Healthcare Provider Update: Healthcare Provider for Kroger Kroger partners with a variety of health insurance providers for its employee healthcare plans, which typically include major insurers such as Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield, UnitedHealthcare, and others. These partnerships offer comprehensive healthcare coverage options to their employees, ensuring access to a broad network of medical services. Potential Healthcare Cost Increases for Kroger in 2026 As we look ahead to 2026, Kroger employees-along with many others-may face substantial healthcare cost increases as health insurance premiums for Affordable Care Act (ACA) marketplace plans are projected to surge. In some states, premiums could rise by as much as 60%, driven by factors such as the expiration of enhanced federal premium subsidies and escalating medical costs, which are now rising at an alarming rate due to inflation and increased demand for healthcare services. According to analysts, without congressional intervention, the average out-of-pocket premium for ACA enrollees could jump by over 75%, putting financial strain on many families and potentially affecting their access to necessary healthcare services. Click here to learn more
When hiring active managers, some advisors look for the star rating on Morningstar rather than using the criteria TRG recommends. We believe that advisors and investors should focus on active managers who skillfully allocate capital to their best investment ideas. Passive investment options are widely available to investors who want market returns with low fees. Active managers must add value and act in clients’ best interests by allocating capital to attractive investments to increase risk-adjusted returns and justify fees. We propose an alternative method to the Morningstar rating system that we believe provides structure that protects downside while maintaining significant performance upside.
“Wide diversification is only required when investors do not understand what they are doing. Diversification is a protection against ignorance. It makes very little sense for those who know what they’re doing.”
– Warren Buffett, Berkshire Hathaway
We want Value managers that fit the following criteria. They are:
- At least 10 yr performance history
-
Low expense ratios.
-
A single manager or a clear lead manager because it demonstrates ownership of fund and avoids group think
-
Manager does not over diversify and is a best idea or focus fund
-
Ability to go to cash/high cash positions- Shows that a manager can wait for better ideas if none are available and is actively searching for the best opportunities
-
Consistently low P/E ratio on holdings (ex. S&P 500 P/E = 25)
-
Managers who eat their own cooking- meaning that they have their own money in their fund
-
Low turnover rate - demonstrates convictions in holdings
We will briefly cover each of the 8 criteria below:
1. Long term survivability: A minimum of 10 years of performance history gives us a long term look into how the manager performs through varying market cycles. We prefer to see at least one market crash and rebound to see how the manager reacts and makes their investment decisions.
2. Low cost of management: We expect low cost management of the fund just like we would expect low cost management for a company. The more value that can be driven from the fund the more profitable the fund is for its managers and its shareholders. High expense ratios can be one of the biggest drags on returns (see table below), but quality managers with low turnover and high conviction may be able to achieve over-performance at a lower cost.
Featured Video
Articles you may find interesting:
- Corporate Employees: 8 Factors When Choosing a Mutual Fund
- Use of Escrow Accounts: Divorce
- Medicare Open Enrollment for Corporate Employees: Cost Changes in 2024!
- Stages of Retirement for Corporate Employees
- 7 Things to Consider Before Leaving Your Company
- How Are Workers Impacted by Inflation & Rising Interest Rates?
- Lump-Sum vs Annuity and Rising Interest Rates
- Internal Revenue Code Section 409A (Governing Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans)
- Corporate Employees: Do NOT Believe These 6 Retirement Myths!
- 401K, Social Security, Pension – How to Maximize Your Options
- Have You Looked at Your 401(k) Plan Recently?
- 11 Questions You Should Ask Yourself When Planning for Retirement
- Worst Month of Layoffs In Over a Year!
*For illustrative purposes only, not indicative of any specific investment product.
3. Single Vision and Responsibility: Single managers, or a team with a clear lead manager, are less likely to be convinced and/or moved from their originating ideals. When a lead manager makes a decision he/she alone is responsible for that decision. When a committee of managers make a decision, it is difficult to place blame or praise (identify ownership) for an investment decision. Lead managers by definition have more riding on their decisions and thus spend more time during the due diligence portion of their investment hypotheses.
4. Does not Over-diversify: Volatility-aversion of investors and lack of in-depth research influence fund managers into creating over-diversified portfolios, diluting the alphas of their best ideas. This leads to the widespread underperformance of mutual funds compared to their benchmark indices after deducting the expenses and fees. Our definition of risk, defined as “permanent capital impairment”, forces us to disregard short-term volatility and focus on making the best investment decisions based on fundamental research.
“There is no sense diluting your best ideas or favorite situations by continuing to work your way down a list of attractive opportunities.”
-Joel Greenblatt, Gotham Capital
5. Holds cash when deals are unavailable: Good managers stay true to their ideals and hold fast when markets do not provide good investment opportunities. In elevated markets we see good value manager’s portfolios having increasing cash positions. When managers cannot find good companies to re-invest their capital into, they will hold cash because they are unwilling to deviate (drift) from their investment objective. For example, some fund families will not allow their managers to go to cash mandating that they stay fully invested at all times. This may force managers to buy into companies that they don’t feel as strongly about and may force them into buying a larger basket of investments. This dilutes the best ideas while their investors are often left paying a higher expense ratio due to additional trade and turnover costs.
6. Focus on finding “On Sale” companies: Value mangers are always trying purchase companies at a price that is lower than what their intrinsic value is. One way of identifying these companies is through the Price to Earnings Multiple. A low market price in relation to a company’s earnings signifies a cheaper price than if the market realized the company’s intrinsic value. In a white paper by Tweedy, Browne Co, they identified that (as a group) stocks with low valuations (P/E, P/B, and P/CF) and high dividend yield consistently outperform their counterparts over the long term.
7. Eat their own cooking: We place high importance on whether or not a manager has any of his/her own money invested along-side their shareholders. If the manager’s compensation is only tied to the size of the fund, there is little incentive to beat the benchmark and keep costs down. In fact, a study by Morningstar found that 85% of balanced-fund managers who succeed when having $1 million in their fund, versus 32% if no stake [4]. We find it hard to invest with a manager who does not believe in their own product.
8. High Level of Conviction: Low turnover signifies a high level of conviction in the positions within the fund. When a manager has low turnover he/she is not transitioning in and out of specific positions because he/she is confident in their research and investment hypothesis.
“It talked about a couple of studies, including the best-performing fund from 2000 to 2010, which was up 18% a year even when the market was flat. The average investor in that fund went in and out at the wrong times on a dollar-weighted basis to lose 11% per year. Meanwhile, the statistics for the top-quartile managers for that decade were stunning: 97% of them spent at least three of those 10 years in the bottom half of performance, 79% spent at least three years I the bottom quartile, and 47% spent at least three years in the bottom decile.”
-Joel Greenblatt, in reference to his book The Big Secret for the Small Investor during an interview with Barron’s.com
Our proposed alternative to the star rating system is simple, easy to use, and is based on methods that have been proven to work.
How does the KROGER CONSOLIDATED RETIREMENT BENEFIT PLAN ensure that employees receive adequate retirement benefits calculated based on their years of service and compensation? Are there specific formulas or formulas that KROGER uses to ensure fair distribution of benefits among its participants, particularly in regards to early retirement adjustments?
The KROGER CONSOLIDATED RETIREMENT BENEFIT PLAN ensures that employees receive adequate retirement benefits based on a formula that takes into account both years of credited service and compensation. The plan, being a defined benefit plan, calculates benefits that are typically paid out monthly upon reaching the normal retirement age, but adjustments can be made for early retirement. This formula guarantees that employees who retire early will see reductions based on the plan’s terms, ensuring a fair distribution across participants(KROGER_2023-10-01_QDRO_…).
In what ways does the cash balance formula mentioned in the KROGER CONSOLIDATED RETIREMENT BENEFIT PLAN impact the retirement planning of employees? How are these benefits expressed in more relatable terms similar to a defined contribution plan, and how might this affect an employee's perception of their retirement savings?
The cash balance formula in the KROGER CONSOLIDATED RETIREMENT BENEFIT PLAN impacts retirement planning by expressing benefits in a manner similar to defined contribution plans. Instead of a traditional annuity calculation, the benefits are often framed as a hypothetical account balance or lump sum, which might make it easier for employees to relate their retirement savings to more familiar terms, thereby influencing how they perceive the growth and adequacy of their retirement savings(KROGER_2023-10-01_QDRO_…).
Can you explain the concept of "shared payment" and "separate interest" as they apply to the KROGER CONSOLIDATED RETIREMENT BENEFIT PLAN? How do these payment structures affect retirees and their alternate payees, and what considerations should participants keep in mind when navigating these options?
In the KROGER CONSOLIDATED RETIREMENT BENEFIT PLAN, "shared payment" refers to a payment structure where the alternate payee receives a portion of the participant’s benefit during the participant's lifetime. In contrast, "separate interest" means that the alternate payee receives a separate benefit, typically over their own lifetime. These structures impact how retirees and their alternate payees manage their retirement income, with shared payments being tied to the participant’s life and separate interests providing independent payments(KROGER_2023-10-01_QDRO_…).
What procedures does KROGER have in place for employees to access or review the applicable Summary Plan Description? How can understanding this document help employees make more informed decisions regarding their retirement benefits and entitlements under the KROGER plan?
KROGER provides procedures for employees to access the Summary Plan Description, typically through HR or digital platforms. Understanding this document is crucial as it outlines the plan’s specific terms, helping employees make more informed decisions about retirement benefits, including when to retire and how to maximize their benefits under the plan(KROGER_2023-10-01_QDRO_…).
With regard to early retirement options, what specific features of the KROGER CONSOLIDATED RETIREMENT BENEFIT PLAN can employees take advantage of? How does the plan's definition of "normal retirement age" influence an employee's decision to retire early, and what potential consequences might this have on their benefits?
The KROGER CONSOLIDATED RETIREMENT BENEFIT PLAN offers early retirement options that include adjustments for those retiring before the plan’s defined "normal retirement age." This early retirement can result in reduced benefits, so employees must carefully consider how retiring early will impact their overall retirement income. The definition of normal retirement age serves as a benchmark, influencing the timing of retirement decisions(KROGER_2023-10-01_QDRO_…).
How does the KROGER CONSOLIDATED RETIREMENT BENEFIT PLAN address potential changes in federal regulations or tax law that may impact retirement plans? In what ways does KROGER communicate these changes to employees, and how can participants stay informed about updates to their retirement benefits?
The KROGER CONSOLIDATED RETIREMENT BENEFIT PLAN incorporates changes in federal regulations or tax laws by updating the plan terms accordingly. KROGER communicates these changes to employees through official channels, such as newsletters or HR communications, ensuring participants are informed and can adjust their retirement planning in line with regulatory changes(KROGER_2023-10-01_QDRO_…).
What are some common misconceptions regarding participation in the KROGER CONSOLIDATED RETIREMENT BENEFIT PLAN that employees might have? How can these misconceptions impact their retirement planning strategies, and what resources does KROGER provide to clarify these issues?
A common misconception regarding participation in the KROGER CONSOLIDATED RETIREMENT BENEFIT PLAN is that it functions similarly to a defined contribution plan, which it does not. This can lead to confusion about benefit accrual and payouts. KROGER provides resources such as plan summaries and HR support to clarify these misunderstandings and help employees better strategize their retirement plans(KROGER_2023-10-01_QDRO_…).
How does the KROGER CONSOLIDATED RETIREMENT BENEFIT PLAN interact with other employer-sponsored retirement plans, specifically concerning offsetting benefits? What implications does this have for employees who may also be participating in defined contribution plans?
The KROGER CONSOLIDATED RETIREMENT BENEFIT PLAN interacts with other employer-sponsored retirement plans by offsetting benefits, particularly with defined contribution plans. This means that benefits from the defined benefit plan may be reduced if the employee is also receiving benefits from a defined contribution plan, impacting the total retirement income(KROGER_2023-10-01_QDRO_…).
What options are available to employees of KROGER regarding the distribution of their retirement benefits upon reaching retirement age? How can employees effectively plan their retirement income to ensure sustainability through their retirement years based on the features of the KROGER plan?
Upon reaching retirement age, KROGER employees have various options for distributing their retirement benefits, including lump sums or annuity payments. Employees should carefully plan their retirement income, considering the sustainability of their benefits through their retirement years. The plan’s features provide flexibility, allowing employees to choose the option that best fits their financial goals(KROGER_2023-10-01_QDRO_…).
How can employees contact KROGER for more information or assistance regarding the KROGER CONSOLIDATED RETIREMENT BENEFIT PLAN? What are the recommended channels for employees seeking guidance on their retirement benefits, and what type of support can they expect from KROGER's human resources team?
Employees seeking more information or assistance regarding the KROGER CONSOLIDATED RETIREMENT BENEFIT PLAN can contact the company through HR or dedicated plan administrators. The recommended channels include direct communication with HR or online resources. Employees can expect detailed support in understanding their benefits and planning for retirement(KROGER_2023-10-01_QDRO_…).