New Update: Healthcare Costs Increasing by Over 60% in Some States. Will you be impacted?

Conagra Brands Employees: Avoid These Costly Financial Mistakes During Divorce

“Conagra Brands employees facing divorce can help safeguard their financial future by prioritizing asset transparency, maintaining sufficient liquidity, and rigorously forecasting post-divorce expenses” – Michael Corgiat, a representative of The Retirement Group, a division of Wealth Enhancement.

“Conagra Brands employees navigating divorce proceedings should engage professional financial guidance early, maintain clear records of all assets, and implement a realistic budget to foster post-divorce stability” – Brent Wolf, a representative of The Retirement Group, a division of Wealth Enhancement.

In this article we will discuss:

Common costly mistakes Conagra Brands employees make during divorce
Strategies for maintaining asset transparency and liquidity
How to forecast and manage post-divorce expenses

Even though financial issues are frequently discussed during divorce, many Conagra Brands employees make the same expensive mistakes, which can have long-term, irreparable effects. According to Patrick Ray, Senior Vice President and Financial Advisor at Wealth Enhancement, “advance planning can help people going through divorce mitigate costly mistakes.” Divorce can cause long-term financial harm to both men and women, but women are more at risk when assets and income sources are separated because they typically make less money. ¹

1. Excessive Expenditure on Celebrations and Lifestyle

It is all too typical for one or both ex-spouses to justify extravagant expenditures with a divorce settlement. These impulse purchases—such as buying a new, unaffordable car or going on lavish vacations—can quickly drain settlement funds. The desire to become a homeowner too soon may also be harmful. According to Ray, “it’s very tempting to start over right away, but that may result in buying too quickly, overpaying, or taking on too much debt.” Emotional turmoil often impairs judgment, leading to interest-only mortgages or high down payments that can strain one’s finances.

2. Inability to Locate and Retrieve Hidden Assets

Transparency in finances is essential to reaching a fair settlement. However, some spouses employ pre-divorce strategies to gain an advantage, such as moving money to family members or hiding assets in corporate entities. “Moving assets into businesses or transferring money to friends or family to conceal their value is one of the oldest tricks in the book,” Ray notes. Such tactics are frequently discovered only after completion, when it may be too costly or difficult to recoup hidden monies. It is crucial to hire a forensic accountant or investigator as soon as possible to protect your interests.

3. Letting Emotions Drag Out the Procedure

Attorney fees for protracted litigation fueled by emotional disagreements—over property or custody—can add up fast. “I’ve seen families spend hundreds of thousands of dollars on legal bills just because their feelings took precedence over sound financial judgment,” Ray adds. In addition to depleting the settlement fund, a drawn-out legal struggle makes it more difficult to restart financially. Rather than playing out this turmoil in the courts, Ray suggests seeking help from friends, family, or mental health professionals if emotional support is required to gain greater clarity or perspective.

4. Mishandling Illiquid Assets of the Marriage

Real estate, retirement savings, private equity interests, and restricted stock are examples of assets that need to be handled carefully. Recipients can later find that they are unable to access or sell these holdings without paying large fines or realizing unexpected losses. “Liquidity is critical. In some cases, it makes more sense to exchange illiquid assets for ones you can access and manage immediately,” Ray says. Structured payout provisions—such as regular cash distributions based on asset performance—can help preserve value and ease the transition.

5. Not Accounting for Post-Divorce Costs

It takes more than just cutting costs to transition from a dual-income to a single-income household; it also requires accurate forecasting. The cost of necessities like energy, housing, health insurance premiums, and child-related expenses mostly stays the same or even rises. “Expenses for housing, utilities, health insurance, and raising children don’t simply disappear,” Ray warns. To prevent cash flow problems, he emphasizes creating a thorough budget, conducting monthly expense reviews, and scrutinizing discretionary spending such as entertainment, dining out, and subscriptions.

Featured Video

Articles you may find interesting:

Key Data Point:

After a divorce or separation, women over 60 experience a 41% reduction in household income—nearly twice as much as men’s 23%percent drop—according to a Georgetown University Center for Retirement Initiatives analysis released May 19, 2023 (https://cri.georgetown.edu/the-unique-and-varied-challenges-women-face-planning-and-preparing-for-retirement/).

Conclusion

People can navigate divorce with greater financial resilience by recognizing and steering clear of these five pitfalls: overspending, hidden assets, emotional prolonging, illiquid holdings, and underestimated living expenses. In addition to safeguarding settlement funds, early professional guidance, careful budgeting, and strategic negotiating can help pave the way toward a more stable financial future for Conagra Brands team members.

Analogy:

Divorce finances are like navigating a ship through stormy seas: overspending on celebratory luxuries is like being tossed by sudden high waves; hidden assets are submerged reefs waiting to breach your hull; emotional disputes pull you into eddies that stall your progress; illiquid holdings are barnacles slowing your ship’s speed; and underestimating ongoing living expenses is like miscalculating provisions for the voyage. Without clear-eyed budgeting, asset transparency, and strategic course corrections, every misstep could capsize your financial journey.

Sources:

1. Pew Research Center. ' Gender pay gap in U.S. has narrowed slightly over 2 decades ,' by Richard Fry and Caroline Aragao. 4 Mar. 2025.

Other Resources:

1. Locus, Heather. “Five Key Areas Where Divorcing Individuals Make Mistakes.” Forbes, 18 July 2023, https://www.forbes.com/sites/heatherlocus/2023/07/18/five-key-areas-where-divorcing-individuals-make-mistakes/ .

2. Pinto, Aviva. “Financial Pitfalls To Avoid During And After Divorce.” Forbes Councils, 11 Mar. 2025, https://www.forbes.com/councils/forbesfinancecouncil/2025/03/11/financial-pitfalls-to-avoid-during-and-after-divorce/ .

3. Money and Divorce: 6 Financial Mistakes to Avoid. Morgan Stanley, 28 Mar. 2025, https://www.morganstanley.com/articles/divorce-financial-planning-guide .

4. “Older Couples Planning a Divorce Have More Assets to Divide.” AARP, 19 May 2023, https://www.aarp.org/money/personal-finance/financial-impact-of-divorce/ .

5. Gustke, Constance. “Retirement Plans Thrown Into Disarray by a Divorce.” The New York Times, 27 June 2014, https://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/27/your-money/retirement-plans-thrown-into-disarray-by-a-divorce.html .

How does Conagra Brands, Inc. ensure that employees understand their retirement benefits, particularly the nuances of the Conagra Foods Inc. Pension Plan and the historical obligations from the Beatrice Retirement Income Plan (BRIP)? Are there specific communication strategies or resources provided to employees to navigate their eligibility and benefits?

Conagra Brands has not provided consistent documentation of the Beatrice Retirement Income Plan (BRIP), as evidenced by a lost BRIP Plan document, which has created confusion among former Beatrice employees. Conagra relies on internal committees like the Conagra Brands Employee Benefits Administrative Committee to oversee the administration of the Conagra Foods Inc. Pension Plan and the historical obligations from BRIP. However, there are allegations in the class action that Conagra has failed to communicate certain benefit entitlements, particularly the age at which unreduced benefits should commence(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).

In light of regulatory compliance, what measures does Conagra Brands, Inc. take to maintain the integrity and security of pension plan documents, especially considering the historical loss of the BRIP Plan document? How do the missing documents impact employee knowledge of their benefits?

The loss of the BRIP Plan document represents a significant failure in document retention and regulatory compliance. Under ERISA, Conagra is required to maintain and distribute these documents upon request. The missing BRIP documents have caused discrepancies in the administration of retirement benefits, particularly regarding the age of eligibility for unreduced benefits. Conagra has been criticized for not informing employees that these documents were lost, leading to confusion and underpayment of benefits(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).

What resources does Conagra Brands, Inc. offer to its employees who have questions about their pension benefits or discrepancies that may arise from the transition from the Beatrice Retirement Income Plan to the Conagra Foods Inc. Pension Plan? How can employees best utilize these resources?

Conagra directs employees to contact the Plan service center for inquiries related to their pension benefits. However, based on the complaints filed in court, there have been issues with transparency and the accessibility of important plan documents, including the BRIP. Employees have had to appeal their benefit decisions and deal with insufficient guidance on navigating the discrepancies between the old BRIP and the Conagra Plan. Resources like benefit calculators and service centers have sometimes provided inaccurate or incomplete information(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).

How does Conagra Brands, Inc. handle the potential discrepancies regarding the pension benefits related to the age eligibility for receiving unreduced benefits in the context of both the Conagra Plan and the Beatrice plan? What steps have been taken to prevent similar issues in the future?

Conagra has been handling discrepancies poorly, particularly around the age at which participants in the BRIP are entitled to receive unreduced benefits. The company's adjustment of the eligibility age from 60 to 65 without properly consulting or notifying employees has led to underpayment of benefits. The ongoing class action lawsuit seeks to address these discrepancies and prevent future issues by clarifying benefit entitlements under the terms of both plans(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).

Can you elaborate on the process that Conagra Brands, Inc. utilizes to communicate with employees about plan amendments and to clarify their rights under the Conagra Foods Inc. Pension Plan? What specific improvements have been made to this communication strategy in recent years?

The communication process regarding plan amendments at Conagra has been criticized as insufficient, particularly concerning the transition from the BRIP to the Conagra Plan. Employees have filed complaints about not receiving adequate notice of important changes, such as the shift in eligibility age for unreduced benefits. Conagra has failed to provide clear documentation, leading to confusion among employees. There is no evidence of significant improvements in recent years(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).

How does Conagra Brands, Inc. ensure compliance with the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), especially regarding the fiduciary duties of the Conagra Brands Employee Benefits Administrative Committee? What protocols are in place to guarantee that employeesâ€™ rights are consistently protected?

Conagra's compliance with ERISA has been challenged in court, with allegations of fiduciary breaches related to the loss of critical plan documents like the BRIP. The Conagra Brands Employee Benefits Administrative Committee is responsible for maintaining the integrity of the pension plan, but the loss of documents and failure to notify employees of their rights raise questions about the adequacy of these protocols. The lawsuit highlights a need for improved oversight and adherence to ERISA's fiduciary requirements(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).

What options are currently available for former Beatrice employees and other participants in the Conagra Foods Inc. Pension Plan to claim benefits they believe they are entitled to? How does Conagra Brands, Inc. facilitate this process?

Former Beatrice employees can contact the Pension Service Center to inquire about their benefits and initiate claims. However, the process has been complicated by missing documentation and conflicting information about eligibility. Some employees have been forced to file legal claims to recover benefits owed to them, as in the case of the ongoing class action lawsuit. The lack of clear and accessible resources has made it difficult for employees to navigate the process effectively(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).

In what ways does Conagra Brands, Inc. provide support or guidance for employees approaching retirement, particularly in understanding the timelines and responsibilities associated with electing benefits from the Conagra Foods Inc. Pension Plan?

Conagra provides online calculators and service center assistance for employees approaching retirement, but these tools have proven unreliable for some participants. Employees have reported being unable to calculate their benefits accurately or being told they were ineligible for benefits before age 65, despite the terms of the BRIP allowing benefits to begin at age 60. The class action complaint highlights deficiencies in the guidance provided to employees regarding their benefits(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).

How can employees at Conagra Brands, Inc. contact the Employee Benefits Administrative Committee for inquiries related to their benefits? What are the most efficient avenues for addressing concerns about the Conagra Foods Inc. Pension Plan or the transitions from the Beatrice plan?

Employees can contact the Plan service center for inquiries related to their benefits, but accessing the Employee Benefits Administrative Committee directly appears to be more challenging. The lawsuit indicates that employees seeking to address discrepancies with their benefits have not received timely or effective communication from the committee, often requiring legal action to resolve their concerns(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).

How does Conagra Brands, Inc. evaluate its pension plan's performance and benefits offerings in relation to industry standards? What methods are used to ensure the company remains competitive while protecting employee benefits under the Conagra Foods Inc. Pension Plan?

There is little publicly available information regarding how Conagra evaluates its pension plan's performance against industry standards. The company's handling of historical pension obligations, particularly from the Beatrice acquisition, suggests that its methods for protecting employee benefits have been insufficient. Ongoing litigation regarding underpayment of benefits and loss of critical documents indicates that the company may need to improve its evaluation methods and compliance efforts to remain competitive(Conagra_Brands_Inc_02-1…).

Additional Articles

Check Out Articles for Conagra Brands employees

For more information you can reach the plan administrator for Conagra Brands at 222 W. Merchandise Mart Plaza Chicago, IL 60654; or by calling them at (312) 549-5000.