Social Security taxes.

Implications for Retirement Planning

Becton Dickinson employees may benefit from adopting a cautious retirement approach:

- Increase contributions: Build additional savings in IRAs or Becton Dickinson 401k plans to help decrease reliance on Social Security.
- Diversify accounts: Roth IRAs and HSAs may provide added flexibility if Social Security payments are reduced.
- Plan conservatively: Expecting lower future benefits can help form a more robust retirement plan.

Key Takeaways for Becton Dickinson Employees

Fact or Proposal	Principal Implication
OASI Trust Fund depletion by 2034	Only 77% of benefits may be paid through payroll tax revenue.
Worker-to-retiree ratio falling to 2.1	Higher financial pressure on active workers to support retirees.
Annual deficits since 2021	Trust Fund reserves are being used to cover shortfalls.
Lifespan at 65 now about 18 years	Benefit duration is 50% longer than when the program began.
23% benefit cuts by 2034 without reform	Legally required reductions unless funding changes are made.
Raising FRA to 69–70	May reduce benefits by ~13%, only delays insolvency by one year.
Additional ideas	Raising wage cap, increasing payroll taxes, revising formulas.

Final Thoughts

Social Security’s future is uncertain, and workers at Becton Dickinson should remain attentive as reforms progress. Raising the full retirement age remains a point of debate; while it may help stabilize the system, those most impacted may be the least prepared for change. A broader solution will likely include some combination of tax adjustments, changes to the FRA, and new benefit structures.

On January 5, 2025, the Social Security Fairness Act repealed the Windfall Elimination Provision and Government Pension Offset, raising benefits for nearly 3 million public employees—including teachers, firefighters, and police officers—by $360 to $1,190 per month. While this provided meaningful relief, it also increased demands on the Social Security Administration’s processing capacity.

For Becton Dickinson employees, staying informed about these proposed changes is as important as monitoring industry developments. Taking proactive steps—such as diversifying savings, setting realistic expectations, and engaging in thoughtful retirement planning—can help individuals better navigate the uncertain horizon.

Featured Video

Articles you may find interesting:

Sources:

1. CBS News. ' Social Security's insolvency date is now a year earlier ,' by Aimee Picchi. June 19, 2025.

2. Social Security Board of Trustees. “The 2024 Annual Report of the Board of Trustees of the Federal Old-Age and Survivors Insurance and Federal Disability Insurance Trust Funds.” Social Security Administration, May 2024, pp. 7–21, 28–32, https://www.ssa.gov/oact/tr/2024/tr2024.pdf .

3. Social Security. ' Status of the Social Security and Medicare Programs .' 2025.

4. Huntington. ' What Does the Future Hold for Social Security and Medicare? ' 2024.

5. Pew Research Center. ' What the data says about Social Security ,' by Drew Desilver. May 20, 2025.

6. MSN. ' New Social Security rule proposal would raise retirement age to 69 for millions of Americans ,' by Andrea Arlett Nabor Herrera. 2025.

7. House Committee on the Budget. ' House Republican Budget Plans Would Cut Social Security Benefits .' 2025.

Other Resources:

1. Van de Water, Paul N. “What the 2024 Trustees’ Report Shows About Social Security.” Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, 7 May 2024, https://www.cbpp.org/research/social-security/what-the-2024-trustees-report-shows-about-social-security .

2. Anderson, Julia. “How Would Raising the Social Security Retirement Age to 69 Affect Your Benefits?” Kiplinger, 8 Apr. 2024, https://www.kiplinger.com/retirement/raising-the-social-security-retirement-age .

3. Congressional Budget Office. “Raising the Full Retirement Age for Social Security.” Congressional Budget Office, Nov. 2024, pp. 1–5, https://www.cbo.gov/publication/58905 .

4. Noguchi, Yuki. “If Social Security Not Fixed, Retirees Face Automatic Cut in 2033.” NPR, 6 May 2024, https://www.npr.org/2024/05/06/1249406440/social-security-medicare-congress-fix-boomers-benefits .

How does the Becton Dickinson and Company defined benefit plan differ from the cash balance plan in terms of eligibility and benefit calculation? Employees at Becton Dickinson and Company should be aware of how their retirement options and benefit calculations are structured, especially considering the historical context and the changes made after

Defined Benefit vs. Cash Balance Plan: The Becton Dickinson and Company defined benefit plan and cash balance plan differ significantly in terms of eligibility and benefit calculations. The defined benefit plan, which was the original format, calculates benefits based on the employee's final average pay, age, and years of service. On the other hand, the cash balance plan, introduced in 2007, provides a hypothetical account balance that grows with defined pay and interest credits. For eligibility, new hires after January 1, 2018, cannot join either plan, reflecting a closure to new entrants. Those rehired or transferred within the company after this date also cannot accrue new benefits under the cash balance plan.

This question encompasses the differences in participation rules, the implications of being hired before or after January 1, 2018, and how various employment classifications affect benefits.

Pension Benefits Calculation: Under the BD Retirement Plan, pension benefits are calculated based on 'Total Compensation,' which includes various forms of income like base salary, bonuses, and other regular compensations. The benefit is determined by 'Credited Service' and 'Vesting Service,' impacting the final benefit amount. Vesting in the plan occurs after five years of service, ensuring that employees are entitled to benefits regardless of subsequent employment duration.

In what ways are pension benefits and service calculated under the Becton Dickinson and Company BD Retirement Plan? The complexities involved in determining the pension benefit calculation are crucial for employees to understand as they plan for retirement. A discussion on how Total Compensation, Credited Service, and Vesting Service impact the final benefit amount will provide clarity to employees regarding their financial planning as they approach retirement.

Maximum Benefit Limits: Employees should be aware of IRS-imposed limits on contributions and benefits under retirement plans. For 2018, the compensation limit recognized for pension calculations was $275,000, adjusted annually for inflation. This affects the projected retirement benefits and requires employees to stay informed about annual adjustments to plan accordingly.

What specific maximum benefit limits should employees at Becton Dickinson and Company be aware of regarding their retirement plans and how do these limits adapt annually? Understanding the implications of IRS limits for defined benefit plans and cash balance plans is vital for employees at Becton Dickinson and Company. This question would delve into how annual adjustments might affect their projected retirement benefits and the importance of staying informed about these limits.

Addressing Discrepancies or Denial of Benefits: If discrepancies or wrongful denials occur concerning retirement benefits, Becton Dickinson and Company employees should contact the Plan Administrator. The process includes filing claims and understanding the rights to appeal under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). This structured approach helps employees rectify issues with their retirement benefits effectively.

How can Becton Dickinson and Company employees address discrepancies in their benefit calculations or if they believe they have been wrongfully denied benefits? The processes for appealing decisions made regarding retirement benefits can greatly impact an employee's financial future. This question would outline the steps employees can take, including contacting the Plan Administrator and the importance of understanding their rights under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA).

Role of Committees in Managing the Retirement Plan: The Plan Administrative Committee and the Investment Committee play critical roles in overseeing the BD Retirement Plan. The former handles the plan's administration, ensuring compliance and managing benefit claims, while the latter focuses on the investment of plan assets. Employees can seek clarification or get involved by attending committee meetings or contacting them directly for specific inquiries.

What roles do the Plan Administrative Committee and the Investment Committee play in managing the BD Retirement Plan of Becton Dickinson and Company, and how can employees get involved or seek clarification on their plans? Employees interested in understanding the governance of their retirement plan will benefit from knowing who oversees the administration and investment of their benefits and how they can participate in discussions or seek advice.

Impact of Early Retirement: Early retirement affects the calculation of pension benefits, which are reduced based on the number of years retirement is taken before the normal retirement age. The plan allows for early retirement from age 55 with at least 10 years of service, with benefits reduced to compensate for the longer payout period.

How does the early retirement benefit impact employees at Becton Dickinson and Company, particularly in terms of eligibility and the calculation of reduced benefits? By exploring the conditions under which early retirement is permitted, along with calculations related to the reduction in benefits for taking early retirement, employees can make more informed decisions based on their personal circumstances.

Ensuring Accuracy of Retirement Benefits: To ensure accuracy in the calculation of retirement benefits, especially after changes in personal circumstances such as marital status or address, employees are encouraged to promptly update their information with HR. Regular reviews of their retirement plan statements and maintaining communication with the plan administrator are advisable practices.

What steps should employees of Becton Dickinson and Company take to ensure their retirement benefits remain accurate and up-to-date, especially after a change in personal circumstances? This question addresses the importance of regularly updating personal information and understanding the repercussions of life changes on retirement benefits, ensuring employees are proactive in managing their future.

Alternatives for Non-Eligible Employees: Employees not eligible for the BD Retirement Plan, possibly due to the timing of their hire or their role, should explore other retirement savings options like IRAs or the BD 401(k) Plan. These alternatives provide avenues for retirement savings, even for those not covered under the traditional pension plans.

What alternatives exist for Becton Dickinson and Company employees who are not eligible for the BD Retirement Plan, and how can they plan for retirement adequately? This discussion can help inform employees who may fall outside the eligibility criteria about other retirement savings options, such as Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs) or employer-sponsored 401(k) plans.

Determining Survivors' Pensions: The survivor's pension is determined by the pre-retirement surviving spouse benefit, which generally provides a monthly benefit of 50% of the employee's pension, payable to the spouse for life after the employee's death. This emphasizes the importance of employees designating beneficiaries and understanding the impact of these decisions on their family's financial security.

In the context of the Becton Dickinson and Company BD Retirement Plan, how are survivors' pensions determined, and what options are available for employees regarding beneficiaries? Employees often overlook the significance of beneficiary designations. This question would clarify the process and options available for ensuring that survivors receive entitled benefits and the financial implications of different choices made regarding pension benefits for spouses and dependent children.

Contacting the Plan Administrator: Employees seeking more information about their retirement benefits should contact the Plan Administrator. Preparedness for such inquiries includes having detailed personal and employment information, understanding their current benefits status, and having specific questions or concerns about their plan benefits.

Additional Articles

Check Out Articles for Becton Dickinson employees

For more information you can reach the plan administrator for Becton Dickinson at 1 Becton Dr Franklin Lakes, NJ 7417; or by calling them at +1 201-847-6800.